Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 216.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while IBM trades at $229.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check IBM's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 116.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while ACN trades at $181.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to ACN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check ACN's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while INFY trades at $10.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to INFY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check INFY's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while FI trades at $63.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to FI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check FI's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CTSH trades at $59.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CTSH's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while FISV trades at $47.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to FISV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check FISV's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while BR trades at $163.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to BR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check BR's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CDW trades at $146.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CDW's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while FIS trades at $35.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to FIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check FIS's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while IREN trades at $46.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -32.42. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check IREN's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while WIT trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to WIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check WIT's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while LDOS trades at $127.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check LDOS's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while GIB trades at $69.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to GIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check GIB's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CACI trades at $626.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CACI's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while IT trades at $185.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IT's ROE of +4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check IT's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WSE has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while WSE trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas WSE's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WSE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to WSE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check WSE's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while JKHY trades at $154.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check JKHY's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while APLD trades at $28.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -40.17. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check APLD's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CIFR trades at $18.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -6.41. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CIFR's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while GDS trades at $32.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check GDS's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while INGM trades at $26.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check INGM's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while EPAM trades at $114.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check EPAM's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while G trades at $34.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas G's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to G's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to G. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check G's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while SAIC trades at $133.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check SAIC's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while EXLS trades at $35.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check EXLS's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while PSN trades at $44.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check PSN's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NSIT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while NSIT trades at $154.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas NSIT's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NSIT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to NSIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check NSIT's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check NCR's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while WNS trades at $76.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to WNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check WNS's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CSQR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CSQR trades at $17.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CSQR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to CSQR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CSQR's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while KD trades at $12.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check KD's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while KEEL trades at $4.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check KEEL's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while SHAZ trades at $57.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check SHAZ's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while INOD trades at $57.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 51.48. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check INOD's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while VNET trades at $6.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check VNET's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while FORTY trades at $116.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check FORTY's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while DXC trades at $10.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check DXC's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CNXC trades at $27.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CNXC's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MGRT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while MGRT trades at $121.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas MGRT's P/E ratio is 717.53. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MGRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to MGRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check MGRT's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while GLOB trades at $35.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check GLOB's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check TWKS's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while BBAI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check BBAI's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while EFOR trades at $32.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check EFOR's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while BITF trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check BITF's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while BTCM trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check BTCM's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CLVT trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CLVT's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 933.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while HIVE trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check HIVE's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 928.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while VYX trades at $6.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check VYX's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while ASGN trades at $20.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check ASGN's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while SLAI trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check SLAI's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while MGIC trades at $17.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check MGIC's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CTLP trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CTLP's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CLVT-PA's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 732.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while TASK trades at $8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check TASK's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 732.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while WYFI trades at $18.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check WYFI's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 725.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while NABL trades at $3.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check NABL's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 615.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while GDYN trades at $7.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check GDYN's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while PHLT trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check PHLT's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 575.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check BBAI-WT's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 538.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while IBEX trades at $40.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check IBEX's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 528.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while VRRM trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check VRRM's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 324.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while ALIT trades at $11.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check ALIT's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while TLS trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check TLS's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 261.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while HCKT trades at $10.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check HCKT's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check BULLZ's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 249.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CNDT trades at $1.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CNDT's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while TSSI trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check TSSI's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to SRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check SRT's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 175.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while UIS trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check UIS's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LAWR has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while LAWR trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas LAWR's P/E ratio is -53.57. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LAWR's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is more volatile compared to LAWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check LAWR's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to CTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CTG's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 163M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while KORE trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KORE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check KORE's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DAVA has a market cap of 150.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while DAVA trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas DAVA's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DAVA's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to DAVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check DAVA's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 126.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while WYY trades at $12.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -98.46. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check WYY's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check ALYA's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, YB has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while YB trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas YB's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to YB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check YB's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ZENA has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while ZENA trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas ZENA's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZENA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to ZENA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check ZENA's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CSPI trades at $7.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -107.86. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CSPI's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, QXL has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while QXL trades at $5.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas QXL's P/E ratio is -110.80. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QXL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to QXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check QXL's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CHRN has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CHRN trades at $20.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CHRN's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to CHRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CHRN's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while TTEC trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check TTEC's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CTM trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -47.66. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CTM's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while SAIH trades at $25.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check SAIH's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check SIFYR's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EKSO has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while EKSO trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas EKSO's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EKSO's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to EKSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check EKSO's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CLPS trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CLPS's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while JFU trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 542.45. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check JFU's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CHOW trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHOW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CHOW's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ALAR has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while ALAR trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas ALAR's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to ALAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check ALAR's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while GLE trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -8.51. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check GLE's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while VEEA trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -55.62. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +51.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check VEEA's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check SGLB's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while LZMH trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check LZMH's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while ARBB trades at $4.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check ARBB's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while TDTH trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check TDTH's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while VEEAW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +51.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check VEEAW's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while DTST trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 39.86. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check DTST's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while CYCU trades at $3.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check CYCU's competition here

Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DAIC has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRFT is priced at $75.96 on the NASDAQ, while DAIC trades at $3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRFT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.34, whereas DAIC's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PRFT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DAIC's ROE of +37.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PRFT is less volatile compared to DAIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRFT.Check DAIC's competition here