GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GDS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDS | $29.25 | -0.27% | 5.7B | 11.79 | $2.48 | N/A |
| IBM | $271.63 | +5.17% | 255.3B | 22.87 | $11.88 | +2.49% |
| ACN | $128.98 | +2.51% | 79B | 9.42 | $13.70 | +4.97% |
| INFY | $10.78 | +1.99% | 43.8B | 13.01 | $0.83 | +4.84% |
| FI | $63.80 | +0.16% | 34.3B | 9.86 | $6.47 | N/A |
| FISV | $49.45 | +4.04% | 26.4B | 7.64 | $6.47 | N/A |
| WIT | $2.27 | +3.65% | 23.8B | 15.65 | $0.15 | +5.43% |
| FIS | $38.57 | +1.88% | 19.9B | 53.01 | $0.73 | +4.39% |
| CTSH | $40.03 | +2.25% | 19B | 7.34 | $5.45 | +3.22% |
| CDW | $133.30 | +4.12% | 17B | 13.12 | $10.16 | +1.91% |
Stock Comparison
GDS vs IBM Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 255.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while IBM trades at $271.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check IBM's competition here
GDS vs ACN Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 79B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while ACN trades at $128.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ACN's competition here
GDS vs INFY Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while INFY trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check INFY's competition here
GDS vs FI Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while FI trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check FI's competition here
GDS vs FISV Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while FISV trades at $49.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check FISV's competition here
GDS vs WIT Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while WIT trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WIT's competition here
GDS vs FIS Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while FIS trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 53.01. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check FIS's competition here
GDS vs CTSH Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while CTSH trades at $40.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CTSH's competition here
GDS vs CDW Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while CDW trades at $133.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CDW's competition here
GDS vs BR Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while BR trades at $137.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check BR's competition here
GDS vs GIB Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while GIB trades at $64.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check GIB's competition here
GDS vs AUROW Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while AUROW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check AUROW's competition here
GDS vs LDOS Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while LDOS trades at $101.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check LDOS's competition here
GDS vs AUR Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while AUR trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -14.16. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check AUR's competition here
GDS vs APLD Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while APLD trades at $39.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -55.94. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check APLD's competition here
GDS vs CACI Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while CACI trades at $453.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CACI's competition here
GDS vs JKHY Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while JKHY trades at $135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check JKHY's competition here
GDS vs INGM Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while INGM trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check INGM's competition here
GDS vs DLB Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while DLB trades at $53.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check DLB's competition here
GDS vs G Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while G trades at $28.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas G's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check G's competition here
GDS vs SAIC Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while SAIC trades at $110.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SAIC's competition here
GDS vs EPAM Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while EPAM trades at $80.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check EPAM's competition here
GDS vs EXLS Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while EXLS trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check EXLS's competition here
GDS vs WAY Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while WAY trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WAY's competition here
GDS vs NCR Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check NCR's competition here
GDS vs WNS Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while WNS trades at $76.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WNS's competition here
GDS vs PAY Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while PAY trades at $23.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check PAY's competition here
GDS vs PRFT Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check PRFT's competition here
GDS vs NIQ Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while NIQ trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check NIQ's competition here
GDS vs KD Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while KD trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check KD's competition here
GDS vs INOD Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while INOD trades at $73.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 66.58. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check INOD's competition here
GDS vs NYAX Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while NYAX trades at $63.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 99.47. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check NYAX's competition here
GDS vs VNET Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while VNET trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check VNET's competition here
GDS vs OMCL Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OMCL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while OMCL trades at $40.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas OMCL's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OMCL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to OMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check OMCL's competition here
GDS vs CNXC Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while CNXC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 2.26. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CNXC's competition here
GDS vs WYFI Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while WYFI trades at $38.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -22.73. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WYFI's competition here
GDS vs FORTY Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while FORTY trades at $95.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check FORTY's competition here
GDS vs TWKS Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TWKS's competition here
GDS vs DXC Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while DXC trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 2.71. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check DXC's competition here
GDS vs CLVT Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while CLVT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CLVT's competition here
GDS vs BTCM Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while BTCM trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check BTCM's competition here
GDS vs GLOB Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while GLOB trades at $30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check GLOB's competition here
GDS vs AI Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while AI trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check AI's competition here
GDS vs BBAI Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while BBAI trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check BBAI's competition here
GDS vs BBAI-WT Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
GDS vs VYX Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while VYX trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check VYX's competition here
GDS vs ASGN Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while ASGN trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ASGN's competition here
GDS vs MGIC Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while MGIC trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check MGIC's competition here
GDS vs CTLP Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while CTLP trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CTLP's competition here
GDS vs SHAZ Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 803.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while SHAZ trades at $82.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -19.17. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SHAZ's competition here
GDS vs EFOR Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 792.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while EFOR trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check EFOR's competition here
GDS vs CLVT-PA Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CLVT-PA's competition here
GDS vs VRRM Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 683.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while VRRM trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check VRRM's competition here
GDS vs NABL Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 665M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while NABL trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check NABL's competition here
GDS vs PHLT Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while PHLT trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check PHLT's competition here
GDS vs GDYN Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 456.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while GDYN trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check GDYN's competition here
GDS vs TASK Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 426.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while TASK trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TASK's competition here
GDS vs IBEX Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 402.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while IBEX trades at $30.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check IBEX's competition here
GDS vs CD Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 380.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while CD trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -53.66. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CD's competition here
GDS vs PSFE Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 378.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while PSFE trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check PSFE's competition here
GDS vs SDHIU Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 375.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while SDHIU trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SDHIU's competition here
GDS vs SDHI Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SDHI has a market cap of 368.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while SDHI trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas SDHI's P/E ratio is 208.40. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SDHI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to SDHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SDHI's competition here
GDS vs TLS Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 336.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while TLS trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TLS's competition here
GDS vs TSSI Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 317.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while TSSI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TSSI's competition here
GDS vs ALIT Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 308.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while ALIT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is 1.27. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ALIT's competition here
GDS vs HCKT Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 284.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while HCKT trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check HCKT's competition here
GDS vs UIS Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 262.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while UIS trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check UIS's competition here
GDS vs BULLZ Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check BULLZ's competition here
GDS vs XRXDW Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 225.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while XRXDW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check XRXDW's competition here
GDS vs CNDT Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 204.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while CNDT trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CNDT's competition here
GDS vs III Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 200.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while III trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas III's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to III's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check III's competition here
GDS vs SRT Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SRT's competition here
GDS vs CTG Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CTG's competition here
GDS vs KORE Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 166M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while KORE trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KORE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check KORE's competition here
GDS vs WYY Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 161.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while WYY trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -81.80. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WYY's competition here
GDS vs ALYA Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ALYA's competition here
GDS vs TTEC Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 99.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while TTEC trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TTEC's competition here
GDS vs DVLT Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while DVLT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check DVLT's competition here
GDS vs CSPI Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while CSPI trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -805.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CSPI's competition here
GDS vs CTM Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while CTM trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -54.25. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CTM's competition here
GDS vs USIO Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while USIO trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is -29.23. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USIO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check USIO's competition here
GDS vs SIFYR Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SIFYR's competition here
GDS vs JFU Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while JFU trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 557.94. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check JFU's competition here
GDS vs CLPS Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while CLPS trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CLPS's competition here
GDS vs SAIH Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while SAIH trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SAIH's competition here
GDS vs DTST Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while DTST trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 46.57. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check DTST's competition here
GDS vs CHOW Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while CHOW trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHOW's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CHOW's competition here
GDS vs ENRDW Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ENRDW has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while ENRDW trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas ENRDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENRDW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to ENRDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ENRDW's competition here
GDS vs SGLB Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SGLB's competition here
GDS vs VEEA Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while VEEA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check VEEA's competition here
GDS vs GLE Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while GLE trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check GLE's competition here
GDS vs LZMH Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while LZMH trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check LZMH's competition here
GDS vs VEEAW Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while VEEAW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check VEEAW's competition here
GDS vs ARBB Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while ARBB trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ARBB's competition here
GDS vs SLAI Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while SLAI trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SLAI's competition here
GDS vs TDTH Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while TDTH trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TDTH's competition here
GDS vs LHSW Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while LHSW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check LHSW's competition here
GDS vs JDZG Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while JDZG trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JDZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check JDZG's competition here
GDS vs SASI Comparison June 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $29.25, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.79, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SASI's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SASI's competition here