GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GDS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDS | $31.16 | -4.85% | 6.1B | 12.56 | $2.48 | N/A |
| IBM | $212.67 | +0.70% | 206B | 18.45 | $11.88 | +3.19% |
| ACN | $143.57 | -0.72% | 87.8B | 10.47 | $13.70 | +4.55% |
| INFY | $11.49 | +4.08% | 46.9B | 13.92 | $0.83 | +4.58% |
| FI | $63.80 | +0.16% | 34.3B | 9.86 | $6.47 | N/A |
| FISV | $50.63 | -2.11% | 27B | 7.83 | $6.47 | N/A |
| FIS | $41.91 | -1.67% | 21.7B | 7.09 | $5.91 | +3.99% |
| CTSH | $44.77 | +0.47% | 21.2B | 8.21 | $5.45 | +2.86% |
| WIT | $1.86 | +0.54% | 18.4B | 12.85 | $0.15 | +6.62% |
| BR | $149.91 | -2.06% | 17.3B | 16.00 | $9.37 | +2.59% |
Stock Comparison
GDS vs IBM Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 206B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while IBM trades at $212.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check IBM's competition here
GDS vs ACN Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while ACN trades at $143.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ACN's competition here
GDS vs INFY Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while INFY trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check INFY's competition here
GDS vs FI Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while FI trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check FI's competition here
GDS vs FISV Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while FISV trades at $50.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check FISV's competition here
GDS vs FIS Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while FIS trades at $41.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check FIS's competition here
GDS vs CTSH Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while CTSH trades at $44.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CTSH's competition here
GDS vs WIT Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while WIT trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WIT's competition here
GDS vs BR Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while BR trades at $149.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check BR's competition here
GDS vs CDW Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while CDW trades at $133.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CDW's competition here
GDS vs GIB Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while GIB trades at $68.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check GIB's competition here
GDS vs LDOS Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while LDOS trades at $106.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check LDOS's competition here
GDS vs AUR Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while AUR trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -13.47. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check AUR's competition here
GDS vs JKHY Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while JKHY trades at $151.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check JKHY's competition here
GDS vs AUROW Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while AUROW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check AUROW's competition here
GDS vs CACI Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while CACI trades at $461.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CACI's competition here
GDS vs APLD Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while APLD trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -36.84. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check APLD's competition here
GDS vs INGM Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while INGM trades at $29.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check INGM's competition here
GDS vs PSN Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while PSN trades at $56.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check PSN's competition here
GDS vs G Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while G trades at $30.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas G's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check G's competition here
GDS vs SAIC Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while SAIC trades at $115.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SAIC's competition here
GDS vs DLB Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while DLB trades at $49.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check DLB's competition here
GDS vs EPAM Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while EPAM trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check EPAM's competition here
GDS vs EXLS Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while EXLS trades at $28.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check EXLS's competition here
GDS vs WAY Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while WAY trades at $22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WAY's competition here
GDS vs NCR Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check NCR's competition here
GDS vs PAY Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while PAY trades at $29.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 40.74. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check PAY's competition here
GDS vs WNS Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while WNS trades at $76.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WNS's competition here
GDS vs NIQ Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while NIQ trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check NIQ's competition here
GDS vs KD Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while KD trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check KD's competition here
GDS vs PRFT Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check PRFT's competition here
GDS vs NYAX Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while NYAX trades at $64.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 100.53. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check NYAX's competition here
GDS vs VNET Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while VNET trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check VNET's competition here
GDS vs INOD Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while INOD trades at $60.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 54.93. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check INOD's competition here
GDS vs FORTY Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while FORTY trades at $107.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check FORTY's competition here
GDS vs CLVT Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while CLVT trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CLVT's competition here
GDS vs DXC Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while DXC trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check DXC's competition here
GDS vs CNXC Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while CNXC trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 2.23. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CNXC's competition here
GDS vs TWKS Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TWKS's competition here
GDS vs GLOB Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while GLOB trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check GLOB's competition here
GDS vs AI Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while AI trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -6.53. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check AI's competition here
GDS vs BTCM Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while BTCM trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check BTCM's competition here
GDS vs MGRT Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MGRT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while MGRT trades at $83.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas MGRT's P/E ratio is 494.06. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to MGRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check MGRT's competition here
GDS vs VYX Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while VYX trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check VYX's competition here
GDS vs BBAI Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while BBAI trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check BBAI's competition here
GDS vs BBAI-WT Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 987M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
GDS vs WYFI Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 971.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while WYFI trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -14.94. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WYFI's competition here
GDS vs NABL Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 899.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while NABL trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check NABL's competition here
GDS vs ASGN Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while ASGN trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ASGN's competition here
GDS vs MGIC Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while MGIC trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check MGIC's competition here
GDS vs CTLP Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while CTLP trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CTLP's competition here
GDS vs EFOR Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 767.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while EFOR trades at $18.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check EFOR's competition here
GDS vs CLVT-PA Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CLVT-PA's competition here
GDS vs VRRM Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 625.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while VRRM trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check VRRM's competition here
GDS vs SHAZ Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 623.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while SHAZ trades at $63.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -14.87. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SHAZ's competition here
GDS vs PHLT Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while PHLT trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check PHLT's competition here
GDS vs ALIT Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 572.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while ALIT trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ALIT's competition here
GDS vs TASK Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 525.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while TASK trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 3.64. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TASK's competition here
GDS vs GDYN Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 484.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while GDYN trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check GDYN's competition here
GDS vs IBEX Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 474.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while IBEX trades at $35.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check IBEX's competition here
GDS vs PSFE Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 420.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while PSFE trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check PSFE's competition here
GDS vs TLS Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 353.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while TLS trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TLS's competition here
GDS vs TSSI Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 274M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while TSSI trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TSSI's competition here
GDS vs UIS Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while UIS trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check UIS's competition here
GDS vs HCKT Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while HCKT trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check HCKT's competition here
GDS vs BULLZ Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check BULLZ's competition here
GDS vs CNDT Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while CNDT trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CNDT's competition here
GDS vs CD Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 246.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while CD trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CD's competition here
GDS vs III Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 190.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while III trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas III's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to III's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check III's competition here
GDS vs XRXDW Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while XRXDW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check XRXDW's competition here
GDS vs SRT Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SRT's competition here
GDS vs CTG Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CTG's competition here
GDS vs KORE Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 163M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while KORE trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KORE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check KORE's competition here
GDS vs WYY Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while WYY trades at $11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -58.87. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WYY's competition here
GDS vs ALYA Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ALYA's competition here
GDS vs TTEC Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while TTEC trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is 2.25. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TTEC's competition here
GDS vs CHRN Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CHRN has a market cap of 94.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while CHRN trades at $26.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CHRN's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CHRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CHRN's competition here
GDS vs CSPI Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while CSPI trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -816.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CSPI's competition here
GDS vs QXL Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, QXL has a market cap of 64.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while QXL trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas QXL's P/E ratio is -96.20. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QXL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to QXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check QXL's competition here
GDS vs CTM Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while CTM trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -47.80. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CTM's competition here
GDS vs USIO Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while USIO trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is -28.04. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USIO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check USIO's competition here
GDS vs SIFYR Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SIFYR's competition here
GDS vs JFU Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while JFU trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 457.08. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check JFU's competition here
GDS vs CLPS Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while CLPS trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CLPS's competition here
GDS vs SAIH Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while SAIH trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SAIH's competition here
GDS vs DTST Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while DTST trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 47.71. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check DTST's competition here
GDS vs CHOW Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while CHOW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHOW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CHOW's competition here
GDS vs SGLB Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SGLB's competition here
GDS vs TDTH Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while TDTH trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TDTH's competition here
GDS vs ENRDW Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ENRDW has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while ENRDW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas ENRDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENRDW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to ENRDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ENRDW's competition here
GDS vs LZMH Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while LZMH trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check LZMH's competition here
GDS vs GLE Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while GLE trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check GLE's competition here
GDS vs SLAI Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while SLAI trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SLAI's competition here
GDS vs ARBB Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while ARBB trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ARBB's competition here
GDS vs LHSW Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while LHSW trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check LHSW's competition here
GDS vs VEEA Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while VEEA trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check VEEA's competition here
GDS vs VEEAW Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while VEEAW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check VEEAW's competition here
GDS vs ALP Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ALP has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while ALP trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas ALP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALP's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to ALP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ALP's competition here
GDS vs JDZG Comparison July 2026
GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 6.1B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $31.16, while JDZG trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.56, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JDZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check JDZG's competition here