The Hackett Group, Inc.
The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HCKT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCKT | $12.98 | +2.93% | 327.4M | 28.22 | $0.46 | +3.69% |
| IBM | $231.98 | +0.39% | 217.6B | 20.53 | $11.30 | +2.90% |
| ACN | $178.36 | +0.04% | 109.8B | 14.61 | $12.21 | +3.57% |
| INFY | $12.86 | -0.62% | 52.2B | 16.09 | $0.80 | +4.03% |
| FI | $63.80 | +0.16% | 34.3B | 9.86 | $6.47 | N/A |
| FISV | $60.84 | -1.15% | 32.5B | 9.40 | $6.47 | N/A |
| CTSH | $55.11 | +0.02% | 26.6B | 12.09 | $4.56 | +2.28% |
| FIS | $45.73 | -0.02% | 23.7B | 62.63 | $0.73 | +3.59% |
| WIT | $2.04 | +0.49% | 21.4B | 15.73 | $0.13 | +5.99% |
| LDOS | $146.06 | -1.04% | 18.5B | 13.11 | $11.14 | +1.13% |
Stock Comparison
HCKT vs IBM Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 217.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while IBM trades at $231.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check IBM's competition here
HCKT vs ACN Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while ACN trades at $178.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check ACN's competition here
HCKT vs INFY Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while INFY trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check INFY's competition here
HCKT vs FI Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while FI trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check FI's competition here
HCKT vs FISV Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while FISV trades at $60.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check FISV's competition here
HCKT vs CTSH Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while CTSH trades at $55.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check CTSH's competition here
HCKT vs FIS Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while FIS trades at $45.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 62.63. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check FIS's competition here
HCKT vs WIT Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while WIT trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check WIT's competition here
HCKT vs LDOS Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while LDOS trades at $146.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check LDOS's competition here
HCKT vs BR Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while BR trades at $155.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check BR's competition here
HCKT vs CDW Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while CDW trades at $135.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check CDW's competition here
HCKT vs GIB Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while GIB trades at $72.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check GIB's competition here
HCKT vs CACI Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while CACI trades at $516.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check CACI's competition here
HCKT vs JKHY Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while JKHY trades at $151.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check JKHY's competition here
HCKT vs IT Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while IT trades at $150.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check IT's competition here
HCKT vs APLD Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while APLD trades at $34.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -92.12. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check APLD's competition here
HCKT vs AUR Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while AUR trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check AUR's competition here
HCKT vs GDS Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while GDS trades at $45.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 70.44. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check GDS's competition here
HCKT vs INGM Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while INGM trades at $30.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check INGM's competition here
HCKT vs EPAM Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while EPAM trades at $118.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check EPAM's competition here
HCKT vs DLB Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while DLB trades at $64.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check DLB's competition here
HCKT vs G Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, G has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while G trades at $34.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas G's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check G's competition here
HCKT vs WAY Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while WAY trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check WAY's competition here
HCKT vs EXLS Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while EXLS trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check EXLS's competition here
HCKT vs PSFE-WT Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
HCKT vs SAIC Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while SAIC trades at $95.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check SAIC's competition here
HCKT vs NCR Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check NCR's competition here
HCKT vs PAY Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while PAY trades at $27.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 52.39. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check PAY's competition here
HCKT vs NIQ Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while NIQ trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check NIQ's competition here
HCKT vs WNS Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while WNS trades at $76.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check WNS's competition here
HCKT vs KD Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while KD trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check KD's competition here
HCKT vs PRFT Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check PRFT's competition here
HCKT vs VNET Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while VNET trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -65.86. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check VNET's competition here
HCKT vs NYAX Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while NYAX trades at $66.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 69.35. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check NYAX's competition here
HCKT vs VRRM Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while VRRM trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check VRRM's competition here
HCKT vs FORTY Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while FORTY trades at $141.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 60.92. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check FORTY's competition here
HCKT vs DXC Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while DXC trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check DXC's competition here
HCKT vs GLOB Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while GLOB trades at $42.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check GLOB's competition here
HCKT vs KEEL Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while KEEL trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check KEEL's competition here
HCKT vs FLYW Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while FLYW trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 123.18. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check FLYW's competition here
HCKT vs CNXC Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while CNXC trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check CNXC's competition here
HCKT vs CLVT Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while CLVT trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -8.17. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check CLVT's competition here
HCKT vs TWKS Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check TWKS's competition here
HCKT vs INOD Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while INOD trades at $42.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 46.02. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check INOD's competition here
HCKT vs BBAI Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while BBAI trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check BBAI's competition here
HCKT vs BTCM Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while BTCM trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check BTCM's competition here
HCKT vs AI Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while AI trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check AI's competition here
HCKT vs VYX Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 982.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while VYX trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 50.46. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check VYX's competition here
HCKT vs NABL Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 976.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while NABL trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is -57.61. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check NABL's competition here
HCKT vs MGIC Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while MGIC trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check MGIC's competition here
HCKT vs ASGN Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 833.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while ASGN trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check ASGN's competition here
HCKT vs CTLP Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 795.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while CTLP trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check CTLP's competition here
HCKT vs CLVT-PA Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check CLVT-PA's competition here
HCKT vs WYFI Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 634.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while WYFI trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -21.22. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check WYFI's competition here
HCKT vs PHLT Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while PHLT trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check PHLT's competition here
HCKT vs TASK Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 583.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while TASK trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check TASK's competition here
HCKT vs GDYN Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 488.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while GDYN trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check GDYN's competition here
HCKT vs TSSI Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 454.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while TSSI trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check TSSI's competition here
HCKT vs PSFE Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 450.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while PSFE trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check PSFE's competition here
HCKT vs CD Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 413.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while CD trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -173.67. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check CD's competition here
HCKT vs SHAZ Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 413.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while SHAZ trades at $42.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check SHAZ's competition here
HCKT vs IBEX Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 381.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while IBEX trades at $28.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check IBEX's competition here
HCKT vs SDHI Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, SDHI has a market cap of 366.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while SDHI trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas SDHI's P/E ratio is -1035.00. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDHI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to SDHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check SDHI's competition here
HCKT vs TLS Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 342.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while TLS trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check TLS's competition here
HCKT vs AUROW Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 304.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while AUROW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check AUROW's competition here
HCKT vs SDHIU Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while SDHIU trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check SDHIU's competition here
HCKT vs CNDT Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 263.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while CNDT trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check CNDT's competition here
HCKT vs BULLZ Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check BULLZ's competition here
HCKT vs BBAI-WT Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 257.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
HCKT vs DVLT Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 204.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while DVLT trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check DVLT's competition here
HCKT vs XRX Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 204M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while XRX trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XRX's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check XRX's competition here
HCKT vs III Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, III has a market cap of 197.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while III trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas III's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to III's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check III's competition here
HCKT vs UIS Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while UIS trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check UIS's competition here
HCKT vs SRT Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check SRT's competition here
HCKT vs CTG Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check CTG's competition here
HCKT vs DMRC Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 161.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while DMRC trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check DMRC's competition here
HCKT vs TTEC Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 150.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while TTEC trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check TTEC's competition here
HCKT vs ALYA Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check ALYA's competition here
HCKT vs CSPI Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while CSPI trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -204.00. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check CSPI's competition here
HCKT vs XRXDW Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while XRXDW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check XRXDW's competition here
HCKT vs KOID Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, KOID has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while KOID trades at $36.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas KOID's P/E ratio is 47.21. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KOID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to KOID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check KOID's competition here
HCKT vs CTM Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 65.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while CTM trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -23.16. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check CTM's competition here
HCKT vs WYY Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while WYY trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -16.93. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check WYY's competition here
HCKT vs SIFYR Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check SIFYR's competition here
HCKT vs GMM Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while GMM trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GMM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check GMM's competition here
HCKT vs JFU Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while JFU trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 0.91. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check JFU's competition here
HCKT vs USIO Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while USIO trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is -13.22. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USIO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check USIO's competition here
HCKT vs DTST Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while DTST trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is -32.71. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check DTST's competition here
HCKT vs CLPS Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while CLPS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check CLPS's competition here
HCKT vs SAIH Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while SAIH trades at $11.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check SAIH's competition here
HCKT vs VEEA Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while VEEA trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check VEEA's competition here
HCKT vs LZMH Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while LZMH trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check LZMH's competition here
HCKT vs CHOW Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while CHOW trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHOW's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check CHOW's competition here
HCKT vs SLAI Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while SLAI trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check SLAI's competition here
HCKT vs LHSW Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while LHSW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check LHSW's competition here
HCKT vs SGLB Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check SGLB's competition here
HCKT vs VEEAW Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while VEEAW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is more volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check VEEAW's competition here
HCKT vs GLE Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while GLE trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check GLE's competition here
HCKT vs ARBB Comparison April 2026
HCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCKT stands at 327.4M. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCKT is priced at $12.98, while ARBB trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCKT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.22, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, HCKT's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HCKT is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCKT.Check ARBB's competition here