Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 221.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while IBM trades at $235.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check IBM's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 116B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while ACN trades at $189.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check ACN's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while INFY trades at $12.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check INFY's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while FI trades at $63.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check FI's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CTSH trades at $64.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CTSH's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while FISV trades at $53.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check FISV's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while BR trades at $183.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check BR's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CDW trades at $147.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CDW's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while WIT trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to WIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check WIT's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while LDOS trades at $140.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check LDOS's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while GIB trades at $74.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check GIB's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CACI trades at $628.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CACI's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while IT trades at $198.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IT's ROE of +4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check IT's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, WSE has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while WSE trades at $13.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas WSE's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WSE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to WSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check WSE's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while IREN trades at $35.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -24.62. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IREN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check IREN's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while JKHY trades at $169.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check JKHY's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while APLD trades at $25.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -36.20. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check APLD's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while INGM trades at $28.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check INGM's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while GDS trades at $33.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check GDS's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while G trades at $38.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas G's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to G's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to G. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check G's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CIFR trades at $15.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CIFR's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while EPAM trades at $114.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check EPAM's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while EXLS trades at $38.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check EXLS's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while SAIC trades at $125.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SAIC's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while PSN trades at $49.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check PSN's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NSIT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while NSIT trades at $155.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas NSIT's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NSIT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to NSIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check NSIT's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check NCR's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while WNS trades at $76.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check WNS's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CSQR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CSQR trades at $19.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CSQR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CSQR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CSQR's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while KD trades at $13.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check KD's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while PRFT trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check PRFT's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while KEEL trades at $3.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check KEEL's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while FORTY trades at $128.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check FORTY's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while INOD trades at $56.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 50.98. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check INOD's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while SHAZ trades at $52.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SHAZ's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while VNET trades at $6.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check VNET's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while DXC trades at $11.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is similarly volatile compared to DXC. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check DXC's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CNXC trades at $29.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CNXC's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while GLOB trades at $40.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check GLOB's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while BBAI trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check BBAI's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check TWKS's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, MGRT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while MGRT trades at $99.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas MGRT's P/E ratio is 589.71. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MGRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to MGRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check MGRT's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while EFOR trades at $31.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check EFOR's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while BITF trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check BITF's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while BTCM trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check BTCM's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CLVT trades at $2.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CLVT's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while VYX trades at $8.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check VYX's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while ASGN trades at $20.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check ASGN's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while SLAI trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SLAI's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while MGIC trades at $17.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check MGIC's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CTLP trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CTLP's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 790.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while NABL trades at $4.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check NABL's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 759.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while HIVE trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check HIVE's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 756.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while TASK trades at $8.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check TASK's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CLVT-PA's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 685.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while WYFI trades at $17.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -10.54. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check WYFI's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 669.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check BBAI-WT's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 666.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while VRRM trades at $4.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check VRRM's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 646.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while GDYN trades at $7.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check GDYN's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while PHLT trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check PHLT's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 510.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while IBEX trades at $38.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check IBEX's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 370.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while ALIT trades at $14.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check ALIT's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 358.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while TLS trades at $4.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check TLS's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 285.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while HCKT trades at $11.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check HCKT's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 266.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CNDT trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CNDT's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check BULLZ's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 228.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while TSSI trades at $8.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check TSSI's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 196.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while UIS trades at $2.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check UIS's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SRT's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, LAWR has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while LAWR trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas LAWR's P/E ratio is -53.57. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LAWR's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to LAWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check LAWR's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, DAVA has a market cap of 171.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while DAVA trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas DAVA's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAVA's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to DAVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check DAVA's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CTG's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 163M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while KORE trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KORE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check KORE's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check ALYA's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, ZENA has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while ZENA trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas ZENA's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZENA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to ZENA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check ZENA's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, YB has a market cap of 103.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while YB trades at $13.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas YB's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to YB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check YB's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while WYY trades at $9.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -75.69. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check WYY's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CSPI trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -116.29. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CSPI's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while TTEC trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check TTEC's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CHRN has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CHRN trades at $18.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CHRN's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CHRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CHRN's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, QXL has a market cap of 60.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while QXL trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas QXL's P/E ratio is -90.50. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QXL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to QXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check QXL's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CTM trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -45.98. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to CTM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CTM's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SIFYR's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while SAIH trades at $23.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SAIH's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, EKSO has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while EKSO trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas EKSO's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EKSO's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to EKSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check EKSO's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while JFU trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 616.95. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check JFU's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CLPS trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CLPS's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CHOW trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHOW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CHOW's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, ALAR has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while ALAR trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas ALAR's P/E ratio is 2.66. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to ALAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check ALAR's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while GLE trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -7.19. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check GLE's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SGLB's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while LZMH trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check LZMH's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while ARBB trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check ARBB's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while TDTH trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check TDTH's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while DTST trades at $3.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 43.71. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check DTST's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while VEEA trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +51.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check VEEA's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, DAIC has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while DAIC trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas DAIC's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAIC's ROE of +37.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to DAIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check DAIC's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while CYCU trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CYCU's competition here

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $41.44 on the NYSE, while VEEAW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.87, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +51.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check VEEAW's competition here