Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 236.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while IBM trades at $251.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check IBM's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 117B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while ACN trades at $190.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check ACN's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while INFY trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check INFY's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while FI trades at $63.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check FI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while FISV trades at $63.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check FISV's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while CTSH trades at $58.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CTSH's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while FIS trades at $47.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 65.51. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check FIS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while WIT trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check WIT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while LDOS trades at $150.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check LDOS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while CDW trades at $142.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CDW's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while GIB trades at $76.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check GIB's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while CACI trades at $512.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CACI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while JKHY trades at $155.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check JKHY's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while IT trades at $157.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check IT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while AUR trades at $5.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check AUR's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while APLD trades at $32.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -85.34. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check APLD's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while GDS trades at $43.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 67.44. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check GDS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while INGM trades at $30.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check INGM's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while EPAM trades at $129.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check EPAM's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while DLB trades at $64.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check DLB's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while G trades at $36.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas G's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check G's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while EXLS trades at $31.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check EXLS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while WAY trades at $25.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 41.57. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check WAY's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check PSFE-WT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while SAIC trades at $95.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SAIC's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check NCR's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while PAY trades at $28.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 55.71. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check PAY's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while NIQ trades at $11.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check NIQ's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while WNS trades at $76.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check WNS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while KD trades at $14.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check KD's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while PRFT trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check PRFT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while NYAX trades at $64.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 66.95. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check NYAX's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while VNET trades at $8.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -62.64. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check VNET's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while VRRM trades at $15.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check VRRM's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while DXC trades at $12.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check DXC's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while FORTY trades at $139.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 60.70. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check FORTY's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while GLOB trades at $47.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check GLOB's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while CNXC trades at $28.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CNXC's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while CLVT trades at $2.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CLVT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while ASGN trades at $40.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check ASGN's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while FLYW trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 127.27. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check FLYW's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while INOD trades at $47.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 51.45. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check INOD's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check TWKS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while BBAI trades at $3.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check BBAI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while AI trades at $9.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check AI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while BTCM trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check BTCM's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 995.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while NABL trades at $5.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is -58.72. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check NABL's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 978.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while VYX trades at $7.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 50.29. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check VYX's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while MGIC trades at $17.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check MGIC's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 794.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while CTLP trades at $10.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CTLP's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CLVT-PA's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 663M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while WYFI trades at $17.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -22.15. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check WYFI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 626.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while TASK trades at $6.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check TASK's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while PHLT trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check PHLT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 501M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while GDYN trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 53.36. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check GDYN's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 480.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while TSSI trades at $16.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 29.77. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check TSSI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while PSFE trades at $9.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check PSFE's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 447.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while CD trades at $5.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -187.67. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CD's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 399.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while SHAZ trades at $40.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -10.10. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SHAZ's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 382.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while IBEX trades at $28.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check IBEX's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, SDHI has a market cap of 367.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while SDHI trades at $10.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SDHI's P/E ratio is -1039.00. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SDHI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to SDHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SDHI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 351.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while HCKT trades at $13.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 30.11. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check HCKT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 347.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while AUROW trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check AUROW's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 346.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while TLS trades at $4.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -8.98. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check TLS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 296.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while SDHIU trades at $10.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SDHIU's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 295.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check BBAI-WT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check BULLZ's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 257.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while CNDT trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CNDT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 236.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while XRX trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to XRX's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check XRX's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 215.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while DVLT trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check DVLT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 204M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while III trades at $4.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas III's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to III's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check III's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 194.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while UIS trades at $2.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check UIS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SRT's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CTG's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 167.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while DMRC trades at $7.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check DMRC's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 159.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while TTEC trades at $3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check TTEC's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check ALYA's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 106.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while XRXDW trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check XRXDW's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while CSPI trades at $9.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -184.40. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CSPI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, KOID has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while KOID trades at $36.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas KOID's P/E ratio is 46.90. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KOID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to KOID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check KOID's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while CTM trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -24.11. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CTM's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while WYY trades at $4.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -16.68. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check WYY's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SIFYR's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while GMM trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GMM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check GMM's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while JFU trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check JFU's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while USIO trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to USIO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check USIO's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while DTST trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check DTST's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while CLPS trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CLPS's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while VEEA trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check VEEA's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while SAIH trades at $10.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is more volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SAIH's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while LZMH trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check LZMH's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while CHOW trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CHOW's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check CHOW's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while SLAI trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SLAI's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while LHSW trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check LHSW's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while VEEAW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check VEEAW's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check SGLB's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while TDTH trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +5.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check TDTH's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while ARBB trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check ARBB's competition here

BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BR stands at 18.8B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BR is priced at $160.64, while GLE trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, BR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BR is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BR.Check GLE's competition here