Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 223.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while IBM trades at $237.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check IBM's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 107.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while ACN trades at $175.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check ACN's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while INFY trades at $12.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check INFY's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while FI trades at $63.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check FI's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while FISV trades at $52.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check FISV's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while CTSH trades at $57.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check CTSH's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while FIS trades at $42.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check FIS's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while WIT trades at $2.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check WIT's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while BR trades at $166.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check BR's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while CDW trades at $135.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check CDW's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while LDOS trades at $137.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check LDOS's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while GIB trades at $74.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check GIB's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while IREN trades at $41.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -28.63. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to IREN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check IREN's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while CACI trades at $644.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check CACI's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while AUR trades at $7.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -15.69. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to AUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check AUR's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, WSE has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while WSE trades at $12.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas WSE's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WSE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to WSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check WSE's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while JKHY trades at $155.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check JKHY's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while APLD trades at $29.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -41.74. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check APLD's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while INGM trades at $28.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check INGM's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while GDS trades at $31.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check GDS's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while DLB trades at $61.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check DLB's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, G has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while G trades at $34.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas G's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to G's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to G. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check G's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while SAIC trades at $126.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check SAIC's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while EXLS trades at $34.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check EXLS's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while EPAM trades at $97.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check EPAM's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while PSN trades at $47.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to PSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check PSN's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while PAY trades at $38.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 46.43. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check PAY's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, NSIT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while NSIT trades at $149.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas NSIT's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NSIT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to NSIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check NSIT's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check NCR's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while NIQ trades at $11.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is 32.42. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check NIQ's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, CSQR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while CSQR trades at $21.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas CSQR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to CSQR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check CSQR's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while WNS trades at $76.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check WNS's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while KD trades at $14.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check KD's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while PRFT trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check PRFT's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while NYAX trades at $69.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 107.58. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check NYAX's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while KEEL trades at $3.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check KEEL's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while VNET trades at $7.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to VNET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check VNET's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while INOD trades at $62.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 56.15. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check INOD's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while DXC trades at $10.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check DXC's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while FORTY trades at $108.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check FORTY's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while GLOB trades at $37.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check GLOB's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while CNXC trades at $25.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 2.34. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check CNXC's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while BBAI trades at $3.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check BBAI's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while AI trades at $10.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check AI's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check BBAI-WT's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check TWKS's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while EFOR trades at $32.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check EFOR's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, MGRT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while MGRT trades at $94.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas MGRT's P/E ratio is 557.94. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MGRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to MGRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check MGRT's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while BTCM trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check BTCM's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while CLVT trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check CLVT's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while SIFY trades at $15.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check SIFY's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while VYX trades at $8.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check VYX's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 951.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while WYFI trades at $24.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -14.63. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check WYFI's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 938.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while NABL trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check NABL's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while ASGN trades at $20.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check ASGN's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while SLAI trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check SLAI's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while MGIC trades at $17.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check MGIC's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while CTLP trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check CTLP's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 777.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while HIVE trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check HIVE's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check CLVT-PA's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 744.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while VRRM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check VRRM's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 658.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while TASK trades at $7.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check TASK's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 614.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while GDYN trades at $7.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check GDYN's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while PHLT trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check PHLT's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 498.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while IBEX trades at $37.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check IBEX's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 487.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while SHAZ trades at $49.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check SHAZ's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 423.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while XRX trades at $3.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to XRX's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to XRX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check XRX's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 398M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while ALIT trades at $15.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check ALIT's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 378M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while PSFE trades at $7.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check PSFE's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while TLS trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to TLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check TLS's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 316.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while TSSI trades at $11.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check TSSI's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 290.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while HCKT trades at $11.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check HCKT's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 263.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while XRXDW trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check XRXDW's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check BULLZ's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 216.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while UIS trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to UIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check UIS's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check SRT's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check CTG's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 163M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while KORE trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KORE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check KORE's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, DAVA has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while DAVA trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas DAVA's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DAVA's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to DAVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check DAVA's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 124.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while TTEC trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is 2.66. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check TTEC's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 113.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while WYY trades at $11.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -57.50. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check WYY's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check ALYA's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while CSPI trades at $8.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -815.00. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check CSPI's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, CHRN has a market cap of 74.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while CHRN trades at $20.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas CHRN's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CHRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CHRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check CHRN's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, QXL has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while QXL trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas QXL's P/E ratio is -92.00. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to QXL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to QXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check QXL's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while CTM trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -47.02. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check CTM's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check SIFYR's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while SAIH trades at $20.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check SAIH's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while JFU trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 529.27. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check JFU's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while CLPS trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check CLPS's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while AERTW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AERTW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check AERTW's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while CHOW trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CHOW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check CHOW's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check SGLB's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, ENRDW has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while ENRDW trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas ENRDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ENRDW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to ENRDW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check ENRDW's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while LHSW trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is -24.67. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check LHSW's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while LZMH trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check LZMH's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while TDTH trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check TDTH's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while VEEA trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check VEEA's competition here

Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 263.7M. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $1.70 on the NASDAQ, while GLE trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.47, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.Check GLE's competition here