Insight Enterprises, Inc.

NSIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSIT stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SNX has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSIT is priced at $73.35, while SNX trades at $220.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.11, whereas SNX's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, NSIT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSIT is more volatile compared to SNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSIT.Check SNX's competition here

NSIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSIT stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ARW has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSIT is priced at $73.35, while ARW trades at $182.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.11, whereas ARW's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, NSIT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSIT is more volatile compared to ARW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSIT.Check ARW's competition here

NSIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSIT stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AVT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSIT is priced at $73.35, while AVT trades at $77.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.11, whereas AVT's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, NSIT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSIT is more volatile compared to AVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSIT.Check AVT's competition here

NSIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSIT stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CNXN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSIT is priced at $73.35, while CNXN trades at $63.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.11, whereas CNXN's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, NSIT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNXN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSIT is more volatile compared to CNXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSIT.Check CNXN's competition here

NSIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSIT stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SCSC has a market cap of 892.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSIT is priced at $73.35, while SCSC trades at $40.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.11, whereas SCSC's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, NSIT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCSC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSIT is more volatile compared to SCSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSIT.Check SCSC's competition here

NSIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSIT stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SNPO has a market cap of 822.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSIT is priced at $73.35, while SNPO trades at $10.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.11, whereas SNPO's P/E ratio is -27.56. In terms of profitability, NSIT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNPO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSIT is more volatile compared to SNPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSIT.Check SNPO's competition here

NSIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSIT stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CLMB has a market cap of 386.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSIT is priced at $73.35, while CLMB trades at $20.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.11, whereas CLMB's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, NSIT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLMB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NSIT is more volatile compared to CLMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSIT.Check CLMB's competition here

NSIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSIT stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ORBS has a market cap of 172.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSIT is priced at $73.35, while ORBS trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.11, whereas ORBS's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, NSIT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORBS's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NSIT is less volatile compared to ORBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSIT.Check ORBS's competition here

NSIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSIT stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WSTG has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSIT is priced at $73.35, while WSTG trades at $31.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.11, whereas WSTG's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, NSIT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WSTG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NSIT is more volatile compared to WSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSIT.Check WSTG's competition here

NSIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSIT stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TAIT has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSIT is priced at $73.35, while TAIT trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.11, whereas TAIT's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, NSIT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TAIT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSIT is more volatile compared to TAIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSIT.Check TAIT's competition here

NSIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSIT stands at 2.2B. In comparison, IZM has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSIT is priced at $73.35, while IZM trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.11, whereas IZM's P/E ratio is 3.43. In terms of profitability, NSIT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IZM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSIT is less volatile compared to IZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSIT.Check IZM's competition here

NSIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSIT stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AEY has a market cap of 538.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NSIT is priced at $73.35, while AEY trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.11, whereas AEY's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NSIT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSIT is less volatile compared to AEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSIT.Check AEY's competition here

NSIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSIT stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSIT is priced at $73.35, while CKP trades at $10.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.11, whereas CKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSIT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CKP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSIT is more volatile compared to CKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSIT.Check CKP's competition here