Wipro Limited
Wipro Limited WIT Peers
See (WIT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WIT | $2.95 | -0.67% | 30.9B | 19.70 | $0.15 | +1.05% |
| IBM | $281.96 | -0.97% | 262B | 48.11 | $5.86 | +2.37% |
| ACN | $286.96 | +1.60% | 178.7B | 22.83 | $12.57 | +2.07% |
| FISV | $114.23 | +0.00% | 116.2B | 29.67 | $3.85 | N/A |
| FI | $165.98 | +0.31% | 92B | 29.37 | $5.65 | N/A |
| INFY | $18.26 | +0.38% | 75.6B | 24.01 | $0.76 | +2.79% |
| CTSH | $76.80 | +1.83% | 37.9B | 16.17 | $4.75 | +1.59% |
| BR | $244.10 | +0.98% | 28.7B | 36.65 | $6.66 | +1.45% |
| IT | $356.52 | +0.97% | 27.4B | 22.24 | $16.03 | N/A |
| CDW | $180.07 | +1.81% | 23.7B | 22.34 | $8.06 | +1.38% |
Stock Comparison
WIT vs IBM Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 262B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while IBM trades at $281.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 48.11. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs ACN Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 178.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while ACN trades at $286.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs FISV Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while FISV trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs FI Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 92B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while FI trades at $165.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs INFY Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while INFY trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs CTSH Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while CTSH trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs BR Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while BR trades at $244.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 36.65. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs IT Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while IT trades at $356.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs CDW Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while CDW trades at $180.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs GIB Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while GIB trades at $101.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs LDOS Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while LDOS trades at $161.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs JKHY Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while JKHY trades at $180.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs AUR Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while AUR trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -13.09. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs CACI Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while CACI trades at $477.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs AUROW Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while AUROW trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs EPAM Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while EPAM trades at $168.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs KD Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while KD trades at $39.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 37.16. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs G Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while G trades at $45.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas G's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs DLB Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while DLB trades at $76.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs EXLS Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while EXLS trades at $43.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 32.78. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs GDS Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while GDS trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 318.64. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs WAY Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while WAY trades at $36.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 304.75. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs SAIC Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while SAIC trades at $114.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs INGM Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while INGM trades at $20.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs GLOB Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while GLOB trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs CNXC Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while CNXC trades at $60.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs NCR Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs AI Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while AI trades at $28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -12.72. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs PAY Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while PAY trades at $29.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 73.96. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs WNS Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while WNS trades at $74.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs CD Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while CD trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs CLVT Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while CLVT trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs PRFT Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs DXC Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while DXC trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs APLD Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while APLD trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs ASGN Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while ASGN trades at $49.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs BBAI Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while BBAI trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -8.77. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs VNET Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while VNET trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -809.00. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs BBAI-WT Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while BBAI-WT trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs VYX Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while VYX trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs FORTY Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while FORTY trades at $127.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs NYAX Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while NYAX trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 245.87. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs TASK Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while TASK trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs NABL Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while NABL trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 100.75. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs INOD Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while INOD trades at $46.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 42.99. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs TWKS Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs FLYW Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while FLYW trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 288.50. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs MGIC Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while MGIC trades at $21.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs PSFE-WT Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 968.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs LZMH Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 942.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while LZMH trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is 620.00. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs GDYN Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 898.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while GDYN trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 81.77. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs PSFE Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 815.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while PSFE trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -686.85. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs CTLP Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 812.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while CTLP trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs CLVT-PA Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs XRX Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 733.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while XRX trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs HCKT Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 645.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while HCKT trades at $23.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs TSSI Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 635.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while TSSI trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 70.56. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs CNDT Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while CNDT trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs IBEX Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 409.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while IBEX trades at $30.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs SDHIU Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 325.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while SDHIU trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +16.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs UIS Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 310.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while UIS trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs PHLT Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 286.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while PHLT trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -45.75. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs DMRC Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 270.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while DMRC trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs BULLZ Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs TTEC Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 255.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while TTEC trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs III Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 218.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while III trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas III's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs TLS Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 215.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while TLS trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs SRT Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs CTG Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs LHSW Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 150.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while LHSW trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs NOTE Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 132M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while NOTE trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs NOTE-WT Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 124.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs CSPI Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 115.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while CSPI trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -73.19. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs CTM Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 115.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while CTM trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -11.55. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs SAIH Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 113.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while SAIH trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs ALYA Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs GLE Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while GLE trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 177.00. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs SAIHW Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while SAIHW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs GMM Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while GMM trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs VEEAW Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while VEEAW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +11.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is more volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs DVLT Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while DVLT trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs VEEA Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while VEEA trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +12.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs BTCM Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while BTCM trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs USIO Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while USIO trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs DTST Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while DTST trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 257.00. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs WYY Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while WYY trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -14.23. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs CLPS Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while CLPS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -19.70. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs TDTH Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while TDTH trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -17.23. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TDTH's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs JFU Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while JFU trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs MASK Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while MASK trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs CYCUW Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while CYCUW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs CYCU Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while CYCU trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs SGLB Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGLB's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs ARBB Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while ARBB trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs JDZG Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while JDZG trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs SASI Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SASI's ROE of +597.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs DTSTW Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while DTSTW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs WAVD Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.
WIT vs TRIT Comparison
WIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIT stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TRIT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WIT is priced at $2.95, while TRIT trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.70, whereas TRIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WIT's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRIT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WIT is less volatile compared to TRIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIT.