Flywire Corporation
Flywire Corporation (FLYW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLYW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLYW | $16.06 | -1.77% | 2B | 66.92 | $0.24 | N/A |
| IBM | $219.30 | +0.43% | 206.2B | 19.43 | $11.29 | +3.06% |
| ACN | $168.82 | +2.95% | 103.9B | 13.84 | $12.20 | +3.80% |
| INFY | $12.07 | +3.52% | 49B | 15.09 | $0.80 | +4.29% |
| FI | $63.80 | +0.16% | 34.3B | 9.86 | $6.47 | N/A |
| FISV | $55.33 | +3.50% | 29.5B | 8.55 | $6.47 | N/A |
| CTSH | $47.13 | +2.35% | 22.3B | 10.61 | $4.44 | +2.68% |
| FIS | $41.80 | -0.02% | 21.6B | 8.10 | $5.16 | +3.94% |
| WIT | $1.89 | +2.16% | 19.8B | 14.54 | $0.13 | +6.43% |
| BR | $145.62 | +1.57% | 16.8B | 15.56 | $9.36 | +2.62% |
Stock Comparison
FLYW vs IBM Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 206.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while IBM trades at $219.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check IBM's competition here
FLYW vs ACN Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while ACN trades at $168.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check ACN's competition here
FLYW vs INFY Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while INFY trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check INFY's competition here
FLYW vs FI Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while FI trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check FI's competition here
FLYW vs FISV Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while FISV trades at $55.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check FISV's competition here
FLYW vs CTSH Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while CTSH trades at $47.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check CTSH's competition here
FLYW vs FIS Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while FIS trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check FIS's competition here
FLYW vs WIT Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while WIT trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check WIT's competition here
FLYW vs BR Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while BR trades at $145.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check BR's competition here
FLYW vs LDOS Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while LDOS trades at $123.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check LDOS's competition here
FLYW vs AUR Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while AUR trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -15.42. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check AUR's competition here
FLYW vs GIB Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while GIB trades at $63.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check GIB's competition here
FLYW vs CDW Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while CDW trades at $102.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check CDW's competition here
FLYW vs APLD Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while APLD trades at $42.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -112.00. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check APLD's competition here
FLYW vs CACI Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while CACI trades at $486.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check CACI's competition here
FLYW vs JKHY Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while JKHY trades at $136.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check JKHY's competition here
FLYW vs GDS Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while GDS trades at $42.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 65.29. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check GDS's competition here
FLYW vs INGM Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while INGM trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check INGM's competition here
FLYW vs PSFE-WT Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
FLYW vs DLB Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while DLB trades at $54.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check DLB's competition here
FLYW vs G Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while G trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas G's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check G's competition here
FLYW vs EPAM Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while EPAM trades at $93.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check EPAM's competition here
FLYW vs EXLS Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while EXLS trades at $27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check EXLS's competition here
FLYW vs SAIC Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while SAIC trades at $92.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check SAIC's competition here
FLYW vs NCR Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check NCR's competition here
FLYW vs WAY Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while WAY trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check WAY's competition here
FLYW vs WNS Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while WNS trades at $76.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check WNS's competition here
FLYW vs INOD Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while INOD trades at $96.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 85.80. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check INOD's competition here
FLYW vs PAY Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while PAY trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 42.58. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check PAY's competition here
FLYW vs VNET Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while VNET trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -72.07. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check VNET's competition here
FLYW vs PRFT Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check PRFT's competition here
FLYW vs KEEL Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while KEEL trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check KEEL's competition here
FLYW vs KD Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while KD trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check KD's competition here
FLYW vs NIQ Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while NIQ trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check NIQ's competition here
FLYW vs NYAX Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while NYAX trades at $63.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check NYAX's competition here
FLYW vs FORTY Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while FORTY trades at $140.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 57.90. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check FORTY's competition here
FLYW vs VRRM Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while VRRM trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check VRRM's competition here
FLYW vs GLOB Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while GLOB trades at $38.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check GLOB's competition here
FLYW vs CLVT Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while CLVT trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -11.55. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check CLVT's competition here
FLYW vs CNXC Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while CNXC trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check CNXC's competition here
FLYW vs BBAI Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while BBAI trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check BBAI's competition here
FLYW vs DXC Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while DXC trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 89.30. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check DXC's competition here
FLYW vs TWKS Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check TWKS's competition here
FLYW vs BTCM Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while BTCM trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check BTCM's competition here
FLYW vs AUROW Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while AUROW trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check AUROW's competition here
FLYW vs AI Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while AI trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check AI's competition here
FLYW vs WYFI Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 927.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while WYFI trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check WYFI's competition here
FLYW vs VYX Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 917.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while VYX trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check VYX's competition here
FLYW vs ASGN Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while ASGN trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check ASGN's competition here
FLYW vs MGIC Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while MGIC trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check MGIC's competition here
FLYW vs CTLP Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while CTLP trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check CTLP's competition here
FLYW vs CLVT-PA Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check CLVT-PA's competition here
FLYW vs EFOR Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 736.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while EFOR trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check EFOR's competition here
FLYW vs CD Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 658.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while CD trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -276.33. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check CD's competition here
FLYW vs NABL Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 637.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while NABL trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is -67.70. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check NABL's competition here
FLYW vs PHLT Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while PHLT trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check PHLT's competition here
FLYW vs GDYN Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 561.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while GDYN trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 111.83. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check GDYN's competition here
FLYW vs SHAZ Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 528.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while SHAZ trades at $53.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check SHAZ's competition here
FLYW vs TASK Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 495.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while TASK trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check TASK's competition here
FLYW vs IBEX Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 409.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while IBEX trades at $30.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check IBEX's competition here
FLYW vs PSFE Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while PSFE trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check PSFE's competition here
FLYW vs SDHI Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, SDHI has a market cap of 367.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while SDHI trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas SDHI's P/E ratio is 207.80. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to SDHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check SDHI's competition here
FLYW vs TLS Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 314.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while TLS trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check TLS's competition here
FLYW vs TSSI Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while TSSI trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check TSSI's competition here
FLYW vs SDHIU Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 293.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while SDHIU trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check SDHIU's competition here
FLYW vs BULLZ Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check BULLZ's competition here
FLYW vs XRXDW Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 248.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while XRXDW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check XRXDW's competition here
FLYW vs BBAI-WT Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 246.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
FLYW vs HCKT Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 238.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while HCKT trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check HCKT's competition here
FLYW vs DMRC Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 218M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while DMRC trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check DMRC's competition here
FLYW vs UIS Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 217.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while UIS trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check UIS's competition here
FLYW vs CNDT Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 215.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while CNDT trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check CNDT's competition here
FLYW vs III Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 197.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while III trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas III's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to III's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check III's competition here
FLYW vs SRT Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check SRT's competition here
FLYW vs CTG Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check CTG's competition here
FLYW vs DVLT Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 144.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while DVLT trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check DVLT's competition here
FLYW vs TTEC Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 119.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while TTEC trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check TTEC's competition here
FLYW vs ALYA Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check ALYA's competition here
FLYW vs WYY Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 100.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while WYY trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -36.43. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check WYY's competition here
FLYW vs KOID Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, KOID has a market cap of 95.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while KOID trades at $40.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas KOID's P/E ratio is 44.75. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to KOID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check KOID's competition here
FLYW vs CSPI Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while CSPI trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -930.00. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check CSPI's competition here
FLYW vs CTM Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while CTM trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -33.89. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check CTM's competition here
FLYW vs JFU Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while JFU trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check JFU's competition here
FLYW vs SIFYR Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check SIFYR's competition here
FLYW vs USIO Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while USIO trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USIO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check USIO's competition here
FLYW vs GMM Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while GMM trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check GMM's competition here
FLYW vs DTST Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while DTST trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is -33.83. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check DTST's competition here
FLYW vs CLPS Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while CLPS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check CLPS's competition here
FLYW vs SAIH Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while SAIH trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is more volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check SAIH's competition here
FLYW vs VEEA Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while VEEA trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check VEEA's competition here
FLYW vs LZMH Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while LZMH trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check LZMH's competition here
FLYW vs CHOW Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while CHOW trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHOW's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check CHOW's competition here
FLYW vs SLAI Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while SLAI trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check SLAI's competition here
FLYW vs VEEAW Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while VEEAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check VEEAW's competition here
FLYW vs LHSW Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while LHSW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check LHSW's competition here
FLYW vs SGLB Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check SGLB's competition here
FLYW vs GLE Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while GLE trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check GLE's competition here
FLYW vs ARBB Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while ARBB trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check ARBB's competition here
FLYW vs TDTH Comparison May 2026
FLYW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYW stands at 2B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYW is priced at $16.06, while TDTH trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYW currently has a P/E ratio of 66.92, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, FLYW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYW is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYW.Check TDTH's competition here