Energous Corporation
Energous Corporation WATT Peers
See (WATT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WATT | $0.28 | +2.90% | 9.6M | -0.18 | -$1.58 | N/A |
| APH | $95.80 | +0.57% | 115.9B | 46.06 | $2.08 | +0.69% |
| TEL | $166.51 | +0.42% | 49.4B | 36.20 | $4.60 | +1.60% |
| GLW | $51.43 | -0.72% | 44B | 98.89 | $0.52 | +2.18% |
| GRMN | $205.09 | +1.66% | 39.5B | 27.06 | $7.58 | +1.54% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $164.66 | +2.23% | 28.3B | 38.83 | $4.24 | N/A |
| FTV | $70.68 | +0.51% | 24B | 31.00 | $2.28 | +0.45% |
| TDY | $494.03 | +0.62% | 23.1B | 28.23 | $17.50 | N/A |
| JBL | $211.92 | +1.71% | 22.7B | 40.29 | $5.26 | +0.15% |
Stock Comparison
WATT vs APH Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 115.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while APH trades at $95.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 46.06. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs TEL Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while TEL trades at $166.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs GLW Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while GLW trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 98.89. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs GRMN Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while GRMN trades at $205.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs IIVI Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs KEYS Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while KEYS trades at $164.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.83. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs FTV Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while FTV trades at $70.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs TDY Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while TDY trades at $494.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs JBL Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while JBL trades at $211.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 40.29. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs FLEX Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while FLEX trades at $47.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs TRMB Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while TRMB trades at $73.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs CLS Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while CLS trades at $143.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs COHR Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while COHR trades at $80.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -368.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs FN Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while FN trades at $276.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs BMI Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while BMI trades at $247.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 54.45. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs SNDK Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while SNDK trades at $47.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs MKSI Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while MKSI trades at $97.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs ITRI Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while ITRI trades at $130.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs LFUS Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while LFUS trades at $223.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 58.66. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs VNT Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while VNT trades at $36.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs CGNX Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while CGNX trades at $30.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 44.51. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs SANM Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while SANM trades at $93.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs ESE Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while ESE trades at $187.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs NOVT Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while NOVT trades at $126.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 64.76. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs ST Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while ST trades at $29.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs TTMI Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while TTMI trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 50.49. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs PLXS Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while PLXS trades at $135.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs OSIS Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while OSIS trades at $214.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs VICR Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while VICR trades at $45.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 85.64. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs KULR Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while KULR trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -54.46. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs BHE Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while BHE trades at $38.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs CTS Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while CTS trades at $43.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs OUST Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while OUST trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs ROG Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while ROG trades at $68.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 76.36. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs BELFB Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while BELFB trades at $92.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs BELFA Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while BELFA trades at $83.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs PENG Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while PENG trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -119.71. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs OST Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 915.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while OST trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs FARO Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 841.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while FARO trades at $43.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1093.75. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs DAKT Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 758.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while DAKT trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 380.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs OUST-WTA Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs ALNT Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 606.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while ALNT trades at $35.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 61.81. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs BKSY Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 555.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while BKSY trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs AMOT Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs MLAB Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 538.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while MLAB trades at $98.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -274.33. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs LYTS Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while LYTS trades at $16.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs BKSY-WT Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 469.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs OUST-WT Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs SATL Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 375.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while SATL trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs SATLW Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 369.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while SATLW trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs NEON Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 362.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while NEON trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -58.39. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs VPG Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 350.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while VPG trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 114.98. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs MEI Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 325.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while MEI trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs VLDR Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs MVIS Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 284.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while MVIS trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs KOPN Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 267M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while KOPN trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -20.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs EMAN Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs LPTH Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while LPTH trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -12.76. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs RELL Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 134M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while RELL trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -62.87. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs MPTI Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 113M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while MPTI trades at $38.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs WBX Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while WBX trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs ODYS Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while ODYS trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs WRAP Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 78.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while WRAP trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs GNSS Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while GNSS trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs MIND Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while MIND trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 2.04. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs ELTK Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while ELTK trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs REFR Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while REFR trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -45.25. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs SOTK Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while SOTK trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 47.75. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs LINK Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while LINK trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -22.79. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs SELX Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while SELX trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -33.25. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs OPTX Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while OPTX trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 135.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs CPSH Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while CPSH trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -14.85. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs DSWL Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while DSWL trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs LGL Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while LGL trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 85.75. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs SVRE Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while SVRE trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs ISNS Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs FCUV Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while FCUV trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs DAIO Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while DAIO trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs NSYS Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while NSYS trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -7.16. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs TMPOW Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs LUNA Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while LUNA trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs HOLO Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while HOLO trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs MTEK Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while MTEK trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -17.56. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs HOLOW Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while HOLOW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs KNW Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while KNW trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to KNW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs SGMA Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while SGMA trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs VIAO Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs ELSE Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while ELSE trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs SLNHP Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while SLNHP trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs SLNH Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while SLNH trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs OUSTZ Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while OUSTZ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs BNSO Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs MINDP Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs SVREW Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while SVREW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs SOBR Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while SOBR trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs MMAT Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs OUSTW Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while OUSTW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs IMTE Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while IMTE trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.
WATT vs OPTXW Comparison
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 9.6M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $0.28, while OPTXW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -5.11%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.