Research Frontiers Incorporated
Research Frontiers Incorporated REFR Peers
See (REFR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REFR | $1.64 | +1.86% | 55M | -41.00 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| APH | $99.46 | +0.95% | 120.3B | 48.28 | $2.06 | +0.66% |
| TEL | $174.29 | +0.51% | 51.7B | 37.97 | $4.59 | +1.53% |
| GLW | $53.04 | +0.61% | 45.4B | 102.00 | $0.52 | +2.11% |
| GRMN | $214.77 | +0.65% | 41.4B | 28.33 | $7.58 | +1.47% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $167.05 | +0.92% | 28.8B | 39.21 | $4.26 | N/A |
| TDY | $517.96 | +1.66% | 24.3B | 29.67 | $17.46 | N/A |
| JBL | $226.01 | +1.86% | 24.3B | 42.97 | $5.26 | +0.14% |
| FLEX | $51.69 | +1.87% | 19.3B | 24.50 | $2.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
REFR vs APH Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 120.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while APH trades at $99.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 48.28. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs TEL Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while TEL trades at $174.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 37.97. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs GLW Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while GLW trades at $53.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 102.00. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs GRMN Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while GRMN trades at $214.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs IIVI Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs KEYS Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while KEYS trades at $167.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 39.21. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs TDY Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while TDY trades at $517.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs JBL Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while JBL trades at $226.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 42.97. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs FLEX Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while FLEX trades at $51.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs TRMB Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while TRMB trades at $78.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs CLS Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while CLS trades at $159.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 44.61. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs FTV Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while FTV trades at $53.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs COHR Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while COHR trades at $90.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -413.18. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs FN Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while FN trades at $294.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs BMI Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while BMI trades at $242.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 53.32. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs MKSI Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while MKSI trades at $104.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 31.12. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs SNDK Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while SNDK trades at $46.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs ITRI Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while ITRI trades at $135.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs LFUS Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while LFUS trades at $236.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 62.07. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs VNT Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while VNT trades at $38.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs SANM Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while SANM trades at $102.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs CGNX Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while CGNX trades at $32.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 47.13. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs ESE Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while ESE trades at $196.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 43.01. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs NOVT Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while NOVT trades at $133.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 68.37. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs ST Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while ST trades at $32.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 39.78. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs TTMI Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while TTMI trades at $44.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 58.69. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs OSIS Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while OSIS trades at $232.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs PLXS Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while PLXS trades at $140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs VICR Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while VICR trades at $46.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 87.30. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs WBX Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while WBX trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs BHE Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while BHE trades at $40.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs ROG Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while ROG trades at $73.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 81.60. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs CTS Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while CTS trades at $44.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs BELFA Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while BELFA trades at $93.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs BELFB Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while BELFB trades at $100.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 30.61. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs OUST Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while OUST trades at $22.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -11.66. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs PENG Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while PENG trades at $20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -122.76. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs FARO Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 848.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while FARO trades at $43.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1098.00. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs DAKT Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 830M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while DAKT trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is -76.82. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DAKT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs OUST-WTA Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs BKSY Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 679.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while BKSY trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -9.72. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs ALNT Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 656.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while ALNT trades at $38.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 66.83. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs BKSY-WT Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 587.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs MLAB Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 564.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while MLAB trades at $103.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -287.22. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs AMOT Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs LYTS Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 535.6M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while LYTS trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs OUST-WT Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs NEON Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 442.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while NEON trades at $26.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -71.32. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs VPG Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 392.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while VPG trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 128.61. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs SATL Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 370.6M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while SATL trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs MEI Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 358.3M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while MEI trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs SATLW Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 352.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while SATLW trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs VLDR Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs MVIS Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 284.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while MVIS trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs KULR Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 262.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while KULR trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs KOPN Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 257.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while KOPN trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs EMAN Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs RELL Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while RELL trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -68.13. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs LPTH Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while LPTH trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -12.20. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs MPTI Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 117.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while MPTI trades at $40.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs GNSS Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 79.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while GNSS trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs ODYS Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while ODYS trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs WRAP Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while WRAP trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs ELTK Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while ELTK trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs LINK Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while LINK trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -29.17. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs MIND Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while MIND trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs SOTK Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while SOTK trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 45.63. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs OPTX Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while OPTX trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 137.00. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs SELX Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while SELX trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs DSWL Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while DSWL trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs CPSH Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while CPSH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -14.45. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs LGL Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while LGL trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs ISNS Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs LUNA Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while LUNA trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs SVRE Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while SVRE trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs DAIO Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while DAIO trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs FCUV Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while FCUV trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs NSYS Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while NSYS trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs MTEK Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while MTEK trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -18.87. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs HOLO Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while HOLO trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs TMPOW Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs HOLOW Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while HOLOW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs OST Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while OST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs KNW Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while KNW trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to KNW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs SGMA Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while SGMA trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs VIAO Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs ELSE Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while ELSE trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 42.36. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs SLNHP Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while SLNHP trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs SLNH Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while SLNH trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs WATT Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while WATT trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs SVREW Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while SVREW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs OUSTZ Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while OUSTZ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs BNSO Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs MINDP Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs SOBR Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while SOBR trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is more volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs IMTE Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while IMTE trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs MMAT Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs OPTXW Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while OPTXW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.
REFR vs LGL-WT Comparison
REFR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REFR stands at 55M. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REFR is priced at $1.64, while LGL-WT trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REFR currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REFR's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REFR is less volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REFR.