Paysafe Limited
Paysafe Limited PSFE-WT Peers
See (PSFE-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSFE-WT | $0.01 | +15.97% | 831.9M | -0.02 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| IBM | $281.88 | +1.68% | 262B | 48.18 | $5.85 | +2.38% |
| ACN | $314.40 | +0.86% | 196.8B | 25.94 | $12.12 | +1.83% |
| FISV | $114.23 | N/A | 116.2B | 29.67 | $3.85 | N/A |
| FI | $164.92 | +1.17% | 91.4B | 29.29 | $5.63 | N/A |
| INFY | $18.74 | +1.71% | 77.6B | 24.65 | $0.76 | +2.71% |
| CTSH | $80.15 | +1.52% | 39.5B | 16.87 | $4.75 | +1.53% |
| WIT | $3.04 | +2.36% | 31.8B | 20.27 | $0.15 | +1.02% |
| IT | $409.23 | +1.05% | 31.5B | 25.51 | $16.04 | N/A |
| BR | $238.98 | +0.76% | 28.1B | 35.99 | $6.64 | +1.47% |
Stock Comparison
PSFE-WT vs IBM Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 262B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while IBM trades at $281.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 48.18. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs ACN Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 196.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while ACN trades at $314.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs FISV Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while FISV trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs FI Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while FI trades at $164.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs INFY Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while INFY trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CTSH Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CTSH trades at $80.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs WIT Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while WIT trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs IT Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while IT trades at $409.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs BR Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while BR trades at $238.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs GIB Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while GIB trades at $108.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CDW Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CDW trades at $172.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs LDOS Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while LDOS trades at $148.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs JKHY Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while JKHY trades at $180.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs AUROW Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while AUROW trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs AUR Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while AUR trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CACI Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CACI trades at $445.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs EPAM Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while EPAM trades at $172.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs KD Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while KD trades at $40.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 38.39. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs EXLS Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while EXLS trades at $48.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs G Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while G trades at $44.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas G's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs DLB Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while DLB trades at $75.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs WAY Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while WAY trades at $38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 322.83. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs GDS Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while GDS trades at $28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 255.64. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs SAIC Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while SAIC trades at $105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs INGM Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while INGM trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs GLOB Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while GLOB trades at $95.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs PAY Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while PAY trades at $33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 83.78. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs NCR Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CNXC Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CNXC trades at $57.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs AI Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while AI trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -10.92. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CD Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CD trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CLVT Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CLVT trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs DXC Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while DXC trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs PRFT Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs APLD Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while APLD trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs WNS Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while WNS trades at $59.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs ASGN Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while ASGN trades at $51.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs LZMH Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while LZMH trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -1401.00. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs FORTY Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while FORTY trades at $110.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs NYAX Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while NYAX trades at $45.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 239.74. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs VYX Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while VYX trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -10.34. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs NABL Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while NABL trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 99.38. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs VNET Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while VNET trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -568.00. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs TASK Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while TASK trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs TWKS Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs INOD Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while INOD trades at $44.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 41.27. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs FLYW Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while FLYW trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 270.50. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs BBAI Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while BBAI trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs BBAI-WT Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while BBAI-WT trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs GDYN Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 977.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while GDYN trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 88.92. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs MGIC Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 804.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while MGIC trades at $16.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CTLP Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 802.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CTLP trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CLVT-PA Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs PSFE Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 742.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while PSFE trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -625.50. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PSFE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs XRX Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 696.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while XRX trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs HCKT Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 675.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while HCKT trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs TSSI Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 540.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while TSSI trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CNDT Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 454.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CNDT trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs IBEX Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 378.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while IBEX trades at $28.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs SDHIU Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 327.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while SDHIU trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +16.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs UIS Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 321.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while UIS trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs DMRC Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 278.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while DMRC trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs PHLT Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 267M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while PHLT trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -42.62. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs TTEC Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 264.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while TTEC trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs III Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, III has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while III trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas III's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs TLS Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 199.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while TLS trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs SRT Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CTG Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CSPI Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CSPI trades at $11.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -72.62. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs ALYA Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs BULLZ Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 103M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while BULLZ trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CTM Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 100.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CTM trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs LHSW Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while LHSW trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs NOTE-WT Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 81.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs NOTE Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while NOTE trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs SAIH Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while SAIH trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs SAIHW Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while SAIHW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs VEEA Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while VEEA trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VEEA's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs GMM Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while GMM trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs VEEAW Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while VEEAW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs DVLT Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while DVLT trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs MASK Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while MASK trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs USIO Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while USIO trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs WYY Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while WYY trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs GLE Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while GLE trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 83.50. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CLPS Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CLPS trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs DTST Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while DTST trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 171.00. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs JFU Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while JFU trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CYCU Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CYCU trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs ARBB Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while ARBB trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs SGLB Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGLB's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CYCUW Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CYCUW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs JDZG Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while JDZG trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs SASI Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SASI's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs WAVD Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs TDTH Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while TDTH trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TDTH's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs DTSTW Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while DTSTW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs BTCM Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 334.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while BTCM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.
PSFE-WT vs CRGE Comparison
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 831.9M. In comparison, CRGE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.01, while CRGE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CRGE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRGE's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to CRGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.