Paysafe Limited
Paysafe Limited (PSFE-WT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PSFE-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSFE-WT | $0.08 | +0.00% | 3.2B | -0.11 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| IBM | $256.28 | +0.00% | 240.5B | 23.09 | $11.14 | +2.61% |
| ACN | $214.95 | +0.00% | 133.6B | 17.80 | $12.10 | +2.90% |
| INFY | $14.55 | +0.00% | 59.4B | 19.01 | $0.77 | +3.26% |
| FI | $63.80 | +0.16% | 34.3B | 9.86 | $6.47 | N/A |
| FISV | $61.53 | +0.00% | 33.4B | 9.50 | $6.47 | N/A |
| CTSH | $64.99 | +0.00% | 31.4B | 14.26 | $4.56 | +1.94% |
| FIS | $49.00 | +0.00% | 25.4B | 153.53 | $0.32 | +3.26% |
| WIT | $2.24 | +0.00% | 23.7B | 16.18 | $0.14 | +5.12% |
| LDOS | $176.27 | +0.00% | 22.2B | 15.77 | $11.00 | +0.94% |
Stock Comparison
PSFE-WT vs IBM Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 240.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while IBM trades at $256.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check IBM's competition here
PSFE-WT vs ACN Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 133.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while ACN trades at $214.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check ACN's competition here
PSFE-WT vs INFY Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while INFY trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check INFY's competition here
PSFE-WT vs FI Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while FI trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check FI's competition here
PSFE-WT vs FISV Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while FISV trades at $61.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check FISV's competition here
PSFE-WT vs CTSH Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while CTSH trades at $64.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check CTSH's competition here
PSFE-WT vs FIS Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while FIS trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 153.53. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check FIS's competition here
PSFE-WT vs WIT Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while WIT trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check WIT's competition here
PSFE-WT vs LDOS Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while LDOS trades at $176.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check LDOS's competition here
PSFE-WT vs GIB Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while GIB trades at $73.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check GIB's competition here
PSFE-WT vs CDW Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while CDW trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check CDW's competition here
PSFE-WT vs CACI Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while CACI trades at $591.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check CACI's competition here
PSFE-WT vs JKHY Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while JKHY trades at $161.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check JKHY's competition here
PSFE-WT vs IT Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while IT trades at $156.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check IT's competition here
PSFE-WT vs AUR Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while AUR trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check AUR's competition here
PSFE-WT vs GDS Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while GDS trades at $45.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 63.49. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check GDS's competition here
PSFE-WT vs APLD Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while APLD trades at $31.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -74.46. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check APLD's competition here
PSFE-WT vs EPAM Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while EPAM trades at $139.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check EPAM's competition here
PSFE-WT vs G Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while G trades at $38.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas G's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check G's competition here
PSFE-WT vs DLB Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while DLB trades at $64.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check DLB's competition here
PSFE-WT vs INGM Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while INGM trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check INGM's competition here
PSFE-WT vs EXLS Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while EXLS trades at $30.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check EXLS's competition here
PSFE-WT vs WAY Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while WAY trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check WAY's competition here
PSFE-WT vs SAIC Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while SAIC trades at $91.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check SAIC's competition here
PSFE-WT vs NCR Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NCR's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check NCR's competition here
PSFE-WT vs NIQ Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while NIQ trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check NIQ's competition here
PSFE-WT vs WNS Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while WNS trades at $76.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check WNS's competition here
PSFE-WT vs PAY Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while PAY trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 55.18. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check PAY's competition here
PSFE-WT vs VNET Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while VNET trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -38.23. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check VNET's competition here
PSFE-WT vs VRRM Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while VRRM trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 55.71. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check VRRM's competition here
PSFE-WT vs KD Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while KD trades at $12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check KD's competition here
PSFE-WT vs PRFT Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check PRFT's competition here
PSFE-WT vs DXC Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while DXC trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check DXC's competition here
PSFE-WT vs CNXC Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while CNXC trades at $32.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check CNXC's competition here
PSFE-WT vs NYAX Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while NYAX trades at $54.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 88.54. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check NYAX's competition here
PSFE-WT vs GLOB Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while GLOB trades at $45.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check GLOB's competition here
PSFE-WT vs ASGN Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while ASGN trades at $44.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check ASGN's competition here
PSFE-WT vs FORTY Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while FORTY trades at $122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check FORTY's competition here
PSFE-WT vs TWKS Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check TWKS's competition here
PSFE-WT vs BBAI Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while BBAI trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check BBAI's competition here
PSFE-WT vs INOD Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while INOD trades at $45.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 44.38. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check INOD's competition here
PSFE-WT vs AI Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while AI trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check AI's competition here
PSFE-WT vs FLYW Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while FLYW trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is -561.50. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FLYW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check FLYW's competition here
PSFE-WT vs VYX Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while VYX trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -21.81. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VYX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check VYX's competition here
PSFE-WT vs BTCM Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while BTCM trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check BTCM's competition here
PSFE-WT vs CLVT Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while CLVT trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check CLVT's competition here
PSFE-WT vs TASK Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 962.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while TASK trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check TASK's competition here
PSFE-WT vs MGIC Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 952.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while MGIC trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check MGIC's competition here
PSFE-WT vs NABL Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 889.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while NABL trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is -118.87. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check NABL's competition here
PSFE-WT vs CTLP Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while CTLP trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check CTLP's competition here
PSFE-WT vs CLVT-PA Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check CLVT-PA's competition here
PSFE-WT vs WYFI Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 646.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while WYFI trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -21.65. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check WYFI's competition here
PSFE-WT vs PHLT Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while PHLT trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check PHLT's competition here
PSFE-WT vs GDYN Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 577.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while GDYN trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check GDYN's competition here
PSFE-WT vs AUROW Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 512.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while AUROW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check AUROW's competition here
PSFE-WT vs IBEX Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 398M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while IBEX trades at $29.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check IBEX's competition here
PSFE-WT vs HCKT Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 378.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while HCKT trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 36.74. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check HCKT's competition here
PSFE-WT vs PSFE Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 369.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while PSFE trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check PSFE's competition here
PSFE-WT vs SDHI Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SDHI has a market cap of 363.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while SDHI trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SDHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SDHI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to SDHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check SDHI's competition here
PSFE-WT vs BBAI-WT Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 331.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
PSFE-WT vs TLS Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 303.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while TLS trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check TLS's competition here
PSFE-WT vs SDHIU Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 293.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while SDHIU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check SDHIU's competition here
PSFE-WT vs CD Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while CD trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -98.75. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check CD's competition here
PSFE-WT vs BULLZ Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check BULLZ's competition here
PSFE-WT vs CNDT Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 246M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while CNDT trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check CNDT's competition here
PSFE-WT vs XRX Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 239.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while XRX trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to XRX's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check XRX's competition here
PSFE-WT vs III Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while III trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas III's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to III's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check III's competition here
PSFE-WT vs DVLT Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while DVLT trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check DVLT's competition here
PSFE-WT vs TSSI Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 187.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while TSSI trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check TSSI's competition here
PSFE-WT vs SRT Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check SRT's competition here
PSFE-WT vs LZMH Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while LZMH trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check LZMH's competition here
PSFE-WT vs CTG Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check CTG's competition here
PSFE-WT vs UIS Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 159.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while UIS trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check UIS's competition here
PSFE-WT vs TTEC Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 110.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while TTEC trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check TTEC's competition here
PSFE-WT vs ALYA Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check ALYA's competition here
PSFE-WT vs DMRC Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 105.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while DMRC trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check DMRC's competition here
PSFE-WT vs CSPI Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while CSPI trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -182.20. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check CSPI's competition here
PSFE-WT vs CTM Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while CTM trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -15.29. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check CTM's competition here
PSFE-WT vs KOID Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KOID has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while KOID trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas KOID's P/E ratio is 44.57. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KOID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to KOID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check KOID's competition here
PSFE-WT vs XRXDW Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while XRXDW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check XRXDW's competition here
PSFE-WT vs JFU Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while JFU trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check JFU's competition here
PSFE-WT vs WYY Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while WYY trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -20.42. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check WYY's competition here
PSFE-WT vs USIO Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while USIO trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to USIO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check USIO's competition here
PSFE-WT vs GMM Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while GMM trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GMM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check GMM's competition here
PSFE-WT vs DTST Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while DTST trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DTST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check DTST's competition here
PSFE-WT vs CLPS Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while CLPS trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check CLPS's competition here
PSFE-WT vs CHOW Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while CHOW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHOW's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check CHOW's competition here
PSFE-WT vs NOTE Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while NOTE trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check NOTE's competition here
PSFE-WT vs VEEA Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while VEEA trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is 1.11. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check VEEA's competition here
PSFE-WT vs VEEAW Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while VEEAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check VEEAW's competition here
PSFE-WT vs SAIH Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while SAIH trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check SAIH's competition here
PSFE-WT vs SGLB Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check SGLB's competition here
PSFE-WT vs LHSW Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while LHSW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check LHSW's competition here
PSFE-WT vs GLE Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while GLE trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GLE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check GLE's competition here
PSFE-WT vs ARBB Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while ARBB trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check ARBB's competition here
PSFE-WT vs CYCU Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while CYCU trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check CYCU's competition here
PSFE-WT vs SASI Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SASI's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check SASI's competition here
PSFE-WT vs WAVD Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -3.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check WAVD's competition here
PSFE-WT vs TDTH Comparison February 2026
PSFE-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSFE-WT stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSFE-WT is priced at $0.08, while TDTH trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSFE-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, PSFE-WT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +5.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PSFE-WT is more volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSFE-WT.Check TDTH's competition here