Phunware, Inc.
Phunware, Inc. (PHUN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PHUN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHUN | $2.73 | +5.81% | 55.1M | -4.33 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| SAP | $271.11 | +0.71% | 316B | 41.76 | $6.49 | +0.97% |
| CRM | $248.29 | +1.00% | 237.3B | 38.84 | $6.39 | +0.66% |
| UBER | $96.79 | +2.72% | 201.8B | 16.49 | $5.87 | N/A |
| INTU | $662.66 | -5.03% | 184.8B | 53.96 | $12.28 | +0.63% |
| SHOP | $142.11 | +3.97% | 184.7B | 78.95 | $1.80 | N/A |
| NOW | $886.75 | +1.12% | 184.3B | 111.06 | $7.98 | N/A |
| APP | $441.68 | +5.47% | 149.4B | 60.50 | $7.30 | N/A |
| MSTR | $358.13 | +6.09% | 101.5B | 25.11 | $14.26 | N/A |
| CDNS | $349.63 | +0.59% | 95.3B | 95.01 | $3.68 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PHUN vs SAP Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 316B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while SAP trades at $271.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 41.76. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check SAP's competition here
PHUN vs CRM Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 237.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while CRM trades at $248.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 38.84. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check CRM's competition here
PHUN vs UBER Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 201.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while UBER trades at $96.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check UBER's competition here
PHUN vs INTU Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 184.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while INTU trades at $662.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 53.96. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check INTU's competition here
PHUN vs SHOP Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 184.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while SHOP trades at $142.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 78.95. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check SHOP's competition here
PHUN vs NOW Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 184.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while NOW trades at $886.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 111.06. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check NOW's competition here
PHUN vs APP Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 149.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while APP trades at $441.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check APP's competition here
PHUN vs MSTR Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 101.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while MSTR trades at $358.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MSTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check MSTR's competition here
PHUN vs CDNS Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while CDNS trades at $349.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 95.01. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check CDNS's competition here
PHUN vs SNOW Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while SNOW trades at $196.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -46.76. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check SNOW's competition here
PHUN vs ADSK Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while ADSK trades at $290.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 62.40. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check ADSK's competition here
PHUN vs WDAY Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while WDAY trades at $221.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 122.93. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check WDAY's competition here
PHUN vs DDOG Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while DDOG trades at $131.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 364.50. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check DDOG's competition here
PHUN vs TEAM Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while TEAM trades at $170.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -172.52. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check TEAM's competition here
PHUN vs FICO Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while FICO trades at $1,415.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 55.39. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check FICO's competition here
PHUN vs ANSS Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check ANSS's competition here
PHUN vs STRF Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while STRF trades at $111.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STRF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check STRF's competition here
PHUN vs TTD Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while TTD trades at $53.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 64.10. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check TTD's competition here
PHUN vs PTC Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while PTC trades at $215.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 50.48. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check PTC's competition here
PHUN vs STRK Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while STRK trades at $96.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STRK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check STRK's competition here
PHUN vs HUBS Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while HUBS trades at $474.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -2061.98. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check HUBS's competition here
PHUN vs ZM Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while ZM trades at $82.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check ZM's competition here
PHUN vs TYL Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while TYL trades at $561.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 80.24. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check TYL's competition here
PHUN vs SSNC Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while SSNC trades at $90.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 28.45. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check SSNC's competition here
PHUN vs GRAB Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while GRAB trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 256.50. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check GRAB's competition here
PHUN vs GWRE Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while GWRE trades at $213.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 522.06. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check GWRE's competition here
PHUN vs AZPN Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check AZPN's competition here
PHUN vs U Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while U trades at $39.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas U's P/E ratio is -36.91. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check U's competition here
PHUN vs BSY Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while BSY trades at $54.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 70.06. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check BSY's competition here
PHUN vs DUOL Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while DUOL trades at $331.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 136.01. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check DUOL's competition here
PHUN vs DOCU Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while DOCU trades at $74.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check DOCU's competition here
PHUN vs DT Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while DT trades at $49.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check DT's competition here
PHUN vs QXO Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while QXO trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is 2.16. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QXO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check QXO's competition here
PHUN vs PAYC Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while PAYC trades at $233.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check PAYC's competition here
PHUN vs MANH Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while MANH trades at $216.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 60.41. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check MANH's competition here
PHUN vs BKI Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check BKI's competition here
PHUN vs DAY Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while DAY trades at $69.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 230.63. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check DAY's competition here
PHUN vs XM Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check XM's competition here
PHUN vs CDAY Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check CDAY's competition here
PHUN vs PCOR Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while PCOR trades at $67.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -70.62. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check PCOR's competition here
PHUN vs PCTY Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while PCTY trades at $182.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 45.35. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check PCTY's competition here
PHUN vs APPF Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while APPF trades at $275.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 49.79. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check APPF's competition here
PHUN vs TTAN Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while TTAN trades at $104.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -28.18. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check TTAN's competition here
PHUN vs SRAD Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while SRAD trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 79.07. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check SRAD's competition here
PHUN vs PEGA Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while PEGA trades at $52.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 43.74. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check PEGA's competition here
PHUN vs MNDY Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while MNDY trades at $177.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 234.07. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check MNDY's competition here
PHUN vs NICE Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while NICE trades at $142.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check NICE's competition here
PHUN vs DSGX Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while DSGX trades at $101.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 61.44. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check DSGX's competition here
PHUN vs ESTC Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while ESTC trades at $80.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -76.98. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check ESTC's competition here
PHUN vs OTEX Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while OTEX trades at $32.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check OTEX's competition here
PHUN vs CVLT Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while CVLT trades at $181.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 101.71. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check CVLT's competition here
PHUN vs NATI Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check NATI's competition here
PHUN vs SMAR Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SMAR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check SMAR's competition here
PHUN vs BULL Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while BULL trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check BULL's competition here
PHUN vs GTLB Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while GTLB trades at $45.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 502.00. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check GTLB's competition here
PHUN vs LIF Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while LIF trades at $90.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 237.42. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check LIF's competition here
PHUN vs IDCC Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while IDCC trades at $266.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check IDCC's competition here
PHUN vs LYFT Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while LYFT trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 73.96. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check LYFT's competition here
PHUN vs COUP Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check COUP's competition here
PHUN vs CWAN Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while CWAN trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check CWAN's competition here
PHUN vs SOUNW Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, SOUNW has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while SOUNW trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas SOUNW's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SOUNW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to SOUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check SOUNW's competition here
PHUN vs FROG Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while FROG trades at $47.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -61.09. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check FROG's competition here
PHUN vs SOUN Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while SOUN trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -18.47. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check SOUN's competition here
PHUN vs QTWO Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while QTWO trades at $79.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 1325.33. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check QTWO's competition here
PHUN vs COMP Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while COMP trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -92.90. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check COMP's competition here
PHUN vs RIOT Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while RIOT trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -33.04. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check RIOT's competition here
PHUN vs ZETA Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while ZETA trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -130.33. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check ZETA's competition here
PHUN vs WK Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while WK trades at $79.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -67.26. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check WK's competition here
PHUN vs BILL Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while BILL trades at $42.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2114.75. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check BILL's competition here
PHUN vs CVT Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check CVT's competition here
PHUN vs VERX Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while VERX trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -78.33. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check VERX's competition here
PHUN vs PYCR Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check PYCR's competition here
PHUN vs FRSH Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while FRSH trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -77.61. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check FRSH's competition here
PHUN vs GBTG Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while GBTG trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -68.92. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check GBTG's competition here
PHUN vs CALX Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while CALX trades at $58.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -142.61. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check CALX's competition here
PHUN vs PWSC Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check PWSC's competition here
PHUN vs AYX Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check AYX's competition here
PHUN vs ENV Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check ENV's competition here
PHUN vs YOU Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while YOU trades at $36.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check YOU's competition here
PHUN vs INTA Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while INTA trades at $42.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -186.17. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check INTA's competition here
PHUN vs INST Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check INST's competition here
PHUN vs ZI Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check ZI's competition here
PHUN vs ASAN Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while ASAN trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check ASAN's competition here
PHUN vs NCNO Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while NCNO trades at $29.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -116.32. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check NCNO's competition here
PHUN vs RUM Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while RUM trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check RUM's competition here
PHUN vs BL Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while BL trades at $53.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 41.84. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check BL's competition here
PHUN vs BLKB Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while BLKB trades at $66.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -12.11. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check BLKB's competition here
PHUN vs AGYS Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while AGYS trades at $110.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 225.57. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check AGYS's competition here
PHUN vs GRND Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while GRND trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -40.51. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GRND's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check GRND's competition here
PHUN vs RUMBW Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while RUMBW trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check RUMBW's competition here
PHUN vs ALRM Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while ALRM trades at $59.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check ALRM's competition here
PHUN vs NATL Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while NATL trades at $39.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check NATL's competition here
PHUN vs BRZE Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while BRZE trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -26.63. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check BRZE's competition here
PHUN vs RNG Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while RNG trades at $30.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is -237.38. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check RNG's competition here
PHUN vs CLSK Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while CLSK trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CLSK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check CLSK's competition here
PHUN vs DAVE Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while DAVE trades at $199.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 52.65. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check DAVE's competition here
PHUN vs DV Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, DV has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while DV trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas DV's P/E ratio is 52.06. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is more volatile compared to DV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check DV's competition here
PHUN vs ALKT Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while ALKT trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -66.53. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check ALKT's competition here
PHUN vs BTDR Comparison August 2025
PHUN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHUN stands at 55.1M. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHUN is priced at $2.73, while BTDR trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHUN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.33, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, PHUN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PHUN is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHUN.Check BTDR's competition here