PAR Technology Corporation
PAR Technology Corporation PAR Peers
See (PAR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAR | $69.22 | -0.86% | 2.80B | -27.14 | -$2.55 | N/A |
| SAP | $298.81 | +0.81% | 348.59B | 54.83 | $5.45 | +0.69% |
| CRM | $287.41 | -1.28% | 275.76B | 45.26 | $6.35 | +0.56% |
| NOW | $1,025.91 | -1.37% | 212.36B | 138.82 | $7.39 | N/A |
| UBER | $92.46 | +0.73% | 193.35B | 16.19 | $5.71 | N/A |
| INTU | $670.86 | +0.09% | 187.55B | 62.93 | $10.66 | +0.60% |
| SHOP | $106.15 | +4.34% | 137.45B | 68.48 | $1.55 | N/A |
| APP | $370.63 | +2.29% | 125.21B | 66.90 | $5.54 | N/A |
| MSTR | $413.42 | +3.41% | 113.20B | -18.60 | -$22.23 | N/A |
| CDNS | $320.30 | -0.39% | 87.46B | 80.88 | $3.96 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PAR vs SAP Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 348.59B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while SAP trades at $298.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 54.83. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs CRM Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 275.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while CRM trades at $287.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 45.26. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs NOW Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 212.36B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while NOW trades at $1,025.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 138.82. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs UBER Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 193.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while UBER trades at $92.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs INTU Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 187.55B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while INTU trades at $670.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 62.93. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs SHOP Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 137.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while SHOP trades at $106.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 68.48. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs APP Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 125.21B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while APP trades at $370.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 66.90. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs MSTR Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 113.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while MSTR trades at $413.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs CDNS Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 87.46B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while CDNS trades at $320.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 80.88. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs WDAY Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 73.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while WDAY trades at $273.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 140.88. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs ADSK Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 63.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while ADSK trades at $295.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 57.68. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs SNOW Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 60.73B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while SNOW trades at $182.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -47.16. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs TEAM Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 56.46B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while TEAM trades at $214.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -129.20. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs FICO Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 53.67B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while FICO trades at $2,204.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 95.15. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs DDOG Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 40.22B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while DDOG trades at $116.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 247.79. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs TTD Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 37.51B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while TTD trades at $76.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 93.07. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs HUBS Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 34.17B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while HUBS trades at $647.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1408.61. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs ANSS Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 30.24B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while ANSS trades at $343.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 51.19. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs ZM Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 25.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while ZM trades at $83.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs STRK Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 24.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while STRK trades at $98.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs TYL Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while TYL trades at $574.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 86.64. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs STRF Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 23.90B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while STRF trades at $98.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs DUOL Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 23.65B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while DUOL trades at $520.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 258.82. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs PTC Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.68B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while PTC trades at $172.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 47.23. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs GRAB Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 20.09B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while GRAB trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 508.00. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs SSNC Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while SSNC trades at $80.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs DOCU Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 18.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while DOCU trades at $91.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs GWRE Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 18.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while GWRE trades at $215.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is -1076.45. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GWRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs AZPN Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.73B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs DT Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 15.94B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while DT trades at $53.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs PAYC Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 15.03B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while PAYC trades at $259.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 36.97. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs MNDY Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.73B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while MNDY trades at $290.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 290.10. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs BSY Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 14.04B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while BSY trades at $48.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 61.67. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs BKI Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.88B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs TTAN Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 11.73B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while TTAN trades at $129.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -15.17. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs MANH Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.72B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while MANH trades at $193.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 55.16. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs PCTY Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 11.07B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while PCTY trades at $200.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 50.10. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs XM Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11.01B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs CDAY Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.85B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs NICE Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while NICE trades at $168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs PCOR Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.43B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while PCOR trades at $69.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -81.31. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs ESTC Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while ESTC trades at $92.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -70.41. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs DSGX Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while DSGX trades at $112.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 68.86. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs DAY Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.52B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while DAY trades at $59.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 372.25. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs U Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 9.25B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while U trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas U's P/E ratio is -19.87. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs QXO Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 9.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while QXO trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -50.03. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs PEGA Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while PEGA trades at $98.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 45.57. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs GTLB Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 8.09B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while GTLB trades at $48.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -1223.75. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs NATI Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs SMAR Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.91B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs CVLT Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.86B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while CVLT trades at $178.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 106.68. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs APPF Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.73B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while APPF trades at $214.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 40.04. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR and APPF have similar daily volatility (1.90).
PAR vs SRAD Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 7.43B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while SRAD trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 125.79. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs OTEX Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.29B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while OTEX trades at $28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs LYFT Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.91B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while LYFT trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 111.73. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs CWAN Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.66B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while CWAN trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs COUP Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COUP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs VERX Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 6.11B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while VERX trades at $38.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -132.79. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs SYT Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, SYT has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while SYT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas SYT's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SYT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to SYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs IDCC Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.64B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while IDCC trades at $217.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs QTWO Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.61B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while QTWO trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -264.71. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs BULL Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.50B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while BULL trades at $11.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -10.54. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs ETWO-WT Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5.36B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs FROG Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.89B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while FROG trades at $42.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -60.08. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs BILL Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while BILL trades at $46.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2319.50. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs GRND Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while GRND trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -39.67. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs INTA Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while INTA trades at $57.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -238.63. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs LIF Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while LIF trades at $60.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 464.38. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs RUMBW Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while RUMBW trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs FRSH Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while FRSH trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -61.87. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs RUM Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while RUM trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs ASAN Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 4.26B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while ASAN trades at $18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -16.28. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs CVT Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs SOUN Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while SOUN trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -16.84. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs PYCR Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs WK Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while WK trades at $70.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -60.38. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs PWSC Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs ZI Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs BRZE Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while BRZE trades at $35.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -34.76. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs AYX Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs ENV Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs INST Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs BL Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while BL trades at $54.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 39.76. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs ZETA Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while ZETA trades at $13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -55.14. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs COMP Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while COMP trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -47.85. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs RIOT Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while RIOT trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs ALKT Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while ALKT trades at $30.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -82.97. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs BLKB Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while BLKB trades at $63.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs ALIT Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while ALIT trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -95.25. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs BTDR Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while BTDR trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs CALX Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while CALX trades at $46.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -88.79. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs ALRM Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while ALRM trades at $58.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs GBTG Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while GBTG trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -60.65. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs NCNO Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while NCNO trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs CLSK Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while CLSK trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs PRGS Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while PRGS trades at $62.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 49.52. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs DCT Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs RNG Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while RNG trades at $27.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is -63.47. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RNG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.
PAR vs DAVE Comparison
PAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAR stands at 2.80B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, PAR is priced at $69.22, while DAVE trades at $182.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAR currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 51.40. In terms of profitability, PAR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PAR is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAR.