Marti Technologies, Inc.
Marti Technologies, Inc. MRT Peers
See (MRT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRT | $2.99 | +0.17% | 228.7M | -2.40 | -$1.25 | N/A |
| SAP | $298.16 | +0.00% | 354.3B | 54.43 | $5.58 | +0.87% |
| CRM | $269.21 | +0.00% | 260.2B | 42.52 | $6.40 | +0.60% |
| INTU | $773.70 | +0.00% | 220.4B | 64.49 | $12.25 | +0.51% |
| NOW | $1,009.76 | +0.00% | 216.4B | 141.75 | $7.37 | N/A |
| UBER | $92.05 | +0.00% | 195.8B | 16.40 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $114.77 | +0.00% | 151.7B | 94.72 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $336.00 | +0.00% | 115.3B | 61.61 | $5.53 | N/A |
| MSTR | $402.28 | +0.00% | 110.6B | -18.18 | -$22.25 | N/A |
| CDNS | $310.95 | +0.00% | 89.4B | 82.89 | $3.95 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MRT vs SAP Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 354.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while SAP trades at $298.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 54.43. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs CRM Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 260.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while CRM trades at $269.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 42.52. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs INTU Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 220.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while INTU trades at $773.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 64.49. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs NOW Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 216.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while NOW trades at $1,009.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 141.75. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs UBER Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 195.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while UBER trades at $92.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs SHOP Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 151.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while SHOP trades at $114.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 94.72. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs APP Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 115.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while APP trades at $336.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 61.61. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs MSTR Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 110.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while MSTR trades at $402.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.18. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs CDNS Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while CDNS trades at $310.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 82.89. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs SNOW Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while SNOW trades at $217.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -52.74. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs ADSK Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 67.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while ADSK trades at $310.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 67.67. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs WDAY Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while WDAY trades at $237.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 133.57. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs TEAM Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while TEAM trades at $206.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -129.53. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs DDOG Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while DDOG trades at $135.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 330.11. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs FICO Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while FICO trades at $1,842.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 79.70. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs TTD Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while TTD trades at $73.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 90.49. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs ANSS Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while ANSS trades at $353.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 54.60. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs STRK Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while STRK trades at $118.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs HUBS Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while HUBS trades at $546.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1304.33. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs STRF Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while STRF trades at $114.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs TYL Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while TYL trades at $583.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 88.73. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs ZM Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while ZM trades at $77.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs PTC Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while PTC trades at $173.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 48.35. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs SSNC Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while SSNC trades at $83.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs GWRE Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while GWRE trades at $227.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 535.77. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs GRAB Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while GRAB trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 488.50. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs DUOL Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while DUOL trades at $397.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 194.40. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs DT Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while DT trades at $54.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs AZPN Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs BSY Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while BSY trades at $54.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs DOCU Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while DOCU trades at $77.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs MNDY Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while MNDY trades at $299.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 304.36. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs PAYC Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while PAYC trades at $228.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs QXO Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while QXO trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -62.80. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs MANH Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while MANH trades at $198.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 57.12. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs BKI Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs XM Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs PCOR Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while PCOR trades at $70.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -85.01. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs U Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while U trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas U's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs CDAY Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs NICE Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while NICE trades at $168.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs PCTY Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while PCTY trades at $180.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs TTAN Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while TTAN trades at $108.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -29.49. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs ESTC Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while ESTC trades at $84.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -83.85. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs DAY Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while DAY trades at $55.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 357.34. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs DSGX Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while DSGX trades at $101.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 63.23. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs SRAD Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while SRAD trades at $27.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 141.15. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs APPF Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while APPF trades at $232.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 43.85. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs NATI Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs SMAR Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs OTEX Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while OTEX trades at $29.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs CVLT Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while CVLT trades at $170.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 103.28. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs GTLB Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while GTLB trades at $45.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 515.22. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs LYFT Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while LYFT trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 107.67. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs BULL Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while BULL trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs CWAN Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while CWAN trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs COUP Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs QTWO Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while QTWO trades at $92.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -278.21. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs IDCC Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while IDCC trades at $221.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs DAVEW Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while DAVEW trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs VERX Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while VERX trades at $34.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -122.24. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs LIF Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while LIF trades at $63.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 505.38. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs BILL Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while BILL trades at $46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2410.50. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs FROG Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while FROG trades at $41.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -59.15. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs PEGA Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while PEGA trades at $52.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 50.69. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs FRSH Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while FRSH trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -63.33. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs RUMBW Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while RUMBW trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs SOUN Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while SOUN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -18.11. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs GRND Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while GRND trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -37.55. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs ETWO-WT Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs RIOT Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while RIOT trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs CVT Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs PYCR Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs RUM Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while RUM trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs INTA Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while INTA trades at $47.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -202.50. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs WK Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while WK trades at $67.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -59.67. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs PWSC Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs ZI Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs DAVE Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while DAVE trades at $270.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 78.68. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs ZETA Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while ZETA trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -61.80. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs BL Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while BL trades at $56.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 41.89. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs AYX Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs CALX Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while CALX trades at $52.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -103.71. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs ENV Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs INST Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs CLSK Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while CLSK trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs COMP Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while COMP trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -49.38. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs NCNO Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while NCNO trades at $27.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -114.80. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs ASAN Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while ASAN trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -13.97. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs KC Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while KC trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -11.02. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs AGYS Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while AGYS trades at $112.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 140.60. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs BRZE Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while BRZE trades at $28.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -28.51. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs BLKB Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while BLKB trades at $64.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs ALKT Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while ALKT trades at $29.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -82.81. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs ALIT Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while ALIT trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -99.67. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs GBTG Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while GBTG trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -64.70. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs ALRM Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while ALRM trades at $57.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs PAR Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while PAR trades at $67.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -27.26. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.
MRT vs BTDR Comparison
MRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRT stands at 228.7M. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRT is priced at $2.99, while BTDR trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.40, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, MRT's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MRT is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRT.