Meta Materials Inc.
Meta Materials Inc. (MMAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MMAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMAT | $0.53 | -17.84% | 3.5M | -0.01 | -$65.82 | N/A |
| APH | $110.74 | +0.83% | 135.2B | 44.11 | $2.51 | +0.60% |
| TEL | $206.97 | +0.33% | 61.1B | 42.58 | $4.86 | +1.29% |
| GLW | $65.76 | +0.03% | 56.3B | 69.95 | $0.94 | +1.70% |
| GRMN | $235.06 | -0.64% | 45.2B | 29.06 | $8.09 | +1.34% |
| BMNR | $60.45 | -1.91% | 31B | -19.95 | -$3.03 | N/A |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $164.48 | -3.37% | 28.3B | 38.60 | $4.26 | N/A |
| TDY | $541.92 | -1.49% | 25.4B | 29.92 | $18.12 | N/A |
| JBL | $217.40 | -0.77% | 23.3B | 41.40 | $5.25 | +0.15% |
Stock Comparison
MMAT vs APH Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while APH trades at $110.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 44.11. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check APH's competition here
MMAT vs TEL Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while TEL trades at $206.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 42.58. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check TEL's competition here
MMAT vs GLW Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while GLW trades at $65.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 69.95. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check GLW's competition here
MMAT vs GRMN Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while GRMN trades at $235.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check GRMN's competition here
MMAT vs BMNR Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while BMNR trades at $60.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -19.95. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check BMNR's competition here
MMAT vs IIVI Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check IIVI's competition here
MMAT vs KEYS Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while KEYS trades at $164.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.60. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check KEYS's competition here
MMAT vs TDY Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while TDY trades at $541.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check TDY's competition here
MMAT vs JBL Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while JBL trades at $217.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 41.40. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check JBL's competition here
MMAT vs CLS Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while CLS trades at $196.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 42.83. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check CLS's competition here
MMAT vs TRMB Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while TRMB trades at $83.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 71.51. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check TRMB's competition here
MMAT vs FLEX Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while FLEX trades at $49.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check FLEX's competition here
MMAT vs FTV Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while FTV trades at $47.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check FTV's competition here
MMAT vs COHR Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while COHR trades at $91.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -416.55. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check COHR's competition here
MMAT vs FN Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while FN trades at $322.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 35.90. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check FN's competition here
MMAT vs CGNX Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while CGNX trades at $43.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 60.44. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check CGNX's competition here
MMAT vs MKSI Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while MKSI trades at $104.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MKSI's competition here
MMAT vs SNDK Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while SNDK trades at $46.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SNDK's competition here
MMAT vs LFUS Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while LFUS trades at $256.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 59.75. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check LFUS's competition here
MMAT vs VNT Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while VNT trades at $43.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check VNT's competition here
MMAT vs SANM Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while SANM trades at $116.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SANM's competition here
MMAT vs ITRI Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while ITRI trades at $125.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ITRI's competition here
MMAT vs BMI Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while BMI trades at $191.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 41.53. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check BMI's competition here
MMAT vs ESE Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while ESE trades at $188.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 44.24. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ESE's competition here
MMAT vs ST Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while ST trades at $32.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 43.25. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ST's competition here
MMAT vs TTMI Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while TTMI trades at $42.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 47.89. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check TTMI's competition here
MMAT vs NOVT Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while NOVT trades at $118.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 70.34. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check NOVT's competition here
MMAT vs OSIS Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while OSIS trades at $233.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OSIS's competition here
MMAT vs PLXS Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while PLXS trades at $132.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check PLXS's competition here
MMAT vs OUSTW Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while OUSTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is less volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OUSTW's competition here
MMAT vs VICR Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while VICR trades at $47.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check VICR's competition here
MMAT vs OUST Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while OUST trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -19.49. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OUST's competition here
MMAT vs OUSTZ Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while OUSTZ trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OUSTZ's competition here
MMAT vs BELFB Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while BELFB trades at $132.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 33.71. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check BELFB's competition here
MMAT vs BELFA Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while BELFA trades at $113.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 28.99. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check BELFA's competition here
MMAT vs BHE Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while BHE trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 38.38. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check BHE's competition here
MMAT vs ROG Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while ROG trades at $76.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -21.68. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ROG's competition here
MMAT vs PENG Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while PENG trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -83.34. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check PENG's competition here
MMAT vs CTS Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while CTS trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check CTS's competition here
MMAT vs FARO Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check FARO's competition here
MMAT vs DAKT Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 840.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while DAKT trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is -81.52. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to DAKT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check DAKT's competition here
MMAT vs ALNT Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 745.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while ALNT trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 51.76. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ALNT's competition here
MMAT vs OUST-WTA Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
MMAT vs BKSY-WT Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 655.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
MMAT vs BKSY Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 644M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while BKSY trades at $18.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check BKSY's competition here
MMAT vs LYTS Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 581.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while LYTS trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check LYTS's competition here
MMAT vs AMOT Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check AMOT's competition here
MMAT vs OUST-WT Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OUST-WT's competition here
MMAT vs SATL Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 376.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while SATL trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SATL's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SATL's competition here
MMAT vs MLAB Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 373.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while MLAB trades at $67.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -522.23. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MLAB's competition here
MMAT vs VPG Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 370.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while VPG trades at $27.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is -310.00. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to VPG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check VPG's competition here
MMAT vs NEON Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 361.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while NEON trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -58.27. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check NEON's competition here
MMAT vs SATLW Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 351.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while SATLW trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SATLW's competition here
MMAT vs MVIS Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 343.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while MVIS trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MVIS's competition here
MMAT vs KOPN Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 311M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while KOPN trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -31.83. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check KOPN's competition here
MMAT vs VLDR Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check VLDR's competition here
MMAT vs MEI Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while MEI trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MEI's competition here
MMAT vs KULR Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 203.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while KULR trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check KULR's competition here
MMAT vs EMAN Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check EMAN's competition here
MMAT vs LPTH Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 156.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while LPTH trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -14.56. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check LPTH's competition here
MMAT vs RELL Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 140.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while RELL trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -123.06. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check RELL's competition here
MMAT vs MPTI Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 121.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while MPTI trades at $41.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MPTI's competition here
MMAT vs MIND Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while MIND trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 2.31. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MIND's competition here
MMAT vs WRAP Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while WRAP trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check WRAP's competition here
MMAT vs LINK Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while LINK trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -31.46. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check LINK's competition here
MMAT vs GNSS Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 74.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while GNSS trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check GNSS's competition here
MMAT vs ELTK Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while ELTK trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ELTK's competition here
MMAT vs ODYS Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 64.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while ODYS trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ODYS's competition here
MMAT vs WBX Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while WBX trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check WBX's competition here
MMAT vs OPTX Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while OPTX trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 150.00. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OPTX's competition here
MMAT vs REFR Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while REFR trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -30.40. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check REFR's competition here
MMAT vs SOTK Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while SOTK trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SOTK's competition here
MMAT vs DSWL Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 49.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while DSWL trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check DSWL's competition here
MMAT vs CPSH Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while CPSH trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to CPSH's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check CPSH's competition here
MMAT vs LGL Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while LGL trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 87.22. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check LGL's competition here
MMAT vs SELX Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while SELX trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -24.74. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SELX's competition here
MMAT vs ISNS Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ISNS's competition here
MMAT vs LUNA Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while LUNA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check LUNA's competition here
MMAT vs SVRE Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while SVRE trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SVRE's competition here
MMAT vs DAIO Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while DAIO trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -11.89. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check DAIO's competition here
MMAT vs NSYS Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while NSYS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check NSYS's competition here
MMAT vs TMPOW Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check TMPOW's competition here
MMAT vs HOLO Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while HOLO trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check HOLO's competition here
MMAT vs HOLOW Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while HOLOW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check HOLOW's competition here
MMAT vs MTEK Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while MTEK trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -15.06. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MTEK's competition here
MMAT vs SGMA Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SGMA's competition here
MMAT vs VIAO Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check VIAO's competition here
MMAT vs KNW Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to KNW's ROE of +873.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check KNW's competition here
MMAT vs SLNHP Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while SLNHP trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SLNHP's competition here
MMAT vs ELSE Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while ELSE trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 35.77. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ELSE's competition here
MMAT vs FCUV Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while FCUV trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check FCUV's competition here
MMAT vs SLNH Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while SLNH trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SLNH's competition here
MMAT vs SVREW Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while SVREW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SVREW's competition here
MMAT vs OST Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while OST trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OST's competition here
MMAT vs WATT Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while WATT trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to WATT's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check WATT's competition here
MMAT vs BNSO Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check BNSO's competition here
MMAT vs MINDP Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MINDP's competition here
MMAT vs SOBR Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while SOBR trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SOBR's competition here
MMAT vs IMTE Comparison August 2025
MMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53, while IMTE trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check IMTE's competition here