LSI Industries Inc.
LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LYTS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYTS | $18.67 | -0.85% | 560.2M | 25.93 | $0.72 | +1.06% |
| APH | $106.70 | +1.59% | 129.1B | 42.51 | $2.51 | +0.63% |
| TEL | $209.31 | +0.60% | 62.1B | 42.98 | $4.87 | +1.28% |
| GLW | $55.46 | +0.18% | 47.5B | 106.64 | $0.52 | +2.02% |
| GRMN | $236.27 | +0.27% | 45.5B | 31.13 | $7.59 | +1.34% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $166.58 | +0.08% | 28.7B | 39.10 | $4.26 | N/A |
| TDY | $556.96 | +0.19% | 26.1B | 30.74 | $18.12 | N/A |
| JBL | $224.76 | +0.99% | 24.1B | 42.81 | $5.25 | +0.14% |
| TRMB | $85.07 | -0.19% | 20.3B | 13.88 | $6.13 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LYTS vs APH Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 129.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while APH trades at $106.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 42.51. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check APH's competition here
LYTS vs TEL Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while TEL trades at $209.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check TEL's competition here
LYTS vs GLW Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while GLW trades at $55.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 106.64. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check GLW's competition here
LYTS vs GRMN Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while GRMN trades at $236.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check GRMN's competition here
LYTS vs IIVI Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check IIVI's competition here
LYTS vs KEYS Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while KEYS trades at $166.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 39.10. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check KEYS's competition here
LYTS vs TDY Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while TDY trades at $556.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check TDY's competition here
LYTS vs JBL Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while JBL trades at $224.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 42.81. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check JBL's competition here
LYTS vs TRMB Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while TRMB trades at $85.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check TRMB's competition here
LYTS vs CLS Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while CLS trades at $173.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 48.61. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check CLS's competition here
LYTS vs FLEX Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while FLEX trades at $50.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check FLEX's competition here
LYTS vs FTV Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while FTV trades at $51.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check FTV's competition here
LYTS vs COHR Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while COHR trades at $104.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -474.09. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check COHR's competition here
LYTS vs FN Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while FN trades at $316.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check FN's competition here
LYTS vs MKSI Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while MKSI trades at $102.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 30.46. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check MKSI's competition here
LYTS vs ITRI Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while ITRI trades at $136.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check ITRI's competition here
LYTS vs SNDK Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while SNDK trades at $41.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check SNDK's competition here
LYTS vs VNT Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while VNT trades at $39.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check VNT's competition here
LYTS vs LFUS Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while LFUS trades at $237.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 62.09. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check LFUS's competition here
LYTS vs CGNX Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while CGNX trades at $34.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 50.19. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check CGNX's competition here
LYTS vs BMI Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while BMI trades at $192.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 41.98. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check BMI's competition here
LYTS vs SANM Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while SANM trades at $98.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check SANM's competition here
LYTS vs ESE Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while ESE trades at $190.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check ESE's competition here
LYTS vs ST Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while ST trades at $32.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 40.67. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check ST's competition here
LYTS vs TTMI Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while TTMI trades at $45.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 61.27. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check TTMI's competition here
LYTS vs NOVT Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while NOVT trades at $124.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 63.91. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check NOVT's competition here
LYTS vs OSIS Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while OSIS trades at $224.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check OSIS's competition here
LYTS vs PLXS Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while PLXS trades at $124.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check PLXS's competition here
LYTS vs VICR Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while VICR trades at $45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check VICR's competition here
LYTS vs BMNR Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while BMNR trades at $35.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -11.57. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check BMNR's competition here
LYTS vs BELFB Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while BELFB trades at $126.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check BELFB's competition here
LYTS vs BELFA Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while BELFA trades at $113.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check BELFA's competition here
LYTS vs BHE Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while BHE trades at $39.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check BHE's competition here
LYTS vs OUST Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while OUST trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check OUST's competition here
LYTS vs PENG Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while PENG trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -86.45. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check PENG's competition here
LYTS vs CTS Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while CTS trades at $41.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check CTS's competition here
LYTS vs ROG Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while ROG trades at $66.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 73.46. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check ROG's competition here
LYTS vs FARO Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check FARO's competition here
LYTS vs DAKT Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 828.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while DAKT trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is -80.29. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAKT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check DAKT's competition here
LYTS vs BKSY-WT Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 724.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
LYTS vs OUST-WTA Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
LYTS vs ALNT Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 675.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while ALNT trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 68.81. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check ALNT's competition here
LYTS vs BKSY Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 674.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while BKSY trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check BKSY's competition here
LYTS vs AMOT Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check AMOT's competition here
LYTS vs OUST-WT Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check OUST-WT's competition here
LYTS vs MLAB Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 425M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while MLAB trades at $77.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -214.61. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check MLAB's competition here
LYTS vs NEON Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while NEON trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -68.22. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check NEON's competition here
LYTS vs SATLW Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 381M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while SATLW trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check SATLW's competition here
LYTS vs VPG Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 373.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while VPG trades at $28.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 122.54. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check VPG's competition here
LYTS vs SATL Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 369.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while SATL trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check SATL's competition here
LYTS vs KOPN Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 314.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while KOPN trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -24.12. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check KOPN's competition here
LYTS vs MVIS Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 306.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while MVIS trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check MVIS's competition here
LYTS vs VLDR Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check VLDR's competition here
LYTS vs MEI Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while MEI trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check MEI's competition here
LYTS vs KULR Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 229.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while KULR trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check KULR's competition here
LYTS vs EMAN Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check EMAN's competition here
LYTS vs RELL Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while RELL trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -137.50. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check RELL's competition here
LYTS vs LPTH Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 130.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while LPTH trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -12.16. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check LPTH's competition here
LYTS vs MPTI Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 129.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while MPTI trades at $44.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check MPTI's competition here
LYTS vs WBX Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while WBX trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check WBX's competition here
LYTS vs GNSS Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while GNSS trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check GNSS's competition here
LYTS vs MIND Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while MIND trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 2.31. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check MIND's competition here
LYTS vs OPTX Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while OPTX trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 210.00. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check OPTX's competition here
LYTS vs ODYS Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while ODYS trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check ODYS's competition here
LYTS vs ELTK Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 69.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while ELTK trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check ELTK's competition here
LYTS vs WRAP Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while WRAP trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -8.56. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check WRAP's competition here
LYTS vs LINK Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while LINK trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -28.25. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check LINK's competition here
LYTS vs REFR Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while REFR trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -42.75. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check REFR's competition here
LYTS vs SOTK Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while SOTK trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 36.89. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check SOTK's competition here
LYTS vs DSWL Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while DSWL trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check DSWL's competition here
LYTS vs LGL Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 40.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while LGL trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 93.25. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check LGL's competition here
LYTS vs SELX Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while SELX trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -26.25. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check SELX's competition here
LYTS vs SVRE Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while SVRE trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check SVRE's competition here
LYTS vs CPSH Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while CPSH trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check CPSH's competition here
LYTS vs ISNS Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check ISNS's competition here
LYTS vs LUNA Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while LUNA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check LUNA's competition here
LYTS vs DAIO Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while DAIO trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -11.89. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check DAIO's competition here
LYTS vs MTEK Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while MTEK trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -20.06. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check MTEK's competition here
LYTS vs HOLO Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while HOLO trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check HOLO's competition here
LYTS vs TMPOW Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check TMPOW's competition here
LYTS vs NSYS Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while NSYS trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check NSYS's competition here
LYTS vs HOLOW Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while HOLOW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check HOLOW's competition here
LYTS vs FCUV Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while FCUV trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check FCUV's competition here
LYTS vs KNW Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while KNW trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KNW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check KNW's competition here
LYTS vs SGMA Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check SGMA's competition here
LYTS vs VIAO Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check VIAO's competition here
LYTS vs ELSE Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while ELSE trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 44.18. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check ELSE's competition here
LYTS vs WATT Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while WATT trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check WATT's competition here
LYTS vs SLNHP Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while SLNHP trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check SLNHP's competition here
LYTS vs SLNH Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while SLNH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check SLNH's competition here
LYTS vs OST Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while OST trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check OST's competition here
LYTS vs SVREW Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while SVREW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check SVREW's competition here
LYTS vs SOBR Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while SOBR trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check SOBR's competition here
LYTS vs BNSO Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check BNSO's competition here
LYTS vs MINDP Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check MINDP's competition here
LYTS vs OUSTZ Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while OUSTZ trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check OUSTZ's competition here
LYTS vs OPTXW Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while OPTXW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check OPTXW's competition here
LYTS vs IMTE Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while IMTE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check IMTE's competition here
LYTS vs MMAT Comparison July 2025
LYTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYTS stands at 560.2M. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYTS is priced at $18.67, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYTS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.93, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LYTS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYTS is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYTS.Check MMAT's competition here