Lianhe Sowell International Group Ltd Ordinary Shares
Lianhe Sowell International Group Ltd Ordinary Shares (LHSW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LHSW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHSW | $2.29 | +0.44% | 123.2M | 47.40 | $0.05 | N/A |
| IBM | $237.11 | +0.00% | 223.3B | 38.73 | $6.19 | +2.79% |
| ACN | $246.16 | +0.00% | 153.9B | 19.64 | $12.58 | +2.39% |
| FISV | $114.23 | +0.00% | 116.2B | 29.67 | $3.85 | N/A |
| FI | $134.62 | +0.00% | 74.3B | 22.86 | $5.98 | N/A |
| INFY | $16.36 | +0.00% | 68.6B | 21.50 | $0.77 | +3.07% |
| CTSH | $69.37 | +0.00% | 34.2B | 14.20 | $4.93 | +1.74% |
| BR | $259.23 | +0.00% | 30.5B | 36.70 | $7.10 | +1.36% |
| WIT | $2.71 | +0.18% | 28.5B | 18.13 | $0.15 | +4.63% |
| LDOS | $178.44 | +0.00% | 22.8B | 16.76 | $10.60 | +0.89% |
Stock Comparison
LHSW vs IBM Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 223.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while IBM trades at $237.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 38.73. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check IBM's competition here
LHSW vs ACN Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 153.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while ACN trades at $246.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check ACN's competition here
LHSW vs FISV Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while FISV trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check FISV's competition here
LHSW vs FI Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while FI trades at $134.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check FI's competition here
LHSW vs INFY Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while INFY trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check INFY's competition here
LHSW vs CTSH Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while CTSH trades at $69.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check CTSH's competition here
LHSW vs BR Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while BR trades at $259.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 36.70. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check BR's competition here
LHSW vs WIT Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while WIT trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check WIT's competition here
LHSW vs LDOS Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while LDOS trades at $178.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check LDOS's competition here
LHSW vs CDW Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while CDW trades at $166.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check CDW's competition here
LHSW vs GIB Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while GIB trades at $93.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check GIB's competition here
LHSW vs IT Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while IT trades at $243.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IT's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check IT's competition here
LHSW vs AUROW Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while AUROW trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check AUROW's competition here
LHSW vs AUR Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while AUR trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check AUR's competition here
LHSW vs JKHY Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while JKHY trades at $159.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check JKHY's competition here
LHSW vs CACI Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while CACI trades at $490.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check CACI's competition here
LHSW vs EPAM Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while EPAM trades at $159.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check EPAM's competition here
LHSW vs G Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while G trades at $43.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas G's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check G's competition here
LHSW vs DLB Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while DLB trades at $72.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check DLB's competition here
LHSW vs KD Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while KD trades at $30.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check KD's competition here
LHSW vs EXLS Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while EXLS trades at $42.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check EXLS's competition here
LHSW vs WAY Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while WAY trades at $35.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 65.60. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check WAY's competition here
LHSW vs GDS Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while GDS trades at $31.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 285.55. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check GDS's competition here
LHSW vs SAIC Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while SAIC trades at $117.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check SAIC's competition here
LHSW vs PAY Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while PAY trades at $37.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 85.15. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check PAY's competition here
LHSW vs INGM Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while INGM trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check INGM's competition here
LHSW vs NCR Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check NCR's competition here
LHSW vs APLD Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while APLD trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -17.61. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check APLD's competition here
LHSW vs WNS Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while WNS trades at $74.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check WNS's competition here
LHSW vs CD Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while CD trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check CD's competition here
LHSW vs CNXC Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while CNXC trades at $48.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check CNXC's competition here
LHSW vs GLOB Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while GLOB trades at $78.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check GLOB's competition here
LHSW vs CLVT Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while CLVT trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check CLVT's competition here
LHSW vs PRFT Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check PRFT's competition here
LHSW vs DXC Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while DXC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check DXC's competition here
LHSW vs AI Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while AI trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check AI's competition here
LHSW vs BBAI-WT Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while BBAI-WT trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
LHSW vs BBAI Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while BBAI trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check BBAI's competition here
LHSW vs ASGN Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while ASGN trades at $50.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check ASGN's competition here
LHSW vs VNET Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while VNET trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -777.00. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check VNET's competition here
LHSW vs FORTY Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while FORTY trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check FORTY's competition here
LHSW vs VYX Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while VYX trades at $12.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -24.04. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check VYX's competition here
LHSW vs NYAX Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while NYAX trades at $44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 78.36. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check NYAX's competition here
LHSW vs TASK Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while TASK trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check TASK's competition here
LHSW vs FLYW Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while FLYW trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 247.40. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FLYW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check FLYW's competition here
LHSW vs TWKS Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check TWKS's competition here
LHSW vs NABL Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while NABL trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 767.00. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check NABL's competition here
LHSW vs INOD Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while INOD trades at $40.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 31.16. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check INOD's competition here
LHSW vs MGIC Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 999.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while MGIC trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check MGIC's competition here
LHSW vs PSFE-WT Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 863.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
LHSW vs PSFE Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 813.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while PSFE trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -16.32. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check PSFE's competition here
LHSW vs CTLP Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 800.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while CTLP trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check CTLP's competition here
LHSW vs CLVT-PA Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check CLVT-PA's competition here
LHSW vs GDYN Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 652M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while GDYN trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check GDYN's competition here
LHSW vs PHLT Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 601.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while PHLT trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -761.00. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check PHLT's competition here
LHSW vs HCKT Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 557.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while HCKT trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check HCKT's competition here
LHSW vs LZMH Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 507.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while LZMH trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is 334.00. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check LZMH's competition here
LHSW vs XRX Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 505.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while XRX trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to XRX's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check XRX's competition here
LHSW vs TSSI Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 409.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while TSSI trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 46.11. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check TSSI's competition here
LHSW vs TLS Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 403.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while TLS trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check TLS's competition here
LHSW vs IBEX Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 384.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while IBEX trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check IBEX's competition here
LHSW vs CNDT Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 383.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while CNDT trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check CNDT's competition here
LHSW vs SDHIU Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 288.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while SDHIU trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check SDHIU's competition here
LHSW vs UIS Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 281.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while UIS trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check UIS's competition here
LHSW vs BULLZ Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check BULLZ's competition here
LHSW vs III Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, III has a market cap of 234.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while III trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas III's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check III's competition here
LHSW vs DMRC Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 189.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while DMRC trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check DMRC's competition here
LHSW vs SRT Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check SRT's competition here
LHSW vs TTEC Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while TTEC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check TTEC's competition here
LHSW vs CTG Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check CTG's competition here
LHSW vs CSPI Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while CSPI trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -77.78. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check CSPI's competition here
LHSW vs ALYA Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check ALYA's competition here
LHSW vs CTM Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while CTM trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check CTM's competition here
LHSW vs NOTE-WT Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check NOTE-WT's competition here
LHSW vs NOTE Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while NOTE trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check NOTE's competition here
LHSW vs SAIHW Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while SAIHW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check SAIHW's competition here
LHSW vs SAIH Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while SAIH trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check SAIH's competition here
LHSW vs GMM Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 65.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while GMM trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check GMM's competition here
LHSW vs BTCM Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while BTCM trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check BTCM's competition here
LHSW vs DVLT Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while DVLT trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check DVLT's competition here
LHSW vs USIO Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while USIO trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check USIO's competition here
LHSW vs WYY Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while WYY trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check WYY's competition here
LHSW vs DTST Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while DTST trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 224.50. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check DTST's competition here
LHSW vs VEEA Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while VEEA trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +12.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check VEEA's competition here
LHSW vs CLPS Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while CLPS trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -18.47. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check CLPS's competition here
LHSW vs VEEAW Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while VEEAW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +11.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check VEEAW's competition here
LHSW vs JFU Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while JFU trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check JFU's competition here
LHSW vs CYCUW Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while CYCUW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is less volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check CYCUW's competition here
LHSW vs GLE Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while GLE trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check GLE's competition here
LHSW vs SGLB Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -9.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check SGLB's competition here
LHSW vs MASK Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while MASK trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check MASK's competition here
LHSW vs CYCU Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while CYCU trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check CYCU's competition here
LHSW vs ARBB Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while ARBB trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check ARBB's competition here
LHSW vs TDTH Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while TDTH trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TDTH's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check TDTH's competition here
LHSW vs JDZG Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while JDZG trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check JDZG's competition here
LHSW vs SASI Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SASI's ROE of -3.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check SASI's competition here
LHSW vs WAVD Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check WAVD's competition here
LHSW vs DTSTW Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while DTSTW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check DTSTW's competition here
LHSW vs SREV Comparison August 2025
LHSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHSW stands at 123.2M. In comparison, SREV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LHSW is priced at $2.29, while SREV trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHSW currently has a P/E ratio of 47.40, whereas SREV's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, LHSW's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SREV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LHSW is more volatile compared to SREV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHSW.Check SREV's competition here