The LGL Group, Inc.
The LGL Group, Inc. LGL Peers
See (LGL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGL | $7.61 | +2.56% | 40.9M | 94.75 | $0.08 | N/A |
| APH | $98.76 | +0.46% | 119.4B | 47.93 | $2.06 | +0.78% |
| TEL | $177.11 | +1.19% | 52.5B | 38.58 | $4.59 | +1.86% |
| GLW | $51.60 | -1.25% | 44.2B | 99.20 | $0.52 | +2.70% |
| GRMN | $215.92 | -0.86% | 41.6B | 28.48 | $7.58 | +1.81% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $163.69 | -0.70% | 28.2B | 38.40 | $4.26 | N/A |
| TDY | $530.73 | +0.61% | 24.9B | 30.39 | $17.46 | N/A |
| JBL | $222.02 | +0.48% | 23.8B | 42.22 | $5.26 | +0.14% |
| FLEX | $52.19 | +0.50% | 19.5B | 24.73 | $2.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LGL vs APH Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 119.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while APH trades at $98.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs TEL Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while TEL trades at $177.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 38.58. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs GLW Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while GLW trades at $51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 99.20. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs GRMN Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while GRMN trades at $215.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs IIVI Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs KEYS Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while KEYS trades at $163.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.40. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs TDY Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while TDY trades at $530.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs JBL Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while JBL trades at $222.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs FLEX Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while FLEX trades at $52.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs TRMB Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while TRMB trades at $79.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs CLS Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while CLS trades at $161.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 45.09. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs FTV Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while FTV trades at $52.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs COHR Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while COHR trades at $93.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -424.09. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs FN Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while FN trades at $291.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs MKSI Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while MKSI trades at $106.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs BMI Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while BMI trades at $239.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 52.48. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs SNDK Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while SNDK trades at $46.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs ITRI Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while ITRI trades at $134.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs LFUS Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while LFUS trades at $233.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 61.04. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs CGNX Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while CGNX trades at $34.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 47.71. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs VNT Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while VNT trades at $38.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs SANM Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while SANM trades at $104.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs ESE Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while ESE trades at $193.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 42.48. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs NOVT Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while NOVT trades at $131.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 67.49. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs ST Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while ST trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 39.51. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs TTMI Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while TTMI trades at $44.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 58.81. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs PLXS Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while PLXS trades at $133.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs OSIS Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while OSIS trades at $212.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs VICR Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while VICR trades at $46.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 87.21. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs WBX Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while WBX trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs BHE Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while BHE trades at $39.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs ROG Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while ROG trades at $73.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 81.47. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs BELFA Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while BELFA trades at $92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 28.02. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs PENG Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while PENG trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -83.14. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs BELFB Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while BELFB trades at $101.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 30.97. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs OUST Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while OUST trades at $23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs CTS Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while CTS trades at $41.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs FARO Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 848.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while FARO trades at $43.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1098.50. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs DAKT Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 791M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while DAKT trades at $16.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is -73.20. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DAKT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs BKSY Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 718.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while BKSY trades at $22.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs OUST-WTA Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs ALNT Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 652.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while ALNT trades at $38.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 66.43. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs BKSY-WT Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 584.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs AMOT Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs LYTS Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 529M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while LYTS trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs MLAB Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 472.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while MLAB trades at $86.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -240.44. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs OUST-WT Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs NEON Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 428M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while NEON trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -68.92. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs VPG Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 377.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while VPG trades at $28.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 123.91. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs SATL Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 341.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while SATL trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs SATLW Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 321.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while SATLW trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs VLDR Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs MVIS Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 290.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while MVIS trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs KOPN Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 275.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while KOPN trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -21.12. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs MEI Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 244.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while MEI trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs KULR Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 242M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while KULR trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -6.53. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs EMAN Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs LPTH Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 139M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while LPTH trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs RELL Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while RELL trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -64.80. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs MPTI Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 114.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while MPTI trades at $39.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs GNSS Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while GNSS trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs ODYS Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 78.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while ODYS trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs WRAP Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while WRAP trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -9.31. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs ELTK Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while ELTK trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs LINK Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 66.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while LINK trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -27.96. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs MIND Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while MIND trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs SOTK Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while SOTK trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 40.56. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs REFR Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while REFR trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -39.50. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs OPTX Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while OPTX trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 134.00. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs DSWL Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while DSWL trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs SELX Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while SELX trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs SVRE Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while SVRE trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs CPSH Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while CPSH trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs ISNS Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs HOLOW Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while HOLOW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs HOLO Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while HOLO trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs LUNA Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while LUNA trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs DAIO Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while DAIO trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -10.79. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs FCUV Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while FCUV trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -9.18. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs SLNH Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while SLNH trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs MTEK Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while MTEK trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -20.44. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs NSYS Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while NSYS trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs KNW Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while KNW trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KNW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs TMPOW Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs SGMA Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while SGMA trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs SLNHP Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while SLNHP trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs VIAO Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs OST Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while OST trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs ELSE Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while ELSE trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 41.27. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs WATT Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while WATT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs SOBR Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while SOBR trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs SVREW Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while SVREW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs BNSO Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs MINDP Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs OUSTZ Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while OUSTZ trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs IMTE Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while IMTE trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs MMAT Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs LGL-WT Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while LGL-WT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.
LGL vs OPTXW Comparison
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 40.9M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.61, while OPTXW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 94.75, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.