The LGL Group, Inc.
The LGL Group, Inc. (LGL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LGL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGL | $7.35 | +5.60% | 39.6M | 91.88 | $0.08 | N/A |
| APH | $108.63 | +4.14% | 132.6B | 43.26 | $2.51 | +0.61% |
| TEL | $204.00 | +1.03% | 60.2B | 41.85 | $4.87 | +1.31% |
| GLW | $63.49 | +2.32% | 54.4B | 67.54 | $0.94 | +1.77% |
| GRMN | $225.53 | +3.11% | 43.4B | 27.86 | $8.09 | +1.40% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $161.72 | +1.92% | 27.8B | 38.05 | $4.25 | N/A |
| TDY | $552.26 | +1.39% | 25.9B | 30.43 | $18.14 | N/A |
| JBL | $222.29 | +1.71% | 23.8B | 42.32 | $5.25 | +0.14% |
| CLS | $201.45 | +3.45% | 23.2B | 43.84 | $4.60 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LGL vs APH Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 132.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while APH trades at $108.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 43.26. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check APH's competition here
LGL vs TEL Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while TEL trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check TEL's competition here
LGL vs GLW Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while GLW trades at $63.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 67.54. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check GLW's competition here
LGL vs GRMN Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while GRMN trades at $225.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check GRMN's competition here
LGL vs IIVI Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check IIVI's competition here
LGL vs KEYS Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while KEYS trades at $161.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check KEYS's competition here
LGL vs TDY Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while TDY trades at $552.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 30.43. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check TDY's competition here
LGL vs JBL Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while JBL trades at $222.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 42.32. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check JBL's competition here
LGL vs CLS Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while CLS trades at $201.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 43.84. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check CLS's competition here
LGL vs TRMB Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while TRMB trades at $84.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check TRMB's competition here
LGL vs FLEX Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while FLEX trades at $50.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check FLEX's competition here
LGL vs COHR Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while COHR trades at $106.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -485.39. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check COHR's competition here
LGL vs FTV Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while FTV trades at $47.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check FTV's competition here
LGL vs FN Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while FN trades at $329.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 36.72. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check FN's competition here
LGL vs CGNX Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while CGNX trades at $41.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 57.54. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check CGNX's competition here
LGL vs MKSI Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while MKSI trades at $94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check MKSI's competition here
LGL vs LFUS Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while LFUS trades at $253.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 58.73. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check LFUS's competition here
LGL vs SANM Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while SANM trades at $116.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check SANM's competition here
LGL vs SNDK Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while SNDK trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check SNDK's competition here
LGL vs VNT Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while VNT trades at $41.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check VNT's competition here
LGL vs ITRI Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while ITRI trades at $125.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check ITRI's competition here
LGL vs BMI Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while BMI trades at $185.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 40.49. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check BMI's competition here
LGL vs ESE Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while ESE trades at $193.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 42.54. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check ESE's competition here
LGL vs TTMI Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while TTMI trades at $44.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 50.37. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check TTMI's competition here
LGL vs NOVT Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while NOVT trades at $124.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 63.92. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check NOVT's competition here
LGL vs ST Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while ST trades at $30.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 40.19. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check ST's competition here
LGL vs OSIS Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while OSIS trades at $221.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check OSIS's competition here
LGL vs PLXS Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while PLXS trades at $129.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check PLXS's competition here
LGL vs BMNR Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while BMNR trades at $31.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -10.22. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check BMNR's competition here
LGL vs VICR Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while VICR trades at $46.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 31.56. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check VICR's competition here
LGL vs BELFA Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while BELFA trades at $116.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check BELFA's competition here
LGL vs BELFB Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while BELFB trades at $131.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check BELFB's competition here
LGL vs BHE Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while BHE trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 38.08. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check BHE's competition here
LGL vs ROG Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while ROG trades at $69.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -19.73. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check ROG's competition here
LGL vs OUST Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while OUST trades at $23.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check OUST's competition here
LGL vs PENG Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while PENG trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -81.72. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check PENG's competition here
LGL vs CTS Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while CTS trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check CTS's competition here
LGL vs FARO Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check FARO's competition here
LGL vs DAKT Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 819.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while DAKT trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is -79.48. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DAKT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check DAKT's competition here
LGL vs BKSY Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 717.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while BKSY trades at $20.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check BKSY's competition here
LGL vs OUST-WTA Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
LGL vs ALNT Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 671.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while ALNT trades at $39.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 68.38. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check ALNT's competition here
LGL vs BKSY-WT Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 611M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
LGL vs AMOT Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check AMOT's competition here
LGL vs LYTS Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 549.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while LYTS trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check LYTS's competition here
LGL vs OUST-WT Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check OUST-WT's competition here
LGL vs MLAB Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 420.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while MLAB trades at $76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -212.50. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check MLAB's competition here
LGL vs SATLW Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 409.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while SATLW trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check SATLW's competition here
LGL vs NEON Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 356.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while NEON trades at $21.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -57.38. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check NEON's competition here
LGL vs SATL Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 350.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while SATL trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check SATL's competition here
LGL vs VPG Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 345.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while VPG trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 113.35. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check VPG's competition here
LGL vs VLDR Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check VLDR's competition here
LGL vs KOPN Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 297.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while KOPN trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -22.87. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check KOPN's competition here
LGL vs MVIS Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 271.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while MVIS trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check MVIS's competition here
LGL vs MEI Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 219.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while MEI trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check MEI's competition here
LGL vs KULR Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 206.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while KULR trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check KULR's competition here
LGL vs EMAN Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check EMAN's competition here
LGL vs LPTH Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 141.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while LPTH trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -13.16. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check LPTH's competition here
LGL vs RELL Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 138.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while RELL trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -122.00. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check RELL's competition here
LGL vs MPTI Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while MPTI trades at $44.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check MPTI's competition here
LGL vs MIND Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 77.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while MIND trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 2.32. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check MIND's competition here
LGL vs WBX Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while WBX trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check WBX's competition here
LGL vs ODYS Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while ODYS trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check ODYS's competition here
LGL vs GNSS Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 70.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while GNSS trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check GNSS's competition here
LGL vs ELTK Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 68.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while ELTK trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check ELTK's competition here
LGL vs WRAP Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while WRAP trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check WRAP's competition here
LGL vs LINK Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while LINK trades at $6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -27.67. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check LINK's competition here
LGL vs OPTX Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while OPTX trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 169.00. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check OPTX's competition here
LGL vs REFR Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while REFR trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -39.50. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check REFR's competition here
LGL vs SOTK Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while SOTK trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 36.33. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check SOTK's competition here
LGL vs DSWL Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while DSWL trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check DSWL's competition here
LGL vs CPSH Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while CPSH trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPSH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check CPSH's competition here
LGL vs SELX Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while SELX trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -26.75. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check SELX's competition here
LGL vs ISNS Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check ISNS's competition here
LGL vs LUNA Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while LUNA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check LUNA's competition here
LGL vs SVRE Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while SVRE trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check SVRE's competition here
LGL vs DAIO Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while DAIO trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check DAIO's competition here
LGL vs TMPOW Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check TMPOW's competition here
LGL vs NSYS Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while NSYS trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check NSYS's competition here
LGL vs HOLO Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while HOLO trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check HOLO's competition here
LGL vs MTEK Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while MTEK trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check MTEK's competition here
LGL vs HOLOW Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while HOLOW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check HOLOW's competition here
LGL vs KNW Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while KNW trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KNW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check KNW's competition here
LGL vs FCUV Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while FCUV trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check FCUV's competition here
LGL vs SGMA Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check SGMA's competition here
LGL vs VIAO Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check VIAO's competition here
LGL vs WATT Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while WATT trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WATT's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check WATT's competition here
LGL vs ELSE Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while ELSE trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check ELSE's competition here
LGL vs SLNH Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while SLNH trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check SLNH's competition here
LGL vs SVREW Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while SVREW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check SVREW's competition here
LGL vs SLNHP Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while SLNHP trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check SLNHP's competition here
LGL vs OST Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while OST trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check OST's competition here
LGL vs SOBR Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while SOBR trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check SOBR's competition here
LGL vs BNSO Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check BNSO's competition here
LGL vs MINDP Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check MINDP's competition here
LGL vs OUSTZ Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while OUSTZ trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check OUSTZ's competition here
LGL vs MMAT Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check MMAT's competition here
LGL vs IMTE Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while IMTE trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check IMTE's competition here
LGL vs OPTXW Comparison August 2025
LGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL stands at 39.6M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL is priced at $7.35, while OPTXW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL currently has a P/E ratio of 91.88, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL.Check OPTXW's competition here