Littelfuse, Inc.
Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LFUS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFUS | $363.28 | +0.00% | 9.2B | -128.14 | -$2.89 | +0.80% |
| APH | $151.20 | +0.00% | 185.6B | 45.21 | $3.34 | +0.49% |
| GLW | $129.99 | +0.00% | 119.7B | 76.25 | $1.83 | +0.81% |
| SNDK | $621.09 | +0.00% | 95.9B | -87.36 | -$7.44 | N/A |
| TEL | $232.40 | +0.00% | 68.9B | 33.81 | $6.94 | +1.22% |
| GRMN | $239.80 | +0.00% | 47.9B | 30.69 | $8.11 | +1.41% |
| KEYS | $239.54 | +0.00% | 41.9B | 48.56 | $5.02 | N/A |
| COHR | $232.48 | +0.00% | 39.4B | 241.17 | $1.03 | N/A |
| CLS | $291.33 | +0.00% | 33.7B | 40.86 | $7.17 | N/A |
| TDY | $666.35 | -0.00% | 31.4B | 35.39 | $18.90 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LFUS vs APH Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 185.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while APH trades at $151.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 45.21. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check APH's competition here
LFUS vs GLW Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 119.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while GLW trades at $129.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 76.25. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check GLW's competition here
LFUS vs SNDK Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 95.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while SNDK trades at $621.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is -87.36. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SNDK's competition here
LFUS vs TEL Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while TEL trades at $232.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check TEL's competition here
LFUS vs GRMN Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while GRMN trades at $239.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check GRMN's competition here
LFUS vs KEYS Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while KEYS trades at $239.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 48.56. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check KEYS's competition here
LFUS vs COHR Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while COHR trades at $232.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 241.17. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check COHR's competition here
LFUS vs CLS Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while CLS trades at $291.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 40.86. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check CLS's competition here
LFUS vs TDY Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while TDY trades at $666.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check TDY's competition here
LFUS vs IIVI Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check IIVI's competition here
LFUS vs JBL Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while JBL trades at $262.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check JBL's competition here
LFUS vs FLEX Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while FLEX trades at $65.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check FLEX's competition here
LFUS vs FN Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while FN trades at $513.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 52.37. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check FN's competition here
LFUS vs FTV Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while FTV trades at $57.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 36.65. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check FTV's competition here
LFUS vs WDCVV Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check WDCVV's competition here
LFUS vs MKSI Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while MKSI trades at $249.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 63.08. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MKSI's competition here
LFUS vs TRMB Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while TRMB trades at $67.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check TRMB's competition here
LFUS vs TTMI Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while TTMI trades at $100.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 64.24. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check TTMI's competition here
LFUS vs CGNX Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while CGNX trades at $55.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 82.40. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check CGNX's competition here
LFUS vs SANM Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while SANM trades at $148.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 35.55. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SANM's competition here
LFUS vs VICR Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while VICR trades at $152.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 92.90. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check VICR's competition here
LFUS vs ESE Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while ESE trades at $272.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 57.48. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ESE's competition here
LFUS vs VNT Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while VNT trades at $41.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check VNT's competition here
LFUS vs ST Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while ST trades at $36.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas ST's P/E ratio is -213.14. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ST's competition here
LFUS vs PLXS Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while PLXS trades at $196.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check PLXS's competition here
LFUS vs NOVT Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while NOVT trades at $144.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 99.97. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check NOVT's competition here
LFUS vs OSIS Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while OSIS trades at $286.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 33.17. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check OSIS's competition here
LFUS vs BMI Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while BMI trades at $161.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 33.29. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check BMI's competition here
LFUS vs ITRI Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while ITRI trades at $99.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ITRI's competition here
LFUS vs BELFA Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while BELFA trades at $214.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 42.27. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check BELFA's competition here
LFUS vs BELFB Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while BELFB trades at $230.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 45.46. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check BELFB's competition here
LFUS vs NOVTU Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while NOVTU trades at $62.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check NOVTU's competition here
LFUS vs BHE Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while BHE trades at $57.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 85.87. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check BHE's competition here
LFUS vs ROG Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while ROG trades at $111.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -29.29. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ROG's competition here
LFUS vs CTS Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while CTS trades at $53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check CTS's competition here
LFUS vs DAKT Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while DAKT trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 231.08. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check DAKT's competition here
LFUS vs ALNT Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while ALNT trades at $67.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 61.10. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ALNT's competition here
LFUS vs OUST Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while OUST trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check OUST's competition here
LFUS vs PENG Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while PENG trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 86.91. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check PENG's competition here
LFUS vs FARO Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check FARO's competition here
LFUS vs BKSY Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 715.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while BKSY trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check BKSY's competition here
LFUS vs OUST-WTA Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
LFUS vs LYTS Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while LYTS trades at $22.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check LYTS's competition here
LFUS vs VPG Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 634.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while VPG trades at $46.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 119.39. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check VPG's competition here
LFUS vs AMOT Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check AMOT's competition here
LFUS vs LPTH Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 523.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while LPTH trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -23.08. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check LPTH's competition here
LFUS vs MLAB Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 515.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while MLAB trades at $92.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 143.64. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MLAB's competition here
LFUS vs OUST-WT Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check OUST-WT's competition here
LFUS vs KOPN Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 403.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while KOPN trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -114.50. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check KOPN's competition here
LFUS vs SATL Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 355.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while SATL trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SATL's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SATL's competition here
LFUS vs BKSY-WT Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 311.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
LFUS vs MEI Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while MEI trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MEI's competition here
LFUS vs VLDR Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check VLDR's competition here
LFUS vs MVIS Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 260.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while MVIS trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MVIS's competition here
LFUS vs OPTX Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 228.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while OPTX trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -77.25. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check OPTX's competition here
LFUS vs RELL Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 197.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while RELL trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 273.60. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check RELL's competition here
LFUS vs MPTI Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while MPTI trades at $65.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MPTI's competition here
LFUS vs EMAN Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check EMAN's competition here
LFUS vs KULR Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while KULR trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check KULR's competition here
LFUS vs SLNHP Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 132.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while SLNHP trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -7.74. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of +9.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SLNHP's competition here
LFUS vs SATLW Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 121.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while SATLW trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SATLW's competition here
LFUS vs GNSS Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 92.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while GNSS trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check GNSS's competition here
LFUS vs WRAP Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while WRAP trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -5.34. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check WRAP's competition here
LFUS vs ODYS Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while ODYS trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ODYS's competition here
LFUS vs MIND Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 71.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while MIND trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MIND's competition here
LFUS vs SOTK Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while SOTK trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SOTK's competition here
LFUS vs CPSH Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while CPSH trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -113.25. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CPSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check CPSH's competition here
LFUS vs ELTK Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while ELTK trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 51.53. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ELTK's competition here
LFUS vs DSWL Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while DSWL trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check DSWL's competition here
LFUS vs UEIC Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while UEIC trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check UEIC's competition here
LFUS vs LINK Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while LINK trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -25.12. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check LINK's competition here
LFUS vs LUNA Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while LUNA trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -48.00. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check LUNA's competition here
LFUS vs ACFN Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while ACFN trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ACFN's competition here
LFUS vs LGL Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while LGL trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 43.48. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check LGL's competition here
LFUS vs OPTXW Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while OPTXW trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check OPTXW's competition here
LFUS vs REFR Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while REFR trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check REFR's competition here
LFUS vs WBX Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while WBX trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check WBX's competition here
LFUS vs ISNS Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ISNS's competition here
LFUS vs HOLO Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while HOLO trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HOLO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check HOLO's competition here
LFUS vs NEON Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while NEON trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check NEON's competition here
LFUS vs SLNH Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while SLNH trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SLNH's ROE of +9.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SLNH's competition here
LFUS vs DAIO Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while DAIO trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check DAIO's competition here
LFUS vs NSYS Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while NSYS trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check NSYS's competition here
LFUS vs TMPOW Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check TMPOW's competition here
LFUS vs SELX Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while SELX trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SELX's competition here
LFUS vs SGMA Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SGMA's competition here
LFUS vs WATT Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while WATT trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WATT's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check WATT's competition here
LFUS vs VIAO Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check VIAO's competition here
LFUS vs KNW Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KNW's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check KNW's competition here
LFUS vs ELSE Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while ELSE trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ELSE's competition here
LFUS vs MTEK Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while MTEK trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MTEK's competition here
LFUS vs GAUZ Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while GAUZ trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check GAUZ's competition here
LFUS vs SVREW Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while SVREW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SVREW's competition here
LFUS vs OST Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check OST's competition here
LFUS vs SVRE Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while SVRE trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SVRE's competition here
LFUS vs AMPGZ Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while AMPGZ trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check AMPGZ's competition here
LFUS vs BNSO Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check BNSO's competition here
LFUS vs MINDP Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MINDP's competition here
LFUS vs FCUV Comparison February 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $363.28, while FCUV trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -128.14, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -3.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check FCUV's competition here