Leidos Holdings, Inc.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 235.87B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while IBM trades at $253.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 43.38. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 201.66B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while ACN trades at $322.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.20B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while FISV trades at $114.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 103.58B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while FI trades at $186.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 77.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while INFY trades at $18.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 40.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while CTSH trades at $81.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 34.40B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while IT trades at $446.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 31.28B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while WIT trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 27.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while BR trades at $237.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 24.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while CDW trades at $188.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 23.93B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while GIB trades at $107.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 14.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while AUR trades at $7.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -17.24. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 13.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while AUROW trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 13.24B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while JKHY trades at $181.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 10.58B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while EPAM trades at $186.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.46B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while CACI trades at $475.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 9.08B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while KD trades at $39.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 67.29. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 7.62B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while EXLS trades at $46.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 35.49. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.61B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while G trades at $43.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas G's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.47B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while DLB trades at $77.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while WAY trades at $40.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 310.00. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 6.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while GLOB trades at $138.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 5.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while GDS trades at $29.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is -51.11. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.64B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while SAIC trades at $119.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while PAY trades at $38.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 95.50. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while INGM trades at $20.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while CNXC trades at $55.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 3.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while AI trades at $24.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -10.85. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while CD trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while DXC trades at $16.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is -55.83. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DXC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while CLVT trades at $4.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while PRFT trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while ASGN trades at $58.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while WNS trades at $53.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while LZMH trades at $11.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -1168.00. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LZMH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while VYX trades at $11.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while TASK trades at $16.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while NYAX trades at $40.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is -254.09. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NYAX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while NABL trades at $7.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 49.00. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while FORTY trades at $96.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while FLYW trades at $11.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 282.25. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while GDYN trades at $15.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 117.15. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while APLD trades at $5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while INOD trades at $35.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 40.24. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while BULLZ trades at $3.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 963.28M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while PSFE trades at $16.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is 45.10. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PSFE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 944.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while BBAI trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 935.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 922.50M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.51M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 718.20M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while XRX trades at $5.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 708.50M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while MGIC trades at $14.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 707.97M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while HCKT trades at $25.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 572.05M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while CTLP trades at $7.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 376.03M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while IBEX trades at $28.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 372.21M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while CNDT trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 369.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while UIS trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 317.99M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while VNET trades at $7.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is 361.50. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 290.74M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while DMRC trades at $13.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 254.47M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while TTEC trades at $5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 231.62M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while III trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas III's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to III's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 202.04M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while PHLT trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -19.85. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 189.42M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while TLS trades at $2.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.33M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 168.99M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 157.99M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while CSPI trades at $15.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is 799.50. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CSPI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 156.00M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while LHSW trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LHSW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 123.06M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.31M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 100.60M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while NOTE trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NOTE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 87.44M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while CTM trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 68.06M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while SAIH trades at $6.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SAIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 65.59M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while VEEA trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VEEA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 57.04M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while WYY trades at $5.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -27.76. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 54.21M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while SDHIU trades at $10.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 46.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while GMM trades at $2.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 45.02M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while DVLT trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 42.06M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while USIO trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 41.44M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while MASK trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MASK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 37.33M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while GLE trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 102.00. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is more volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 30.79M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while BTCM trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 28.38M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while CLPS trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -20.39. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 28.02M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while DTST trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 56.43. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 16.92M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while ARBB trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 15.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while CYCU trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CYCU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 13.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while JDZG trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.31M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SGLB's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.89M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while SASI trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SASI's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 2.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while VEEAW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 2.25M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while DTSTW trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while WAVD trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 2.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while TDTH trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TDTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 1.14M. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while CYCUW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 824131.00. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while JFU trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.

LDOS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LDOS stands at 20.09B. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 121958.00. Regarding current trading prices, LDOS is priced at $156.10, while SAIHW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LDOS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.74, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LDOS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LDOS is less volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LDOS.