KULR Technology Group, Inc.
KULR Technology Group, Inc. KULR Peers
See (KULR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KULR | $0.90 | -21.84% | 277.5M | -7.49 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| APH | $93.40 | +0.98% | 113B | 45.34 | $2.06 | +0.65% |
| TEL | $165.54 | +1.80% | 49.1B | 35.91 | $4.61 | +1.61% |
| GLW | $50.81 | +2.44% | 43.5B | 97.71 | $0.52 | +2.21% |
| GRMN | $203.92 | +1.29% | 39.3B | 26.87 | $7.59 | +1.92% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $162.25 | +2.57% | 27.9B | 38.09 | $4.26 | N/A |
| FTV | $70.82 | +1.99% | 24.1B | 31.06 | $2.28 | +0.45% |
| TDY | $488.61 | +0.23% | 22.9B | 28.21 | $17.32 | N/A |
| JBL | $180.98 | +2.92% | 19.4B | 40.67 | $4.45 | +0.18% |
Stock Comparison
KULR vs APH Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 113B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while APH trades at $93.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 45.34. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs TEL Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while TEL trades at $165.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 35.91. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs GLW Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while GLW trades at $50.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 97.71. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs GRMN Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while GRMN trades at $203.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs IIVI Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs KEYS Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while KEYS trades at $162.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.09. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs FTV Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while FTV trades at $70.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs TDY Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while TDY trades at $488.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs JBL Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while JBL trades at $180.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 40.67. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs TRMB Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while TRMB trades at $72.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs FLEX Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while FLEX trades at $43.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs CLS Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while CLS trades at $128.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs COHR Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while COHR trades at $80.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -366.82. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs FN Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while FN trades at $258.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs BMI Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while BMI trades at $243.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 53.70. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs SNDK Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while SNDK trades at $44.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs MKSI Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while MKSI trades at $93.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs ITRI Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while ITRI trades at $125.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs LFUS Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while LFUS trades at $221.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 60.76. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs VNT Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while VNT trades at $36.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs CGNX Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while CGNX trades at $30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 44.26. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs ESE Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while ESE trades at $183.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 40.07. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs SANM Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while SANM trades at $87.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs NOVT Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while NOVT trades at $124.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 63.41. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs ST Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while ST trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs OSIS Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while OSIS trades at $234.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs TTMI Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while TTMI trades at $37.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 49.45. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs PLXS Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while PLXS trades at $130.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs VICR Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while VICR trades at $44.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 84.60. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs BHE Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while BHE trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs ROG Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while ROG trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 77.62. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs CTS Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while CTS trades at $41.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs BELFA Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while BELFA trades at $81.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs BELFB Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while BELFB trades at $88.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs OUST Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while OUST trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -10.21. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs PENG Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while PENG trades at $19.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -113.94. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs FARO Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 842.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while FARO trades at $43.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1095.50. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs OST Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 766M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while OST trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs OUST-WTA Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs DAKT Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 689M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while DAKT trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 345.25. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs ALNT Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 591.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while ALNT trades at $34.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 60.24. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs AMOT Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs MLAB Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 524.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while MLAB trades at $96.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -266.92. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs LYTS Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 485.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while LYTS trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs OUST-WT Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs BKSY Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 362.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while BKSY trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs SATL Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 356.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while SATL trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs VPG Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 353.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while VPG trades at $26.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 115.83. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs BKSY-WT Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 347.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs MEI Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 335.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while MEI trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs SATLW Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 326.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while SATLW trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs MVIS Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 314.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while MVIS trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs NEON Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 313M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while NEON trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -50.41. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs VLDR Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs KOPN Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 267M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while KOPN trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -20.50. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs EMAN Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs MPTI Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while MPTI trades at $45.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs RELL Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 129.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while RELL trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -60.60. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs LPTH Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 127.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while LPTH trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -11.92. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs WBX Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 95.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while WBX trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs WRAP Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while WRAP trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs ODYS Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 85.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while ODYS trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs ELTK Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while ELTK trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs GNSS Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while GNSS trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs REFR Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while REFR trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -45.50. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs SOTK Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while SOTK trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 46.50. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs LINK Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while LINK trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -22.75. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs MIND Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while MIND trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs SELX Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while SELX trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs OPTX Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while OPTX trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 126.00. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs SVRE Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while SVRE trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs CPSH Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while CPSH trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -13.05. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs DSWL Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while DSWL trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs LGL Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while LGL trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 85.00. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs ISNS Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs LUNA Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while LUNA trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs KNW Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while KNW trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to KNW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs DAIO Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while DAIO trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs FCUV Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while FCUV trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -9.17. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs MTEK Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while MTEK trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -18.62. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs TMPOW Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs NSYS Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while NSYS trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs HOLOW Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while HOLOW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs HOLO Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while HOLO trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs SGMA Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while SGMA trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs VIAO Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs ELSE Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while ELSE trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs SLNHP Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while SLNHP trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs WATT Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while WATT trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs SLNH Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while SLNH trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs OUSTZ Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while OUSTZ trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs SVREW Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while SVREW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs BNSO Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs MINDP Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs SOBR Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while SOBR trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs IMTE Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while IMTE trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs MMAT Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs OPTXW Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while OPTXW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.
KULR vs MTEKW Comparison
KULR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KULR stands at 277.5M. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KULR is priced at $0.90, while MTEKW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KULR currently has a P/E ratio of -7.49, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, KULR's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KULR is more volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KULR.