Jabil Inc.
Jabil Inc. JBL Peers
See (JBL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JBL | $161.76 | +5.05% | 17.36B | 36.43 | $4.44 | +0.20% |
| APH | $84.48 | +4.45% | 102.19B | 41.01 | $2.06 | +0.71% |
| TEL | $161.01 | +5.32% | 47.75B | 35.00 | $4.60 | +1.62% |
| GLW | $46.97 | +4.19% | 40.23B | 90.33 | $0.52 | +2.39% |
| GRMN | $197.87 | +3.36% | 38.10B | 26.07 | $7.59 | +1.52% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.51B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $162.62 | +5.52% | 28.10B | 46.46 | $3.50 | N/A |
| FTV | $73.75 | +4.58% | 25.07B | 32.35 | $2.28 | +0.43% |
| TDY | $493.85 | +1.83% | 23.14B | 28.25 | $17.48 | N/A |
| TRMB | $70.54 | +3.55% | 16.83B | 11.51 | $6.13 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
JBL vs APH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 102.19B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while APH trades at $84.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 41.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TEL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 47.75B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while TEL trades at $161.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs GLW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 40.23B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while GLW trades at $46.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 90.33. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs GRMN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 38.10B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while GRMN trades at $197.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs IIVI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.51B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs KEYS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.10B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while KEYS trades at $162.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 46.46. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FTV Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 25.07B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while FTV trades at $73.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 32.35. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TDY Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 23.14B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while TDY trades at $493.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TRMB Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 16.83B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while TRMB trades at $70.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FLEX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 15.66B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while FLEX trades at $40.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs COHR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 12.05B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while COHR trades at $77.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -194.32. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CLS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 11.54B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while CLS trades at $100.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 7.72B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while FN trades at $215.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BMI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 6.94B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while BMI trades at $235.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 51.89. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MKSI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 6.09B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while MKSI trades at $90.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 32.30. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SNDK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while SNDK trades at $41.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VNT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while VNT trades at $36.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LFUS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while LFUS trades at $217.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 56.99. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CGNX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while CGNX trades at $31.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 45.83. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ITRI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while ITRI trades at $112.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs NOVT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while NOVT trades at $131.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 67.53. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ESE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while ESE trades at $179.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 42.08. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SANM Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 4.46B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while SANM trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ST Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while ST trades at $27.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OSIS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while OSIS trades at $226.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs PLXS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while PLXS trades at $131.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TTMI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while TTMI trades at $28.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 38.53. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VICR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while VICR trades at $43.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 82.85. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BHE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while BHE trades at $36.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ROG Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while ROG trades at $70.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 77.98. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CTS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while CTS trades at $42.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs PENG Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 997.63M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while PENG trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -111.24. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BELFA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 992.55M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while BELFA trades at $71.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BELFB Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 973.76M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while BELFB trades at $78.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FARO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 810.58M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while FARO trades at $42.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1054.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs DAKT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 716.97M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while DAKT trades at $14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 359.25. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUST-WTA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.80M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MLAB Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 695.50M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while MLAB trades at $128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUST Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 617.03M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while OUST trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUSTZ Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 587.59M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while OUSTZ trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs AMOT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.91M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ALNT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 505.33M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while ALNT trades at $29.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LYTS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 494.77M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while LYTS trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUST-WT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.22M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SATL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 429.56M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while SATL trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SATL's ROE of -5.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs KULR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 428.01M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while KULR trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -16.72. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KULR's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BKSY Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 364.95M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while BKSY trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VPG Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 346.68M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while VPG trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BKSY-WT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 342.88M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VLDR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.24M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MVIS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 297.41M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while MVIS trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MEI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 275.89M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while MEI trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs KOPN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 251.20M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while KOPN trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs NEON Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 175.56M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while NEON trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -30.89. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs EMAN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.20M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MPTI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 167.43M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while MPTI trades at $57.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OST Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 159.96M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while OST trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs RELL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 132.26M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while RELL trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -62.07. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LPTH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 111.97M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while LPTH trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -10.87. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs WBX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 93.04M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while WBX trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs GNSS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 81.78M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while GNSS trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs WRAP Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 76.84M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while WRAP trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ELTK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 75.06M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while ELTK trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SOTK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 62.11M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while SOTK trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SELX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 59.89M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while SELX trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs REFR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 57.71M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while REFR trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -42.87. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SATLW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 57.55M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while SATLW trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SATLW's ROE of -5.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MIND Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 55.63M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while MIND trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OPTX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 55.03M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while OPTX trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 150.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LINK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 53.56M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while LINK trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -22.62. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs DSWL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 37.13M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while DSWL trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LGL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 35.57M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while LGL trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 82.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs HOLO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 35.41M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while HOLO trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ISNS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.83M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FCUV Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 33.55M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while FCUV trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -10.70. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CPSH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 26.07M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while CPSH trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs NSYS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 24.00M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while NSYS trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -18.49. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TMPOW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.70M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs DAIO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 23.47M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while DAIO trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MTEK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 18.92M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while MTEK trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -14.81. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VIAO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.47M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ELSE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 14.49M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while ELSE trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LUNA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 13.88M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while LUNA trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs WATT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 9.15M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while WATT trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WATT's ROE of -7.73%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SVREW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 8.89M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while SVREW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SLNH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 8.87M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while SLNH trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SGMA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 7.62M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while SGMA trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SLNHP Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 7.61M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while SLNHP trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BNSO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.44M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MINDP Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.30M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SOBR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 5.19M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while SOBR trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs IMTE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 4.13M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while IMTE trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MMAT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.52M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SVRE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 2.04M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while SVRE trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MTEKW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while MTEKW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OPTXW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 1.79M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while OPTXW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LGL-WT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 1.62M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while LGL-WT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUSTW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 1.24M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while OUSTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs KNW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 17.36B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 240587.00. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $161.76, while KNW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.43, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KNW's ROE of +5.76%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.