Jabil Inc.
Jabil Inc. JBL Peers
See (JBL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JBL | $214.74 | +1.32% | 23.1B | 40.83 | $5.26 | +0.15% |
| APH | $97.04 | +1.30% | 117.4B | 46.65 | $2.08 | +0.68% |
| TEL | $167.93 | +0.87% | 49.8B | 36.59 | $4.59 | +1.58% |
| GLW | $51.42 | -0.02% | 44B | 98.88 | $0.52 | +2.17% |
| GRMN | $203.60 | -0.72% | 39.2B | 26.86 | $7.58 | +1.55% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $164.12 | -0.37% | 28.2B | 38.71 | $4.24 | N/A |
| FTV | $70.08 | -0.83% | 23.8B | 30.74 | $2.28 | +0.46% |
| TDY | $497.22 | +0.52% | 23.3B | 28.48 | $17.46 | N/A |
| FLEX | $49.02 | +2.32% | 18.3B | 23.23 | $2.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
JBL vs APH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 117.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while APH trades at $97.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 46.65. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TEL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while TEL trades at $167.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 36.59. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs GLW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while GLW trades at $51.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 98.88. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs GRMN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while GRMN trades at $203.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs IIVI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs KEYS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while KEYS trades at $164.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.71. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FTV Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while FTV trades at $70.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TDY Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while TDY trades at $497.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FLEX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while FLEX trades at $49.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TRMB Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while TRMB trades at $74.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CLS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while CLS trades at $149.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 41.63. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs COHR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while COHR trades at $85.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -389.32. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while FN trades at $286.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 31.89. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BMI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while BMI trades at $242.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 53.35. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SNDK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while SNDK trades at $47.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MKSI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while MKSI trades at $98.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ITRI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while ITRI trades at $131.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LFUS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while LFUS trades at $225.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 59.23. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VNT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while VNT trades at $36.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CGNX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while CGNX trades at $30.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 44.64. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SANM Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while SANM trades at $95.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ESE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while ESE trades at $190.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 41.80. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs NOVT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while NOVT trades at $125.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 64.45. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ST Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while ST trades at $29.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 36.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TTMI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while TTMI trades at $39.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 52.27. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs PLXS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while PLXS trades at $134.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OSIS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while OSIS trades at $214.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VICR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while VICR trades at $46.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 86.89. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BHE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while BHE trades at $38.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CTS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while CTS trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ROG Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while ROG trades at $68.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 76.02. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUST Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while OUST trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -12.07. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BELFB Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while BELFB trades at $91.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BELFA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while BELFA trades at $82.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs PENG Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while PENG trades at $20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -119.88. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OST Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 967.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while OST trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FARO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 841.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while FARO trades at $43.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1094.75. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUST-WTA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs DAKT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 709.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while DAKT trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 361.25. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ALNT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 592.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while ALNT trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 60.38. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs AMOT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BKSY Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 547M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while BKSY trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -7.82. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MLAB Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 536M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while MLAB trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -272.92. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LYTS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 494.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while LYTS trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUST-WT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BKSY-WT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 450.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs NEON Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 372.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while NEON trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -59.95. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SATL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 360.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while SATL trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SATLW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 355.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while SATLW trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VPG Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while VPG trades at $26.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 114.96. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MEI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 329.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while MEI trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VLDR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MVIS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 265.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while MVIS trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs KOPN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while KOPN trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -19.81. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs KULR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 201.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while KULR trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs EMAN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs RELL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 135.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while RELL trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -63.67. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LPTH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while LPTH trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MPTI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 114.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while MPTI trades at $39.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs WBX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while WBX trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ODYS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while ODYS trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs WRAP Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while WRAP trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MIND Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while MIND trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs GNSS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while GNSS trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ELTK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while ELTK trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SOTK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 57.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while SOTK trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 46.04. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs REFR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while REFR trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -42.25. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LINK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while LINK trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -22.58. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OPTX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while OPTX trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 133.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SELX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while SELX trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -32.27. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CPSH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while CPSH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -14.45. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs DSWL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while DSWL trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LGL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while LGL trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 89.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ISNS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SVRE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while SVRE trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FCUV Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while FCUV trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs DAIO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while DAIO trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -10.34. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LUNA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while LUNA trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs NSYS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while NSYS trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TMPOW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs HOLO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while HOLO trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs HOLOW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while HOLOW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MTEK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while MTEK trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -17.56. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SGMA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while SGMA trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VIAO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs KNW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while KNW trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KNW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ELSE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while ELSE trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SLNHP Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while SLNHP trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SLNH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while SLNH trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs WATT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while WATT trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUSTZ Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while OUSTZ trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BNSO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MINDP Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SVREW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while SVREW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SOBR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while SOBR trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MMAT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs IMTE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while IMTE trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUSTW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while OUSTW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OPTXW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.1B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $214.74, while OPTXW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.83, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.