Jabil Inc.
Jabil Inc. JBL Peers
See (JBL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JBL | $220.84 | -1.06% | 23.7B | 42.16 | $5.24 | +0.14% |
| APH | $101.78 | -1.86% | 123.1B | 49.42 | $2.06 | +0.64% |
| TEL | $180.47 | +0.53% | 53.6B | 39.26 | $4.60 | +1.47% |
| GLW | $54.02 | +0.23% | 46.2B | 103.85 | $0.52 | +2.08% |
| GRMN | $227.71 | +0.69% | 43.8B | 29.99 | $7.59 | +1.39% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $165.27 | +1.39% | 28.4B | 38.80 | $4.26 | N/A |
| TDY | $555.95 | -0.59% | 26B | 31.73 | $17.51 | N/A |
| TRMB | $82.52 | +1.34% | 19.7B | 13.62 | $6.06 | N/A |
| FLEX | $52.45 | -1.58% | 19.6B | 24.86 | $2.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
JBL vs APH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while APH trades at $101.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 49.42. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TEL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while TEL trades at $180.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 39.26. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs GLW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while GLW trades at $54.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 103.85. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs GRMN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while GRMN trades at $227.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 29.99. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs IIVI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs KEYS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while KEYS trades at $165.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.80. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TDY Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while TDY trades at $555.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 31.73. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TRMB Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while TRMB trades at $82.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FLEX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while FLEX trades at $52.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CLS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while CLS trades at $156.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 43.72. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FTV Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while FTV trades at $51.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs COHR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while COHR trades at $97.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -440.95. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while FN trades at $300.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MKSI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while MKSI trades at $102.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 29.77. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ITRI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while ITRI trades at $134.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BMI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while BMI trades at $204.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 45.06. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SNDK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while SNDK trades at $41.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CGNX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while CGNX trades at $34.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 47.58. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VNT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while VNT trades at $38.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LFUS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while LFUS trades at $230.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 60.45. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SANM Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while SANM trades at $99.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ESE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while ESE trades at $188.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 41.44. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ST Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while ST trades at $32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 39.59. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TTMI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while TTMI trades at $45.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 60.05. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs NOVT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while NOVT trades at $124.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 63.65. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OSIS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while OSIS trades at $217.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs PLXS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while PLXS trades at $133.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BMNR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while BMNR trades at $40.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VICR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while VICR trades at $45.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 85.28. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUST Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while OUST trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -14.04. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BHE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while BHE trades at $39.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BELFB Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while BELFB trades at $106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 32.46. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BELFA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while BELFA trades at $94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs PENG Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while PENG trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -84.31. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ROG Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while ROG trades at $67.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 74.57. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CTS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while CTS trades at $40.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FARO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs DAKT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 781.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while DAKT trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is -75.81. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DAKT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUST-WTA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BKSY-WT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 662.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ALNT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 662.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while ALNT trades at $39.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 67.45. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BKSY Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 637.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while BKSY trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -9.11. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs AMOT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LYTS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 526.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while LYTS trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs NEON Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 481.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while NEON trades at $28.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -77.49. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUST-WT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MLAB Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 392.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while MLAB trades at $71.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -198.31. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SATL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 376.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while SATL trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VPG Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while VPG trades at $27.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 121.28. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MVIS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 360.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while MVIS trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SATLW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 356.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while SATLW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs KOPN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 337M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while KOPN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -25.87. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VLDR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs KULR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 261.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while KULR trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MEI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while MEI trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs EMAN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs WBX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while WBX trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs RELL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while RELL trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -64.27. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LPTH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while LPTH trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -12.52. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MPTI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 121.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while MPTI trades at $41.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs GNSS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while GNSS trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ODYS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while ODYS trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LINK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 73.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while LINK trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -31.17. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs WRAP Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while WRAP trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ELTK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 69.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while ELTK trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs REFR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while REFR trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -44.75. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MIND Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while MIND trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OPTX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while OPTX trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 162.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SOTK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while SOTK trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs DSWL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while DSWL trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SVRE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while SVRE trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SELX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while SELX trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -28.55. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LGL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while LGL trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 97.38. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CPSH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while CPSH trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ISNS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LUNA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while LUNA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs DAIO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while DAIO trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -10.97. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MTEK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while MTEK trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs HOLO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while HOLO trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs HOLOW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while HOLOW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TMPOW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs NSYS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while NSYS trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FCUV Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while FCUV trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SGMA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs KNW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while KNW trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KNW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs WATT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while WATT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VIAO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ELSE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while ELSE trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OST Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while OST trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SLNH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while SLNH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SLNHP Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while SLNHP trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SVREW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while SVREW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SOBR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while SOBR trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BNSO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MINDP Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs IMTE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while IMTE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUSTZ Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while OUSTZ trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MMAT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OPTXW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 23.7B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $220.84, while OPTXW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 42.16, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.