Jabil Inc.
Jabil Inc. JBL Peers
See (JBL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JBL | $168.05 | +0.02% | 18B | 37.85 | $4.44 | +0.19% |
| APH | $90.37 | +0.49% | 109.3B | 43.87 | $2.06 | +0.67% |
| TEL | $159.92 | -0.09% | 47.4B | 34.84 | $4.59 | +1.67% |
| GLW | $50.05 | +0.93% | 42.9B | 96.25 | $0.52 | +2.25% |
| GRMN | $202.95 | -0.01% | 39.1B | 26.74 | $7.59 | +1.48% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $158.36 | +0.84% | 27.3B | 37.17 | $4.26 | N/A |
| FTV | $70.27 | +0.11% | 23.9B | 30.82 | $2.28 | +0.46% |
| TDY | $494.19 | -0.94% | 23.2B | 28.30 | $17.46 | N/A |
| TRMB | $70.84 | -0.60% | 16.9B | 11.56 | $6.13 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
JBL vs APH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 109.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while APH trades at $90.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 43.87. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TEL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while TEL trades at $159.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 34.84. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs GLW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while GLW trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 96.25. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs GRMN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while GRMN trades at $202.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs IIVI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs KEYS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while KEYS trades at $158.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 37.17. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FTV Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while FTV trades at $70.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TDY Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while TDY trades at $494.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 28.30. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TRMB Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while TRMB trades at $70.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FLEX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while FLEX trades at $42.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CLS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while CLS trades at $116.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 32.59. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs COHR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while COHR trades at $76.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -349.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while FN trades at $233.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BMI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while BMI trades at $251.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 55.46. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MKSI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while MKSI trades at $82.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SNDK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while SNDK trades at $37.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ITRI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while ITRI trades at $116.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VNT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while VNT trades at $35.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LFUS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while LFUS trades at $202.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 53.23. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CGNX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while CGNX trades at $29.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 43.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ESE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while ESE trades at $179.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SANM Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while SANM trades at $85.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs NOVT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while NOVT trades at $121.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 62.20. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ST Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while ST trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OSIS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while OSIS trades at $217.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs PLXS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while PLXS trades at $130.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TTMI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while TTMI trades at $29.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 39.79. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VICR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while VICR trades at $43.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 81.34. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BHE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while BHE trades at $36.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ROG Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while ROG trades at $65.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 73.09. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CTS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while CTS trades at $40.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs PENG Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 958.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while PENG trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -106.82. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BELFA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 901.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while BELFA trades at $62.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BELFB Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 884M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while BELFB trades at $71.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FARO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 815.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while FARO trades at $42.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1060.25. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUST-WTA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUST Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 688M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while OUST trades at $12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs DAKT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 657.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while DAKT trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 329.25. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OST Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 614.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while OST trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs AMOT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MLAB Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 534.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while MLAB trades at $97.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -288.12. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ALNT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 513.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while ALNT trades at $30.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 52.29. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LYTS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 479.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while LYTS trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUST-WT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SATL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 385.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while SATL trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BKSY Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 354.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while BKSY trades at $11.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SATLW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 352.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while SATLW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BKSY-WT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 349.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs KULR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 337.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while KULR trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VPG Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 332.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while VPG trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 109.17. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VLDR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MEI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 281.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while MEI trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MVIS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 276.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while MVIS trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs KOPN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 206.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while KOPN trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -15.87. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs NEON Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 178.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while NEON trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -28.70. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs EMAN Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MPTI Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 133M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while MPTI trades at $45.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LPTH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 129.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while LPTH trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -12.04. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs RELL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while RELL trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs WBX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while WBX trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ODYS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while ODYS trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs GNSS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while GNSS trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs WRAP Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 71.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while WRAP trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ELTK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while ELTK trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs REFR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while REFR trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -49.75. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SOTK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while SOTK trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 46.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OPTX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while OPTX trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LINK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while LINK trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -24.58. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SELX Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while SELX trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -36.25. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MIND Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 47.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while MIND trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs CPSH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while CPSH trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -14.10. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs DSWL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while DSWL trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LGL Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while LGL trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 84.38. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ISNS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs FCUV Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while FCUV trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs HOLO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while HOLO trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs DAIO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while DAIO trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs NSYS Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while NSYS trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs TMPOW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LUNA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while LUNA trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MTEK Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while MTEK trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -14.56. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SGMA Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while SGMA trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs VIAO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs ELSE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while ELSE trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs WATT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while WATT trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SLNHP Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while SLNHP trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SLNH Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while SLNH trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SVREW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while SVREW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs BNSO Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MINDP Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SOBR Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while SOBR trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUSTZ Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while OUSTZ trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs IMTE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while IMTE trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MMAT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OPTXW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while OPTXW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs MTEKW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while MTEKW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs OUSTW Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while OUSTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs LGL-WT Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while LGL-WT trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.
JBL vs SVRE Comparison
JBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 18B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 772K. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $168.05, while SVRE trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 37.85, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.