International Business Machines Corporation
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IBM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | $245.76 | -4.10% | 240.5B | 23.09 | $11.14 | +2.61% |
| ACN | $207.39 | -3.52% | 133.6B | 17.80 | $12.10 | +2.90% |
| INFY | $14.07 | -3.33% | 59.4B | 19.01 | $0.77 | +3.26% |
| FI | $63.80 | +0.16% | 34.3B | 9.86 | $6.47 | N/A |
| FISV | $58.70 | -4.61% | 33.4B | 9.50 | $6.47 | N/A |
| CTSH | $61.95 | -4.68% | 31.4B | 14.26 | $4.56 | +1.94% |
| FIS | $47.86 | -2.34% | 25.4B | 153.53 | $0.32 | +3.26% |
| WIT | $2.20 | -2.01% | 23.7B | 16.18 | $0.14 | +5.12% |
| LDOS | $172.65 | -2.05% | 22.2B | 15.77 | $11.00 | +0.94% |
| GIB | $71.62 | -2.86% | 16.4B | 13.56 | $5.48 | +0.62% |
Stock Comparison
IBM vs ACN Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 133.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while ACN trades at $207.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check ACN's competition here
IBM vs INFY Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while INFY trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check INFY's competition here
IBM vs FI Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while FI trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check FI's competition here
IBM vs FISV Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while FISV trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check FISV's competition here
IBM vs CTSH Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while CTSH trades at $61.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CTSH's competition here
IBM vs FIS Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while FIS trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 153.53. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check FIS's competition here
IBM vs WIT Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while WIT trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check WIT's competition here
IBM vs LDOS Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while LDOS trades at $172.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check LDOS's competition here
IBM vs GIB Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while GIB trades at $71.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check GIB's competition here
IBM vs CDW Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while CDW trades at $121.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CDW's competition here
IBM vs CACI Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while CACI trades at $569.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CACI's competition here
IBM vs JKHY Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while JKHY trades at $158.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check JKHY's competition here
IBM vs IT Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while IT trades at $147.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check IT's competition here
IBM vs AUR Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while AUR trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check AUR's competition here
IBM vs GDS Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while GDS trades at $43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 63.49. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check GDS's competition here
IBM vs APLD Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while APLD trades at $29.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -74.46. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check APLD's competition here
IBM vs EPAM Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while EPAM trades at $130.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check EPAM's competition here
IBM vs G Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while G trades at $37.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas G's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check G's competition here
IBM vs DLB Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while DLB trades at $63.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check DLB's competition here
IBM vs INGM Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while INGM trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check INGM's competition here
IBM vs EXLS Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while EXLS trades at $28.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check EXLS's competition here
IBM vs WAY Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while WAY trades at $24.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check WAY's competition here
IBM vs SAIC Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while SAIC trades at $87.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check SAIC's competition here
IBM vs NCR Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NCR's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check NCR's competition here
IBM vs NIQ Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while NIQ trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check NIQ's competition here
IBM vs WNS Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while WNS trades at $76.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check WNS's competition here
IBM vs PAY Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while PAY trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 55.18. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check PAY's competition here
IBM vs VNET Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while VNET trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -38.23. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check VNET's competition here
IBM vs PSFE-WT Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
IBM vs VRRM Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while VRRM trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 55.71. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check VRRM's competition here
IBM vs KD Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while KD trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check KD's competition here
IBM vs PRFT Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check PRFT's competition here
IBM vs DXC Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while DXC trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check DXC's competition here
IBM vs CNXC Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while CNXC trades at $30.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CNXC's competition here
IBM vs NYAX Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while NYAX trades at $55.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 88.54. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check NYAX's competition here
IBM vs GLOB Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while GLOB trades at $42.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check GLOB's competition here
IBM vs ASGN Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while ASGN trades at $42.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check ASGN's competition here
IBM vs FORTY Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while FORTY trades at $121.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check FORTY's competition here
IBM vs TWKS Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check TWKS's competition here
IBM vs BBAI Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while BBAI trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check BBAI's competition here
IBM vs INOD Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while INOD trades at $44.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 44.38. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check INOD's competition here
IBM vs AI Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while AI trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check AI's competition here
IBM vs FLYW Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while FLYW trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is -561.50. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FLYW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check FLYW's competition here
IBM vs VYX Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while VYX trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -21.81. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VYX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check VYX's competition here
IBM vs BTCM Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while BTCM trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check BTCM's competition here
IBM vs CLVT Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while CLVT trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CLVT's competition here
IBM vs TASK Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 962.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while TASK trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check TASK's competition here
IBM vs MGIC Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 952.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while MGIC trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check MGIC's competition here
IBM vs NABL Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 889.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while NABL trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is -118.87. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check NABL's competition here
IBM vs CTLP Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while CTLP trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CTLP's competition here
IBM vs CLVT-PA Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CLVT-PA's competition here
IBM vs WYFI Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 646.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while WYFI trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -21.65. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check WYFI's competition here
IBM vs PHLT Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while PHLT trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check PHLT's competition here
IBM vs GDYN Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 577.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while GDYN trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check GDYN's competition here
IBM vs AUROW Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 512.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while AUROW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check AUROW's competition here
IBM vs IBEX Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 398M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while IBEX trades at $28.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check IBEX's competition here
IBM vs HCKT Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 378.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while HCKT trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 36.74. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check HCKT's competition here
IBM vs PSFE Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 369.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while PSFE trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check PSFE's competition here
IBM vs SDHI Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, SDHI has a market cap of 363.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while SDHI trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas SDHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SDHI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to SDHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check SDHI's competition here
IBM vs BBAI-WT Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 331.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
IBM vs TLS Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 303.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while TLS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check TLS's competition here
IBM vs SDHIU Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 293.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while SDHIU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check SDHIU's competition here
IBM vs CD Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while CD trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -98.75. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CD's competition here
IBM vs BULLZ Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check BULLZ's competition here
IBM vs CNDT Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 246M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while CNDT trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CNDT's competition here
IBM vs XRX Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 239.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while XRX trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to XRX's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check XRX's competition here
IBM vs III Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while III trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas III's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to III's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check III's competition here
IBM vs DVLT Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while DVLT trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check DVLT's competition here
IBM vs TSSI Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 187.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while TSSI trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check TSSI's competition here
IBM vs SRT Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check SRT's competition here
IBM vs LZMH Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while LZMH trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check LZMH's competition here
IBM vs CTG Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CTG's competition here
IBM vs UIS Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 159.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while UIS trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check UIS's competition here
IBM vs TTEC Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 110.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while TTEC trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check TTEC's competition here
IBM vs ALYA Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check ALYA's competition here
IBM vs DMRC Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 105.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while DMRC trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check DMRC's competition here
IBM vs CSPI Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while CSPI trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -182.20. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CSPI's competition here
IBM vs CTM Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while CTM trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -15.29. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CTM's competition here
IBM vs KOID Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, KOID has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while KOID trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas KOID's P/E ratio is 44.57. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KOID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to KOID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check KOID's competition here
IBM vs XRXDW Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while XRXDW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check XRXDW's competition here
IBM vs JFU Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while JFU trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check JFU's competition here
IBM vs WYY Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while WYY trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -20.42. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check WYY's competition here
IBM vs USIO Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while USIO trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to USIO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check USIO's competition here
IBM vs GMM Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while GMM trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GMM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check GMM's competition here
IBM vs DTST Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while DTST trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DTST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check DTST's competition here
IBM vs CLPS Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while CLPS trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CLPS's competition here
IBM vs CHOW Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while CHOW trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CHOW's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CHOW's competition here
IBM vs NOTE Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while NOTE trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check NOTE's competition here
IBM vs VEEA Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while VEEA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is 1.11. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check VEEA's competition here
IBM vs VEEAW Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while VEEAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check VEEAW's competition here
IBM vs SAIH Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while SAIH trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check SAIH's competition here
IBM vs SGLB Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check SGLB's competition here
IBM vs LHSW Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while LHSW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check LHSW's competition here
IBM vs GLE Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while GLE trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GLE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check GLE's competition here
IBM vs ARBB Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while ARBB trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check ARBB's competition here
IBM vs CYCU Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while CYCU trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CYCU's competition here
IBM vs SASI Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SASI's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check SASI's competition here
IBM vs WAVD Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -3.92%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check WAVD's competition here
IBM vs TDTH Comparison February 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 240.5B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $245.76, while TDTH trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +5.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check TDTH's competition here