International Business Machines Corporation
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IBM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | $246.28 | -0.57% | 231B | 22.12 | $11.13 | +2.72% |
| ACN | $196.65 | +0.31% | 121.9B | 16.23 | $12.11 | +3.17% |
| INFY | $13.27 | -1.30% | 54.6B | 17.26 | $0.77 | +3.59% |
| FI | $63.80 | +0.16% | 34.3B | 9.86 | $6.47 | N/A |
| FISV | $56.74 | +1.19% | 30.5B | 8.77 | $6.47 | N/A |
| CTSH | $60.37 | -1.32% | 29.1B | 13.24 | $4.56 | +2.08% |
| FIS | $49.70 | +0.89% | 25.7B | 68.05 | $0.73 | +3.31% |
| WIT | $2.26 | -1.74% | 23.7B | 16.18 | $0.14 | +5.12% |
| LDOS | $173.86 | +0.03% | 22.2B | 15.59 | $11.15 | +0.93% |
| BR | $178.32 | +0.52% | 20.8B | 19.70 | $9.05 | +2.07% |
Stock Comparison
IBM vs ACN Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 121.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while ACN trades at $196.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check ACN's competition here
IBM vs INFY Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while INFY trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check INFY's competition here
IBM vs FI Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while FI trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check FI's competition here
IBM vs FISV Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while FISV trades at $56.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check FISV's competition here
IBM vs CTSH Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while CTSH trades at $60.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CTSH's competition here
IBM vs FIS Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while FIS trades at $49.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 68.05. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check FIS's competition here
IBM vs WIT Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while WIT trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check WIT's competition here
IBM vs LDOS Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while LDOS trades at $173.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check LDOS's competition here
IBM vs BR Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while BR trades at $178.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check BR's competition here
IBM vs GIB Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while GIB trades at $71.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check GIB's competition here
IBM vs CDW Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while CDW trades at $116.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CDW's competition here
IBM vs CACI Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while CACI trades at $606.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CACI's competition here
IBM vs JKHY Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while JKHY trades at $168.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check JKHY's competition here
IBM vs IT Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while IT trades at $166.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check IT's competition here
IBM vs GDS Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while GDS trades at $42.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 61.23. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check GDS's competition here
IBM vs AUR Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while AUR trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -9.27. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check AUR's competition here
IBM vs EPAM Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while EPAM trades at $137.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check EPAM's competition here
IBM vs APLD Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while APLD trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -69.36. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check APLD's competition here
IBM vs G Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while G trades at $38.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas G's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check G's competition here
IBM vs DLB Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while DLB trades at $60.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check DLB's competition here
IBM vs INGM Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while INGM trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check INGM's competition here
IBM vs EXLS Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while EXLS trades at $29.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check EXLS's competition here
IBM vs WAY Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while WAY trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 39.61. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check WAY's competition here
IBM vs SAIC Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while SAIC trades at $91.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check SAIC's competition here
IBM vs NCR Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check NCR's competition here
IBM vs PSFE-WT Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
IBM vs NIQ Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while NIQ trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check NIQ's competition here
IBM vs WNS Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while WNS trades at $76.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check WNS's competition here
IBM vs PAY Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while PAY trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 46.90. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check PAY's competition here
IBM vs KD Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while KD trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check KD's competition here
IBM vs VNET Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while VNET trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -33.90. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check VNET's competition here
IBM vs PRFT Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check PRFT's competition here
IBM vs VRRM Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while VRRM trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check VRRM's competition here
IBM vs NYAX Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while NYAX trades at $59.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 96.27. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check NYAX's competition here
IBM vs DXC Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while DXC trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check DXC's competition here
IBM vs GLOB Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while GLOB trades at $44.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check GLOB's competition here
IBM vs CNXC Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while CNXC trades at $31.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CNXC's competition here
IBM vs FORTY Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while FORTY trades at $124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check FORTY's competition here
IBM vs CLVT Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while CLVT trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -8.58. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CLVT's competition here
IBM vs ASGN Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while ASGN trades at $36.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check ASGN's competition here
IBM vs FLYW Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while FLYW trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 113.00. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check FLYW's competition here
IBM vs TWKS Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check TWKS's competition here
IBM vs BBAI Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while BBAI trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check BBAI's competition here
IBM vs INOD Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while INOD trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 46.20. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check INOD's competition here
IBM vs BTCM Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while BTCM trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check BTCM's competition here
IBM vs AI Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while AI trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check AI's competition here
IBM vs TASK Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 918.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while TASK trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check TASK's competition here
IBM vs NABL Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 908.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while NABL trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is -53.61. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check NABL's competition here
IBM vs VYX Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 902.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while VYX trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 46.36. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check VYX's competition here
IBM vs MGIC Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while MGIC trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check MGIC's competition here
IBM vs CTLP Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 766M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while CTLP trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CTLP's competition here
IBM vs CLVT-PA Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CLVT-PA's competition here
IBM vs PHLT Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while PHLT trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check PHLT's competition here
IBM vs WYFI Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 602.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while WYFI trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check WYFI's competition here
IBM vs GDYN Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 536.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while GDYN trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check GDYN's competition here
IBM vs AUROW Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 462.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while AUROW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check AUROW's competition here
IBM vs PSFE Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 397.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while PSFE trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check PSFE's competition here
IBM vs IBEX Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 385.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while IBEX trades at $28.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check IBEX's competition here
IBM vs SDHI Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, SDHI has a market cap of 364.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while SDHI trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas SDHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SDHI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to SDHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check SDHI's competition here
IBM vs HCKT Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 351.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while HCKT trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 30.11. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check HCKT's competition here
IBM vs CD Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 334.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while CD trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -118.00. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CD's competition here
IBM vs BBAI-WT Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 333.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
IBM vs TLS Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 315.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while TLS trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check TLS's competition here
IBM vs SDHIU Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while SDHIU trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check SDHIU's competition here
IBM vs TSSI Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 287M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while TSSI trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 62.89. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check TSSI's competition here
IBM vs BULLZ Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check BULLZ's competition here
IBM vs XRX Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while XRX trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to XRX's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check XRX's competition here
IBM vs CNDT Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 199.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while CNDT trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CNDT's competition here
IBM vs LZMH Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 198.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while LZMH trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -32.66. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check LZMH's competition here
IBM vs III Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 193.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while III trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas III's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to III's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check III's competition here
IBM vs DVLT Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 188M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while DVLT trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check DVLT's competition here
IBM vs SRT Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check SRT's competition here
IBM vs CTG Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CTG's competition here
IBM vs UIS Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 163.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while UIS trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check UIS's competition here
IBM vs TTEC Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 145.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while TTEC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check TTEC's competition here
IBM vs DMRC Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 142.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while DMRC trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check DMRC's competition here
IBM vs ALYA Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check ALYA's competition here
IBM vs XRXDW Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 108.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while XRXDW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check XRXDW's competition here
IBM vs CSPI Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while CSPI trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -178.60. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CSPI's competition here
IBM vs CTM Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 78.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while CTM trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CTM's competition here
IBM vs KOID Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, KOID has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while KOID trades at $32.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas KOID's P/E ratio is 38.48. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KOID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to KOID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check KOID's competition here
IBM vs JFU Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while JFU trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 1.23. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check JFU's competition here
IBM vs WYY Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while WYY trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check WYY's competition here
IBM vs GMM Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while GMM trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GMM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check GMM's competition here
IBM vs USIO Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while USIO trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to USIO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check USIO's competition here
IBM vs CLPS Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while CLPS trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CLPS's competition here
IBM vs DTST Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while DTST trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DTST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check DTST's competition here
IBM vs TDTH Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while TDTH trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +5.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check TDTH's competition here
IBM vs VEEA Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while VEEA trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check VEEA's competition here
IBM vs CHOW Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while CHOW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CHOW's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CHOW's competition here
IBM vs SAIH Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while SAIH trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check SAIH's competition here
IBM vs NOTE Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while NOTE trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check NOTE's competition here
IBM vs SGLB Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check SGLB's competition here
IBM vs LHSW Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while LHSW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check LHSW's competition here
IBM vs GLE Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while GLE trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GLE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check GLE's competition here
IBM vs ARBB Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while ARBB trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check ARBB's competition here
IBM vs VEEAW Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while VEEAW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check VEEAW's competition here
IBM vs CYCU Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while CYCU trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check CYCU's competition here
IBM vs SASI Comparison March 2026
IBM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM stands at 231B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM is priced at $246.28, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.12, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, IBM's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SASI's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.Check SASI's competition here