MicroCloud Hologram Inc.
MicroCloud Hologram Inc. HOLOW Peers
See (HOLOW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOLOW | $0.15 | +0.00% | 26.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| APH | $98.31 | +0.10% | 118.9B | 47.72 | $2.06 | +0.78% |
| TEL | $175.03 | +1.38% | 51.9B | 38.14 | $4.59 | +1.89% |
| GLW | $52.26 | -0.59% | 44.8B | 100.56 | $0.52 | +2.67% |
| GRMN | $217.80 | +0.32% | 41.9B | 28.73 | $7.58 | +1.78% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $164.84 | +0.57% | 28.4B | 38.71 | $4.26 | N/A |
| TDY | $527.52 | +1.47% | 24.7B | 30.23 | $17.46 | N/A |
| JBL | $220.96 | -0.14% | 23.7B | 42.03 | $5.26 | +0.14% |
| FLEX | $51.93 | +0.48% | 19.4B | 24.61 | $2.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HOLOW vs APH Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 118.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while APH trades at $98.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 47.72. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs TEL Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while TEL trades at $175.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 38.14. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs GLW Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while GLW trades at $52.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 100.56. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs GRMN Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while GRMN trades at $217.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs IIVI Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs KEYS Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while KEYS trades at $164.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.71. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs TDY Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while TDY trades at $527.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs JBL Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while JBL trades at $220.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 42.03. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs FLEX Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while FLEX trades at $51.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs TRMB Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while TRMB trades at $80.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs CLS Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while CLS trades at $158.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 44.48. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs FTV Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while FTV trades at $53.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs COHR Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while COHR trades at $93.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -426.09. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs FN Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while FN trades at $289.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 32.29. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs MKSI Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while MKSI trades at $107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs BMI Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while BMI trades at $239.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 52.68. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs SNDK Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while SNDK trades at $46.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs ITRI Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while ITRI trades at $135.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs LFUS Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while LFUS trades at $237.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 62.10. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs CGNX Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while CGNX trades at $34.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 48.25. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs VNT Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while VNT trades at $38.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs SANM Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while SANM trades at $104.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs ESE Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while ESE trades at $191.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 41.93. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs NOVT Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while NOVT trades at $133.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 68.66. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs ST Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while ST trades at $32.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs TTMI Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while TTMI trades at $43.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 58.53. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs OSIS Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while OSIS trades at $229.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs PLXS Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while PLXS trades at $136.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs VICR Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while VICR trades at $47.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 88.84. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs WBX Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while WBX trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs BHE Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while BHE trades at $40.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs ROG Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while ROG trades at $73.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 81.86. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs OUST Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while OUST trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -12.54. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs BELFA Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while BELFA trades at $94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 28.45. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs CTS Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while CTS trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs BELFB Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while BELFB trades at $102.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs PENG Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while PENG trades at $23.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -82.12. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs FARO Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 848.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while FARO trades at $43.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1098.25. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs DAKT Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 807.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while DAKT trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is -74.77. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DAKT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs BKSY Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 741.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while BKSY trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs OUST-WTA Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs ALNT Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 660.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while ALNT trades at $39.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 67.26. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs BKSY-WT Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 651.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs AMOT Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs LYTS Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 541M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while LYTS trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs MLAB Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 492.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while MLAB trades at $90.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -250.97. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs OUST-WT Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs NEON Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 422.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while NEON trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -68.11. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs VPG Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 382.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while VPG trades at $28.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 125.30. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs SATL Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 349.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while SATL trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs SATLW Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while SATLW trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs VLDR Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs MVIS Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 292.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while MVIS trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs MEI Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 275.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while MEI trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs KOPN Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 270.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while KOPN trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -20.75. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs KULR Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while KULR trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs EMAN Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs RELL Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 141.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while RELL trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -66.60. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs LPTH Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while LPTH trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -11.68. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs MPTI Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 117.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while MPTI trades at $40.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs GNSS Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while GNSS trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs ODYS Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while ODYS trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs WRAP Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while WRAP trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -9.28. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs ELTK Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while ELTK trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs LINK Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while LINK trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -27.88. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs MIND Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while MIND trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs SOTK Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while SOTK trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 46.63. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs REFR Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while REFR trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -39.50. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs OPTX Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while OPTX trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 137.00. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs SELX Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 44.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while SELX trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs DSWL Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while DSWL trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs LGL Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while LGL trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 94.50. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs SVRE Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while SVRE trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs CPSH Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while CPSH trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -12.42. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs ISNS Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs LUNA Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while LUNA trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs DAIO Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while DAIO trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs HOLO Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while HOLO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs FCUV Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while FCUV trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs MTEK Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while MTEK trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -21.12. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs KNW Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while KNW trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KNW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs NSYS Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while NSYS trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs TMPOW Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs SLNH Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while SLNH trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs SGMA Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while SGMA trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs VIAO Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs OST Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while OST trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs ELSE Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while ELSE trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs SLNHP Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while SLNHP trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs WATT Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while WATT trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs SVREW Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while SVREW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs SOBR Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while SOBR trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs BNSO Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs MINDP Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs OUSTZ Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while OUSTZ trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs IMTE Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while IMTE trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs MMAT Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs OPTXW Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while OPTXW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.
HOLOW vs MTEKW Comparison
HOLOW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLOW stands at 26.1M. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLOW is priced at $0.15, while MTEKW trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLOW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, HOLOW's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLOW is more volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLOW.