MicroCloud Hologram Inc.

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 185.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while APH trades at $151.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 45.21. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check APH's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 119.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while GLW trades at $129.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 76.25. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check GLW's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 95.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while SNDK trades at $621.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is -87.36. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check SNDK's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while TEL trades at $232.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check TEL's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while GRMN trades at $239.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check GRMN's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while KEYS trades at $239.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 48.56. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check KEYS's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while COHR trades at $232.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 241.17. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check COHR's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while CLS trades at $291.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 40.86. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check CLS's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while TDY trades at $666.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check TDY's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check IIVI's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while JBL trades at $262.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check JBL's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while FLEX trades at $65.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check FLEX's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while FN trades at $513.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 52.37. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check FN's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while FTV trades at $57.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 36.65. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check FTV's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check WDCVV's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while MKSI trades at $249.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 63.08. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check MKSI's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while TRMB trades at $67.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check TRMB's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while TTMI trades at $100.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 64.24. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check TTMI's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while CGNX trades at $55.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 82.40. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check CGNX's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while LFUS trades at $363.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is -128.14. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check LFUS's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while SANM trades at $148.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 35.55. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check SANM's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while VICR trades at $152.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 92.90. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check VICR's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while ESE trades at $272.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 57.48. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check ESE's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while VNT trades at $41.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check VNT's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while ST trades at $36.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ST's P/E ratio is -213.14. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check ST's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while PLXS trades at $196.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check PLXS's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while NOVT trades at $144.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 99.97. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check NOVT's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while OSIS trades at $286.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 33.17. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check OSIS's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while BMI trades at $161.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 33.29. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check BMI's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while ITRI trades at $99.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check ITRI's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while BELFA trades at $214.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 42.27. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check BELFA's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while BELFB trades at $230.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 45.46. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check BELFB's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while NOVTU trades at $62.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check NOVTU's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while BHE trades at $57.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 85.87. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check BHE's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while ROG trades at $111.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -29.29. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check ROG's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while CTS trades at $53.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check CTS's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while DAKT trades at $27.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 231.08. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check DAKT's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while ALNT trades at $67.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 61.10. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check ALNT's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while OUST trades at $19.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check OUST's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while PENG trades at $18.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 86.91. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check PENG's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while FARO trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check FARO's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 715.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while BKSY trades at $21.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check BKSY's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check OUST-WTA's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while LYTS trades at $22.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check LYTS's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 634.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while VPG trades at $46.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 119.39. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check VPG's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check AMOT's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 523.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while LPTH trades at $13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -23.08. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check LPTH's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 515.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while MLAB trades at $92.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 143.64. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check MLAB's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check OUST-WT's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 403.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while KOPN trades at $2.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -114.50. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check KOPN's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 355.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while SATL trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SATL's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check SATL's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 311.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check BKSY-WT's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while MEI trades at $8.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check MEI's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check VLDR's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 260.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while MVIS trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check MVIS's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 228.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while OPTX trades at $6.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -77.25. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check OPTX's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 197.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while RELL trades at $13.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 273.60. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check RELL's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while MPTI trades at $65.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check MPTI's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check EMAN's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while KULR trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check KULR's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 132.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while SLNHP trades at $8.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -7.74. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of +9.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check SLNHP's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 121.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while SATLW trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check SATLW's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 92.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while GNSS trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check GNSS's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while WRAP trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -5.34. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check WRAP's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while ODYS trades at $5.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check ODYS's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 71.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while MIND trades at $8.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check MIND's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while SOTK trades at $4.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check SOTK's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while CPSH trades at $4.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -113.25. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CPSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check CPSH's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while ELTK trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 51.53. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check ELTK's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while DSWL trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check DSWL's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while UEIC trades at $4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check UEIC's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while LINK trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -25.12. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check LINK's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while LUNA trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -48.00. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check LUNA's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while ACFN trades at $17.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check ACFN's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while LGL trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 43.48. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check LGL's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while OPTXW trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check OPTXW's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while REFR trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check REFR's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while WBX trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check WBX's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check ISNS's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while NEON trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check NEON's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while SLNH trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLNH's ROE of +9.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check SLNH's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while DAIO trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check DAIO's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while NSYS trades at $9.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check NSYS's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check TMPOW's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while SELX trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check SELX's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while SGMA trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check SGMA's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while WATT trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WATT's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check WATT's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check VIAO's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while KNW trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNW's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check KNW's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while ELSE trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check ELSE's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while MTEK trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check MTEK's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while GAUZ trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check GAUZ's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while SVREW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check SVREW's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while OST trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check OST's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while SVRE trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check SVRE's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while AMPGZ trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check AMPGZ's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while BNSO trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check BNSO's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while MINDP trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check MINDP's competition here

HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 31.5M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $2.22, while FCUV trades at $5.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -3.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check FCUV's competition here