Corning Incorporated
Corning Incorporated GLW Peers
See (GLW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLW | $49.59 | -0.74% | 42.5B | 95.37 | $0.52 | +2.82% |
| APH | $89.85 | +1.05% | 108.7B | 43.83 | $2.05 | +0.68% |
| TEL | $159.93 | -1.00% | 47.4B | 34.77 | $4.60 | +1.66% |
| GRMN | $202.92 | +0.04% | 39.1B | 26.74 | $7.59 | +1.48% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $157.02 | -1.03% | 27B | 37.65 | $4.17 | N/A |
| FTV | $70.15 | -1.29% | 23.8B | 30.90 | $2.27 | +0.57% |
| TDY | $498.85 | +0.27% | 23.4B | 28.57 | $17.46 | N/A |
| JBL | $167.99 | -0.33% | 18B | 37.75 | $4.45 | +0.19% |
| TRMB | $71.27 | -0.54% | 17B | 11.61 | $6.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GLW vs APH Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 108.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while APH trades at $89.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 43.83. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs TEL Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while TEL trades at $159.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs GRMN Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while GRMN trades at $202.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs IIVI Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs KEYS Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while KEYS trades at $157.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs FTV Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while FTV trades at $70.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs TDY Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while TDY trades at $498.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs JBL Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while JBL trades at $167.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 37.75. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs TRMB Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while TRMB trades at $71.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs FLEX Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while FLEX trades at $42.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs CLS Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while CLS trades at $115.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs COHR Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while COHR trades at $75.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -343.64. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs FN Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while FN trades at $232.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs BMI Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while BMI trades at $248.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 54.56. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs MKSI Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while MKSI trades at $82.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs SNDK Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while SNDK trades at $37.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs VNT Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while VNT trades at $35.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs ITRI Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while ITRI trades at $115.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs LFUS Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while LFUS trades at $205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 53.67. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs CGNX Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while CGNX trades at $29.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 42.81. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs ESE Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while ESE trades at $181.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 39.78. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs SANM Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while SANM trades at $84.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs NOVT Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while NOVT trades at $123.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 63.50. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs ST Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while ST trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs OSIS Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while OSIS trades at $219.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs PLXS Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while PLXS trades at $131.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs TTMI Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while TTMI trades at $29.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 39.81. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs VICR Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while VICR trades at $43.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 82.47. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs BHE Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while BHE trades at $36.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs ROG Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while ROG trades at $66.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 73.91. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs CTS Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while CTS trades at $40.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs PENG Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while PENG trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -104.47. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs BELFB Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 921.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while BELFB trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs BELFA Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 890.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while BELFA trades at $64.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs FARO Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 814.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while FARO trades at $42.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1059.25. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs DAKT Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 740.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while DAKT trades at $14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 371.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs OUST-WTA Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs OUST Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 657.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while OUST trades at $12.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs OST Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 590.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while OST trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs AMOT Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs MLAB Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 548.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while MLAB trades at $100.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -279.50. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs ALNT Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 515.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while ALNT trades at $30.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 52.47. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs LYTS Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 488.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while LYTS trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs OUST-WT Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs SATLW Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 428.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while SATLW trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +34.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs SATL Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 386.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while SATL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SATL's ROE of +34.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs BKSY-WT Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 357.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs BKSY Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 354.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while BKSY trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs KULR Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 347.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while KULR trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs VPG Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 341M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while VPG trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 111.83. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs VLDR Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs MEI Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 285.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while MEI trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs MVIS Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 274.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while MVIS trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs KOPN Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while KOPN trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs EMAN Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs NEON Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 171.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while NEON trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -27.62. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs MPTI Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while MPTI trades at $46.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs RELL Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while RELL trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -59.67. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs LPTH Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 120.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while LPTH trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -11.26. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs WBX Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while WBX trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs ODYS Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while ODYS trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs WRAP Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 73.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while WRAP trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -9.06. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs GNSS Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 73.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while GNSS trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs ELTK Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while ELTK trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs LINK Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while LINK trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -26.92. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs REFR Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while REFR trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -45.62. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs OPTX Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while OPTX trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 166.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs SOTK Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while SOTK trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 48.13. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs SELX Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while SELX trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -36.25. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs MIND Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while MIND trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs CPSH Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while CPSH trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -14.25. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs DSWL Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while DSWL trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs LGL Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while LGL trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 81.75. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs ISNS Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs HOLO Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while HOLO trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs FCUV Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while FCUV trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs NSYS Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while NSYS trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs DAIO Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while DAIO trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -9.24. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs TMPOW Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs SGMA Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while SGMA trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs VIAO Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs LUNA Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while LUNA trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs MTEK Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while MTEK trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs ELSE Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while ELSE trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs WATT Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while WATT trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs SLNHP Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while SLNHP trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs SLNH Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while SLNH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs SVREW Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while SVREW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs BNSO Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs MINDP Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs SOBR Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while SOBR trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs OUSTZ Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while OUSTZ trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs IMTE Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while IMTE trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs MMAT Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs OPTXW Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while OPTXW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs SVRE Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while SVRE trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs OUSTW Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while OUSTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs LGL-WT Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while LGL-WT trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.
GLW vs MTEKW Comparison
GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 42.5B. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $49.59, while MTEKW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 95.37, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.