Corning Incorporated

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 181.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while APH trades at $147.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 44.26. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check APH's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 98.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while SNDK trades at $666.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is -89.46. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check SNDK's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while TEL trades at $231.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check TEL's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while GRMN trades at $246.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check GRMN's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while KEYS trades at $245.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 48.84. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check KEYS's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while COHR trades at $248.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 243.91. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check COHR's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while CLS trades at $296.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 41.40. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check CLS's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while TDY trades at $672.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check TDY's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check IIVI's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while JBL trades at $261.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 40.81. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check JBL's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while FLEX trades at $63.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check FLEX's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while FN trades at $576.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 55.24. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check FN's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while FTV trades at $57.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check FTV's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check WDCVV's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while MKSI trades at $253.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 61.73. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check MKSI's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while TRMB trades at $65.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 37.17. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check TRMB's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while TTMI trades at $106.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 63.60. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check TTMI's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while CGNX trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 83.04. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check CGNX's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while LFUS trades at $368.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is -127.47. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check LFUS's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while SANM trades at $147.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check SANM's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while VICR trades at $171.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 94.40. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check VICR's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while ESE trades at $276.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 57.56. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check ESE's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while VNT trades at $40.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check VNT's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while ST trades at $37.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas ST's P/E ratio is -205.61. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check ST's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while PLXS trades at $197.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 30.72. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check PLXS's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while NOVT trades at $142.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 97.52. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check NOVT's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while OSIS trades at $293.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check OSIS's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while BMI trades at $156.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check BMI's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while ITRI trades at $95.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check ITRI's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while BELFA trades at $215.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 42.19. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check BELFA's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while BELFB trades at $231.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 44.84. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check BELFB's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while NOVTU trades at $61.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check NOVTU's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while BHE trades at $57.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 84.99. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check BHE's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while ROG trades at $106.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -28.99. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check ROG's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while CTS trades at $52.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check CTS's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while DAKT trades at $27.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 229.17. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check DAKT's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while ALNT trades at $65.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 58.68. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check ALNT's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while OUST trades at $18.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check OUST's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while PENG trades at $19.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 87.50. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check PENG's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while FARO trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check FARO's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check OUST-WTA's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 694.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while BKSY trades at $19.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check BKSY's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 665.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while LYTS trades at $21.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check LYTS's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 620.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while VPG trades at $46.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 116.78. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check VPG's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check AMOT's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while MLAB trades at $93.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 144.35. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check MLAB's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 488.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while LPTH trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -21.54. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check LPTH's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check OUST-WT's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 379.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while KOPN trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -107.50. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check KOPN's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 320.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while SATL trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SATL's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check SATL's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 312M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check BKSY-WT's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 305.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while MEI trades at $8.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check MEI's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check VLDR's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 248.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while MVIS trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check MVIS's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 210.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while OPTX trades at $5.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -71.25. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check OPTX's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while MPTI trades at $66.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check MPTI's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 187.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while RELL trades at $12.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 259.40. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check RELL's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check EMAN's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while SLNHP trades at $8.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of +9.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check SLNHP's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 127M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while KULR trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check KULR's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 98.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while SATLW trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check SATLW's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while ODYS trades at $5.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check ODYS's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 85M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while GNSS trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check GNSS's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while WRAP trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check WRAP's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while MIND trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check MIND's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while SOTK trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 40.70. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check SOTK's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while CPSH trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -108.75. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check CPSH's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while ELTK trades at $8.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 51.29. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check ELTK's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while DSWL trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check DSWL's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while LINK trades at $3.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -26.46. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check LINK's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while UEIC trades at $3.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check UEIC's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while LUNA trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check LUNA's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while ACFN trades at $17.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check ACFN's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while LGL trades at $7.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check LGL's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while REFR trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check REFR's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while WBX trades at $3.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check WBX's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while OPTXW trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check OPTXW's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check ISNS's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while HOLO trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HOLO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check HOLO's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while NEON trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check NEON's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while SLNH trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLNH's ROE of +9.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check SLNH's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while DAIO trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check DAIO's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while SELX trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check SELX's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while NSYS trades at $8.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -9.03. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check NSYS's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check TMPOW's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while SGMA trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check SGMA's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check VIAO's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while WATT trades at $10.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WATT's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check WATT's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while KNW trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNW's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check KNW's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while ELSE trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check ELSE's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while MTEK trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check MTEK's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while SVREW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check SVREW's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while OST trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check OST's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while GAUZ trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check GAUZ's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while SVRE trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check SVRE's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while BNSO trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check BNSO's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while MINDP trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check MINDP's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while AMPGZ trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check AMPGZ's competition here

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 124.6B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $145.27, while FCUV trades at $5.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 79.38, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -3.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.Check FCUV's competition here