Corning Incorporated

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 107.17B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while KYCCF trades at $441.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 38.66. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 97.48B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while APH trades at $80.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 39.12. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 66.99B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while HNHPF trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.23B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to HNHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 45.11B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TEL trades at $152.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 36.64B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while GRMN trades at $190.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.51B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 27.97B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MRAAF trades at $15.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 26.31B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while KEYS trades at $152.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 43.37. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 25.85B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MRAAY trades at $6.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to MRAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, HXGBY has a market cap of 25.19B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while HXGBY trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas HXGBY's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HXGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to HXGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 24.63B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while HXGBF trades at $9.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to HXGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 23.73B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while FTV trades at $69.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 22.57B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TDY trades at $481.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TTDKY has a market cap of 20.36B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TTDKY trades at $10.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TTDKY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TTDKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to TTDKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TTDKF has a market cap of 19.56B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TTDKF trades at $10.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TTDKF's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TTDKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TTDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 16.57B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while JBL trades at $154.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 34.76. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 16.08B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TRMB trades at $67.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 14.76B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while FLEX trades at $38.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 11.59B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while VEMLY trades at $40.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VEMLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 11.08B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while CLS trades at $96.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 10.94B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while COHR trades at $70.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -176.50. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 10.23B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while BYDIY trades at $226.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BYDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 9.79B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while BYDIF trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BYDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 9.10B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SOTGY trades at $83.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SNPTF trades at $8.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SNPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.75B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to MNBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 7.45B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while FN trades at $207.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while BMI trades at $229.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 54.16. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 6.53B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SHMZF trades at $22.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SHMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5.79B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while OMRNY trades at $29.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 113.12. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OMRNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MNBEF trades at $14.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 5.33B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SNDK trades at $36.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 5.21B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MKSI trades at $77.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while VNT trades at $34.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while CGNX trades at $29.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4.92B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ITRI trades at $107.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while LFUS trades at $196.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 51.52. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while AUOTY trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is -41.93. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AUOTY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to AUOTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ESE trades at $173.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 40.69. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.39B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while NOVT trades at $121.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 62.52. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 4.31B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SANM trades at $80.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while IBIDF trades at $30.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to IBIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while OSIS trades at $222.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while HRSEF trades at $105.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while PLXS trades at $126.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ST trades at $22.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SEPJF trades at $27.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SEPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while HPHTF trades at $8.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to HPHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while VEMLF trades at $9.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to VEMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TTMI trades at $26.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while HRIBF trades at $61.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SEPJY trades at $12.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TOPCF trades at $22.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 203.49. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while HPHTY trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while RNSHF trades at $29.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while APELY trades at $20.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to APELY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to APELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while APELF trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to APELF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to APELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, FITGF has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while FITGF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas FITGF's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to FITGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while KGBLY trades at $15.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to KGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while VICR trades at $41.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 77.53. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TYOYY trades at $57.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TYOYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while AMANF trades at $25.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while VAIAF trades at $47.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to VAIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while JELLF trades at $33.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while NPEGF trades at $20.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -148.07. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while NILRF trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to NILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while CODAF trades at $7.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while BHE trades at $34.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ROG trades at $65.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 72.62. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while CTS trades at $40.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while JNPKF trades at $20.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to JNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while JPAVF trades at $17.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while BCNAF trades at $12.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while AITUF trades at $7.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to AITUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 941.71M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while PENG trades at $17.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -105.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 918.34M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while BELFB trades at $73.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 908.02M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while BELFA trades at $65.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 833.58M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while AUDGF trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 333.33. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to AUDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 810.77M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while FARO trades at $42.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1054.25. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 728.77M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ASAAF trades at $12.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASAAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.80M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 696.01M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while DAKT trades at $13.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 348.75. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 683.41M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while OUSTW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 682.49M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while CAZGF trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -37.14. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to CAZGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 682.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MLAB trades at $125.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 602.67M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while BCNAY trades at $6.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to BCNAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.91M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 531.70M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while VARXF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 488.93M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while JNNDF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 481.44M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while LYTS trades at $16.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 465.33M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while OUST trades at $8.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 464.63M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 461.09M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to JPDYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.22M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 455.24M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ALNT trades at $26.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, KRKNF has a market cap of 449.35M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while KRKNF trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas KRKNF's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KRKNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to KRKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 437.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while KACPF trades at $11.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 436.81M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SATL trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SATL's ROE of -5.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 430.88M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while OUSTZ trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 391.38M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TRUHF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TRUHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 382.50M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while KULR trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -14.94. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KULR's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 371.85M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while HROEY trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to HROEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 362.74M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while BKSY trades at $11.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 330.59M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to NNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 321.89M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while VPG trades at $24.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 321.08M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.24M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 282.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MVIS trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 251.62M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MEI trades at $7.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 230.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while KOPN trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 181.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TTGPF trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TTGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.56M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SMOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.20M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 168.49M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while NEON trades at $10.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -29.65. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 166.13M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while NPTSF trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 160.54M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MPTI trades at $55.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 154.25M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while CHAEF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 151.93M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while OST trades at $4.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 126.27M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while FUBAF trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUBAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to FUBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 126.15M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while RELL trades at $8.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -59.20. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.51M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to HUDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 108.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while IACYF trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 103.39M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while LPTH trades at $2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 99.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ENMPF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ENMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 98.01M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ENMPY trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 92.56M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while GNSS trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 91.47M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while WBX trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.52M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to IKGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 86.64M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ODYS trades at $5.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 73.81M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while WRAP trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 69.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ELTK trades at $10.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 69.06M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SDIIF trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 64.30M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SATLW trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SATLW's ROE of -5.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 62.76M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SOTK trades at $3.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 56.92. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 56.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SELX trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 54.30M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while OPTX trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 148.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 53.00M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MIND trades at $6.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 52.87M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while LINK trades at $5.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -22.33. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.48M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MPAD trades at $19.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 44.82M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SILLF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 44.47M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ACFN trades at $17.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 42.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while AATC trades at $7.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 39.88M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while REFR trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -29.75. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 36.69M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while HOLO trades at $7.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 36.11M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while LGL trades at $6.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 84.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 35.78M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while FCUV trades at $5.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 35.69M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while DSWL trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 26.44M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while CPSH trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 24.16M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while YNVYF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to YNVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 23.77M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while NSYS trades at $8.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -18.32. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.70M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 22.91M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while DAIO trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -8.55. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, FGRRF has a market cap of 22.75M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while FGRRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas FGRRF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FGRRF's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to FGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ERMG has a market cap of 22.59M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ERMG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ERMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ERMG's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to ERMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 22.52M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ROBOF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 21.51M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while NSCIF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to NSCIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 20.85M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while IEHC trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to IEHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.28M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while INRD trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 17.88M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MTEK trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.47M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 16.30M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while WELX trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.27M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while KESPF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to KESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 13.88M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while BMNR trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 13.59M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ELSE trades at $3.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 30.31. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 11.36M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while AAIRF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 11.28M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while LUNA trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SIGL has a market cap of 11.26M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SIGL trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SIGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIGL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 10.59M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while BNSOF trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNSOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 8.89M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SVREW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 8.87M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SLNH trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 8.81M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while LCTC trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to LCTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 8.53M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while WATT trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WATT's ROE of -7.73%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 8.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SCND trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 7.62M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SGMA trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 7.61M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SLNHP trades at $4.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 6.31M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ZTSTF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ESHSF has a market cap of 6.13M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ESHSF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ESHSF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ESHSF's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ESHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 5.67M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TNLX trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to TNLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 5.55M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while GNCLF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.44M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while BNSO trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.30M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MINDP trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 5.15M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SOBR trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.98M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while IMTE trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 3.81M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while DPLS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to DPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 3.79M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TRCK trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.52M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MMAT trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, RMTD has a market cap of 2.93M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while RMTD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas RMTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RMTD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to RMTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MRRYF has a market cap of 2.63M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MRRYF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MRRYF's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRRYF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 2.03M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SVRE trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 1.97M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while VPER trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 1.93M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while LGL-WT trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 1.76M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while OPTXW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TKOI has a market cap of 1.65M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TKOI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TKOI's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKOI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to TKOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, GWSO has a market cap of 1.64M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while GWSO trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas GWSO's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GWSO's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to GWSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, NXOPF has a market cap of 1.62M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while NXOPF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas NXOPF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NXOPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to NXOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 1.54M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MTEKW trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, EQTL has a market cap of 1.51M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while EQTL trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas EQTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EQTL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to EQTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SRMX has a market cap of 1.44M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SRMX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SRMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SRMX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SRMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, LBAS has a market cap of 1.22M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while LBAS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas LBAS's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBAS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to LBAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TRCC has a market cap of 1.16M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TRCC trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TRCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, VPIM has a market cap of 1.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while VPIM trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas VPIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VPIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VPIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, DION has a market cap of 957666.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while DION trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas DION's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DION's ROE of -18.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to DION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, UCLE has a market cap of 667924.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while UCLE trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas UCLE's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UCLE's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to UCLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SUTI has a market cap of 619921.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SUTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SUTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUTI's ROE of +2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SUTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, NXSL has a market cap of 401691.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while NXSL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas NXSL's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NXSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to NXSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, FLXT has a market cap of 339004.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while FLXT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas FLXT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLXT's ROE of -17.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to FLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, MJLB has a market cap of 298926.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while MJLB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas MJLB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MJLB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to MJLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 240587.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while KNW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KNW's ROE of +5.76%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SATT has a market cap of 225111.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SATT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SATT's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SATT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to SATT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, VIAOY has a market cap of 181228.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while VIAOY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas VIAOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VIAOY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VIAOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 175444.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while HOLOW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, CPQQ has a market cap of 100955.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while CPQQ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas CPQQ's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPQQ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to CPQQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SMIT has a market cap of 73570.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SMIT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SMIT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMIT's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SMIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, GIGA has a market cap of 61866.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while GIGA trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas GIGA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GIGA's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to GIGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TRKR has a market cap of 56789.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TRKR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TRKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRKR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, IRBL has a market cap of 38000.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while IRBL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas IRBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IRBL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to IRBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ADTC has a market cap of 32000.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ADTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ADTC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to ADTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, DGNG has a market cap of 24279.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while DGNG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas DGNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DGNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to DGNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, CMCZ has a market cap of 21175.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while CMCZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas CMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMCZ's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to CMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, CPWY has a market cap of 18716.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while CPWY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas CPWY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPWY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to CPWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ASPT has a market cap of 17252.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ASPT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ASPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASPT's ROE of +201.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to ASPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ESNR has a market cap of 16317.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ESNR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ESNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ESNR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to ESNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, DSGT has a market cap of 15726.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while DSGT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas DSGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DSGT's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to DSGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ALPE has a market cap of 7776.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ALPE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ALPE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALPE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to ALPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, AURT has a market cap of 7392.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while AURT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas AURT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AURT's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to AURT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TMPOQ has a market cap of 3076.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TMPOQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TMPOQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TMPOQ's ROE of +6.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TMPOQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, UNXLQ has a market cap of 2928.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while UNXLQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas UNXLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UNXLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to UNXLQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, QNGYQ has a market cap of 1616.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while QNGYQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas QNGYQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QNGYQ's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to QNGYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, HOKUQ has a market cap of 1106.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while HOKUQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas HOKUQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HOKUQ's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to HOKUQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, AHAG has a market cap of 711.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while AHAG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas AHAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHAG's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to AHAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, SIMC has a market cap of 647.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while SIMC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas SIMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to SIMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, CSGH has a market cap of 562.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while CSGH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas CSGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CSGH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to CSGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, NTUR has a market cap of 556.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while NTUR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas NTUR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NTUR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to NTUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, IINX has a market cap of 177.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while IINX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas IINX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to IINX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, GSIL has a market cap of 174.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while GSIL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas GSIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GSIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to GSIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, AWIN has a market cap of 92.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while AWIN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas AWIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AWIN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to AWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, QNGY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while QNGY trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas QNGY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QNGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to QNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TMPO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TMPO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TMPO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TMPO's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to TMPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, FTV-PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while FTV-PA trades at $983.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas FTV-PA's P/E ratio is 209.96. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FTV-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to FTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, NUVG comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while NUVG trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas NUVG's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NUVG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to NUVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, VLDRW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while VLDRW trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas VLDRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VLDRW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to VLDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, QNGYW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while QNGYW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas QNGYW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QNGYW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to QNGYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ERTWF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ERTWF trades at $5.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ERTWF's P/E ratio is -19.07. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ERTWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to ERTWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, ATC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while ATC trades at $22.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas ATC's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to ATC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, PLJJF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while PLJJF trades at $42.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas PLJJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLJJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to PLJJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, TRUHY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while TRUHY trades at $3.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas TRUHY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRUHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is more volatile compared to TRUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.

GLW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLW stands at 38.58B. In comparison, IIVIP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GLW is priced at $45.05, while IIVIP trades at $187.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLW currently has a P/E ratio of 86.63, whereas IIVIP's P/E ratio is 75.98. In terms of profitability, GLW's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IIVIP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLW is less volatile compared to IIVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLW.