GDS Holdings Limited

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 240.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while IBM trades at $246.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check IBM's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 133.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while ACN trades at $207.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ACN's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while INFY trades at $14.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check INFY's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while FI trades at $63.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check FI's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while FISV trades at $58.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check FISV's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while CTSH trades at $62.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CTSH's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while FIS trades at $47.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 153.53. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check FIS's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while WIT trades at $2.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WIT's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while LDOS trades at $172.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check LDOS's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while GIB trades at $72.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check GIB's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while CDW trades at $121.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CDW's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while CACI trades at $572.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CACI's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while JKHY trades at $159.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check JKHY's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while IT trades at $147.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check IT's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while AUR trades at $4.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check AUR's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while APLD trades at $29.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -74.46. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check APLD's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while EPAM trades at $131.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check EPAM's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while G trades at $37.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas G's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check G's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while DLB trades at $63.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check DLB's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while INGM trades at $20.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check INGM's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while EXLS trades at $29.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check EXLS's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while WAY trades at $24.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WAY's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while SAIC trades at $86.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SAIC's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NCR's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check NCR's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while NIQ trades at $11.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check NIQ's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while WNS trades at $76.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WNS's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while PAY trades at $24.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 55.18. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check PAY's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while VNET trades at $11.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -38.23. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check VNET's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check PSFE-WT's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while VRRM trades at $18.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 55.71. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check VRRM's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while KD trades at $11.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check KD's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while PRFT trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check PRFT's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while DXC trades at $12.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check DXC's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while CNXC trades at $30.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CNXC's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while NYAX trades at $54.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 88.54. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check NYAX's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while GLOB trades at $42.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check GLOB's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while ASGN trades at $42.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ASGN's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while FORTY trades at $116.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check FORTY's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TWKS's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while BBAI trades at $3.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check BBAI's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while INOD trades at $44.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 44.38. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check INOD's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while AI trades at $9.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check AI's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while FLYW trades at $10.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is -561.50. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FLYW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check FLYW's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while VYX trades at $8.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -21.81. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VYX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check VYX's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while BTCM trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check BTCM's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while CLVT trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CLVT's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 962.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while TASK trades at $10.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TASK's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 952.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while MGIC trades at $18.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check MGIC's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 889.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while NABL trades at $4.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is -118.87. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check NABL's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while CTLP trades at $10.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CTLP's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CLVT-PA's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 646.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while WYFI trades at $16.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -21.65. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WYFI's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while PHLT trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check PHLT's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 577.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while GDYN trades at $6.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check GDYN's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 512.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while AUROW trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check AUROW's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 398M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while IBEX trades at $28.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check IBEX's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 378.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while HCKT trades at $12.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 36.74. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check HCKT's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 369.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while PSFE trades at $6.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check PSFE's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SDHI has a market cap of 363.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while SDHI trades at $10.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas SDHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SDHI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to SDHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SDHI's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 331.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check BBAI-WT's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 303.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while TLS trades at $3.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TLS's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 293.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while SDHIU trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SDHIU's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while CD trades at $4.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -98.75. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CD's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check BULLZ's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 246M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while CNDT trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CNDT's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 239.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while XRX trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XRX's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check XRX's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while III trades at $4.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas III's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to III's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check III's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while DVLT trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check DVLT's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 187.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while TSSI trades at $7.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TSSI's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SRT's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while LZMH trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check LZMH's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CTG's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 159.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while UIS trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check UIS's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 110.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while TTEC trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TTEC's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ALYA's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 105.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while DMRC trades at $4.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check DMRC's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while CSPI trades at $8.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -182.20. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CSPI's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while CTM trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -15.29. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CTM's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, KOID has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while KOID trades at $36.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas KOID's P/E ratio is 44.57. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KOID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to KOID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check KOID's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while XRXDW trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check XRXDW's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while JFU trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check JFU's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while WYY trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -20.42. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WYY's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while USIO trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to USIO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check USIO's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while GMM trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GMM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check GMM's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while DTST trades at $4.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DTST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check DTST's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while CLPS trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CLPS's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while CHOW trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CHOW's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CHOW's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while NOTE trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check NOTE's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while VEEA trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is 1.11. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check VEEA's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while VEEAW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check VEEAW's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while SAIH trades at $6.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SAIH's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SGLB's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while LHSW trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check LHSW's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while GLE trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GLE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check GLE's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while ARBB trades at $4.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is more volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check ARBB's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while CYCU trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check CYCU's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while SASI trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SASI's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check SASI's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while WAVD trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -3.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check WAVD's competition here

GDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GDS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GDS is priced at $43.25, while TDTH trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GDS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.49, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, GDS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +5.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GDS is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDS.Check TDTH's competition here