Fortive Corporation

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 168.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while APH trades at $136.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 41.09. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check APH's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while GLW trades at $132.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 72.16. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check GLW's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while SNDK trades at $703.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is -94.07. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SNDK's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while TEL trades at $203.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 29.32. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check TEL's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while KEYS trades at $285.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 50.35. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check KEYS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while GRMN trades at $234.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check GRMN's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while COHR trades at $247.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 242.56. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check COHR's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while CLS trades at $270.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 37.75. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CLS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check IIVI's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while TDY trades at $645.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 34.15. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check TDY's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while JBL trades at $258.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 40.38. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check JBL's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while FLEX trades at $64.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check FLEX's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while FN trades at $512.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 49.11. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check FN's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check WDCVV's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while TRMB trades at $66.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 37.84. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check TRMB's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while MKSI trades at $221.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 50.79. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MKSI's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while TTMI trades at $96.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 57.45. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check TTMI's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while VICR trades at $185.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 71.04. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check VICR's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while LFUS trades at $329.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is -113.32. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check LFUS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while CGNX trades at $49.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 72.88. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CGNX's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while ESE trades at $266.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 55.46. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV and ESE have similar daily volatility (1.95).Check ESE's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while SANM trades at $123.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SANM's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while VNT trades at $36.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check VNT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while PLXS trades at $194.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check PLXS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while ST trades at $34.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 162.10. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ST's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while OSIS trades at $278.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OSIS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while BMI trades at $151.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 31.73. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BMI's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while NOVT trades at $118.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 80.28. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check NOVT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while ITRI trades at $91.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV and ITRI have similar daily volatility (1.95).Check ITRI's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while BELFB trades at $205.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 44.11. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BELFB's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while BELFA trades at $188.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 40.64. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BELFA's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while BHE trades at $54.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 79.65. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BHE's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while NOVTU trades at $53.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV and NOVTU have similar daily volatility (1.95).Check NOVTU's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while ROG trades at $101.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -29.93. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ROG's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while OUST trades at $21.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -19.91. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OUST's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while CTS trades at $46.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CTS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while ALNT trades at $64.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 57.54. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ALNT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 996.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while DAKT trades at $20.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 37.16. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check DAKT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 921.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while PENG trades at $17.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 79.73. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check PENG's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 864.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while BKSY trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -11.49. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BKSY's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while FARO trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check FARO's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OUST-WTA's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 600.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while LYTS trades at $19.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check LYTS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check AMOT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 547.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while VPG trades at $41.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 102.87. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check VPG's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 479.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while LPTH trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -21.15. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check LPTH's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OUST-WT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 436.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while MLAB trades at $78.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 121.51. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MLAB's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 372.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while KOPN trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -105.50. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check KOPN's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 304.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BKSY-WT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check VLDR's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 291.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while SATL trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SATL's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SATL's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 270.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while OPTX trades at $7.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -91.50. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OPTX's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 196.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while MPTI trades at $67.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MPTI's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 179.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while MVIS trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MVIS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 178.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while MEI trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MEI's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check EMAN's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 162.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while RELL trades at $11.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 224.80. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check RELL's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 134.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while SLNHP trades at $9.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of +9.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SLNHP's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while KULR trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check KULR's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while ODYS trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ODYS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 84.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while WRAP trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check WRAP's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while GNSS trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check GNSS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while MIND trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MIND's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 70.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while SOTK trades at $4.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 44.80. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SOTK's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while SATLW trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SATLW's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while ELTK trades at $9.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 53.95. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ELTK's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while CPSH trades at $3.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 125.33. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CPSH's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while UEIC trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check UEIC's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while DSWL trades at $3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check DSWL's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while ACFN trades at $19.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ACFN's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while LINK trades at $3.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -23.85. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check LINK's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while LUNA trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -46.67. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check LUNA's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while LGL trades at $7.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 42.91. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check LGL's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while OPTXW trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OPTXW's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ISNS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while REFR trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -16.83. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check REFR's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while HOLO trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOLO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check HOLO's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while NEON trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check NEON's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while WBX trades at $2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check WBX's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while NSYS trades at $9.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -10.14. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check NSYS's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while DAIO trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check DAIO's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while SLNH trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLNH's ROE of +9.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SLNH's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check TMPOW's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while WATT trades at $13.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WATT's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check WATT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while SGMA trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SGMA's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check VIAO's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while SELX trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SELX's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while KNW trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KNW's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check KNW's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while ELSE trades at $4.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ELSE's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while MTEK trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MTEK's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while OST trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OST's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while GAUZ trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check GAUZ's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while SVREW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SVREW's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while SVRE trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SVRE's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while BNSO trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BNSO's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while MINDP trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MINDP's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while MMAT trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MMAT's competition here

FTV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 17.1B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $53.76, while AMPGZ trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 33.80, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check AMPGZ's competition here