Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TRI's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TRI and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRI | $96.98 | -1.85% | 42.3B | 23.43 | $4.14 | +4.14% |
| CTAS | $200.04 | -0.23% | 80B | 40.49 | $4.94 | +0.94% |
| RELX | $34.25 | -1.30% | 59.8B | 20.05 | $1.71 | +2.67% |
| CPRT | $32.03 | -1.75% | 29.7B | 19.89 | $1.61 | N/A |
| ROL | $34.54 | -1.17% | 16.6B | 30.29 | $1.14 | +2.12% |
| RBA | $81.33 | -0.67% | 15.1B | 19.45 | $4.18 | +1.55% |
| ARMK | $56.91 | -1.16% | 15B | 27.90 | $2.04 | +0.84% |
| ULS | $72.89 | -0.41% | 14.7B | 33.45 | $2.18 | +0.77% |
| BIPI | $16.25 | -0.12% | 12.9B | N/A | N/A | +7.88% |
| RTO | $22.78 | -1.26% | 11.5B | 19.71 | $1.16 | +2.79% |
Stock Comparison
Cintas Corporation (NASDAQ: CTAS)
TRI vs CTAS Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 80B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while CTAS trades at $200.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 40.49. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CTAS's competition here
RELX Plc (NYSE: RELX)
TRI vs RELX Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, RELX has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while RELX trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas RELX's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RELX's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RELX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RELX's competition here
Copart, Inc. (NASDAQ: CPRT)
TRI vs CPRT Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while CPRT trades at $32.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CPRT's competition here
Rollins, Inc. (NYSE: ROL)
TRI vs ROL Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while ROL trades at $34.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ROL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ROL's competition here
RB Global, Inc. (NYSE: RBA)
TRI vs RBA Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while RBA trades at $81.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RBA's competition here
Aramark (NYSE: ARMK)
TRI vs ARMK Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while ARMK trades at $56.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ARMK's competition here
UL Solutions Inc. (NYSE: ULS)
TRI vs ULS Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while ULS trades at $72.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 33.45. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ULS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ULS's competition here
BIP Bermuda Holdings I Limited (NYSE: BIPI)
TRI vs BIPI Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while BIPI trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BIPI's competition here
Rentokil Initial plc (NYSE: RTO)
TRI vs RTO Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while RTO trades at $22.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RTO's competition here
IAA, Inc. (NYSE: IAA)
TRI vs IAA Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check IAA's competition here
UniFirst Corporation (NYSE: UNF)
TRI vs UNF Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while UNF trades at $275.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check UNF's competition here
First Advantage Corporation (NASDAQ: FA)
TRI vs FA Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while FA trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas FA's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to FA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check FA's competition here
Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. (NYSE: BFAM)
TRI vs BFAM Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while BFAM trades at $65.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BFAM's competition here
Maximus, Inc. (NYSE: MMS)
TRI vs MMS Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while MMS trades at $56.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to MMS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check MMS's competition here
CBIZ, Inc. (NYSE: CBZ)
TRI vs CBZ Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while CBZ trades at $54.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CBZ's competition here
ABM Industries Inc. (NYSE: ABM)
TRI vs ABM Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while ABM trades at $49.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ABM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ABM's competition here
PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (NYSE: PAGS)
TRI vs PAGS Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while PAGS trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAGS's competition here
Flywire Corp (NASDAQ: FLYW)
TRI vs FLYW Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while FLYW trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 68.23. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check FLYW's competition here
Cimpress plc (NASDAQ: CMPR)
TRI vs CMPR Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while CMPR trades at $85.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CMPR's competition here
TIC Solutions, Inc. (NYSE: TIC)
TRI vs TIC Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while TIC trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -27.22. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TIC's competition here
Target Hospitality Corp. (NASDAQ: TH)
TRI vs TH Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while TH trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -50.53. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TH's competition here
EVERTEC, Inc. (NYSE: EVTC)
TRI vs EVTC Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while EVTC trades at $29.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check EVTC's competition here
Viad Corp (NYSE: VVI)
TRI vs VVI Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check VVI's competition here
Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. (NYSE: RHLD)
TRI vs RHLD Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while RHLD trades at $135.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RHLD's ROE of +37.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RHLD's competition here
Deluxe Corporation (NYSE: DLX)
TRI vs DLX Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while DLX trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to DLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check DLX's competition here
SP Plus Corporation (NASDAQ: SP)
TRI vs SP Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SP's competition here
BrightView Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BV)
TRI vs BV Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while BV trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to BV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BV's competition here
TDCX Inc. (NYSE: TDCX)
TRI vs TDCX Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TDCX's competition here
Transcat, Inc. (NASDAQ: TRNS)
TRI vs TRNS Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, TRNS has a market cap of 780.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while TRNS trades at $83.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas TRNS's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRNS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to TRNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TRNS's competition here
Paysign, Inc. (NASDAQ: PAYS)
TRI vs PAYS Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, PAYS has a market cap of 728.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while PAYS trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas PAYS's P/E ratio is 50.12. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAYS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PAYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAYS's competition here
Cass Information Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CASS)
TRI vs CASS Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 713.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while CASS trades at $55.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CASS's competition here
Ennis, Inc. (NYSE: EBF)
TRI vs EBF Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, EBF has a market cap of 537.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while EBF trades at $21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas EBF's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to EBF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check EBF's competition here
Quad/Graphics, Inc. (NYSE: QUAD)
TRI vs QUAD Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 523.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while QUAD trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check QUAD's competition here
BUUU Group Ltd (NASDAQ: BUUU)
TRI vs BUUU Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 448M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while BUUU trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is -3831.00. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BUUU's competition here
Acacia Research Corporation (NASDAQ: ACTG)
TRI vs ACTG Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 440.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while ACTG trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is 57.00. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ACTG's competition here
Spire Global, Inc. (NYSE: SPIR)
TRI vs SPIR Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 374.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while SPIR trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SPIR's competition here
Civeo Corporation (NYSE: CVEO)
TRI vs CVEO Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while CVEO trades at $33.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -28.55. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CVEO's competition here
Spire Global, Inc. (NYSE: SPIR-WT)
TRI vs SPIR-WT Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, SPIR-WT has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while SPIR-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas SPIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPIR-WT's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SPIR-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SPIR-WT's competition here
Etoiles Capital Group Co., Ltd (NASDAQ: EFTY)
TRI vs EFTY Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, EFTY has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while EFTY trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas EFTY's P/E ratio is 187.75. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EFTY's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to EFTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check EFTY's competition here
Performant Financial Corporation (NASDAQ: PFMT)
TRI vs PFMT Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PFMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PFMT's competition here
Resolute Holdings Management Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued (NASDAQ: RHLDV)
TRI vs RHLDV Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RHLDV's competition here
Information Services Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: III)
TRI vs III Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 242.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while III trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas III's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to III's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to III. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check III's competition here
PFSweb, Inc. (NASDAQ: PFSW)
TRI vs PFSW Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PFSW's competition here
ARC Document Solutions, Inc. (NYSE: ARC)
TRI vs ARC Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ARC's competition here
Team, Inc. (NYSE: TISI)
TRI vs TISI Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 121.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while TISI trades at $26.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TISI's ROE of -4.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TISI's competition here
Concorde International Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: YOOV)
TRI vs YOOV Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, YOOV has a market cap of 113.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while YOOV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas YOOV's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to YOOV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check YOOV's competition here
Concorde International Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: CIGL)
TRI vs CIGL Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CIGL has a market cap of 82.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while CIGL trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas CIGL's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIGL's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CIGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CIGL's competition here
Where Food Comes From Inc (NASDAQ: WFCF)
TRI vs WFCF Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, WFCF has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while WFCF trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas WFCF's P/E ratio is 46.75. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to WFCF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check WFCF's competition here
System1, Inc. WT (NYSE: SST-WT)
TRI vs SST-WT Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, SST-WT has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while SST-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas SST-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SST-WT's ROE of -11.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SST-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SST-WT's competition here
DLH Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: DLHC)
TRI vs DLHC Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while DLHC trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check DLHC's competition here
Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ANPA)
TRI vs ANPA Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while ANPA trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 311.00. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ANPA's competition here
Network-1 Technologies, Inc. (AMEX: NTIP)
TRI vs NTIP Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while NTIP trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check NTIP's competition here
YSX Tech. Co., Ltd (NASDAQ: YSXT)
TRI vs YSXT Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while YSXT trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check YSXT's competition here
SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated (NASDAQ: SBCWW)
TRI vs SBCWW Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while SBCWW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SBCWW's competition here
Harte Hanks, Inc. (NASDAQ: HHS)
TRI vs HHS Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while HHS trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HHS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to HHS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check HHS's competition here
Avax One Technology Ltd (NASDAQ: AVX)
TRI vs AVX Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, AVX has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while AVX trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas AVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AVX's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to AVX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check AVX's competition here
Primech Holdings Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: PMEC)
TRI vs PMEC Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while PMEC trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PMEC's competition here
TryHard Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: THH)
TRI vs THH Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while THH trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 91.50. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check THH's competition here
SPAR Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: SGRP)
TRI vs SGRP Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while SGRP trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SGRP's competition here
Cre8 Enterprise Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CRE)
TRI vs CRE Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while CRE trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CRE's competition here
Token Cat Limited (NASDAQ: TC)
TRI vs TC Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while TC trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TC's competition here
YY Group Holding Limited (NASDAQ: YYGH)
TRI vs YYGH Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, YYGH has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while YYGH trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas YYGH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YYGH's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to YYGH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check YYGH's competition here
Top KingWin Ltd. Class A (NASDAQ: DPU)
TRI vs DPU Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, DPU has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while DPU trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas DPU's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DPU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to DPU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check DPU's competition here
Intelligent Group Limited (NASDAQ: INTJ)
TRI vs INTJ Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while INTJ trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check INTJ's competition here
VisionSys AI Inc. (NASDAQ: VSA)
TRI vs VSA Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while VSA trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VSA's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check VSA's competition here
Samfine Creation Holdings Group Limited (NASDAQ: SFHG)
TRI vs SFHG Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while SFHG trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SFHG's competition here
PowerCompute, Inc. (NASDAQ: PWCM)
TRI vs PWCM Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, PWCM has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while PWCM trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas PWCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PWCM's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PWCM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PWCM's competition here
SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company (NASDAQ: SMX)
TRI vs SMX Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while SMX trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMX's ROE of -22.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SMX's competition here
Lichen International Limited (NASDAQ: LICN)
TRI vs LICN Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 868.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while LICN trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check LICN's competition here
JIADE Limited (NASDAQ: JDZG)
TRI vs JDZG Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 323.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while JDZG trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JDZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check JDZG's competition here
Target Hospitality Corp. (NASDAQ: THWWW)
TRI vs THWWW Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check THWWW's competition here
Powell Max Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: PMAX)
TRI vs PMAX Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 146.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while PMAX trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PMAX's competition here
Harrison Global Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BLMZ)
TRI vs BLMZ Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BLMZ's competition here
Katapult Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: KPLTW)
TRI vs KPLTW Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, KPLTW has a market cap of 18.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while KPLTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas KPLTW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KPLTW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to KPLTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check KPLTW's competition here
8000 Inc (NASDAQ: EIGH)
TRI vs EIGH Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, EIGH has a market cap of 15.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while EIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas EIGH's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EIGH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to EIGH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check EIGH's competition here
GEO Reentry, Inc. (NYSE: CRN)
TRI vs CRN Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CRN's competition here
ALJ Regional Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALJJ)
TRI vs ALJJ Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ALJJ's competition here
Epic Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: EPIQ)
TRI vs EPIQ Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, EPIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while EPIQ trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas EPIQ's P/E ratio is -37.32. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to EPIQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check EPIQ's competition here
Intersections Inc. (NASDAQ: INTX)
TRI vs INTX Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is 79.40. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check INTX's competition here
R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company (NYSE: RRD)
TRI vs RRD Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RRD's competition here
PAE Incorporated (NASDAQ: PAE)
TRI vs PAE Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAE's competition here
PAE Incorporated (NASDAQ: PAEWW)
TRI vs PAEWW Comparison September 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.3B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.98 on the NASDAQ, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.43, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAEWW's competition here