Thomson Reuters Corporation
Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRI | $85.36 | -2.28% | 37.3B | 24.60 | $3.47 | +3.74% |
| CTAS | $171.36 | -0.49% | 68.6B | 36.08 | $4.75 | +1.04% |
| RELX | $33.60 | +0.06% | 59.5B | 22.55 | $1.49 | +2.73% |
| CPRT | $33.04 | -0.24% | 31.8B | 20.78 | $1.59 | N/A |
| ULS | $101.90 | +1.91% | 20.5B | 59.24 | $1.72 | +0.54% |
| RBA | $104.53 | +1.20% | 19.5B | 48.62 | $2.15 | +1.18% |
| RTO | $31.95 | +1.24% | 16.1B | 56.05 | $0.57 | +1.95% |
| ARMK | $51.53 | -0.02% | 13.5B | 38.46 | $1.34 | +0.86% |
| BIPI | $16.33 | +0.93% | 13B | N/A | N/A | +7.88% |
| IAA | $39.89 | -0.10% | 5.3B | 18.55 | $2.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRI vs CTAS Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while CTAS trades at $171.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CTAS's competition here
TRI vs RELX Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, RELX has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while RELX trades at $33.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas RELX's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RELX's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RELX's competition here
TRI vs CPRT Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while CPRT trades at $33.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CPRT's competition here
TRI vs ULS Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while ULS trades at $101.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 59.24. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ULS's competition here
TRI vs RBA Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while RBA trades at $104.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 48.62. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RBA's competition here
TRI vs RTO Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while RTO trades at $31.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 56.05. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RTO's competition here
TRI vs ARMK Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while ARMK trades at $51.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ARMK's competition here
TRI vs BIPI Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while BIPI trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BIPI's competition here
TRI vs IAA Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check IAA's competition here
TRI vs UNF Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while UNF trades at $264.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 35.86. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check UNF's competition here
TRI vs MMS Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while MMS trades at $60.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check MMS's competition here
TRI vs FA Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while FA trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas FA's P/E ratio is 305.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check FA's competition here
TRI vs ABM Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while ABM trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ABM's competition here
TRI vs TIC Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while TIC trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -14.81. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TIC's competition here
TRI vs TH Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while TH trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -42.47. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TH's competition here
TRI vs CBZ Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while CBZ trades at $31.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CBZ's competition here
TRI vs PRSU Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while PRSU trades at $43.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 40.71. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PRSU's competition here
TRI vs VVI Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check VVI's competition here
TRI vs BV Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while BV trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 412.67. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BV's competition here
TRI vs LZ Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while LZ trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 107.17. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check LZ's competition here
TRI vs SP Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SP's competition here
TRI vs TDCX Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TDCX's competition here
TRI vs RHLD Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 912.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while RHLD trades at $110.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RHLD's ROE of -10.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RHLD's competition here
TRI vs SPIR Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 673.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while SPIR trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPIR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SPIR's competition here
TRI vs CASS Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while CASS trades at $46.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CASS's competition here
TRI vs ACTG Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 443.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while ACTG trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is -24.16. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ACTG's competition here
TRI vs QUAD Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 387.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while QUAD trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check QUAD's competition here
TRI vs CVEO Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 367.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while CVEO trades at $33.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -27.79. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CVEO's competition here
TRI vs SPIR-WT Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, SPIR-WT has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while SPIR-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas SPIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPIR-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SPIR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SPIR-WT's competition here
TRI vs PPHC Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 319.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while PPHC trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PPHC's competition here
TRI vs PFMT Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PFMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PFMT's competition here
TRI vs RHLDV Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RHLDV's competition here
TRI vs BUUU Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 219.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while BUUU trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is 268.29. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BUUU's competition here
TRI vs YOOV Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, YOOV has a market cap of 183.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while YOOV trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas YOOV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to YOOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check YOOV's competition here
TRI vs PFSW Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PFSW's competition here
TRI vs ARC Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ARC's competition here
TRI vs ANPA Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while ANPA trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 692.00. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ANPA's competition here
TRI vs DLHC Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while DLHC trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -17.34. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check DLHC's competition here
TRI vs TISI Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 71.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while TISI trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TISI's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TISI's competition here
TRI vs SST-WT Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, SST-WT has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while SST-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas SST-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SST-WT's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SST-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SST-WT's competition here
TRI vs ZGM Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while ZGM trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ZGM's competition here
TRI vs NTIP Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while NTIP trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -13.59. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check NTIP's competition here
TRI vs OMEX Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while OMEX trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check OMEX's competition here
TRI vs PMEC Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while PMEC trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -14.92. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PMEC's competition here
TRI vs SST Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while SST trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SST's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SST's competition here
TRI vs YSXT Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while YSXT trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check YSXT's competition here
TRI vs SGRP Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while SGRP trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SGRP's competition here
TRI vs THH Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while THH trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check THH's competition here
TRI vs WHLM Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while WHLM trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check WHLM's competition here
TRI vs ATTO Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ATTO's competition here
TRI vs MSGY Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while MSGY trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check MSGY's competition here
TRI vs CRE Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while CRE trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CRE's competition here
TRI vs SFHG Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while SFHG trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SFHG's competition here
TRI vs SMX Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 929.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while SMX trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMX's ROE of -22.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SMX's competition here
TRI vs LICN Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 830.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while LICN trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check LICN's competition here
TRI vs VSA Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 816.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while VSA trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VSA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check VSA's competition here
TRI vs PMAX Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 449.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while PMAX trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PMAX's competition here
TRI vs THWWW Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check THWWW's competition here
TRI vs BLMZ Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BLMZ's competition here
TRI vs GPAK Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 10.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check GPAK's competition here
TRI vs RRD Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RRD's competition here
TRI vs INTX Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check INTX's competition here
TRI vs CRN Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CRN's competition here
TRI vs ALJJ Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ALJJ's competition here
TRI vs EPIQ Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, EPIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while EPIQ trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas EPIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to EPIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check EPIQ's competition here
TRI vs PAE Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAE's competition here
TRI vs PAEWW Comparison May 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37.3B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $85.36, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAEWW's competition here