Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TRI's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TRI and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRI | $115.58 | +6.79% | 48.9B | 27.25 | $4.14 | +3.56% |
| CTAS | $219.93 | +3.59% | 86.2B | 43.93 | $4.94 | +0.87% |
| RELX | $39.94 | +1.76% | 68.4B | 23.06 | $1.71 | +2.34% |
| CPRT | $28.24 | +2.65% | 25.8B | 17.29 | $1.61 | N/A |
| ROL | $33.59 | +2.83% | 16B | 29.24 | $1.14 | +2.20% |
| RBA | $81.51 | +2.13% | 15B | 19.35 | $4.18 | +1.55% |
| ULS | $74.86 | +2.53% | 14.8B | 33.65 | $2.18 | +0.77% |
| ARMK | $55.72 | +0.00% | 14.8B | 27.50 | $2.04 | +0.86% |
| BIPI | $15.64 | -0.95% | 12.4B | N/A | N/A | +8.20% |
| RTO | $21.17 | -0.12% | 10.7B | 18.34 | $1.16 | +3.01% |
Stock Comparison
Cintas Corporation (NASDAQ: CTAS)
TRI vs CTAS Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 86.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while CTAS trades at $219.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 43.93. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CTAS's competition here
RELX Plc (NYSE: RELX)
TRI vs RELX Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, RELX has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while RELX trades at $39.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas RELX's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RELX's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RELX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RELX's competition here
Copart, Inc. (NASDAQ: CPRT)
TRI vs CPRT Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while CPRT trades at $28.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CPRT's competition here
Rollins, Inc. (NYSE: ROL)
TRI vs ROL Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while ROL trades at $33.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ROL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ROL's competition here
RB Global, Inc. (NYSE: RBA)
TRI vs RBA Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while RBA trades at $81.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RBA's competition here
UL Solutions Inc. (NYSE: ULS)
TRI vs ULS Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while ULS trades at $74.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ULS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ULS's competition here
Aramark (NYSE: ARMK)
TRI vs ARMK Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while ARMK trades at $55.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ARMK's competition here
BIP Bermuda Holdings I Limited (NYSE: BIPI)
TRI vs BIPI Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while BIPI trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BIPI's competition here
Rentokil Initial plc (NYSE: RTO)
TRI vs RTO Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while RTO trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RTO's competition here
IAA, Inc. (NYSE: IAA)
TRI vs IAA Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check IAA's competition here
UniFirst Corporation (NYSE: UNF)
TRI vs UNF Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while UNF trades at $271.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 34.74. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check UNF's competition here
First Advantage Corporation (NASDAQ: FA)
TRI vs FA Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while FA trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas FA's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to FA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check FA's competition here
Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. (NYSE: BFAM)
TRI vs BFAM Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while BFAM trades at $67.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BFAM's competition here
PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (NYSE: PAGS)
TRI vs PAGS Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while PAGS trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAGS's competition here
Maximus, Inc. (NYSE: MMS)
TRI vs MMS Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while MMS trades at $62.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to MMS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check MMS's competition here
ABM Industries Inc. (NYSE: ABM)
TRI vs ABM Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while ABM trades at $52.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ABM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ABM's competition here
CBIZ, Inc. (NYSE: CBZ)
TRI vs CBZ Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while CBZ trades at $54.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CBZ's competition here
Flywire Corp (NASDAQ: FLYW)
TRI vs FLYW Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while FLYW trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 71.61. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check FLYW's competition here
Cimpress plc (NASDAQ: CMPR)
TRI vs CMPR Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while CMPR trades at $81.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CMPR's competition here
EVERTEC, Inc. (NYSE: EVTC)
TRI vs EVTC Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while EVTC trades at $32.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check EVTC's competition here
TIC Solutions, Inc. (NYSE: TIC)
TRI vs TIC Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while TIC trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -26.35. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to TIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TIC's competition here
Target Hospitality Corp. (NASDAQ: TH)
TRI vs TH Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while TH trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -40.71. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to TH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TH's competition here
Viad Corp (NYSE: VVI)
TRI vs VVI Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check VVI's competition here
SP Plus Corporation (NASDAQ: SP)
TRI vs SP Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SP's competition here
Deluxe Corporation (NYSE: DLX)
TRI vs DLX Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while DLX trades at $23.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to DLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check DLX's competition here
TDCX Inc. (NYSE: TDCX)
TRI vs TDCX Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TDCX's competition here
BrightView Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BV)
TRI vs BV Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 975.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while BV trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to BV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BV's competition here
Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. (NYSE: RHLD)
TRI vs RHLD Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 880M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while RHLD trades at $115.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RHLD's ROE of +37.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RHLD's competition here
Paysign, Inc. (NASDAQ: PAYS)
TRI vs PAYS Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, PAYS has a market cap of 858.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while PAYS trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas PAYS's P/E ratio is 58.50. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAYS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PAYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAYS's competition here
Transcat, Inc. (NASDAQ: TRNS)
TRI vs TRNS Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, TRNS has a market cap of 764.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while TRNS trades at $86.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas TRNS's P/E ratio is 74.28. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRNS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to TRNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TRNS's competition here
Cass Information Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CASS)
TRI vs CASS Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 701.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while CASS trades at $55.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CASS's competition here
Ennis, Inc. (NYSE: EBF)
TRI vs EBF Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, EBF has a market cap of 569.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while EBF trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas EBF's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to EBF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check EBF's competition here
BUUU Group Ltd (NASDAQ: BUUU)
TRI vs BUUU Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 500.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while BUUU trades at $42.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is -2139.50. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BUUU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BUUU's competition here
Quad/Graphics, Inc. (NYSE: QUAD)
TRI vs QUAD Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 491.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while QUAD trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check QUAD's competition here
Acacia Research Corporation (NASDAQ: ACTG)
TRI vs ACTG Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while ACTG trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is 52.50. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ACTG's competition here
Spire Global, Inc. (NYSE: SPIR-WT)
TRI vs SPIR-WT Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, SPIR-WT has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while SPIR-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas SPIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPIR-WT's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SPIR-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SPIR-WT's competition here
Spire Global, Inc. (NYSE: SPIR)
TRI vs SPIR Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 343M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while SPIR trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SPIR's competition here
Etoiles Capital Group Co., Ltd (NASDAQ: EFTY)
TRI vs EFTY Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, EFTY has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while EFTY trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas EFTY's P/E ratio is 375.50. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EFTY's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to EFTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check EFTY's competition here
Information Services Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: III)
TRI vs III Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 281.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while III trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas III's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to III's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to III. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check III's competition here
Performant Financial Corporation (NASDAQ: PFMT)
TRI vs PFMT Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PFMT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PFMT's competition here
Resolute Holdings Management Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued (NASDAQ: RHLDV)
TRI vs RHLDV Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RHLDV's competition here
PFSweb, Inc. (NASDAQ: PFSW)
TRI vs PFSW Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PFSW's competition here
ARC Document Solutions, Inc. (NYSE: ARC)
TRI vs ARC Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ARC's competition here
Team, Inc. (NYSE: TISI)
TRI vs TISI Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 110.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while TISI trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TISI's ROE of -4.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to TISI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TISI's competition here
Concorde International Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: YOOV)
TRI vs YOOV Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, YOOV has a market cap of 103.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while YOOV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas YOOV's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to YOOV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check YOOV's competition here
Where Food Comes From Inc (NASDAQ: WFCF)
TRI vs WFCF Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, WFCF has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while WFCF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas WFCF's P/E ratio is 53.07. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to WFCF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check WFCF's competition here
System1, Inc. WT (NYSE: SST-WT)
TRI vs SST-WT Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, SST-WT has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while SST-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas SST-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SST-WT's ROE of -11.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SST-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SST-WT's competition here
DLH Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: DLHC)
TRI vs DLHC Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while DLHC trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check DLHC's competition here
Concorde International Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: CIGL)
TRI vs CIGL Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, CIGL has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while CIGL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas CIGL's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIGL's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CIGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CIGL's competition here
SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated (NASDAQ: SBCWW)
TRI vs SBCWW Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while SBCWW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SBCWW's competition here
YSX Tech. Co., Ltd (NASDAQ: YSXT)
TRI vs YSXT Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while YSXT trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check YSXT's competition here
Network-1 Technologies, Inc. (AMEX: NTIP)
TRI vs NTIP Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while NTIP trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -13.17. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check NTIP's competition here
Harte Hanks, Inc. (NASDAQ: HHS)
TRI vs HHS Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while HHS trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HHS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to HHS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check HHS's competition here
Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ANPA)
TRI vs ANPA Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while ANPA trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 181.23. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANPA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ANPA's competition here
Primech Holdings Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: PMEC)
TRI vs PMEC Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while PMEC trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -6.51. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PMEC's competition here
Lichen International Limited (NASDAQ: LICN)
TRI vs LICN Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while LICN trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check LICN's competition here
SPAR Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: SGRP)
TRI vs SGRP Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while SGRP trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SGRP's competition here
TryHard Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: THH)
TRI vs THH Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while THH trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas THH's P/E ratio is -25.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check THH's competition here
Axonex AI Group Limited (NASDAQ: AXNX)
TRI vs AXNX Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, AXNX has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while AXNX trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas AXNX's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXNX's ROE of -2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to AXNX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check AXNX's competition here
Cre8 Enterprise Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CRE)
TRI vs CRE Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while CRE trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CRE's competition here
YY Group Holding Limited (NASDAQ: YYGH)
TRI vs YYGH Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, YYGH has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while YYGH trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas YYGH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YYGH's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to YYGH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check YYGH's competition here
Token Cat Limited (NASDAQ: TC)
TRI vs TC Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while TC trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas TC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TC's competition here
Intelligent Group Limited (NASDAQ: INTJ)
TRI vs INTJ Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while INTJ trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check INTJ's competition here
Nexpu Ltd. (NASDAQ: DPU)
TRI vs DPU Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, DPU has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while DPU trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas DPU's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DPU's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to DPU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check DPU's competition here
Samfine Creation Holdings Group Limited (NASDAQ: SFHG)
TRI vs SFHG Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while SFHG trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SFHG's competition here
VisionSys AI Inc. (NASDAQ: VSA)
TRI vs VSA Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while VSA trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VSA's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to VSA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check VSA's competition here
JIADE Limited (NASDAQ: JDZG)
TRI vs JDZG Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 588.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while JDZG trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JDZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check JDZG's competition here
PowerCompute, Inc. (NASDAQ: PWCM)
TRI vs PWCM Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, PWCM has a market cap of 572K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while PWCM trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas PWCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PWCM's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PWCM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PWCM's competition here
Target Hospitality Corp. (NASDAQ: THWWW)
TRI vs THWWW Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check THWWW's competition here
SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company (NASDAQ: SMX)
TRI vs SMX Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 116.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while SMX trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMX's ROE of -22.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SMX's competition here
Harrison Global Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BLMZ)
TRI vs BLMZ Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BLMZ's competition here
Katapult Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: KPLTW)
TRI vs KPLTW Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, KPLTW has a market cap of 18.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while KPLTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas KPLTW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KPLTW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to KPLTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check KPLTW's competition here
8000 Inc (NASDAQ: EIGH)
TRI vs EIGH Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, EIGH has a market cap of 15.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while EIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas EIGH's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EIGH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to EIGH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check EIGH's competition here
ALJ Regional Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALJJ)
TRI vs ALJJ Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ALJJ's competition here
GEO Reentry, Inc. (NYSE: CRN)
TRI vs CRN Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CRN's competition here
Epic Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: EPIQ)
TRI vs EPIQ Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, EPIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while EPIQ trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas EPIQ's P/E ratio is -37.32. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to EPIQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check EPIQ's competition here
R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company (NYSE: RRD)
TRI vs RRD Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RRD's competition here
Intersections Inc. (NASDAQ: INTX)
TRI vs INTX Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is 79.40. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check INTX's competition here
PAE Incorporated (NASDAQ: PAE)
TRI vs PAE Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAE's competition here
PAE Incorporated (NASDAQ: PAEWW)
TRI vs PAEWW Comparison October 2026
Thomson Reuters Corporation (NASDAQ: TRI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 48.9B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $115.58 on the NASDAQ, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAEWW's competition here