ABM Industries Incorporated
ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ABM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABM | $40.74 | +0.74% | 2.3B | 15.66 | $2.54 | +2.80% |
| CTAS | $174.27 | +0.03% | 69.6B | 36.78 | $4.73 | +1.00% |
| TRI | $95.35 | +6.08% | 41.3B | 28.36 | $3.29 | +2.64% |
| CPRT | $33.24 | -0.31% | 32.1B | 20.96 | $1.59 | N/A |
| RBA | $106.08 | +0.69% | 19.6B | 51.60 | $2.04 | +1.16% |
| ULS | $90.11 | +2.06% | 17.7B | 55.02 | $1.60 | +0.61% |
| GPN | $71.04 | +4.63% | 16.8B | 16.02 | $4.43 | +1.41% |
| RTO | $33.91 | +1.41% | 16.6B | 57.91 | $0.57 | +1.72% |
| BIPI | $16.36 | -0.30% | 13B | N/A | N/A | +7.85% |
| ARMK | $45.49 | +0.13% | 11.8B | 37.80 | $1.19 | +1.00% |
Stock Comparison
ABM vs CTAS Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while CTAS trades at $174.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 36.78. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check CTAS's competition here
ABM vs TRI Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while TRI trades at $95.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check TRI's competition here
ABM vs CPRT Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while CPRT trades at $33.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check CPRT's competition here
ABM vs RBA Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while RBA trades at $106.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 51.60. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check RBA's competition here
ABM vs ULS Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while ULS trades at $90.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 55.02. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check ULS's competition here
ABM vs GPN Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while GPN trades at $71.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check GPN's competition here
ABM vs RTO Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while RTO trades at $33.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check RTO's competition here
ABM vs BIPI Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while BIPI trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check BIPI's competition here
ABM vs ARMK Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while ARMK trades at $45.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 37.80. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check ARMK's competition here
ABM vs IAA Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check IAA's competition here
ABM vs UNF Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while UNF trades at $254.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check UNF's competition here
ABM vs MMS Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while MMS trades at $65.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check MMS's competition here
ABM vs FA Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while FA trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -65.25. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check FA's competition here
ABM vs TIC Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while TIC trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -15.04. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check TIC's competition here
ABM vs CBZ Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while CBZ trades at $29.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check CBZ's competition here
ABM vs TH Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while TH trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -38.35. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check TH's competition here
ABM vs KODK Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while KODK trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check KODK's competition here
ABM vs VVI Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check VVI's competition here
ABM vs PRSU Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while PRSU trades at $41.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 46.23. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check PRSU's competition here
ABM vs RHLD Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while RHLD trades at $133.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -192.97. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RHLD's ROE of +7.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check RHLD's competition here
ABM vs LZ Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while LZ trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 80.88. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check LZ's competition here
ABM vs BV Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while BV trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 168.43. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check BV's competition here
ABM vs SP Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check SP's competition here
ABM vs TDCX Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check TDCX's competition here
ABM vs CASS Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 601M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while CASS trades at $47.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check CASS's competition here
ABM vs SPIR Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 530.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while SPIR trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -249.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check SPIR's competition here
ABM vs ACTG Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 478.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while ACTG trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACTG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check ACTG's competition here
ABM vs PPHC Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 402.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while PPHC trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check PPHC's competition here
ABM vs CVEO Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while CVEO trades at $31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -19.70. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check CVEO's competition here
ABM vs QUAD Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 366.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while QUAD trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check QUAD's competition here
ABM vs YOOV Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, YOOV has a market cap of 351.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while YOOV trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas YOOV's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to YOOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check YOOV's competition here
ABM vs SPIR-WT Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SPIR-WT has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while SPIR-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SPIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPIR-WT's ROE of -249.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to SPIR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check SPIR-WT's competition here
ABM vs PFMT Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PFMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check PFMT's competition here
ABM vs RHLDV Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check RHLDV's competition here
ABM vs BUUU Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 175.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while BUUU trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is 214.29. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check BUUU's competition here
ABM vs PFSW Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check PFSW's competition here
ABM vs ARC Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check ARC's competition here
ABM vs ANPA Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 86.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while ANPA trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 690.00. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check ANPA's competition here
ABM vs DLHC Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while DLHC trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -74.37. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check DLHC's competition here
ABM vs TISI Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while TISI trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TISI's ROE of -18.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check TISI's competition here
ABM vs SST-WT Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SST-WT has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while SST-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SST-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SST-WT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to SST-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check SST-WT's competition here
ABM vs SST Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while SST trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SST's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check SST's competition here
ABM vs NTIP Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while NTIP trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check NTIP's competition here
ABM vs OMEX Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while OMEX trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check OMEX's competition here
ABM vs YSXT Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while YSXT trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check YSXT's competition here
ABM vs PMEC Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while PMEC trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check PMEC's competition here
ABM vs ZGM Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while ZGM trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check ZGM's competition here
ABM vs THH Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while THH trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check THH's competition here
ABM vs WHLM Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while WHLM trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check WHLM's competition here
ABM vs SGRP Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while SGRP trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check SGRP's competition here
ABM vs ATTO Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check ATTO's competition here
ABM vs MSGY Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while MSGY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check MSGY's competition here
ABM vs CRE Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while CRE trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check CRE's competition here
ABM vs SMX Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while SMX trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMX's ROE of -22.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check SMX's competition here
ABM vs LICN Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while LICN trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check LICN's competition here
ABM vs SFHG Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while SFHG trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check SFHG's competition here
ABM vs VSA Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while VSA trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VSA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check VSA's competition here
ABM vs PMAX Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 315.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while PMAX trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check PMAX's competition here
ABM vs THWWW Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check THWWW's competition here
ABM vs BLMZ Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check BLMZ's competition here
ABM vs GPAK Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 23K. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check GPAK's competition here
ABM vs PAE Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check PAE's competition here
ABM vs ALJJ Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check ALJJ's competition here
ABM vs RRD Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check RRD's competition here
ABM vs PAEWW Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check PAEWW's competition here
ABM vs CRN Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check CRN's competition here
ABM vs EPIQ Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EPIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while EPIQ trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas EPIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to EPIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check EPIQ's competition here
ABM vs INTX Comparison May 2026
ABM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABM stands at 2.3B. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABM is priced at $40.74, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ABM is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABM.Check INTX's competition here