Cintas Corporation
Cintas Corporation (CTAS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CTAS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTAS | $173.95 | -0.15% | 69.6B | 36.78 | $4.73 | +1.00% |
| TRI | $93.29 | +3.78% | 41.3B | 28.36 | $3.29 | +2.64% |
| CPRT | $33.33 | -0.03% | 32.1B | 20.96 | $1.59 | N/A |
| RBA | $105.25 | -0.09% | 19.6B | 51.60 | $2.04 | +1.16% |
| ULS | $88.01 | -0.32% | 17.7B | 55.02 | $1.60 | +0.61% |
| GPN | $70.97 | +4.54% | 16.8B | 16.02 | $4.43 | +1.41% |
| RTO | $33.00 | -1.30% | 16.6B | 57.91 | $0.57 | +1.72% |
| BIPI | $16.31 | -0.61% | 13B | N/A | N/A | +7.85% |
| ARMK | $44.97 | -1.01% | 11.8B | 37.80 | $1.19 | +1.00% |
| IAA | $39.89 | -0.10% | 5.3B | 18.55 | $2.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CTAS vs TRI Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while TRI trades at $93.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check TRI's competition here
CTAS vs CPRT Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while CPRT trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check CPRT's competition here
CTAS vs RBA Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while RBA trades at $105.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 51.60. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check RBA's competition here
CTAS vs ULS Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while ULS trades at $88.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 55.02. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ULS's competition here
CTAS vs GPN Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while GPN trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check GPN's competition here
CTAS vs RTO Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while RTO trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check RTO's competition here
CTAS vs BIPI Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while BIPI trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS and BIPI have similar daily volatility (2.12).Check BIPI's competition here
CTAS vs ARMK Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while ARMK trades at $44.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 37.80. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ARMK's competition here
CTAS vs IAA Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check IAA's competition here
CTAS vs UNF Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while UNF trades at $255.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check UNF's competition here
CTAS vs MMS Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while MMS trades at $65.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check MMS's competition here
CTAS vs ABM Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while ABM trades at $39.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ABM's competition here
CTAS vs FA Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while FA trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -65.25. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check FA's competition here
CTAS vs TIC Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while TIC trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -15.04. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check TIC's competition here
CTAS vs CBZ Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while CBZ trades at $33.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check CBZ's competition here
CTAS vs TH Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while TH trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -38.35. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check TH's competition here
CTAS vs KODK Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while KODK trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check KODK's competition here
CTAS vs VVI Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check VVI's competition here
CTAS vs PRSU Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while PRSU trades at $40.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 46.23. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PRSU's competition here
CTAS vs RHLD Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while RHLD trades at $132.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -192.97. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RHLD's ROE of +7.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check RHLD's competition here
CTAS vs LZ Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while LZ trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 80.88. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check LZ's competition here
CTAS vs BV Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while BV trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 168.43. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check BV's competition here
CTAS vs SP Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check SP's competition here
CTAS vs TDCX Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check TDCX's competition here
CTAS vs CASS Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 601M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while CASS trades at $46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check CASS's competition here
CTAS vs SPIR Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 530.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while SPIR trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -249.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check SPIR's competition here
CTAS vs ACTG Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 478.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while ACTG trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ACTG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ACTG's competition here
CTAS vs PPHC Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 402.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while PPHC trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PPHC's competition here
CTAS vs CVEO Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while CVEO trades at $31.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -19.70. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check CVEO's competition here
CTAS vs QUAD Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 366.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while QUAD trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check QUAD's competition here
CTAS vs YOOV Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, YOOV has a market cap of 351.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while YOOV trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas YOOV's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to YOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to YOOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check YOOV's competition here
CTAS vs SPIR-WT Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, SPIR-WT has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while SPIR-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas SPIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SPIR-WT's ROE of -249.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to SPIR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check SPIR-WT's competition here
CTAS vs PFMT Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PFMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PFMT's competition here
CTAS vs RHLDV Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check RHLDV's competition here
CTAS vs BUUU Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 175.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while BUUU trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is 214.29. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check BUUU's competition here
CTAS vs PFSW Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PFSW's competition here
CTAS vs ARC Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ARC's competition here
CTAS vs ANPA Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 86.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while ANPA trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 690.00. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ANPA's competition here
CTAS vs DLHC Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while DLHC trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -74.37. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check DLHC's competition here
CTAS vs TISI Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while TISI trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TISI's ROE of -18.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check TISI's competition here
CTAS vs SST-WT Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, SST-WT has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while SST-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas SST-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SST-WT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to SST-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check SST-WT's competition here
CTAS vs SST Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while SST trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SST's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check SST's competition here
CTAS vs NTIP Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while NTIP trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check NTIP's competition here
CTAS vs OMEX Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while OMEX trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check OMEX's competition here
CTAS vs YSXT Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while YSXT trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check YSXT's competition here
CTAS vs PMEC Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while PMEC trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PMEC's competition here
CTAS vs ZGM Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while ZGM trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ZGM's competition here
CTAS vs THH Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while THH trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check THH's competition here
CTAS vs WHLM Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while WHLM trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check WHLM's competition here
CTAS vs SGRP Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while SGRP trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check SGRP's competition here
CTAS vs ATTO Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ATTO's competition here
CTAS vs MSGY Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while MSGY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check MSGY's competition here
CTAS vs CRE Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while CRE trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CRE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check CRE's competition here
CTAS vs SMX Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while SMX trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SMX's ROE of -22.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check SMX's competition here
CTAS vs LICN Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while LICN trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check LICN's competition here
CTAS vs SFHG Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while SFHG trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check SFHG's competition here
CTAS vs VSA Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while VSA trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VSA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check VSA's competition here
CTAS vs PMAX Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 315.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while PMAX trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PMAX's competition here
CTAS vs THWWW Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check THWWW's competition here
CTAS vs BLMZ Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check BLMZ's competition here
CTAS vs GPAK Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 23K. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check GPAK's competition here
CTAS vs INTX Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check INTX's competition here
CTAS vs PAE Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PAE's competition here
CTAS vs PAEWW Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check PAEWW's competition here
CTAS vs EPIQ Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, EPIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while EPIQ trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas EPIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to EPIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to EPIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check EPIQ's competition here
CTAS vs ALJJ Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check ALJJ's competition here
CTAS vs RRD Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check RRD's competition here
CTAS vs CRN Comparison May 2026
CTAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTAS stands at 69.6B. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTAS is priced at $173.95, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTAS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTAS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CTAS is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTAS.Check CRN's competition here