GEO Reentry, Inc.
GEO Reentry, Inc. (CRN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRN | $29.45 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CTAS | $170.99 | -2.02% | 68.9B | 36.25 | $4.75 | +1.04% |
| RELX | $32.95 | -2.97% | 59.5B | 22.09 | $1.52 | +2.73% |
| TRI | $84.86 | -5.71% | 38.1B | 25.10 | $3.48 | +3.74% |
| CPRT | $32.77 | -2.00% | 31.9B | 20.82 | $1.59 | N/A |
| ULS | $100.37 | +1.37% | 20.1B | 58.12 | $1.72 | +0.54% |
| RBA | $102.89 | +0.05% | 19.3B | 48.06 | $2.15 | +1.18% |
| RTO | $31.76 | -1.41% | 15.9B | 55.38 | $0.57 | +1.95% |
| ARMK | $51.85 | -2.06% | 13.6B | 38.46 | $1.34 | +0.86% |
| BIPI | $16.21 | -0.64% | 12.9B | N/A | N/A | +7.88% |
Stock Comparison
CRN vs CTAS Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while CTAS trades at $170.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 36.25. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check CTAS's competition here
CRN vs RELX Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, RELX has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while RELX trades at $32.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELX's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RELX's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to RELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check RELX's competition here
CRN vs TRI Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while TRI trades at $84.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check TRI's competition here
CRN vs CPRT Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while CPRT trades at $32.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check CPRT's competition here
CRN vs ULS Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while ULS trades at $100.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 58.12. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check ULS's competition here
CRN vs RBA Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while RBA trades at $102.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check RBA's competition here
CRN vs RTO Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while RTO trades at $31.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 55.38. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check RTO's competition here
CRN vs ARMK Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while ARMK trades at $51.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check ARMK's competition here
CRN vs BIPI Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while BIPI trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check BIPI's competition here
CRN vs IAA Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check IAA's competition here
CRN vs UNF Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while UNF trades at $263.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 35.78. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check UNF's competition here
CRN vs MMS Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while MMS trades at $58.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check MMS's competition here
CRN vs FA Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while FA trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FA's P/E ratio is 298.00. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check FA's competition here
CRN vs ABM Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while ABM trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check ABM's competition here
CRN vs TIC Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while TIC trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -14.76. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check TIC's competition here
CRN vs TH Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while TH trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -42.79. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check TH's competition here
CRN vs CBZ Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while CBZ trades at $30.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check CBZ's competition here
CRN vs VVI Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check VVI's competition here
CRN vs PRSU Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while PRSU trades at $43.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 39.81. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check PRSU's competition here
CRN vs BV Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while BV trades at $12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 399.83. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check BV's competition here
CRN vs LZ Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while LZ trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 106.17. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check LZ's competition here
CRN vs SP Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check SP's competition here
CRN vs TDCX Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check TDCX's competition here
CRN vs RHLD Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 886.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while RHLD trades at $110.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RHLD's ROE of -10.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check RHLD's competition here
CRN vs SPIR Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 642.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while SPIR trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SPIR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check SPIR's competition here
CRN vs CASS Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 593.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while CASS trades at $46.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check CASS's competition here
CRN vs ACTG Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 443.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while ACTG trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is -24.16. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check ACTG's competition here
CRN vs QUAD Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 380.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while QUAD trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check QUAD's competition here
CRN vs CVEO Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 371.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while CVEO trades at $33.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -28.04. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check CVEO's competition here
CRN vs SPIR-WT Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, SPIR-WT has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while SPIR-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SPIR-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to SPIR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check SPIR-WT's competition here
CRN vs PPHC Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 324.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while PPHC trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check PPHC's competition here
CRN vs PFMT Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PFMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check PFMT's competition here
CRN vs RHLDV Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check RHLDV's competition here
CRN vs BUUU Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 230.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while BUUU trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is 282.14. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check BUUU's competition here
CRN vs YOOV Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, YOOV has a market cap of 186.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while YOOV trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOOV's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to YOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is less volatile compared to YOOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check YOOV's competition here
CRN vs PFSW Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check PFSW's competition here
CRN vs ARC Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check ARC's competition here
CRN vs ANPA Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 85.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while ANPA trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 687.50. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check ANPA's competition here
CRN vs DLHC Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while DLHC trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check DLHC's competition here
CRN vs TISI Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 74.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while TISI trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TISI's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check TISI's competition here
CRN vs SST-WT Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, SST-WT has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while SST-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SST-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SST-WT's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to SST-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check SST-WT's competition here
CRN vs NTIP Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while NTIP trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -13.45. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check NTIP's competition here
CRN vs ZGM Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while ZGM trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is less volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check ZGM's competition here
CRN vs OMEX Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while OMEX trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check OMEX's competition here
CRN vs PMEC Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while PMEC trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -14.86. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check PMEC's competition here
CRN vs SST Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while SST trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SST's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check SST's competition here
CRN vs YSXT Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while YSXT trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check YSXT's competition here
CRN vs SGRP Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while SGRP trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check SGRP's competition here
CRN vs THH Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while THH trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check THH's competition here
CRN vs WHLM Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while WHLM trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check WHLM's competition here
CRN vs ATTO Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check ATTO's competition here
CRN vs MSGY Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while MSGY trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check MSGY's competition here
CRN vs CRE Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while CRE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CRE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check CRE's competition here
CRN vs LICN Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while LICN trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check LICN's competition here
CRN vs SFHG Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while SFHG trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check SFHG's competition here
CRN vs SMX Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 974.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while SMX trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SMX's ROE of -22.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check SMX's competition here
CRN vs VSA Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 757.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while VSA trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VSA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check VSA's competition here
CRN vs PMAX Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 429.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while PMAX trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check PMAX's competition here
CRN vs THWWW Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check THWWW's competition here
CRN vs BLMZ Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check BLMZ's competition here
CRN vs GPAK Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 10.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is less volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check GPAK's competition here
CRN vs INTX Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check INTX's competition here
CRN vs PAE Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check PAE's competition here
CRN vs EPIQ Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, EPIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while EPIQ trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EPIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to EPIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check EPIQ's competition here
CRN vs ALJJ Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check ALJJ's competition here
CRN vs RRD Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check RRD's competition here
CRN vs PAEWW Comparison May 2026
CRN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRN stands at 0. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRN is priced at $29.45, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRN's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRN is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRN.Check PAEWW's competition here