RB Global, Inc. (RBA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RBA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBA | $113.95 | -1.18% | 21.2B | 28.07 | $4.06 | +1.10% |
| CTAS | $169.08 | -1.64% | 67.7B | 35.67 | $4.74 | +1.07% |
| RELX | $31.29 | -0.16% | 54.9B | 20.66 | $1.52 | +2.87% |
| TRI | $82.66 | -1.44% | 36.1B | 20.56 | $4.02 | +4.82% |
| CPRT | $28.10 | -8.02% | 26B | 17.45 | $1.61 | N/A |
| ULS | $100.07 | +1.03% | 20.1B | 47.39 | $2.11 | +0.55% |
| ARMK | $56.23 | +0.30% | 14.8B | 27.55 | $2.04 | +0.83% |
| RTO | $28.78 | -0.52% | 14.5B | 24.90 | $1.16 | +2.17% |
| TRU | $71.79 | +2.05% | 13.8B | 16.21 | $4.43 | +0.67% |
| BIPI | $16.30 | +0.31% | 12.9B | N/A | N/A | +7.85% |
Stock Comparison
RBA vs CTAS Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while CTAS trades at $169.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check CTAS's competition here
RBA vs RELX Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RELX has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while RELX trades at $31.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas RELX's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RELX's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to RELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check RELX's competition here
RBA vs TRI Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while TRI trades at $82.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check TRI's competition here
RBA vs CPRT Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while CPRT trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check CPRT's competition here
RBA vs ULS Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while ULS trades at $100.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 47.39. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check ULS's competition here
RBA vs ARMK Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while ARMK trades at $56.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check ARMK's competition here
RBA vs RTO Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while RTO trades at $28.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check RTO's competition here
RBA vs TRU Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while TRU trades at $71.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check TRU's competition here
RBA vs BIPI Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while BIPI trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check BIPI's competition here
RBA vs WSE Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, WSE has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while WSE trades at $12.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas WSE's P/E ratio is 38.02. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WSE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to WSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check WSE's competition here
RBA vs IAA Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check IAA's competition here
RBA vs UNF Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while UNF trades at $263.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check UNF's competition here
RBA vs DLO Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while DLO trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check DLO's competition here
RBA vs FA Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while FA trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas FA's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check FA's competition here
RBA vs MMS Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while MMS trades at $54.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check MMS's competition here
RBA vs PAGS Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while PAGS trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check PAGS's competition here
RBA vs ABM Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while ABM trades at $44.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check ABM's competition here
RBA vs CMPR Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while CMPR trades at $98.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 55.25. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check CMPR's competition here
RBA vs FLYW Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while FLYW trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 73.24. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check FLYW's competition here
RBA vs TH Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while TH trades at $20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -46.45. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check TH's competition here
RBA vs TIC Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while TIC trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -28.95. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check TIC's competition here
RBA vs CBZ Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while CBZ trades at $32.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check CBZ's competition here
RBA vs PRSU Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while PRSU trades at $54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 46.26. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check PRSU's competition here
RBA vs BV Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while BV trades at $14.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check BV's competition here
RBA vs VVI Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check VVI's competition here
RBA vs RHLD Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while RHLD trades at $138.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RHLD's ROE of +6.76%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check RHLD's competition here
RBA vs SP Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check SP's competition here
RBA vs LZ Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while LZ trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check LZ's competition here
RBA vs TDCX Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check TDCX's competition here
RBA vs CASS Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 660.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while CASS trades at $51.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check CASS's competition here
RBA vs KPLTW Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, KPLTW has a market cap of 604.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while KPLTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas KPLTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KPLTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to KPLTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check KPLTW's competition here
RBA vs SPIR Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 573.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while SPIR trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPIR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check SPIR's competition here
RBA vs PAYS Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PAYS has a market cap of 465.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while PAYS trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas PAYS's P/E ratio is 48.94. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAYS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to PAYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check PAYS's competition here
RBA vs ACTG Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 450.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while ACTG trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is -42.36. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check ACTG's competition here
RBA vs QUAD Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 433.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while QUAD trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check QUAD's competition here
RBA vs CVEO Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 378.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while CVEO trades at $34.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -29.09. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check CVEO's competition here
RBA vs SPIR-WT Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SPIR-WT has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while SPIR-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas SPIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPIR-WT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to SPIR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check SPIR-WT's competition here
RBA vs PFMT Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check PFMT's competition here
RBA vs RHLDV Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check RHLDV's competition here
RBA vs BUUU Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 241.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while BUUU trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is -2066.00. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check BUUU's competition here
RBA vs PPHC Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 214.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while PPHC trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check PPHC's competition here
RBA vs PFSW Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check PFSW's competition here
RBA vs RGP Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while RGP trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check RGP's competition here
RBA vs ARC Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check ARC's competition here
RBA vs YOOV Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, YOOV has a market cap of 87.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while YOOV trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas YOOV's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to YOOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check YOOV's competition here
RBA vs TISI Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 77.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while TISI trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TISI's ROE of +123300.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check TISI's competition here
RBA vs DLHC Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 76.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while DLHC trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -17.67. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check DLHC's competition here
RBA vs WFCF Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, WFCF has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while WFCF trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas WFCF's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFCF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to WFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check WFCF's competition here
RBA vs SST-WT Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SST-WT has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while SST-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas SST-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SST-WT's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to SST-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check SST-WT's competition here
RBA vs ANPA Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while ANPA trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 430.00. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check ANPA's competition here
RBA vs PIIIW Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PIIIW has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while PIIIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas PIIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PIIIW's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to PIIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check PIIIW's competition here
RBA vs NTIP Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while NTIP trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check NTIP's competition here
RBA vs CRVO Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CRVO has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while CRVO trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas CRVO's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRVO's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to CRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check CRVO's competition here
RBA vs OMEX Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while OMEX trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check OMEX's competition here
RBA vs PMEC Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while PMEC trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check PMEC's competition here
RBA vs SGRP Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while SGRP trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check SGRP's competition here
RBA vs TC Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while TC trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TC's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check TC's competition here
RBA vs THH Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while THH trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check THH's competition here
RBA vs ATTO Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check ATTO's competition here
RBA vs CRE Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while CRE trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check CRE's competition here
RBA vs YYGH Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, YYGH has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while YYGH trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas YYGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YYGH's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to YYGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check YYGH's competition here
RBA vs INTJ Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while INTJ trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check INTJ's competition here
RBA vs VSA Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while VSA trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VSA's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check VSA's competition here
RBA vs GLXG Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, GLXG has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while GLXG trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas GLXG's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLXG's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to GLXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check GLXG's competition here
RBA vs SFHG Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while SFHG trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check SFHG's competition here
RBA vs FCHL Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, FCHL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while FCHL trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas FCHL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCHL's ROE of +2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to FCHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check FCHL's competition here
RBA vs SMX Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 830.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while SMX trades at $13.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMX's ROE of -22.94%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check SMX's competition here
RBA vs LICN Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 761.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while LICN trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check LICN's competition here
RBA vs PMAX Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 353.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while PMAX trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check PMAX's competition here
RBA vs THWWW Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check THWWW's competition here
RBA vs BLMZ Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check BLMZ's competition here
RBA vs EIGH Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EIGH has a market cap of 15.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while EIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas EIGH's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EIGH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to EIGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check EIGH's competition here
RBA vs RRD Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check RRD's competition here
RBA vs ALJJ Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check ALJJ's competition here
RBA vs PAE Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check PAE's competition here
RBA vs EPIQ Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EPIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while EPIQ trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas EPIQ's P/E ratio is -37.67. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to EPIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check EPIQ's competition here
RBA vs PAEWW Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check PAEWW's competition here
RBA vs CRN Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check CRN's competition here
RBA vs INTX Comparison July 2026
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 21.2B. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $113.95, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.07, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is 79.40. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.Check INTX's competition here