UniFirst Corporation
UniFirst Corporation (UNF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNF | $258.21 | -0.78% | 4.7B | 34.96 | $7.38 | +0.55% |
| CTAS | $174.04 | -1.06% | 69.6B | 36.79 | $4.73 | +1.00% |
| TRI | $89.04 | -0.79% | 39.4B | 27.15 | $3.28 | +2.74% |
| CPRT | $33.19 | +0.36% | 32B | 20.87 | $1.59 | N/A |
| RBA | $107.75 | +0.94% | 20B | 52.83 | $2.04 | +1.13% |
| ULS | $88.59 | -1.77% | 17.8B | 55.35 | $1.60 | +0.61% |
| RTO | $33.49 | -1.73% | 16.9B | 58.79 | $0.57 | +1.69% |
| GPN | $68.33 | +0.84% | 16.2B | 15.43 | $4.43 | +1.46% |
| BIPI | $16.41 | -0.73% | 13.1B | N/A | N/A | +7.80% |
| ARMK | $45.60 | -1.47% | 12B | 38.32 | $1.19 | +0.99% |
Stock Comparison
UNF vs CTAS Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while CTAS trades at $174.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 36.79. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check CTAS's competition here
UNF vs TRI Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while TRI trades at $89.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check TRI's competition here
UNF vs CPRT Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while CPRT trades at $33.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check CPRT's competition here
UNF vs RBA Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while RBA trades at $107.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 52.83. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check RBA's competition here
UNF vs ULS Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while ULS trades at $88.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 55.35. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check ULS's competition here
UNF vs RTO Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while RTO trades at $33.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 58.79. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check RTO's competition here
UNF vs GPN Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while GPN trades at $68.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check GPN's competition here
UNF vs BIPI Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while BIPI trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check BIPI's competition here
UNF vs ARMK Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while ARMK trades at $45.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 38.32. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check ARMK's competition here
UNF vs IAA Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check IAA's competition here
UNF vs MMS Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while MMS trades at $65.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check MMS's competition here
UNF vs ABM Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while ABM trades at $40.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check ABM's competition here
UNF vs FA Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while FA trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -62.90. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check FA's competition here
UNF vs TIC Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while TIC trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -14.51. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check TIC's competition here
UNF vs CBZ Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while CBZ trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check CBZ's competition here
UNF vs TH Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while TH trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -38.62. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check TH's competition here
UNF vs KODK Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while KODK trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check KODK's competition here
UNF vs VVI Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check VVI's competition here
UNF vs RHLD Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while RHLD trades at $139.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -201.54. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RHLD's ROE of +7.52%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check RHLD's competition here
UNF vs BV Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while BV trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 176.00. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check BV's competition here
UNF vs PRSU Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while PRSU trades at $41.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 46.85. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check PRSU's competition here
UNF vs LZ Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while LZ trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 80.75. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check LZ's competition here
UNF vs SP Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check SP's competition here
UNF vs TDCX Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check TDCX's competition here
UNF vs CASS Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 611.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while CASS trades at $47.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check CASS's competition here
UNF vs SPIR Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 549.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while SPIR trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -249.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check SPIR's competition here
UNF vs ACTG Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 476.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while ACTG trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACTG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check ACTG's competition here
UNF vs PPHC Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 412.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while PPHC trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is -5.93. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check PPHC's competition here
UNF vs QUAD Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 403.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while QUAD trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check QUAD's competition here
UNF vs CVEO Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 397.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while CVEO trades at $31.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -19.77. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check CVEO's competition here
UNF vs SPIR-WT Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SPIR-WT has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while SPIR-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas SPIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPIR-WT's ROE of -249.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to SPIR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check SPIR-WT's competition here
UNF vs YOOV Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, YOOV has a market cap of 345M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while YOOV trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas YOOV's P/E ratio is -10.13. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to YOOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check YOOV's competition here
UNF vs PFMT Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PFMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check PFMT's competition here
UNF vs RHLDV Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check RHLDV's competition here
UNF vs BUUU Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 175.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while BUUU trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is 214.29. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check BUUU's competition here
UNF vs PFSW Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check PFSW's competition here
UNF vs ARC Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check ARC's competition here
UNF vs ANPA Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 99.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while ANPA trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 795.00. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check ANPA's competition here
UNF vs DLHC Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while DLHC trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -75.62. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check DLHC's competition here
UNF vs TISI Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 78.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while TISI trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TISI's ROE of -18.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check TISI's competition here
UNF vs SST-WT Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SST-WT has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while SST-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas SST-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SST-WT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to SST-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check SST-WT's competition here
UNF vs SST Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while SST trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SST's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check SST's competition here
UNF vs NTIP Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while NTIP trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check NTIP's competition here
UNF vs OMEX Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while OMEX trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check OMEX's competition here
UNF vs YSXT Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while YSXT trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check YSXT's competition here
UNF vs PMEC Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while PMEC trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check PMEC's competition here
UNF vs ZGM Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while ZGM trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check ZGM's competition here
UNF vs THH Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while THH trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check THH's competition here
UNF vs WHLM Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while WHLM trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check WHLM's competition here
UNF vs SGRP Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while SGRP trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check SGRP's competition here
UNF vs MSGY Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while MSGY trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check MSGY's competition here
UNF vs ATTO Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check ATTO's competition here
UNF vs CRE Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while CRE trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check CRE's competition here
UNF vs LICN Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while LICN trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check LICN's competition here
UNF vs SMX Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while SMX trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMX's ROE of -22.94%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check SMX's competition here
UNF vs VSA Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while VSA trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VSA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check VSA's competition here
UNF vs SFHG Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while SFHG trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check SFHG's competition here
UNF vs PMAX Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 366.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while PMAX trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check PMAX's competition here
UNF vs THWWW Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check THWWW's competition here
UNF vs BLMZ Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check BLMZ's competition here
UNF vs GPAK Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 23K. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check GPAK's competition here
UNF vs PAE Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check PAE's competition here
UNF vs ALJJ Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check ALJJ's competition here
UNF vs RRD Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check RRD's competition here
UNF vs PAEWW Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check PAEWW's competition here
UNF vs CRN Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check CRN's competition here
UNF vs EPIQ Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EPIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while EPIQ trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas EPIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to EPIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check EPIQ's competition here
UNF vs INTX Comparison May 2026
UNF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNF is priced at $258.21, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.96, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, UNF is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNF.Check INTX's competition here