Transcat, Inc.
Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRNS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRNS | $74.33 | +4.99% | 681.4M | 85.91 | $0.85 | N/A |
| GWW | $1,251.81 | +1.01% | 58.9B | 33.56 | $37.18 | +0.74% |
| FAST | $44.44 | +2.09% | 50.4B | 38.88 | $1.13 | +2.09% |
| FERG | $226.21 | +1.10% | 43.3B | 21.98 | $10.16 | +1.94% |
| WCC | $369.65 | +4.35% | 17.7B | 25.84 | $14.07 | +0.51% |
| WSO | $374.94 | -0.90% | 15.3B | 30.78 | $12.19 | +3.28% |
| WSO-B | $390.00 | -3.42% | 14.8B | 31.97 | $12.20 | +3.28% |
| QXO | $16.89 | -0.82% | 12.1B | -17.55 | -$0.95 | N/A |
| AIT | $309.42 | +1.23% | 11.4B | 29.00 | $10.59 | +0.63% |
| WCC-PA | $221.82 | +1.73% | 10.9B | 21.85 | $10.15 | +0.51% |
Stock Comparison
TRNS vs GWW Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, GWW has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while GWW trades at $1,251.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas GWW's P/E ratio is 33.56. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GWW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to GWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check GWW's competition here
TRNS vs FAST Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, FAST has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while FAST trades at $44.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas FAST's P/E ratio is 38.88. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FAST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to FAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check FAST's competition here
TRNS vs FERG Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, FERG has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while FERG trades at $226.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas FERG's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FERG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to FERG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check FERG's competition here
TRNS vs WCC Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, WCC has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while WCC trades at $369.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas WCC's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WCC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to WCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WCC's competition here
TRNS vs WSO Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, WSO has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while WSO trades at $374.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas WSO's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WSO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to WSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WSO's competition here
TRNS vs WSO-B Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, WSO-B has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while WSO-B trades at $390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas WSO-B's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WSO-B's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to WSO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WSO-B's competition here
TRNS vs QXO Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while QXO trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -17.55. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QXO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check QXO's competition here
TRNS vs AIT Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, AIT has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while AIT trades at $309.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas AIT's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AIT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to AIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check AIT's competition here
TRNS vs WCC-PA Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, WCC-PA has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while WCC-PA trades at $221.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas WCC-PA's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WCC-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to WCC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WCC-PA's competition here
TRNS vs CNM Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, CNM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while CNM trades at $48.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas CNM's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to CNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check CNM's competition here
TRNS vs POOL Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, POOL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while POOL trades at $183.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas POOL's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to POOL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to POOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check POOL's competition here
TRNS vs MSM Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, MSM has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while MSM trades at $107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas MSM's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to MSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check MSM's competition here
TRNS vs SITE Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, SITE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while SITE trades at $114.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas SITE's P/E ratio is 33.54. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SITE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to SITE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check SITE's competition here
TRNS vs DXPE Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, DXPE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while DXPE trades at $147.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas DXPE's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DXPE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to DXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check DXPE's competition here
TRNS vs SYX Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, SYX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while SYX trades at $35.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas SYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to SYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check SYX's competition here
TRNS vs DSGR Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, DSGR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while DSGR trades at $26.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas DSGR's P/E ratio is 225.00. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DSGR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to DSGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check DSGR's competition here
TRNS vs GIC Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, GIC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while GIC trades at $29.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas GIC's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to GIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check GIC's competition here
TRNS vs LAWS Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, LAWS has a market cap of 796.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while LAWS trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas LAWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LAWS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to LAWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check LAWS's competition here
TRNS vs TITN Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, TITN has a market cap of 435.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while TITN trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas TITN's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TITN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to TITN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check TITN's competition here
TRNS vs EVI Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, EVI has a market cap of 221.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while EVI trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas EVI's P/E ratio is 38.27. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to EVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check EVI's competition here
TRNS vs BRIA Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, BRIA has a market cap of 40.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while BRIA trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas BRIA's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BRIA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to BRIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check BRIA's competition here
TRNS vs HTLM Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, HTLM has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while HTLM trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas HTLM's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HTLM's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to HTLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check HTLM's competition here
TRNS vs RECT Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, RECT has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while RECT trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas RECT's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RECT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to RECT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check RECT's competition here
TRNS vs PASW Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, PASW has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while PASW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas PASW's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PASW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to PASW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check PASW's competition here
TRNS vs HWCC Comparison May 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 681.4M. In comparison, HWCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $74.33, while HWCC trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 85.91, whereas HWCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HWCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to HWCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check HWCC's competition here