Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRNS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRNS | $92.75 | -0.14% | 866.3M | 162.72 | $0.57 | N/A |
| GWW | $1,341.42 | -1.76% | 63.3B | 36.12 | $37.14 | +0.69% |
| FAST | $46.12 | +0.50% | 52.9B | 40.81 | $1.13 | +2.00% |
| FERG | $237.28 | -0.45% | 46B | 23.37 | $10.15 | +1.47% |
| WCC | $369.72 | +1.19% | 18B | 26.28 | $14.07 | +0.52% |
| WSO-B | $350.00 | +0.00% | 16.5B | 28.69 | $12.20 | +3.10% |
| WSO | $397.16 | -0.97% | 16.3B | 32.56 | $12.19 | +3.10% |
| AIT | $338.07 | +0.03% | 12.5B | 31.97 | $10.58 | +0.57% |
| QXO | $16.74 | -5.74% | 12.1B | -17.61 | -$0.95 | N/A |
| WCC-PA | $221.82 | +1.73% | 10.9B | 21.85 | $10.15 | +0.52% |
Stock Comparison
TRNS vs GWW Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, GWW has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while GWW trades at $1,341.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas GWW's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to GWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check GWW's competition here
TRNS vs FAST Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, FAST has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while FAST trades at $46.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas FAST's P/E ratio is 40.81. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FAST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to FAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check FAST's competition here
TRNS vs FERG Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, FERG has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while FERG trades at $237.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas FERG's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FERG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to FERG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check FERG's competition here
TRNS vs WCC Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, WCC has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while WCC trades at $369.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas WCC's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WCC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to WCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WCC's competition here
TRNS vs WSO-B Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, WSO-B has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while WSO-B trades at $350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas WSO-B's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WSO-B's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to WSO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WSO-B's competition here
TRNS vs WSO Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, WSO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while WSO trades at $397.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas WSO's P/E ratio is 32.56. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WSO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to WSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WSO's competition here
TRNS vs AIT Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, AIT has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while AIT trades at $338.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas AIT's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AIT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to AIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check AIT's competition here
TRNS vs QXO Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while QXO trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -17.61. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QXO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check QXO's competition here
TRNS vs WCC-PA Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, WCC-PA has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while WCC-PA trades at $221.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas WCC-PA's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WCC-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to WCC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WCC-PA's competition here
TRNS vs CNM Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, CNM has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while CNM trades at $47.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas CNM's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to CNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check CNM's competition here
TRNS vs POOL Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, POOL has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while POOL trades at $195.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas POOL's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to POOL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to POOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check POOL's competition here
TRNS vs MSM Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, MSM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while MSM trades at $117.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas MSM's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MSM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to MSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check MSM's competition here
TRNS vs SITE Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, SITE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while SITE trades at $106.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas SITE's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SITE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to SITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check SITE's competition here
TRNS vs DXPE Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, DXPE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while DXPE trades at $169.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas DXPE's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DXPE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to DXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check DXPE's competition here
TRNS vs SYX Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, SYX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while SYX trades at $35.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas SYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to SYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check SYX's competition here
TRNS vs DSGR Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, DSGR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while DSGR trades at $28.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas DSGR's P/E ratio is 235.33. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DSGR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to DSGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check DSGR's competition here
TRNS vs GIC Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, GIC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while GIC trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas GIC's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to GIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check GIC's competition here
TRNS vs LAWS Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, LAWS has a market cap of 796.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while LAWS trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas LAWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LAWS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to LAWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check LAWS's competition here
TRNS vs TITN Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, TITN has a market cap of 485.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while TITN trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas TITN's P/E ratio is -8.87. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TITN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to TITN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check TITN's competition here
TRNS vs EVI Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, EVI has a market cap of 205.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while EVI trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas EVI's P/E ratio is 35.53. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to EVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check EVI's competition here
TRNS vs BRIA Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, BRIA has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while BRIA trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas BRIA's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRIA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to BRIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check BRIA's competition here
TRNS vs HTLM Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, HTLM has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while HTLM trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas HTLM's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HTLM's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to HTLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check HTLM's competition here
TRNS vs RECT Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, RECT has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while RECT trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas RECT's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RECT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to RECT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check RECT's competition here
TRNS vs PASW Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, PASW has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while PASW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas PASW's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PASW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to PASW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check PASW's competition here
TRNS vs HWCC Comparison June 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 866.3M. In comparison, HWCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $92.75, while HWCC trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 162.72, whereas HWCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HWCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to HWCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check HWCC's competition here