Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (CIGL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CIGL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIGL | $1.99 | +0.00% | 3.2M | -13.27 | -$0.15 | N/A |
| ALLE | $137.24 | -1.61% | 11.8B | 16.98 | $8.08 | +1.55% |
| MSA | $171.03 | -1.36% | 6.6B | 20.77 | $8.24 | +1.25% |
| ADT | $7.00 | -0.85% | 5.1B | 7.62 | $0.92 | +3.15% |
| BCO | $120.12 | +2.00% | 4.9B | 14.64 | $8.21 | +0.85% |
| BRC | $93.69 | +0.15% | 4.4B | 18.53 | $5.06 | +1.06% |
| GEO | $29.46 | -0.54% | 3.9B | 29.17 | $1.01 | N/A |
| VVNT | $12.00 | +0.00% | 2.6B | -50.00 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| NSSC | $36.12 | -1.50% | 1.3B | 25.08 | $1.44 | +1.60% |
| EVLV | $5.66 | -2.08% | 1B | -24.61 | -$0.23 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CIGL vs ALLE Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ALLE has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while ALLE trades at $137.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas ALLE's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to ALLE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to ALLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check ALLE's competition here
CIGL vs MSA Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, MSA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while MSA trades at $171.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas MSA's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to MSA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to MSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check MSA's competition here
CIGL vs ADT Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ADT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while ADT trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas ADT's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to ADT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to ADT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check ADT's competition here
CIGL vs BCO Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, BCO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while BCO trades at $120.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas BCO's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to BCO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to BCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check BCO's competition here
CIGL vs BRC Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, BRC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while BRC trades at $93.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas BRC's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to BRC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to BRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check BRC's competition here
CIGL vs GEO Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, GEO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while GEO trades at $29.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas GEO's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to GEO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to GEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check GEO's competition here
CIGL vs VVNT Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, VVNT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while VVNT trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas VVNT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to VVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to VVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check VVNT's competition here
CIGL vs NSSC Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, NSSC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while NSSC trades at $36.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas NSSC's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to NSSC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to NSSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check NSSC's competition here
CIGL vs EVLV Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, EVLV has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while EVLV trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas EVLV's P/E ratio is -24.61. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to EVLV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to EVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check EVLV's competition here
CIGL vs MG Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, MG has a market cap of 498.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while MG trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas MG's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to MG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to MG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check MG's competition here
CIGL vs CIX Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CIX has a market cap of 315.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while CIX trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas CIX's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to CIX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to CIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check CIX's competition here
CIGL vs NL Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, NL has a market cap of 288.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while NL trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas NL's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to NL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to NL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check NL's competition here
CIGL vs BAERW Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, BAERW has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while BAERW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas BAERW's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to BAERW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is less volatile compared to BAERW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check BAERW's competition here
CIGL vs BAER Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, BAER has a market cap of 111.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while BAER trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas BAER's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to BAER's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is less volatile compared to BAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check BAER's competition here
CIGL vs NXTD Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, NXTD has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while NXTD trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas NXTD's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to NXTD's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to NXTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check NXTD's competition here
CIGL vs SPCB Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SPCB has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while SPCB trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas SPCB's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to SPCB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to SPCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check SPCB's competition here
CIGL vs SNT Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SNT has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while SNT trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas SNT's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to SNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to SNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check SNT's competition here
CIGL vs KSCP Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, KSCP has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while KSCP trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas KSCP's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to KSCP's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to KSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check KSCP's competition here
CIGL vs UUU Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, UUU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while UUU trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas UUU's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to UUU's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to UUU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check UUU's competition here
CIGL vs GFAI Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, GFAI has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while GFAI trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas GFAI's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to GFAI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to GFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check GFAI's competition here
CIGL vs VRME Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, VRME has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while VRME trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas VRME's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to VRME's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to VRME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check VRME's competition here
CIGL vs GFAIW Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, GFAIW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while GFAIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas GFAIW's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to GFAIW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to GFAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check GFAIW's competition here
CIGL vs SUGP Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SUGP has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while SUGP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas SUGP's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to SUGP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to SUGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check SUGP's competition here
CIGL vs BKYI Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, BKYI has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while BKYI trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas BKYI's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to BKYI's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to BKYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check BKYI's competition here
CIGL vs IVDAW Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, IVDAW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while IVDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas IVDAW's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to IVDAW's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is less volatile compared to IVDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check IVDAW's competition here
CIGL vs IVDA Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, IVDA has a market cap of 724.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while IVDA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas IVDA's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to IVDA's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to IVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check IVDA's competition here
CIGL vs VRMEW Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, VRMEW has a market cap of 172.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while VRMEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas VRMEW's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to VRMEW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is less volatile compared to VRMEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check VRMEW's competition here
CIGL vs LOJN Comparison July 2026
CIGL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIGL stands at 3.2M. In comparison, LOJN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIGL is priced at $1.99, while LOJN trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -13.27, whereas LOJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIGL's ROE is -5.35%, compared to LOJN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIGL is more volatile compared to LOJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIGL.Check LOJN's competition here