Flex Ltd.
Flex Ltd. FLEX Peers
See (FLEX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLEX | $53.80 | +2.57% | 20.1B | 25.50 | $2.11 | N/A |
| APH | $100.71 | -1.05% | 121.9B | 48.92 | $2.06 | +0.66% |
| TEL | $202.04 | +11.95% | 59.9B | 43.92 | $4.60 | +1.33% |
| GLW | $55.80 | +3.30% | 47.8B | 107.37 | $0.52 | +2.00% |
| GRMN | $232.00 | +1.88% | 44.7B | 30.55 | $7.59 | +1.36% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $167.99 | +1.65% | 28.9B | 39.44 | $4.26 | N/A |
| TDY | $546.58 | -1.69% | 25.6B | 31.21 | $17.51 | N/A |
| JBL | $229.15 | +3.76% | 24.6B | 43.57 | $5.26 | +0.14% |
| TRMB | $83.62 | +1.33% | 20B | 13.64 | $6.13 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLEX vs APH Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 121.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while APH trades at $100.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 48.92. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs TEL Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while TEL trades at $202.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 43.92. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs GLW Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while GLW trades at $55.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 107.37. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs GRMN Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while GRMN trades at $232.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs IIVI Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs KEYS Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while KEYS trades at $167.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs TDY Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while TDY trades at $546.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 31.21. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs JBL Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while JBL trades at $229.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 43.57. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs TRMB Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while TRMB trades at $83.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs CLS Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while CLS trades at $168.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 47.14. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs FTV Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while FTV trades at $51.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs COHR Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while COHR trades at $98.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -447.41. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs FN Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while FN trades at $305.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs MKSI Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while MKSI trades at $99.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs SNDK Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while SNDK trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs ITRI Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while ITRI trades at $135.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs VNT Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while VNT trades at $39.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs CGNX Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while CGNX trades at $34.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 50.16. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs LFUS Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while LFUS trades at $232.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 60.86. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs BMI Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while BMI trades at $192.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 41.88. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs SANM Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while SANM trades at $100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs ESE Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while ESE trades at $189.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 41.60. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs ST Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while ST trades at $33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 40.77. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs TTMI Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while TTMI trades at $46.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 61.94. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs NOVT Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while NOVT trades at $126.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 64.88. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs OSIS Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while OSIS trades at $226.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs PLXS Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while PLXS trades at $133.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs VICR Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while VICR trades at $52.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 99.40. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs BMNR Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while BMNR trades at $39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs BHE Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while BHE trades at $40.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs OUST Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while OUST trades at $26.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -13.67. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs BELFB Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while BELFB trades at $107.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs BELFA Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while BELFA trades at $94.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 28.86. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs PENG Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while PENG trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -85.86. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs ROG Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while ROG trades at $67.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 75.16. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs CTS Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while CTS trades at $40.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs FARO Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs DAKT Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 810.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while DAKT trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is -78.57. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DAKT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs BKSY Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 712.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while BKSY trades at $20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs OUST-WTA Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs ALNT Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 679.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while ALNT trades at $40.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 69.24. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs BKSY-WT Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 677.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs AMOT Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs LYTS Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 543.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while LYTS trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs NEON Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 491.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while NEON trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -79.19. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs OUST-WT Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs MLAB Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 410.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while MLAB trades at $74.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -207.33. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs SATLW Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 401.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while SATLW trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs VPG Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 379.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while VPG trades at $28.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 124.39. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs SATL Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 370.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while SATL trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs MVIS Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 366.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while MVIS trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs KOPN Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 348.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while KOPN trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -26.75. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs VLDR Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs KULR Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 266.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while KULR trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs MEI Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 239.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while MEI trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs EMAN Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs RELL Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while RELL trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -65.20. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs LPTH Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 137.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while LPTH trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -12.84. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs MPTI Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 127.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while MPTI trades at $43.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs WBX Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while WBX trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs GNSS Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 87.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while GNSS trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs ODYS Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while ODYS trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs LINK Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while LINK trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -31.79. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs WRAP Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while WRAP trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -9.19. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs ELTK Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 70.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while ELTK trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs OPTX Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while OPTX trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 180.00. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs MIND Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while MIND trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs REFR Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while REFR trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs SOTK Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while SOTK trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 39.12. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs DSWL Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while DSWL trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs SELX Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while SELX trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs SVRE Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while SVRE trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs LGL Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while LGL trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 94.25. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs CPSH Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while CPSH trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs ISNS Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs LUNA Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while LUNA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs DAIO Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while DAIO trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs MTEK Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while MTEK trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -21.12. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs HOLOW Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while HOLOW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs HOLO Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while HOLO trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs NSYS Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while NSYS trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs TMPOW Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs FCUV Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while FCUV trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs KNW Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while KNW trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KNW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs WATT Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while WATT trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs SGMA Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs SLNHP Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while SLNHP trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs VIAO Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs ELSE Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while ELSE trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 42.45. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs SLNH Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while SLNH trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs OST Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while OST trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs SVREW Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while SVREW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs SOBR Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while SOBR trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs BNSO Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs MINDP Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs OUSTZ Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while OUSTZ trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs IMTE Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while IMTE trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs MMAT Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.
FLEX vs OPTXW Comparison
FLEX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLEX stands at 20.1B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLEX is priced at $53.80, while OPTXW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLEX currently has a P/E ratio of 25.50, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLEX's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLEX is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLEX.