Fiserv, Inc.
Fiserv, Inc. FI Peers
See (FI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FI | $143.00 | -13.85% | 79.3B | 25.37 | $5.64 | N/A |
| IBM | $282.01 | +0.02% | 262.1B | 48.28 | $5.84 | +2.37% |
| ACN | $286.04 | -0.32% | 178.2B | 22.76 | $12.57 | +2.06% |
| FISV | $114.23 | +0.00% | 116.2B | 29.67 | $3.85 | N/A |
| INFY | $18.45 | +1.04% | 76.5B | 24.28 | $0.76 | +4.56% |
| CTSH | $77.19 | +0.51% | 38.1B | 16.25 | $4.75 | +1.58% |
| WIT | $2.99 | +1.36% | 31.3B | 19.90 | $0.15 | +1.03% |
| BR | $242.64 | -0.60% | 28.5B | 36.49 | $6.65 | +1.45% |
| IT | $357.98 | +0.41% | 27.6B | 22.34 | $16.03 | N/A |
| CDW | $181.37 | +0.72% | 23.9B | 22.47 | $8.07 | +1.38% |
Stock Comparison
FI vs IBM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 262.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while IBM trades at $282.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 48.28. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ACN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 178.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while ACN trades at $286.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FISV Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while FISV trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs INFY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while INFY trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTSH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while CTSH trades at $77.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WIT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while WIT trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BR Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while BR trades at $242.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 36.49. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs IT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while IT trades at $357.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CDW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while CDW trades at $181.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GIB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while GIB trades at $102.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs LDOS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while LDOS trades at $163.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs JKHY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while JKHY trades at $180.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AUR Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while AUR trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -13.77. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AUROW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while AUROW trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CACI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while CACI trades at $480.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs EPAM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while EPAM trades at $171.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs KD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while KD trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 37.20. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs G Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while G trades at $45.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas G's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DLB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while DLB trades at $76.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 29.08. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs EXLS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while EXLS trades at $42.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 32.43. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GDS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while GDS trades at $36.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 333.82. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WAY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while WAY trades at $36.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 306.92. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SAIC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while SAIC trades at $116.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs INGM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while INGM trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GLOB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while GLOB trades at $90.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CNXC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while CNXC trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while AI trades at $29.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -13.02. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NCR Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PAY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while PAY trades at $29.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 73.70. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WNS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while WNS trades at $74.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while CD trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CLVT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while CLVT trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DXC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while DXC trades at $14.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PRFT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs APLD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while APLD trades at $10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BBAI-WT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while BBAI-WT trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BBAI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while BBAI trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VNET Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while VNET trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -874.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ASGN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while ASGN trades at $50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VYX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while VYX trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FORTY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while FORTY trades at $129.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NYAX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while NYAX trades at $46.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 246.32. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TASK Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while TASK trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NABL Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while NABL trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 101.13. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs INOD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while INOD trades at $47.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 43.91. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TWKS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FLYW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while FLYW trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 296.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs MGIC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while MGIC trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GDYN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 912.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while GDYN trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 83.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PSFE-WT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 908.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs LZMH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 882M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while LZMH trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is 580.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs XRX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 836.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while XRX trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PSFE Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 816.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while PSFE trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -688.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTLP Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 811.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while CTLP trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CLVT-PA Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs HCKT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 650.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while HCKT trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TSSI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 646.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while TSSI trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 71.78. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CNDT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 458M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while CNDT trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs IBEX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 413.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while IBEX trades at $30.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SDHIU Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 324.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while SDHIU trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +16.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs UIS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 317.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while UIS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PHLT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 295.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while PHLT trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -47.12. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DMRC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 274.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while DMRC trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TTEC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 260.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while TTEC trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BULLZ Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs III Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 226.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while III trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas III's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TLS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 216M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while TLS trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SRT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTG Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs LHSW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 155.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while LHSW trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 59.80. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NOTE-WT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 133.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NOTE Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while NOTE trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 119.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while CTM trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CSPI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 117.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while CSPI trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -74.25. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ALYA Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SAIH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while SAIH trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GLE Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while GLE trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 181.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SAIHW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while SAIHW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VEEAW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while VEEAW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +11.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GMM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while GMM trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DVLT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while DVLT trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VEEA Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while VEEA trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +12.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BTCM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while BTCM trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs USIO Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while USIO trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DTST Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while DTST trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 257.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WYY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while WYY trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -14.45. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CLPS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while CLPS trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs JFU Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while JFU trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TDTH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while TDTH trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -13.92. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDTH's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs MASK Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while MASK trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CYCU Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while CYCU trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CYCUW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while CYCUW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SGLB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -6.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ARBB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while ARBB trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs JDZG Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while JDZG trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SASI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SASI's ROE of +597.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DTSTW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while DTSTW trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WAVD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SREV Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 79.3B. In comparison, SREV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $143.00, while SREV trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.37, whereas SREV's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SREV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SREV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.