Fiserv, Inc.
Fiserv, Inc. FI Peers
See (FI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
FI vs IBM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 231.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while IBM trades at $249.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 42.68. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ACN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 192.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ACN trades at $307.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FISV Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while FISV trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs INFY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 74.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while INFY trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FJTSY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, FJTSY has a market cap of 39.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while FJTSY trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas FJTSY's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FJTSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to FJTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FJTSF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, FJTSF has a market cap of 38.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while FJTSF trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas FJTSF's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FJTSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to FJTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTSH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 38.40B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CTSH trades at $77.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs IT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 32.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while IT trades at $426.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NIPNF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NIPNF has a market cap of 32.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NIPNF trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NIPNF's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIPNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NIPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WIT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 30.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while WIT trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NTDTY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NTDTY has a market cap of 29.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NTDTY trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NTDTY's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTDTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NTDTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NTTDF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NTTDF has a market cap of 28.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NTTDF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NTTDF's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTTDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NTTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CAPMF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CAPMF has a market cap of 27.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CAPMF trades at $161.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CAPMF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CAPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CGEMY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CGEMY has a market cap of 27.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CGEMY trades at $32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CGEMY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CGEMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CGEMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BR Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 27.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while BR trades at $232.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GIB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 23.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while GIB trades at $105.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NURAF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NURAF has a market cap of 22.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NURAF trades at $39.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NURAF's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NURAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NRILY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NRILY has a market cap of 22.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NRILY trades at $38.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NRILY's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NRILY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NRILY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CDW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 21.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CDW trades at $165.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs LDOS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 18.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while LDOS trades at $147.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AUROW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 15.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while AUROW trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WIZEY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, WIZEY has a market cap of 14.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while WIZEY trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas WIZEY's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WIZEY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WIZEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WPLCF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, WPLCF has a market cap of 13.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while WPLCF trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas WPLCF's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WPLCF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to WPLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AUR Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 13.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while AUR trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -16.91. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs JKHY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 12.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while JKHY trades at $172.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CACI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CACI trades at $461.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs EPAM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 9.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while EPAM trades at $159.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs G Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 8.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while G trades at $49.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas G's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs KD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 7.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while KD trades at $33.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 57.81. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs EXLS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 7.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while EXLS trades at $46.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 35.26. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DLB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DLB trades at $74.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WAY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 7.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while WAY trades at $40.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is -315.19. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TISNF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, TISNF has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while TISNF trades at $29.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas TISNF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TISNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DTATF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DTATF has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DTATF trades at $43.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DTATF's P/E ratio is 362.92. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTATF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DTATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ISMAF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ISMAF has a market cap of 5.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ISMAF trades at $33.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ISMAF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ISMAF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ISMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs RPYTF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, RPYTF has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while RPYTF trades at $155.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas RPYTF's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RPYTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to RPYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SAIC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SAIC trades at $117.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DUSXF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DUSXF has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DUSXF trades at $12.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DUSXF's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUSXF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DUSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BECTY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, BECTY has a market cap of 5.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while BECTY trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas BECTY's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BECTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BECTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GDS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while GDS trades at $27.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GLOB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while GLOB trades at $117.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 31.68. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BHTLF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, BHTLF has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while BHTLF trades at $37.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas BHTLF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHTLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PAY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while PAY trades at $34.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 97.63. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs INGM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while INGM trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AEXAY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, AEXAY has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while AEXAY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas AEXAY's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEXAY's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to AEXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TSYHF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, TSYHF has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while TSYHF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas TSYHF's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSYHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TSYHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TSYHY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, TSYHY has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while TSYHY trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas TSYHY's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSYHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TSYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SPSAF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SPSAF has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SPSAF trades at $199.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SPSAF's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPSAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SPSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NCR Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CNXC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CNXC trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CD trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FI and CD have similar daily volatility (2.71).
FI vs ISMAY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ISMAY has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ISMAY trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ISMAY's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ISMAY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ISMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTLPP Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CTLPP has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CTLPP trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CTLPP's P/E ratio is 1333.33. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTLPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTLPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CLVT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CLVT trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DXC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DXC trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is -52.93. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DXC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while AI trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NWITY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NWITY has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NWITY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NWITY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWITY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NWITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PRFT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NWKLF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NWKLF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NWKLF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NWKLF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWKLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NWKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WNS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while WNS trades at $59.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NSSXF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NSSXF has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NSSXF trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NSSXF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NSSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ASGN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ASGN trades at $52.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 50.59. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SLNTY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SLNTY has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SLNTY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SLNTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLNTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SLNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NTCYF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NTCYF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NTCYF trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NTCYF's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTCYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NTCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CFTLF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CFTLF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CFTLF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CFTLF's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFTLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CFTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NDTAF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NDTAF has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NDTAF trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NDTAF's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NDTAF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NDTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ATEAY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ATEAY has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ATEAY trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ATEAY's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATEAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ATEAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs LZMH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while LZMH trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -999.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LZMH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs HLTEF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, HLTEF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while HLTEF trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas HLTEF's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLTEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to HLTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NYAX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NYAX trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYAX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TWKS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NCRRP Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NCRRP has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NCRRP trades at $1,100.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NCRRP's P/E ratio is 941.02. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCRRP's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NCRRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ATAZF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ATAZF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ATAZF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ATAZF's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATAZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ATAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NABL Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NABL trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 44.75. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FORTY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while FORTY trades at $87.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DLGEF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DLGEF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DLGEF trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DLGEF's P/E ratio is 33.01. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DLGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TASK Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while TASK trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs INOD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while INOD trades at $38.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 43.46. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VYX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while VYX trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FLYW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while FLYW trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 486.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs APLD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while APLD trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GDYN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while GDYN trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 103.62. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CCCMF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CCCMF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CCCMF trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CCCMF's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCCMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CCCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BBAI-WT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CRAYF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CRAYF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CRAYF trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CRAYF's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRAYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CRAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PSFE-WT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 966.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NGRRF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NGRRF has a market cap of 956.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NGRRF trades at $71.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NGRRF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGRRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SESPF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SESPF has a market cap of 954.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SESPF trades at $61.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SESPF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SESPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SESPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs KSUEF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, KSUEF has a market cap of 943.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while KSUEF trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas KSUEF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSUEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to KSUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs KAHTY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, KAHTY has a market cap of 936.71M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while KAHTY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas KAHTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAHTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to KAHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BBAI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 927.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while BBAI trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PSFE Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 906.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while PSFE trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSFE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DTSOF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DTSOF has a market cap of 875.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DTSOF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DTSOF's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTSOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DTSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ADSGF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ADSGF has a market cap of 835.11M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ADSGF trades at $130.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ADSGF's P/E ratio is 245.36. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ADSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTSDF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CTSDF has a market cap of 814.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CTSDF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CTSDF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AEXAF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, AEXAF has a market cap of 773.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while AEXAF trades at $40.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas AEXAF's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEXAF's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to AEXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TRCLF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, TRCLF has a market cap of 764.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while TRCLF trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas TRCLF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRCLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TRCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CLVT-PA Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs HCKT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 737.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while HCKT trades at $26.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs MGIC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 672.66M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while MGIC trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs XRX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 643.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while XRX trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTLP Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 593.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CTLP trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DCHIF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DCHIF has a market cap of 551.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DCHIF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DCHIF's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DCHIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DCHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FDRVF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, FDRVF has a market cap of 538.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while FDRVF trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas FDRVF's P/E ratio is -22.97. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FDRVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to FDRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FDDMF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, FDDMF has a market cap of 508.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while FDDMF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas FDDMF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FDDMF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to FDDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GBDMF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, GBDMF has a market cap of 488.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while GBDMF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas GBDMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBDMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to GBDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CMTUF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CMTUF has a market cap of 470.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CMTUF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CMTUF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMTUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DTTLY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DTTLY has a market cap of 347.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DTTLY trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DTTLY's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTTLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DTTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs UIS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 346.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while UIS trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs IBEX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 340.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while IBEX trades at $25.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CNDT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 338.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CNDT trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VNET Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 311.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while VNET trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is 348.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SLUNF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SLUNF has a market cap of 304.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SLUNF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SLUNF's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLUNF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SLUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DMRC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 296.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DMRC trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -7.51. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SVPLF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SVPLF has a market cap of 279.77M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SVPLF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SVPLF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SVPLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SVPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CEJOF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CEJOF has a market cap of 264.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CEJOF trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CEJOF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEJOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CEJOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CSYJF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CSYJF has a market cap of 262.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CSYJF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CSYJF's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CSYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SSCC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SSCC has a market cap of 244.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SSCC trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SSCC's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSCC's ROE of -7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CSYJY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CSYJY has a market cap of 240.18M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CSYJY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CSYJY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSYJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CSYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FCCN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, FCCN has a market cap of 230.18M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while FCCN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas FCCN's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCCN's ROE of +20.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to FCCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ITFRF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ITFRF has a market cap of 229.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ITFRF trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ITFRF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ITFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs EMCHF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, EMCHF has a market cap of 226.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while EMCHF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas EMCHF's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to EMCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs APMRF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, APMRF has a market cap of 224.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while APMRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas APMRF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to APMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TLS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 198.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while TLS trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs III Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 186.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while III trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas III's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to III's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PHLT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 186.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while PHLT trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -18.31. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TTEC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 182.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while TTEC trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SRT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TSSI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 171.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while TSSI trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTG Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 168.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ALVNF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ALVNF has a market cap of 167.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ALVNF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ALVNF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ALVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CSPI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 163.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CSPI trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is 826.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSPI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs LHSW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 158.60M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while LHSW trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LHSW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BULLZ Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 158.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while BULLZ trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs APPEF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, APPEF has a market cap of 157.84M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while APPEF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas APPEF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APPEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to APPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GSDT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, GSDT has a market cap of 141.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while GSDT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas GSDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSDT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GSDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs APXYY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, APXYY has a market cap of 138.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while APXYY trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas APXYY's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APXYY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to APXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ULPRF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ULPRF has a market cap of 136.98M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ULPRF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ULPRF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ULPRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ULPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ALYAF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ALYAF has a market cap of 129.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ALYAF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ALYAF's P/E ratio is -43.33. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALYAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ALYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ALYA Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs QUISF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, QUISF has a market cap of 108.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while QUISF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas QUISF's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QUISF's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to QUISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CNGFF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CNGFF has a market cap of 103.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CNGFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CNGFF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNGFF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NOTE-WT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 101.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs QSCGF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, QSCGF has a market cap of 99.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while QSCGF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas QSCGF's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QSCGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to QSCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NOTE Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 97.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NOTE trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOTE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DCHIY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DCHIY has a market cap of 88.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DCHIY trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DCHIY's P/E ratio is -12.36. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DCHIY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DCHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 78.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CTM trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SAIH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 66.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SAIH trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs KDCXF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, KDCXF has a market cap of 64.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while KDCXF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas KDCXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KDCXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to KDCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DVLT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 59.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DVLT trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs EAXR Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, EAXR has a market cap of 56.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while EAXR trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas EAXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EAXR's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to EAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs HLEO Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, HLEO has a market cap of 56.32M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while HLEO trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas HLEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLEO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to HLEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VEEA Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 55.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while VEEA trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VEEA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SDHIU Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 54.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SDHIU trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CXGEF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CXGEF has a market cap of 53.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CXGEF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CXGEF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CXGEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CXGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WYY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 49.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while WYY trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -24.19. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GMM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 45.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while GMM trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs USIO Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 41.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while USIO trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SEBFF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SEBFF has a market cap of 38.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SEBFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SEBFF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEBFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SEBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs MASK Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 36.18M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while MASK trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MASK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GLE Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 32.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while GLE trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 87.50. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SNELF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SNELF has a market cap of 28.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SNELF trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SNELF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNELF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SNELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BTCM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 27.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while BTCM trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CLPS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 26.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CLPS trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -24.02. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DTST Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 25.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DTST trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 51.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BNXAF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, BNXAF has a market cap of 25.18M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while BNXAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas BNXAF's P/E ratio is -19.87. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNXAF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to BNXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs MLBEF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, MLBEF has a market cap of 25.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while MLBEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas MLBEF's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLBEF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to MLBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ARBB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 17.98M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ARBB trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SPOFF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SPOFF has a market cap of 15.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SPOFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SPOFF's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPOFF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SPOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CYCU Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 14.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CYCU trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CYCU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs JDZG Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 14.18M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while JDZG trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs POSAF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, POSAF has a market cap of 11.57M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while POSAF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas POSAF's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POSAF's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to POSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SGLB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGLB's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs KTHGF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, KTHGF has a market cap of 11.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while KTHGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas KTHGF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KTHGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to KTHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs XTMIF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, XTMIF has a market cap of 8.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while XTMIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas XTMIF's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XTMIF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to XTMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SUIC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SUIC has a market cap of 6.84M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SUIC trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SUIC's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUIC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SUIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BRQSF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, BRQSF has a market cap of 6.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while BRQSF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas BRQSF's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRQSF's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BRQSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs KNRLF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, KNRLF has a market cap of 6.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while KNRLF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas KNRLF's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KNRLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to KNRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FUUN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, FUUN has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while FUUN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas FUUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to FUUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DCSX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DCSX has a market cap of 5.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DCSX trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DCSX's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DCSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CPIHF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CPIHF has a market cap of 3.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CPIHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CPIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPIHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CPIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SASI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SASI's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DRGV Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DRGV has a market cap of 3.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DRGV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DRGV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRGV's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DRGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NOSUF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NOSUF has a market cap of 3.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NOSUF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NOSUF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOSUF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NOSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VSSSF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, VSSSF has a market cap of 2.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while VSSSF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas VSSSF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSSSF's ROE of +25.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VSSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VEEAW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 2.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while VEEAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SEAV Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SEAV has a market cap of 2.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SEAV trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SEAV's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEAV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SKTCF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SKTCF has a market cap of 2.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SKTCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SKTCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKTCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SKTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CRCW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CRCW has a market cap of 2.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CRCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CRCW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRCW's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SNOIF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SNOIF has a market cap of 2.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SNOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SNOIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNOIF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SNOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DTSTW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DTSTW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WAVD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs MOBIF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, MOBIF has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while MOBIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas MOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOBIF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to MOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CATG Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CATG has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CATG trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CATG's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CATG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CATG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TDTH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 1.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while TDTH trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GTCH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, GTCH has a market cap of 1.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while GTCH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas GTCH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTCH's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DTMXF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DTMXF has a market cap of 1.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DTMXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DTMXF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTMXF's ROE of -5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DTMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs MOOIF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, MOOIF has a market cap of 1.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while MOOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas MOOIF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOOIF's ROE of +18.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to MOOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SFWJ Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SFWJ has a market cap of 1.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SFWJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SFWJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFWJ's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SFWJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CYCUW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 1.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CYCUW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SSFT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SSFT has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SSFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SSFT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSFT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs JFU Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 853564.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while JFU trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VEII Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, VEII has a market cap of 696013.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while VEII trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas VEII's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VEII's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VEII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NFTFF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NFTFF has a market cap of 685285.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NFTFF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NFTFF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NFTFF's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NFTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SDVI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SDVI has a market cap of 674664.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SDVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SDVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SDVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AGILQ Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, AGILQ has a market cap of 581689.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while AGILQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas AGILQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGILQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to AGILQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs UTRX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, UTRX has a market cap of 489638.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while UTRX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas UTRX's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UTRX's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to UTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TRIRW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, TRIRW has a market cap of 397925.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while TRIRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas TRIRW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRIRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TRIRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WYLDF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, WYLDF has a market cap of 340019.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while WYLDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas WYLDF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WYLDF's ROE of +6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WYLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ESYL Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ESYL has a market cap of 317805.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ESYL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ESYL's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESYL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ESYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs HMNY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, HMNY has a market cap of 300139.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while HMNY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas HMNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMNY's ROE of +11.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to HMNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SLLN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SLLN has a market cap of 272904.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SLLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SLLN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLLN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SLLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ROKK Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ROKK has a market cap of 272428.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ROKK trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ROKK's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROKK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ROKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DYNE Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DYNE has a market cap of 232936.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DYNE trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DYNE's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DYNE's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DYNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DIGAF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DIGAF has a market cap of 168217.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DIGAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DIGAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DIGAF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DIGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CBRI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CBRI has a market cap of 163292.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CBRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CBRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBRI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CBRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SAIHW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 139970.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SAIHW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ZWBC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ZWBC has a market cap of 134886.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ZWBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ZWBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZWBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ZWBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs APQT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, APQT has a market cap of 108108.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while APQT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas APQT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APQT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to APQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs HUBV Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, HUBV has a market cap of 101820.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while HUBV trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas HUBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUBV's ROE of -4.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to HUBV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CLTS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CLTS has a market cap of 99989.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CLTS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CLTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CLTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ICLD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ICLD has a market cap of 95702.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ICLD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ICLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ICLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ADGL Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ADGL has a market cap of 95638.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ADGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ADGL's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADGL's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ADGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ALYI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ALYI has a market cap of 93379.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ALYI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ALYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALYI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ALYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs RCMH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, RCMH has a market cap of 84453.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while RCMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas RCMH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RCMH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to RCMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs IPSI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, IPSI has a market cap of 73897.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while IPSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas IPSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPSI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to IPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs XALL Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, XALL has a market cap of 57390.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while XALL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas XALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XALL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to XALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DVRNF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DVRNF has a market cap of 54091.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DVRNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DVRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DVRNF's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DVRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WCIG Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, WCIG has a market cap of 49979.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while WCIG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas WCIG's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WCIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs RGGI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, RGGI has a market cap of 45979.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while RGGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas RGGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RGGI's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to RGGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs INIX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, INIX has a market cap of 40485.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while INIX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas INIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to INIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GSPH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, GSPH has a market cap of 37091.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while GSPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas GSPH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSPH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GSPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs YIPI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, YIPI has a market cap of 29790.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while YIPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas YIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YIPI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to YIPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs HWNI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, HWNI has a market cap of 21137.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while HWNI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas HWNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWNI's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to HWNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs EMRH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, EMRH has a market cap of 10100.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while EMRH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas EMRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMRH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to EMRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CMPY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CMPY has a market cap of 6671.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CMPY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CMPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TPPPF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, TPPPF has a market cap of 6094.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while TPPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas TPPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPPPF's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TPPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FCTI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, FCTI has a market cap of 5522.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while FCTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas FCTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to FCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ENHT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ENHT has a market cap of 5238.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ENHT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ENHT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENHT's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ENHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PGFY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, PGFY has a market cap of 5010.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while PGFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas PGFY's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to PGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs HZHI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, HZHI has a market cap of 4973.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while HZHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas HZHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HZHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to HZHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NDVNQ Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NDVNQ has a market cap of 4759.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NDVNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NDVNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NDVNQ's ROE of +5.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NDVNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DGIF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DGIF has a market cap of 4340.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DGIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DGIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DGIF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs THDS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, THDS has a market cap of 3713.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while THDS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas THDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THDS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to THDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CCTR Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CCTR has a market cap of 2977.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CCTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CCTR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCTR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CCTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CKYS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CKYS has a market cap of 2000.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CKYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CKYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CKYS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CKYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs OTFT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, OTFT has a market cap of 1737.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while OTFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas OTFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to OTFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs EXCC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, EXCC has a market cap of 1025.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while EXCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas EXCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXCC's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to EXCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PRZM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, PRZM has a market cap of 1007.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while PRZM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas PRZM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRZM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to PRZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PRLO Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, PRLO has a market cap of 730.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while PRLO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas PRLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRLO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to PRLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SCNTQ Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SCNTQ has a market cap of 661.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SCNTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SCNTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCNTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SCNTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs RTNB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, RTNB has a market cap of 610.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while RTNB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas RTNB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTNB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to RTNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VBTC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, VBTC has a market cap of 528.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while VBTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas VBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VBTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs USDC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, USDC has a market cap of 371.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while USDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas USDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to USDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BETSF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, BETSF has a market cap of 312.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while BETSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas BETSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BETSF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to BETSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TSCC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, TSCC has a market cap of 300.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while TSCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas TSCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSCC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BTSR Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, BTSR has a market cap of 210.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while BTSR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas BTSR's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTSR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to BTSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ITTOF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ITTOF has a market cap of 171.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ITTOF trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ITTOF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITTOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ITTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ITTOY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ITTOY has a market cap of 150.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ITTOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ITTOY's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITTOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ITTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DPFD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, DPFD has a market cap of 114.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while DPFD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas DPFD's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DPFD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DPFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs IMCI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, IMCI has a market cap of 104.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while IMCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas IMCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IMCI's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to IMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NONEY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NONEY has a market cap of 100.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NONEY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NONEY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NONEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NONEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SEVM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SEVM has a market cap of 90.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SEVM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SEVM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SEVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NONEF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NONEF has a market cap of 84.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NONEF trades at $27.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NONEF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NONEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NONEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ATHC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ATHC has a market cap of 75.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ATHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ATHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATHC's ROE of -6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ATHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NNSCF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, NNSCF has a market cap of 46.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while NNSCF trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas NNSCF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NNSCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NNSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs HYDN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, HYDN has a market cap of 39.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while HYDN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas HYDN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HYDN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to HYDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SFBTF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SFBTF has a market cap of 35.00. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SFBTF trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SFBTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFBTF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SFBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SYKE Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SYKE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SYKE trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SYKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SYKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CRGE Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CRGE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CRGE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CRGE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRGE's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CRGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PCPJ Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, PCPJ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while PCPJ trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas PCPJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCPJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to PCPJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CCRC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CCRC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CCRC trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CCRC's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCRC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CCRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GDYNW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, GDYNW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while GDYNW trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas GDYNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GDYNW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GDYNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TRIT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, TRIT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while TRIT trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas TRIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRIT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TRIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CYXT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CYXT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CYXT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CYXT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CYXT's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CYXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CNLK Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CNLK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CNLK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CNLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CNLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FCCND Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, FCCND comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while FCCND trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas FCCND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCCND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to FCCND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CSVI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CSVI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CSVI trades at $57.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CSVI's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSVI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CSVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BLFDF Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, BLFDF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while BLFDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas BLFDF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLFDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BLFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AVCT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, AVCT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while AVCT trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas AVCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVCT's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to AVCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SREV Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SREV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SREV trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SREV's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SREV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SREV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SWCH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, SWCH comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while SWCH trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas SWCH's P/E ratio is 796.51. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SWCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ACZT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, ACZT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while ACZT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas ACZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACZT's ROE of -70.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ACZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTEK Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, CTEK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while CTEK trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas CTEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTEK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs REKRW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 102.83B. In comparison, REKRW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $185.47, while REKRW trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 32.88, whereas REKRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REKRW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to REKRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | $249.24 | +1.50% | 231.64B | 42.68 | $5.84 | +2.68% |
| ACN | $307.70 | +0.78% | 192.63B | 25.39 | $12.12 | +1.86% |
| FISV | $114.23 | N/A | 116.20B | 29.67 | $3.85 | N/A |
| FI | $185.47 | +0.60% | 102.83B | 32.88 | $5.64 | N/A |
| INFY | $17.86 | -0.11% | 74.00B | 23.50 | $0.76 | +3.27% |
| FJTSY | $21.99 | +0.55% | 39.08B | 27.84 | $0.79 | N/A |
| FJTSF | $21.87 | +0.25% | 38.87B | 27.68 | $0.79 | +0.87% |
| CTSH | $77.91 | +0.27% | 38.40B | 16.40 | $4.75 | +1.55% |
| IT | $426.76 | -0.17% | 32.89B | 26.67 | $16.00 | N/A |
| NIPNF | $24.40 | +6.55% | 32.52B | 26.52 | $0.92 | +0.76% |