Fiserv, Inc.
Fiserv, Inc. FI Peers
See (FI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FI | $166.71 | +0.80% | 92.4B | 29.51 | $5.65 | N/A |
| IBM | $268.84 | +0.74% | 249.9B | 45.88 | $5.86 | +2.49% |
| ACN | $317.50 | +0.67% | 198.8B | 26.28 | $12.08 | +1.81% |
| FISV | $114.23 | N/A | 116.2B | 29.67 | $3.85 | N/A |
| INFY | $18.20 | +1.48% | 75.4B | 23.94 | $0.76 | +2.79% |
| CTSH | $80.28 | +1.21% | 39.6B | 16.90 | $4.75 | +1.52% |
| IT | $422.51 | +0.30% | 32.5B | 26.32 | $16.05 | N/A |
| WIT | $2.89 | +1.05% | 30.2B | 19.23 | $0.15 | +0.01% |
| BR | $245.31 | +0.17% | 28.8B | 36.83 | $6.66 | +1.40% |
| GIB | $107.85 | +0.19% | 23.9B | 19.43 | $5.55 | +0.23% |
Stock Comparison
FI vs IBM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 249.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while IBM trades at $268.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ACN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 198.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while ACN trades at $317.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FISV Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while FISV trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs INFY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while INFY trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTSH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CTSH trades at $80.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs IT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while IT trades at $422.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WIT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while WIT trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BR Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while BR trades at $245.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GIB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while GIB trades at $107.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CDW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CDW trades at $178.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs LDOS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while LDOS trades at $148.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs JKHY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while JKHY trades at $181.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AUROW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while AUROW trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AUR Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while AUR trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -12.48. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs EPAM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while EPAM trades at $178.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CACI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CACI trades at $445.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs KD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while KD trades at $40.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs EXLS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while EXLS trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs G Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while G trades at $43.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas G's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DLB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while DLB trades at $74.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WAY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while WAY trades at $41.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 343.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SAIC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while SAIC trades at $105.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GDS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while GDS trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 229.73. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs INGM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while INGM trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI and INGM have similar daily volatility (1.44).
FI vs PAY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while PAY trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 91.24. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GLOB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while GLOB trades at $100.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs LZMH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while LZMH trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -2477.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NCR Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CNXC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CNXC trades at $56.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while AI trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs APLD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while APLD trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CD trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CLVT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CLVT trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DXC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while DXC trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PRFT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WNS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while WNS trades at $59.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ASGN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while ASGN trades at $53.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FORTY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while FORTY trades at $114.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NYAX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while NYAX trades at $44.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 235.68. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs INOD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while INOD trades at $51.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 47.44. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VYX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while VYX trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VNET Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while VNET trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -591.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NABL Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while NABL trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 101.75. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TASK Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while TASK trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TWKS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FLYW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while FLYW trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 262.50. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BBAI-WT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while BBAI-WT trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BBAI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while BBAI trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GDYN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while GDYN trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 93.46. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs MGIC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 802.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while MGIC trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CLVT-PA Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PSFE Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 748.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while PSFE trades at $12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -630.75. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSFE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PSFE-WT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 725.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs HCKT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 691.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while HCKT trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTLP Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 649.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CTLP trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs XRX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 645.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while XRX trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TSSI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 496.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while TSSI trades at $19.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 55.11. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CNDT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 430.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CNDT trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs IBEX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 400M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while IBEX trades at $29.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SDHIU Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 357.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while SDHIU trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs UIS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 325.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while UIS trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DMRC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 288.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while DMRC trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PHLT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while PHLT trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -38.87. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TTEC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 239.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while TTEC trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs III Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 232.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while III trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas III's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TLS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 202.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while TLS trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SRT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTG Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BULLZ Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 149M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while BULLZ trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CSPI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CSPI trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -83.22. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs LHSW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 119.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while LHSW trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 45.80. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ALYA Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CTM trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NOTE Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while NOTE trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NOTE-WT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 80.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VEEA Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while VEEA trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VEEA's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SAIH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 73.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while SAIH trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GMM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while GMM trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DVLT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while DVLT trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs USIO Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while USIO trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs MASK Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while MASK trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WYY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while WYY trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -15.82. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GLE Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while GLE trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 76.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DTST Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while DTST trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 194.03. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CLPS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CLPS trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -19.72. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs JFU Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while JFU trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CYCU Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CYCU trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CYCU's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SGLB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGLB's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ARBB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while ARBB trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs JDZG Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while JDZG trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VEEAW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while VEEAW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SASI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SASI's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TDTH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while TDTH trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDTH's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WAVD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DTSTW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while DTSTW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CYCUW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CYCUW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BTCM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 320.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while BTCM trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SAIHW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 207.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while SAIHW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CCRC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CCRC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $166.71, while CCRC trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.51, whereas CCRC's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCRC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CCRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.