Fiserv, Inc.
Fiserv, Inc. FI Peers
See (FI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FI | $172.41 | +0.05% | 95.6B | 30.52 | $5.65 | N/A |
| IBM | $294.78 | +1.75% | 273.9B | 50.38 | $5.85 | +2.28% |
| ACN | $298.89 | +1.16% | 187.1B | 23.79 | $12.56 | +1.93% |
| GDS | $30.57 | +1.33% | 126.1B | 277.91 | $0.11 | N/A |
| FISV | $114.23 | +0.00% | 116.2B | 29.67 | $3.85 | N/A |
| INFY | $18.53 | +0.05% | 76.8B | 24.37 | $0.76 | +2.75% |
| CTSH | $78.03 | +0.37% | 38.5B | 16.43 | $4.75 | +1.57% |
| WIT | $3.02 | -0.66% | 31.6B | 20.13 | $0.15 | +1.02% |
| IT | $404.22 | +0.36% | 31.1B | 25.21 | $16.03 | N/A |
| BR | $243.03 | +1.50% | 28.5B | 36.48 | $6.66 | +1.45% |
Stock Comparison
FI vs IBM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 273.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while IBM trades at $294.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 50.38. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ACN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 187.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while ACN trades at $298.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GDS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while GDS trades at $30.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 277.91. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FISV Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while FISV trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs INFY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while INFY trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTSH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while CTSH trades at $78.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WIT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while WIT trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs IT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while IT trades at $404.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BR Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while BR trades at $243.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 36.48. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CDW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while CDW trades at $178.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GIB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while GIB trades at $104.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs LDOS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while LDOS trades at $157.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs JKHY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while JKHY trades at $180.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CACI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while CACI trades at $476.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AUROW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while AUROW trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs EPAM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while EPAM trades at $176.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs KD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while KD trades at $41.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 39.95. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AUR Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while AUR trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs G Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while G trades at $44.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas G's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DLB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while DLB trades at $74.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs EXLS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while EXLS trades at $43.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 33.17. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WAY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while WAY trades at $40.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 340.58. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SAIC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while SAIC trades at $112.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs INGM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while INGM trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PAY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while PAY trades at $32.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 81.80. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GLOB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while GLOB trades at $90.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NCR Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CNXC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while CNXC trades at $52.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs AI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while AI trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while CD trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CLVT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while CLVT trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DXC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while DXC trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WNS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while WNS trades at $63.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PRFT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs LZMH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while LZMH trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is 1661.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs APLD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while APLD trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BBAI-WT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while BBAI-WT trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ASGN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while ASGN trades at $49.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BBAI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while BBAI trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FORTY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while FORTY trades at $127.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NYAX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while NYAX trades at $50.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 279.28. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VNET Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while VNET trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -690.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs INOD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while INOD trades at $51.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 47.43. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VYX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while VYX trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NABL Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while NABL trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 101.19. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TASK Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while TASK trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TWKS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs FLYW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while FLYW trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 292.50. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GDYN Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 976.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while GDYN trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 88.85. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs MGIC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 938.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while MGIC trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTLP Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 805M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while CTLP trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PSFE-WT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 799.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CLVT-PA Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PSFE Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 748.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while PSFE trades at $12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -630.50. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TSSI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 721.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while TSSI trades at $28.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 80.08. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs HCKT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 703M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while HCKT trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 30.26. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs XRX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 662.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while XRX trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CNDT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 427.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while CNDT trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs IBEX Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while IBEX trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SDHIU Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while SDHIU trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +16.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs UIS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 321.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while UIS trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs PHLT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 313.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while PHLT trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DMRC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 284.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while DMRC trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BULLZ Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TLS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while TLS trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs III Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 231.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while III trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas III's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TTEC Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 230.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while TTEC trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SRT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTG Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CSPI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 127.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while CSPI trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -80.87. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ALYA Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CTM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while CTM trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs LHSW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while LHSW trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NOTE Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while NOTE trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SAIHW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while SAIHW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SAIH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while SAIH trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs NOTE-WT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VEEA Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while VEEA trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VEEA's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs VEEAW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while VEEAW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs JDZG Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while JDZG trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 83.89. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GMM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while GMM trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DVLT Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while DVLT trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs USIO Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while USIO trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WYY Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while WYY trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -15.45. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs GLE Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while GLE trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 75.75. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CLPS Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while CLPS trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs MASK Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while MASK trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DTST Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while DTST trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 172.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs JFU Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while JFU trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CYCUW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while CYCUW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs ARBB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while ARBB trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SGLB Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGLB's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs CYCU Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while CYCU trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SASI Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SASI's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs TDTH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while TDTH trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDTH's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs WAVD Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs DTSTW Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 856.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while DTSTW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs BTCM Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 327.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while BTCM trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.
FI vs SWCH Comparison
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 95.6B. In comparison, SWCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $172.41, while SWCH trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 30.52, whereas SWCH's P/E ratio is 796.51. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SWCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.