Fiserv, Inc.
Fiserv, Inc. (FI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FI | $142.03 | +1.39% | 78.7B | 23.74 | $5.98 | N/A |
| IBM | $259.72 | -0.30% | 241.4B | 41.90 | $6.20 | +2.58% |
| ACN | $283.15 | +0.51% | 176.4B | 22.55 | $12.56 | +2.09% |
| FISV | $114.23 | +0.00% | 116.2B | 29.67 | $3.85 | N/A |
| INFY | $17.37 | -1.75% | 72B | 22.55 | $0.77 | +2.92% |
| CTSH | $76.67 | -0.08% | 37.8B | 16.14 | $4.75 | +1.59% |
| WIT | $2.93 | -0.34% | 30.5B | 19.40 | $0.15 | +1.05% |
| BR | $253.69 | +0.28% | 29.8B | 38.17 | $6.65 | +1.38% |
| IT | $356.64 | +0.14% | 27.5B | 22.25 | $16.03 | N/A |
| CDW | $181.14 | +0.17% | 23.9B | 22.45 | $8.07 | +1.38% |
Stock Comparison
FI vs IBM Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 241.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while IBM trades at $259.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 41.90. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check IBM's competition here
FI vs ACN Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 176.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while ACN trades at $283.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check ACN's competition here
FI vs FISV Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while FISV trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check FISV's competition here
FI vs INFY Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while INFY trades at $17.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check INFY's competition here
FI vs CTSH Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while CTSH trades at $76.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check CTSH's competition here
FI vs WIT Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while WIT trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check WIT's competition here
FI vs BR Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while BR trades at $253.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 38.17. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check BR's competition here
FI vs IT Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while IT trades at $356.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check IT's competition here
FI vs CDW Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while CDW trades at $181.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check CDW's competition here
FI vs GIB Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while GIB trades at $101.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check GIB's competition here
FI vs LDOS Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while LDOS trades at $163.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check LDOS's competition here
FI vs JKHY Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while JKHY trades at $176.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 30.04. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check JKHY's competition here
FI vs AUR Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while AUR trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -13.66. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check AUR's competition here
FI vs AUROW Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while AUROW trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check AUROW's competition here
FI vs CACI Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while CACI trades at $479.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check CACI's competition here
FI vs EPAM Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while EPAM trades at $170.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check EPAM's competition here
FI vs KD Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while KD trades at $39.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check KD's competition here
FI vs G Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while G trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas G's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check G's competition here
FI vs DLB Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while DLB trades at $76.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 28.93. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check DLB's competition here
FI vs EXLS Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while EXLS trades at $42.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 32.47. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check EXLS's competition here
FI vs GDS Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while GDS trades at $36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 334.36. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check GDS's competition here
FI vs WAY Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while WAY trades at $35.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 275.85. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check WAY's competition here
FI vs SAIC Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while SAIC trades at $114.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check SAIC's competition here
FI vs INGM Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while INGM trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check INGM's competition here
FI vs GLOB Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while GLOB trades at $92.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check GLOB's competition here
FI vs CNXC Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while CNXC trades at $60.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check CNXC's competition here
FI vs NCR Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check NCR's competition here
FI vs PAY Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while PAY trades at $28.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 71.62. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check PAY's competition here
FI vs AI Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while AI trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -11.61. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check AI's competition here
FI vs WNS Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while WNS trades at $74.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check WNS's competition here
FI vs CD Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while CD trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check CD's competition here
FI vs CLVT Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while CLVT trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check CLVT's competition here
FI vs PRFT Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check PRFT's competition here
FI vs DXC Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while DXC trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check DXC's competition here
FI vs APLD Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while APLD trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check APLD's competition here
FI vs ASGN Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while ASGN trades at $54.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check ASGN's competition here
FI vs BBAI-WT Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while BBAI-WT trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
FI vs VNET Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while VNET trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -826.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check VNET's competition here
FI vs BBAI Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while BBAI trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -8.78. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check BBAI's competition here
FI vs VYX Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while VYX trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check VYX's competition here
FI vs FORTY Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while FORTY trades at $127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check FORTY's competition here
FI vs NYAX Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while NYAX trades at $46.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 242.47. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check NYAX's competition here
FI vs INOD Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while INOD trades at $49.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 45.56. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check INOD's competition here
FI vs NABL Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while NABL trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 102.88. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check NABL's competition here
FI vs TASK Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while TASK trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check TASK's competition here
FI vs TWKS Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check TWKS's competition here
FI vs FLYW Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while FLYW trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 292.25. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check FLYW's competition here
FI vs MGIC Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while MGIC trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check MGIC's competition here
FI vs GDYN Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 884.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while GDYN trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 80.46. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check GDYN's competition here
FI vs LZMH Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 882M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while LZMH trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is 580.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check LZMH's competition here
FI vs PSFE-WT Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 860.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
FI vs PSFE Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 815.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while PSFE trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -686.90. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check PSFE's competition here
FI vs CTLP Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 812M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while CTLP trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check CTLP's competition here
FI vs XRX Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 764.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while XRX trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check XRX's competition here
FI vs CLVT-PA Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check CLVT-PA's competition here
FI vs TSSI Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 724.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while TSSI trades at $28.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 80.42. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check TSSI's competition here
FI vs HCKT Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 643.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while HCKT trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check HCKT's competition here
FI vs CNDT Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 449.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while CNDT trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check CNDT's competition here
FI vs IBEX Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while IBEX trades at $29.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check IBEX's competition here
FI vs SDHIU Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 324.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while SDHIU trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +16.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check SDHIU's competition here
FI vs UIS Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 309.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while UIS trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check UIS's competition here
FI vs PHLT Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 284.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while PHLT trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -45.37. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check PHLT's competition here
FI vs DMRC Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 261.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while DMRC trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check DMRC's competition here
FI vs BULLZ Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check BULLZ's competition here
FI vs TTEC Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while TTEC trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check TTEC's competition here
FI vs III Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 218.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while III trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas III's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check III's competition here
FI vs TLS Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while TLS trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check TLS's competition here
FI vs SRT Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check SRT's competition here
FI vs CTG Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check CTG's competition here
FI vs LHSW Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 157.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while LHSW trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 60.60. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check LHSW's competition here
FI vs NOTE Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 122.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while NOTE trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check NOTE's competition here
FI vs CTM Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 119.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while CTM trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -11.98. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check CTM's competition here
FI vs SAIH Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while SAIH trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check SAIH's competition here
FI vs ALYA Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check ALYA's competition here
FI vs CSPI Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 108.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while CSPI trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -69.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check CSPI's competition here
FI vs SAIHW Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while SAIHW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check SAIHW's competition here
FI vs NOTE-WT Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 87.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check NOTE-WT's competition here
FI vs GLE Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while GLE trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 151.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check GLE's competition here
FI vs VEEA Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while VEEA trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +12.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check VEEA's competition here
FI vs VEEAW Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while VEEAW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +11.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check VEEAW's competition here
FI vs GMM Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while GMM trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check GMM's competition here
FI vs DVLT Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while DVLT trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check DVLT's competition here
FI vs USIO Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while USIO trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check USIO's competition here
FI vs BTCM Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while BTCM trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check BTCM's competition here
FI vs DTST Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while DTST trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 234.10. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check DTST's competition here
FI vs WYY Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while WYY trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -13.86. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check WYY's competition here
FI vs CLPS Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while CLPS trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -18.81. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check CLPS's competition here
FI vs JFU Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while JFU trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check JFU's competition here
FI vs MASK Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while MASK trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check MASK's competition here
FI vs CYCUW Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while CYCUW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check CYCUW's competition here
FI vs CYCU Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while CYCU trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check CYCU's competition here
FI vs TDTH Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while TDTH trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -10.31. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDTH's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check TDTH's competition here
FI vs SGLB Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -6.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check SGLB's competition here
FI vs ARBB Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while ARBB trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check ARBB's competition here
FI vs JDZG Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while JDZG trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check JDZG's competition here
FI vs SASI Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SASI's ROE of +597.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check SASI's competition here
FI vs DTSTW Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while DTSTW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check DTSTW's competition here
FI vs WAVD Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check WAVD's competition here
FI vs SYKE Comparison July 2025
FI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FI stands at 78.7B. In comparison, SYKE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FI is priced at $142.03, while SYKE trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.74, whereas SYKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FI's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SYKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FI is more volatile compared to SYKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FI.Check SYKE's competition here