eMagin Corporation
eMagin Corporation EMAN Peers
See (EMAN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMAN | $2.07 | +2.99% | 172.20M | -12.94 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| APH | $86.89 | +1.07% | 105.10B | 42.18 | $2.06 | +0.70% |
| TEL | $164.04 | +0.56% | 48.65B | 35.66 | $4.60 | +1.59% |
| GLW | $48.20 | +1.26% | 41.28B | 92.69 | $0.52 | +2.33% |
| GRMN | $205.29 | +1.67% | 39.53B | 27.05 | $7.59 | +1.46% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.51B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $165.46 | +0.41% | 28.59B | 47.27 | $3.50 | N/A |
| FTV | $73.17 | +0.95% | 24.87B | 32.09 | $2.28 | +0.44% |
| TDY | $499.12 | +0.59% | 23.39B | 28.57 | $17.47 | N/A |
| JBL | $167.77 | +0.74% | 18.01B | 37.87 | $4.43 | +0.19% |
Stock Comparison
EMAN vs APH Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 105.10B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while APH trades at $86.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 42.18. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs TEL Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 48.65B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while TEL trades at $164.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 35.66. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs GLW Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 41.28B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while GLW trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 92.69. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs GRMN Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 39.53B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while GRMN trades at $205.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs IIVI Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.51B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs KEYS Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.59B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while KEYS trades at $165.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 47.27. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs FTV Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 24.87B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while FTV trades at $73.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 32.09. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs TDY Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 23.39B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while TDY trades at $499.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs JBL Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 18.01B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while JBL trades at $167.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 37.87. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs TRMB Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 17.15B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while TRMB trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs FLEX Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 16.10B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while FLEX trades at $42.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs CLS Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 13.03B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while CLS trades at $113.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs COHR Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 12.18B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while COHR trades at $78.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -357.27. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs FN Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 8.24B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while FN trades at $229.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs BMI Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 7.21B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while BMI trades at $244.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 53.94. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs MKSI Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 6.08B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while MKSI trades at $90.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs SNDK Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 5.88B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while SNDK trades at $40.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs VNT Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.49B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while VNT trades at $37.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs LFUS Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.41B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while LFUS trades at $218.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 57.26. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs CGNX Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.30B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while CGNX trades at $31.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 45.77. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs ITRI Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while ITRI trades at $114.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs ESE Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while ESE trades at $183.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 44.59. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs NOVT Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while NOVT trades at $131.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 67.61. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs SANM Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 4.52B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while SANM trades at $84.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs ST Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while ST trades at $27.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 33.54. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs OSIS Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while OSIS trades at $232.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs PLXS Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.64B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while PLXS trades at $134.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs TTMI Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while TTMI trades at $29.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 39.16. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs VICR Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while VICR trades at $43.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 81.83. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs BHE Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while BHE trades at $37.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs ROG Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while ROG trades at $69.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 49.95. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs CTS Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while CTS trades at $43.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs PENG Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while PENG trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -112.24. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs BELFB Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 953.10M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while BELFB trades at $76.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs BELFA Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 936.98M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while BELFA trades at $69.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs FARO Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 812.88M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while FARO trades at $42.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -89.96. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs DAKT Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 753.64M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while DAKT trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 377.63. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs OUST-WTA Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.80M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs MLAB Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 665.18M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while MLAB trades at $122.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs OUST Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 596.05M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while OUST trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs AMOT Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.91M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs ALNT Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 545.11M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while ALNT trades at $32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 55.52. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs LYTS Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 487.87M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while LYTS trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs OUST-WT Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.22M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs SATL Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 431.53M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while SATL trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SATL's ROE of +34.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs BKSY-WT Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 377.56M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs BKSY Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 374.45M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while BKSY trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs KULR Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 366.27M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while KULR trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -14.31. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs VPG Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 356.62M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while VPG trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 116.96. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs SATLW Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 356.13M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while SATLW trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +34.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs VLDR Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.24M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs MVIS Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 279.17M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while MVIS trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs MEI Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 270.89M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while MEI trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs KOPN Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 240.94M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while KOPN trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs NEON Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 180.75M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while NEON trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -29.11. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs OST Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 166.54M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while OST trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs MPTI Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 140.53M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while MPTI trades at $48.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs RELL Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 134.53M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while RELL trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 315.67. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs LPTH Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 109.39M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while LPTH trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs WBX Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 78.55M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while WBX trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs GNSS Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 76.31M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while GNSS trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs WRAP Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 75.33M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while WRAP trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -9.31. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs ELTK Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 71.15M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while ELTK trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs SELX Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 61.38M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while SELX trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -41.00. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs SOTK Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 60.48M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while SOTK trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 54.86. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs REFR Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 56.19M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while REFR trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -41.75. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs MIND Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 53.95M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while MIND trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs OPTX Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 52.10M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while OPTX trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 142.00. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs LINK Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 51.29M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while LINK trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs DSWL Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 38.09M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while DSWL trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs LGL Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 36.65M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while LGL trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 75.56. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs ISNS Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.83M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs HOLO Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 32.15M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while HOLO trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs FCUV Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 29.35M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while FCUV trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -9.81. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs CPSH Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 27.31M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while CPSH trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs NSYS Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 24.19M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while NSYS trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -18.64. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs TMPOW Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.70M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs DAIO Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 22.18M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while DAIO trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs MTEK Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 19.36M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while MTEK trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -15.16. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs VIAO Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.47M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs LUNA Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 13.88M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while LUNA trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs ELSE Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 13.11M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while ELSE trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs WATT Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 9.15M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while WATT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs SLNH Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 8.87M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while SLNH trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs SGMA Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 7.71M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while SGMA trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs SLNHP Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 7.61M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while SLNHP trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs SVREW Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 7.30M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while SVREW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs BNSO Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.44M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs MINDP Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.30M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs SOBR Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 4.75M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while SOBR trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs OUSTZ Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 4.55M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while OUSTZ trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs IMTE Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 4.25M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while IMTE trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs MMAT Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.52M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs MTEKW Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 1.83M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while MTEKW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs LGL-WT Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 1.67M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while LGL-WT trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs OPTXW Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 1.60M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while OPTXW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs SVRE Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 1.54M. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while SVRE trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs OUSTW Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 979069.00. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while OUSTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.
EMAN vs KNW Comparison
EMAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMAN stands at 172.20M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 240587.00. Regarding current trading prices, EMAN is priced at $2.07, while KNW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMAN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.94, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EMAN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KNW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EMAN is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMAN.