CDW Corporation
CDW Corporation CDW Peers
See (CDW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDW | $182.13 | -0.39% | 24B | 22.60 | $8.06 | +1.37% |
| IBM | $291.97 | +1.50% | 271.4B | 49.91 | $5.85 | +2.29% |
| ACN | $304.78 | +0.82% | 190.8B | 24.27 | $12.56 | +1.88% |
| GDS | $33.98 | +10.20% | 140.2B | 308.91 | $0.11 | N/A |
| FISV | $114.23 | +0.00% | 116.2B | 29.67 | $3.85 | N/A |
| FI | $175.55 | +1.80% | 97.3B | 31.07 | $5.65 | N/A |
| INFY | $18.96 | +0.42% | 78.6B | 24.95 | $0.76 | +2.68% |
| CTSH | $80.98 | +0.91% | 39.9B | 17.05 | $4.75 | +1.51% |
| WIT | $3.11 | +0.97% | 32.6B | 20.73 | $0.15 | +0.99% |
| IT | $400.28 | +1.22% | 30.8B | 24.97 | $16.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CDW vs IBM Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 271.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while IBM trades at $291.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 49.91. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs ACN Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 190.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while ACN trades at $304.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs GDS Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while GDS trades at $33.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 308.91. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs FISV Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while FISV trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs FI Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 97.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while FI trades at $175.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs INFY Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 78.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while INFY trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs CTSH Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while CTSH trades at $80.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs WIT Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while WIT trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs IT Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while IT trades at $400.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs BR Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while BR trades at $242.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs GIB Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while GIB trades at $106.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs LDOS Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while LDOS trades at $164.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs JKHY Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while JKHY trades at $181.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 30.89. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs CACI Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while CACI trades at $489.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs EPAM Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while EPAM trades at $182.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs KD Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while KD trades at $43.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 41.34. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs AUR Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while AUR trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs AUROW Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while AUROW trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is more volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs G Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while G trades at $45.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas G's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs EXLS Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while EXLS trades at $45.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 34.30. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs DLB Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while DLB trades at $75.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs WAY Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while WAY trades at $39.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 327.83. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs SAIC Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while SAIC trades at $118.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs INGM Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while INGM trades at $21.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs GLOB Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while GLOB trades at $91.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs PAY Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while PAY trades at $31.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 77.60. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs NCR Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs CNXC Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while CNXC trades at $57.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs AI Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while AI trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs CD Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while CD trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs CLVT Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while CLVT trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs DXC Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while DXC trades at $16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs WNS Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while WNS trades at $65.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs PRFT Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs APLD Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while APLD trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs ASGN Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while ASGN trades at $52.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs BBAI Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while BBAI trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -9.23. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs LZMH Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while LZMH trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is 1429.00. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs FORTY Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while FORTY trades at $134.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs VNET Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while VNET trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs NYAX Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while NYAX trades at $50.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 280.22. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs VYX Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while VYX trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -11.55. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs BBAI-WT Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while BBAI-WT trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs PSFE-WT Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs INOD Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while INOD trades at $50.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 46.42. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs NABL Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while NABL trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 103.13. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs TASK Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while TASK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs TWKS Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs FLYW Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while FLYW trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 295.75. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs GDYN Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while GDYN trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 95.31. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs MGIC Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while MGIC trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs CTLP Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 810.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while CTLP trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs PSFE Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 798M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while PSFE trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -672.50. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs CLVT-PA Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs XRX Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 717M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while XRX trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs HCKT Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 710.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while HCKT trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs TSSI Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 702.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while TSSI trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 78.03. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs CNDT Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 453.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while CNDT trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs IBEX Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 409.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while IBEX trades at $30.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs PHLT Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 328.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while PHLT trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -52.38. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs SDHIU Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while SDHIU trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +16.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs UIS Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while UIS trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs DMRC Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 295.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while DMRC trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs BULLZ Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs TTEC Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 247.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while TTEC trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs III Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 246.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while III trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas III's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs TLS Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 238.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while TLS trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs SRT Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs CTG Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs CSPI Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 126.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while CSPI trades at $12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -80.25. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs NOTE Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 118.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while NOTE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs LHSW Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 114.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while LHSW trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs ALYA Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs NOTE-WT Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 103.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs CTM Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 100.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while CTM trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -10.09. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs SAIH Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while SAIH trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs SAIHW Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while SAIHW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs VEEA Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while VEEA trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to VEEA's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs JDZG Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while JDZG trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 83.20. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs GMM Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while GMM trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs VEEAW Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 56.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while VEEAW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs DVLT Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while DVLT trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs USIO Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while USIO trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs WYY Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while WYY trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs GLE Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while GLE trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 75.50. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs MASK Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while MASK trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs CLPS Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while CLPS trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -18.40. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs DTST Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while DTST trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 179.00. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs JFU Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while JFU trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs CYCUW Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while CYCUW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs CYCU Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while CYCU trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs SGLB Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SGLB's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs ARBB Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while ARBB trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs SASI Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SASI's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs TDTH Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while TDTH trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TDTH's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs WAVD Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs DTSTW Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 931.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while DTSTW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs BTCM Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 366.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while BTCM trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.
CDW vs GDYNW Comparison
CDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDW stands at 24B. In comparison, GDYNW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDW is priced at $182.13, while GDYNW trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDW currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas GDYNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GDYNW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDW is less volatile compared to GDYNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDW.