Chindata Group Holdings Limited
Chindata Group Holdings Limited (CD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD | $8.45 | -1.63% | 3.1B | 26.41 | $0.32 | N/A |
| IBM | $263.21 | +1.34% | 245.1B | 42.37 | $6.21 | +2.58% |
| ACN | $277.04 | -2.16% | 172.6B | 22.04 | $12.57 | +2.09% |
| FISV | $114.23 | +0.00% | 116.2B | 29.67 | $3.85 | N/A |
| FI | $139.94 | -1.47% | 76.1B | 23.40 | $5.98 | N/A |
| INFY | $17.16 | -1.21% | 71.1B | 22.29 | $0.77 | +2.92% |
| CTSH | $75.42 | -1.63% | 37.2B | 15.88 | $4.75 | +1.59% |
| BR | $252.47 | -0.48% | 29.7B | 37.97 | $6.65 | +1.38% |
| WIT | $2.77 | -3.55% | 29B | 18.47 | $0.15 | +1.05% |
| IT | $352.47 | -1.17% | 27.1B | 21.96 | $16.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CD vs IBM Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 245.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while IBM trades at $263.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 42.37. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check IBM's competition here
CD vs ACN Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 172.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while ACN trades at $277.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check ACN's competition here
CD vs FISV Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while FISV trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check FISV's competition here
CD vs FI Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while FI trades at $139.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check FI's competition here
CD vs INFY Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while INFY trades at $17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check INFY's competition here
CD vs CTSH Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while CTSH trades at $75.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check CTSH's competition here
CD vs BR Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while BR trades at $252.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 37.97. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check BR's competition here
CD vs WIT Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while WIT trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check WIT's competition here
CD vs IT Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while IT trades at $352.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check IT's competition here
CD vs CDW Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while CDW trades at $181.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check CDW's competition here
CD vs GIB Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while GIB trades at $99.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check GIB's competition here
CD vs LDOS Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while LDOS trades at $160.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check LDOS's competition here
CD vs JKHY Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while JKHY trades at $175.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check JKHY's competition here
CD vs AUR Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while AUR trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -13.34. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check AUR's competition here
CD vs CACI Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while CACI trades at $463.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check CACI's competition here
CD vs AUROW Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while AUROW trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check AUROW's competition here
CD vs EPAM Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while EPAM trades at $169.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check EPAM's competition here
CD vs KD Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while KD trades at $39.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 37.60. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check KD's competition here
CD vs G Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while G trades at $45.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas G's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check G's competition here
CD vs DLB Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while DLB trades at $76.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 28.86. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check DLB's competition here
CD vs EXLS Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while EXLS trades at $42.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 31.98. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check EXLS's competition here
CD vs GDS Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while GDS trades at $36.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 332.00. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check GDS's competition here
CD vs WAY Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while WAY trades at $36.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 277.62. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check WAY's competition here
CD vs SAIC Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while SAIC trades at $113.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check SAIC's competition here
CD vs INGM Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while INGM trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check INGM's competition here
CD vs GLOB Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while GLOB trades at $93.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check GLOB's competition here
CD vs NCR Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check NCR's competition here
CD vs CNXC Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while CNXC trades at $59.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check CNXC's competition here
CD vs PAY Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while PAY trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 71.22. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check PAY's competition here
CD vs AI Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while AI trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -11.52. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check AI's competition here
CD vs WNS Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while WNS trades at $74.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check WNS's competition here
CD vs CLVT Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while CLVT trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check CLVT's competition here
CD vs PRFT Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check PRFT's competition here
CD vs DXC Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while DXC trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check DXC's competition here
CD vs APLD Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while APLD trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check APLD's competition here
CD vs ASGN Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while ASGN trades at $54.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check ASGN's competition here
CD vs VNET Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while VNET trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -834.00. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check VNET's competition here
CD vs BBAI-WT Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while BBAI-WT trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
CD vs BBAI Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while BBAI trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -8.51. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check BBAI's competition here
CD vs VYX Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while VYX trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -12.52. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check VYX's competition here
CD vs FORTY Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while FORTY trades at $123.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check FORTY's competition here
CD vs NYAX Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while NYAX trades at $44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 248.44. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check NYAX's competition here
CD vs NABL Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while NABL trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 104.25. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check NABL's competition here
CD vs INOD Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while INOD trades at $49.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 45.79. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check INOD's competition here
CD vs TASK Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while TASK trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check TASK's competition here
CD vs TWKS Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check TWKS's competition here
CD vs FLYW Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while FLYW trades at $11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 291.50. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check FLYW's competition here
CD vs MGIC Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while MGIC trades at $21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check MGIC's competition here
CD vs LZMH Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 941.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while LZMH trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is 619.00. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check LZMH's competition here
CD vs GDYN Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 872.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while GDYN trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 79.38. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check GDYN's competition here
CD vs CTLP Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 812M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while CTLP trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check CTLP's competition here
CD vs PSFE Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 785.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while PSFE trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -662.00. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check PSFE's competition here
CD vs PSFE-WT Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 761.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
CD vs CLVT-PA Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check CLVT-PA's competition here
CD vs XRX Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 748.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while XRX trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check XRX's competition here
CD vs TSSI Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 682.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while TSSI trades at $27.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 75.72. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check TSSI's competition here
CD vs HCKT Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 641.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while HCKT trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check HCKT's competition here
CD vs CNDT Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while CNDT trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 1.90. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check CNDT's competition here
CD vs IBEX Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 401.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while IBEX trades at $30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check IBEX's competition here
CD vs SDHIU Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 325.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while SDHIU trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +16.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check SDHIU's competition here
CD vs UIS Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 303.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while UIS trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check UIS's competition here
CD vs PHLT Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 286.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while PHLT trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -45.75. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check PHLT's competition here
CD vs DMRC Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 271.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while DMRC trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check DMRC's competition here
CD vs BULLZ Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check BULLZ's competition here
CD vs TTEC Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 247.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while TTEC trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check TTEC's competition here
CD vs III Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 219.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while III trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas III's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check III's competition here
CD vs TLS Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 209.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while TLS trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check TLS's competition here
CD vs SAIHW Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 207.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while SAIHW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check SAIHW's competition here
CD vs SRT Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check SRT's competition here
CD vs CTG Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check CTG's competition here
CD vs LHSW Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 150.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while LHSW trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check LHSW's competition here
CD vs NOTE Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 123.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while NOTE trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check NOTE's competition here
CD vs CTM Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 116.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while CTM trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -11.64. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check CTM's competition here
CD vs CSPI Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 112.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while CSPI trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -71.19. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check CSPI's competition here
CD vs NOTE-WT Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 110.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check NOTE-WT's competition here
CD vs ALYA Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check ALYA's competition here
CD vs SAIH Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while SAIH trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check SAIH's competition here
CD vs VEEAW Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while VEEAW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +11.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check VEEAW's competition here
CD vs GLE Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 70.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while GLE trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 153.00. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check GLE's competition here
CD vs VEEA Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while VEEA trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +12.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check VEEA's competition here
CD vs GMM Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while GMM trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check GMM's competition here
CD vs DVLT Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while DVLT trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check DVLT's competition here
CD vs USIO Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while USIO trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check USIO's competition here
CD vs BTCM Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while BTCM trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check BTCM's competition here
CD vs DTST Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while DTST trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 237.50. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check DTST's competition here
CD vs WYY Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while WYY trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -14.23. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check WYY's competition here
CD vs CLPS Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while CLPS trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -19.30. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check CLPS's competition here
CD vs JFU Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while JFU trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check JFU's competition here
CD vs MASK Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while MASK trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check MASK's competition here
CD vs TDTH Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while TDTH trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDTH's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check TDTH's competition here
CD vs CYCUW Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while CYCUW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check CYCUW's competition here
CD vs CYCU Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while CYCU trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check CYCU's competition here
CD vs SGLB Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -6.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check SGLB's competition here
CD vs ARBB Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while ARBB trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check ARBB's competition here
CD vs JDZG Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while JDZG trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check JDZG's competition here
CD vs SASI Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SASI's ROE of +597.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check SASI's competition here
CD vs DTSTW Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while DTSTW trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check DTSTW's competition here
CD vs WAVD Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check WAVD's competition here
CD vs SWCH Comparison July 2025
CD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CD stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SWCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CD is priced at $8.45, while SWCH trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CD currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas SWCH's P/E ratio is 796.51. In terms of profitability, CD's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CD is more volatile compared to SWCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CD.Check SWCH's competition here