Badger Meter, Inc.

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while APH trades at $105.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check APH's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while TEL trades at $208.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 42.90. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check TEL's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while GLW trades at $54.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 106.52. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check GLW's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while GRMN trades at $235.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check GRMN's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check IIVI's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while KEYS trades at $166.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check KEYS's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while TDY trades at $557.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check TDY's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while JBL trades at $221.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 42.41. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check JBL's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while TRMB trades at $85.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check TRMB's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while CLS trades at $169.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 47.55. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check CLS's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while FLEX trades at $50.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check FLEX's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while FTV trades at $51.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check FTV's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while COHR trades at $102.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -455.16. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check COHR's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while FN trades at $310.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 34.41. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check FN's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while MKSI trades at $102.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MKSI's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while ITRI trades at $135.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ITRI's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while SNDK trades at $41.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SNDK's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while VNT trades at $39.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check VNT's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while CGNX trades at $34.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 49.38. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check CGNX's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while LFUS trades at $232.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 60.46. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check LFUS's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while SANM trades at $98.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SANM's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while ESE trades at $192.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 42.05. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ESE's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while ST trades at $32.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 40.44. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ST's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while TTMI trades at $45.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 60.39. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check TTMI's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while NOVT trades at $126.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 65.24. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check NOVT's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while OSIS trades at $224.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OSIS's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while PLXS trades at $124.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check PLXS's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while VICR trades at $45.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 31.79. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check VICR's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while BELFA trades at $106.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check BELFA's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while BELFB trades at $121.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 32.13. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check BELFB's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while OUST trades at $25.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -13.49. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OUST's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while BHE trades at $39.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check BHE's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while PENG trades at $25.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -86.74. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check PENG's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while CTS trades at $41.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check CTS's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while ROG trades at $65.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 72.52. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ROG's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while FARO trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check FARO's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 816.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while DAKT trades at $16.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is -79.19. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DAKT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check DAKT's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 741.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check BKSY-WT's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OUST-WTA's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 688.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while BKSY trades at $19.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check BKSY's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 672.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while ALNT trades at $39.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 68.52. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ALNT's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 565M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while LYTS trades at $18.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check LYTS's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check AMOT's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OUST-WT's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 458.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while NEON trades at $25.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -73.89. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check NEON's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 416M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while MLAB trades at $76.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -210.06. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MLAB's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 372M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while VPG trades at $28.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 122.00. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check VPG's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 370.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while SATL trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SATL's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 351.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while SATLW trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SATLW's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 333.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while KOPN trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -25.62. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check KOPN's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 324M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while MVIS trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MVIS's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check VLDR's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 249M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while KULR trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -6.72. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check KULR's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 232.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while MEI trades at $6.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MEI's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check EMAN's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 149.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while RELL trades at $10.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -131.62. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check RELL's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while LPTH trades at $3.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check LPTH's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 128.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while MPTI trades at $43.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MPTI's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while BMNR trades at $40.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check BMNR's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while WBX trades at $6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check WBX's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while GNSS trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check GNSS's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while ODYS trades at $4.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ODYS's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while OPTX trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 200.20. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OPTX's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while WRAP trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check WRAP's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 70.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while ELTK trades at $10.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ELTK's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while MIND trades at $9.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MIND's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while LINK trades at $7.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -29.21. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check LINK's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while REFR trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -44.62. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check REFR's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while SOTK trades at $3.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SOTK's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while DSWL trades at $2.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check DSWL's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while LGL trades at $7.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 93.88. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check LGL's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while SELX trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SELX's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while SVRE trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SVRE's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while CPSH trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -12.65. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check CPSH's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ISNS's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while LUNA trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check LUNA's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while DAIO trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -11.48. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check DAIO's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while HOLOW trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check HOLOW's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while MTEK trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -20.72. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MTEK's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while HOLO trades at $5.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check HOLO's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check TMPOW's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while NSYS trades at $8.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check NSYS's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while FCUV trades at $2.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check FCUV's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while SGMA trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SGMA's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while KNW trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KNW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check KNW's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check VIAO's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while ELSE trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 44.09. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ELSE's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while WATT trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check WATT's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while OST trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OST's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while SLNHP trades at $4.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SLNHP's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while SLNH trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SLNH's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while SVREW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SVREW's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while SOBR trades at $4.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SOBR's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while OUSTZ trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OUSTZ's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while BNSO trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check BNSO's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while MINDP trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MINDP's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while OPTXW trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OPTXW's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while IMTE trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check IMTE's competition here

BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $195.61, while MMAT trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 42.06, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MMAT's competition here