Aurora Innovation, Inc.
Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUROW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AUROW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUROW | $0.79 | -4.82% | 11.1B | -0.36 | -$2.27 | N/A |
| IBM | $252.28 | +0.85% | 225.5B | 38.98 | $6.21 | +2.76% |
| ACN | $247.54 | +2.41% | 149B | 19.48 | $12.28 | +2.47% |
| FISV | $114.23 | +0.00% | 116.2B | 29.67 | $3.85 | N/A |
| FI | $134.04 | +1.01% | 72.4B | 22.28 | $5.98 | N/A |
| INFY | $16.07 | +0.31% | 66.3B | 20.77 | $0.77 | +3.17% |
| CTSH | $70.89 | +2.56% | 34B | 14.50 | $4.80 | +1.75% |
| BR | $266.89 | +0.15% | 31.2B | 37.46 | $7.10 | +1.32% |
| WIT | $2.63 | -1.13% | 28B | 17.80 | $0.15 | +4.75% |
| LDOS | $174.49 | -0.45% | 22.6B | 16.67 | $10.59 | +0.90% |
Stock Comparison
AUROW vs IBM Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 225.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while IBM trades at $252.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 38.98. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check IBM's competition here
AUROW vs ACN Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 149B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while ACN trades at $247.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check ACN's competition here
AUROW vs FISV Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while FISV trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check FISV's competition here
AUROW vs FI Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while FI trades at $134.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check FI's competition here
AUROW vs INFY Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while INFY trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check INFY's competition here
AUROW vs CTSH Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CTSH trades at $70.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CTSH's competition here
AUROW vs BR Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while BR trades at $266.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 37.46. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check BR's competition here
AUROW vs WIT Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while WIT trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check WIT's competition here
AUROW vs LDOS Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while LDOS trades at $174.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check LDOS's competition here
AUROW vs CDW Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CDW trades at $165.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CDW's competition here
AUROW vs GIB Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while GIB trades at $96.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check GIB's competition here
AUROW vs IT Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while IT trades at $243.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to IT's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check IT's competition here
AUROW vs JKHY Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while JKHY trades at $166.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check JKHY's competition here
AUROW vs AUR Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while AUR trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check AUR's competition here
AUROW vs CACI Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CACI trades at $475.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CACI's competition here
AUROW vs EPAM Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while EPAM trades at $151.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check EPAM's competition here
AUROW vs G Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while G trades at $42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas G's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check G's competition here
AUROW vs KD Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while KD trades at $29.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check KD's competition here
AUROW vs DLB Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while DLB trades at $72.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 26.77. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check DLB's competition here
AUROW vs EXLS Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while EXLS trades at $42.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check EXLS's competition here
AUROW vs GDS Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while GDS trades at $35.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 330.64. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check GDS's competition here
AUROW vs WAY Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while WAY trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 62.89. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check WAY's competition here
AUROW vs SAIC Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while SAIC trades at $115.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check SAIC's competition here
AUROW vs INGM Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while INGM trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check INGM's competition here
AUROW vs PAY Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while PAY trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 78.86. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check PAY's competition here
AUROW vs NCR Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check NCR's competition here
AUROW vs APLD Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while APLD trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -18.44. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check APLD's competition here
AUROW vs GLOB Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while GLOB trades at $78.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check GLOB's competition here
AUROW vs WNS Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while WNS trades at $74.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check WNS's competition here
AUROW vs CD Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CD trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CD's competition here
AUROW vs CNXC Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CNXC trades at $46.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CNXC's competition here
AUROW vs AI Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while AI trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check AI's competition here
AUROW vs PRFT Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check PRFT's competition here
AUROW vs CLVT Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CLVT trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CLVT's competition here
AUROW vs DXC Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while DXC trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check DXC's competition here
AUROW vs ASGN Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while ASGN trades at $50.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check ASGN's competition here
AUROW vs BBAI-WT Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while BBAI-WT trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
AUROW vs VNET Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while VNET trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -798.00. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check VNET's competition here
AUROW vs BBAI Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while BBAI trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check BBAI's competition here
AUROW vs VYX Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while VYX trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -23.73. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check VYX's competition here
AUROW vs FORTY Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while FORTY trades at $107.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check FORTY's competition here
AUROW vs NYAX Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while NYAX trades at $42.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 236.50. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check NYAX's competition here
AUROW vs TASK Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while TASK trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check TASK's competition here
AUROW vs TWKS Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check TWKS's competition here
AUROW vs NABL Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while NABL trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 93.56. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check NABL's competition here
AUROW vs FLYW Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while FLYW trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 235.80. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FLYW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check FLYW's competition here
AUROW vs INOD Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while INOD trades at $43.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 33.74. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check INOD's competition here
AUROW vs MGIC Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 980M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while MGIC trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check MGIC's competition here
AUROW vs CTLP Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 799.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CTLP trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CTLP's competition here
AUROW vs CLVT-PA Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CLVT-PA's competition here
AUROW vs PSFE Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 673.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while PSFE trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -567.50. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check PSFE's competition here
AUROW vs PSFE-WT Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 672.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
AUROW vs GDYN Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 650.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while GDYN trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 38.40. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check GDYN's competition here
AUROW vs PHLT Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 602M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while PHLT trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -95.25. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check PHLT's competition here
AUROW vs HCKT Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 571.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while HCKT trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check HCKT's competition here
AUROW vs XRX Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 524.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while XRX trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to XRX's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check XRX's competition here
AUROW vs LZMH Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 517M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while LZMH trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is 340.00. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check LZMH's competition here
AUROW vs TSSI Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 504.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while TSSI trades at $28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 55.97. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check TSSI's competition here
AUROW vs CNDT Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 401.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CNDT trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CNDT's competition here
AUROW vs IBEX Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 378.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while IBEX trades at $27.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check IBEX's competition here
AUROW vs SDHIU Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 333.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while SDHIU trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +16.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check SDHIU's competition here
AUROW vs UIS Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 270.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while UIS trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check UIS's competition here
AUROW vs BULLZ Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check BULLZ's competition here
AUROW vs DMRC Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while DMRC trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check DMRC's competition here
AUROW vs III Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 214M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while III trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas III's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check III's competition here
AUROW vs SRT Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check SRT's competition here
AUROW vs TLS Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 174.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while TLS trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check TLS's competition here
AUROW vs CTG Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CTG's competition here
AUROW vs TTEC Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 163.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while TTEC trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check TTEC's competition here
AUROW vs LHSW Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while LHSW trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 51.79. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check LHSW's competition here
AUROW vs CTM Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CTM trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -11.68. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CTM's competition here
AUROW vs ALYA Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check ALYA's competition here
AUROW vs CSPI Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 107.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CSPI trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -68.31. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CSPI's competition here
AUROW vs NOTE-WT Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 95.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check NOTE-WT's competition here
AUROW vs NOTE Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while NOTE trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check NOTE's competition here
AUROW vs SAIH Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while SAIH trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check SAIH's competition here
AUROW vs GMM Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while GMM trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check GMM's competition here
AUROW vs SAIHW Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while SAIHW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check SAIHW's competition here
AUROW vs VEEAW Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while VEEAW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +11.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check VEEAW's competition here
AUROW vs VEEA Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while VEEA trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +12.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check VEEA's competition here
AUROW vs BTCM Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while BTCM trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check BTCM's competition here
AUROW vs USIO Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while USIO trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check USIO's competition here
AUROW vs DVLT Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while DVLT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check DVLT's competition here
AUROW vs DTST Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while DTST trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 234.50. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check DTST's competition here
AUROW vs WYY Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while WYY trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -14.91. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check WYY's competition here
AUROW vs CLPS Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CLPS trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -23.19. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CLPS's competition here
AUROW vs GLE Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while GLE trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check GLE's competition here
AUROW vs JFU Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while JFU trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check JFU's competition here
AUROW vs CYCU Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CYCU trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CYCU's competition here
AUROW vs SGLB Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -6.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check SGLB's competition here
AUROW vs MASK Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while MASK trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check MASK's competition here
AUROW vs CYCUW Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CYCUW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CYCUW's competition here
AUROW vs TDTH Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while TDTH trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -8.38. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TDTH's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check TDTH's competition here
AUROW vs ARBB Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while ARBB trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check ARBB's competition here
AUROW vs JDZG Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while JDZG trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check JDZG's competition here
AUROW vs SASI Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SASI's ROE of -3.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check SASI's competition here
AUROW vs WAVD Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check WAVD's competition here
AUROW vs DTSTW Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while DTSTW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check DTSTW's competition here
AUROW vs CTEK Comparison August 2025
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CTEK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.79, while CTEK trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CTEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CTEK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.Check CTEK's competition here