Aurora Innovation, Inc.
Aurora Innovation, Inc. AUROW Peers
See (AUROW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUROW | $0.73 | -2.89% | 7.5B | -0.32 | -$2.27 | N/A |
| IBM | $287.43 | -0.93% | 267.1B | 49.13 | $5.85 | +2.91% |
| ACN | $288.36 | -3.04% | 196.1B | 22.95 | $12.56 | +2.49% |
| GDS | $32.51 | +0.87% | 134B | 295.27 | $0.11 | N/A |
| FISV | $114.23 | +0.00% | 116.2B | 29.67 | $3.85 | N/A |
| FI | $169.70 | -0.73% | 94.1B | 30.03 | $5.65 | N/A |
| INFY | $18.10 | -3.83% | 75B | 23.82 | $0.76 | +4.65% |
| CTSH | $76.73 | -4.03% | 37.8B | 16.15 | $4.75 | +1.59% |
| WIT | $2.92 | -4.89% | 30.6B | 19.50 | $0.15 | +1.05% |
| IT | $387.78 | -1.69% | 29.8B | 24.14 | $16.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AUROW vs IBM Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 267.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while IBM trades at $287.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 49.13. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs ACN Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 196.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while ACN trades at $288.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs GDS Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 134B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while GDS trades at $32.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 295.27. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs FISV Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while FISV trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs FI Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while FI trades at $169.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 30.03. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs INFY Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while INFY trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs CTSH Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while CTSH trades at $76.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs WIT Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while WIT trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs IT Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while IT trades at $387.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs BR Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while BR trades at $238.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 35.82. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs CDW Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while CDW trades at $179.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs GIB Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while GIB trades at $102.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs LDOS Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while LDOS trades at $163.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs JKHY Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while JKHY trades at $179.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs CACI Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while CACI trades at $479.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs EPAM Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while EPAM trades at $177.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs KD Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while KD trades at $41.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 39.60. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs AUR Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while AUR trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -11.41. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs G Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while G trades at $45.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas G's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs EXLS Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while EXLS trades at $45.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 34.19. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs DLB Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while DLB trades at $75.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs WAY Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while WAY trades at $37.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 289.54. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs SAIC Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while SAIC trades at $116.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs INGM Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while INGM trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs GLOB Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while GLOB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs NCR Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs CNXC Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while CNXC trades at $59.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs PAY Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while PAY trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 75.10. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs AI Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while AI trades at $26.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs WNS Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while WNS trades at $74.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs CD Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while CD trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs CLVT Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while CLVT trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs DXC Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while DXC trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs PRFT Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs ASGN Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while ASGN trades at $50.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs APLD Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while APLD trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs BBAI Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while BBAI trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs FORTY Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while FORTY trades at $132.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs VYX Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while VYX trades at $13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -11.73. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs VNET Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while VNET trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -697.00. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs BBAI-WT Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while BBAI-WT trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs INOD Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while INOD trades at $52.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 48.81. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs NYAX Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while NYAX trades at $43.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 228.66. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs NABL Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while NABL trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 102.44. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs TASK Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while TASK trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs PSFE-WT Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs TWKS Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs FLYW Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while FLYW trades at $11.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 290.63. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs MGIC Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while MGIC trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs GDYN Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 970.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while GDYN trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 88.30. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs LZMH Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 952M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while LZMH trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is 626.00. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs PSFE Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 813.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while PSFE trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -685.50. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs CTLP Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 808.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while CTLP trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs CLVT-PA Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs HCKT Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 700.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while HCKT trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs XRX Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 645.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while XRX trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs TSSI Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 573.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while TSSI trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 63.67. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs CNDT Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 444.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while CNDT trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs IBEX Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 402M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while IBEX trades at $30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs PHLT Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 337.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while PHLT trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -53.86. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs SDHIU Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 326.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while SDHIU trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +16.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs UIS Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 303.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while UIS trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs DMRC Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 281.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while DMRC trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs BULLZ Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs TTEC Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 246.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while TTEC trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs III Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 243.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while III trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas III's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs TLS Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 214.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while TLS trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs SRT Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs CTG Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs LHSW Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while LHSW trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 47.20. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs CSPI Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 119.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while CSPI trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -75.69. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs NOTE Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 113.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while NOTE trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs ALYA Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs CTM Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 109.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while CTM trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs SAIHW Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while SAIHW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs NOTE-WT Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs SAIH Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while SAIH trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs GMM Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while GMM trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs VEEAW Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while VEEAW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +11.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs VEEA Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while VEEA trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +12.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs DVLT Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while DVLT trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs USIO Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while USIO trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs GLE Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while GLE trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs WYY Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while WYY trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -15.10. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs CLPS Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while CLPS trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -18.56. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs DTST Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while DTST trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 173.00. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs MASK Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while MASK trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs JFU Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while JFU trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs CYCU Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while CYCU trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs CYCUW Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while CYCUW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs SGLB Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SGLB's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs ARBB Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while ARBB trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs JDZG Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while JDZG trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs SASI Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SASI's ROE of +597.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs TDTH Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while TDTH trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TDTH's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs WAVD Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs DTSTW Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while DTSTW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs BTCM Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while BTCM trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.
AUROW vs SWCH Comparison
AUROW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUROW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SWCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AUROW is priced at $0.73, while SWCH trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUROW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas SWCH's P/E ratio is 796.51. In terms of profitability, AUROW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SWCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AUROW is more volatile compared to SWCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUROW.