Aurora Innovation, Inc.
Aurora Innovation, Inc. AUR Peers
See (AUR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUR | $5.33 | -1.21% | 9.1B | -11.00 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| IBM | $293.23 | +0.45% | 269.3B | 49.52 | $5.85 | +2.32% |
| ACN | $297.00 | +0.31% | 184.9B | 23.51 | $12.56 | +1.95% |
| GDS | $30.77 | +3.64% | 124.5B | 274.27 | $0.11 | N/A |
| FISV | $114.23 | +0.00% | 116.2B | 29.67 | $3.85 | N/A |
| FI | $171.80 | +0.26% | 95.6B | 30.89 | $5.58 | N/A |
| INFY | $18.50 | -0.56% | 76.8B | 24.38 | $0.76 | +2.75% |
| CTSH | $77.80 | +0.27% | 38.3B | 16.36 | $4.75 | +1.58% |
| WIT | $3.04 | -1.78% | 31.8B | 20.27 | $0.15 | +1.02% |
| IT | $403.98 | -0.15% | 31B | 25.11 | $16.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AUR vs IBM Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 269.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while IBM trades at $293.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 49.52. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs ACN Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 184.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while ACN trades at $297.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs GDS Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 124.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while GDS trades at $30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 274.27. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs FISV Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while FISV trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs FI Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while FI trades at $171.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 30.89. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs INFY Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while INFY trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs CTSH Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while CTSH trades at $77.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs WIT Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while WIT trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs IT Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while IT trades at $403.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs BR Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while BR trades at $241.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 35.94. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs CDW Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while CDW trades at $177.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs GIB Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while GIB trades at $104.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs LDOS Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while LDOS trades at $157.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs JKHY Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while JKHY trades at $178.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs CACI Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while CACI trades at $474.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs EPAM Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while EPAM trades at $177.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs KD Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while KD trades at $42.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 39.48. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs AUROW Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while AUROW trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs G Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while G trades at $43.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas G's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs EXLS Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while EXLS trades at $43.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs DLB Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while DLB trades at $74.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs WAY Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while WAY trades at $40.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 331.33. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs SAIC Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while SAIC trades at $111.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs INGM Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while INGM trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs PAY Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while PAY trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 80.55. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs GLOB Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while GLOB trades at $90.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs NCR Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs CNXC Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while CNXC trades at $52.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs AI Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while AI trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -10.82. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs CD Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while CD trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs CLVT Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while CLVT trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs DXC Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while DXC trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs PRFT Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs WNS Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while WNS trades at $63.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs LZMH Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while LZMH trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is 1565.00. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs APLD Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while APLD trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs ASGN Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while ASGN trades at $49.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs FORTY Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while FORTY trades at $128.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs VNET Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while VNET trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -698.00. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs NYAX Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while NYAX trades at $49.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 275.61. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs BBAI-WT Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while BBAI-WT trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs BBAI Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while BBAI trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs VYX Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while VYX trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -10.24. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs INOD Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while INOD trades at $50.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 45.19. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs NABL Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while NABL trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 101.31. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs TASK Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while TASK trades at $16.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs TWKS Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs FLYW Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while FLYW trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 285.25. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs GDYN Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 986.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while GDYN trades at $11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 89.77. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs PSFE-WT Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 959.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs MGIC Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 894.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while MGIC trades at $19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs CTLP Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 805.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while CTLP trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs TSSI Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 756.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while TSSI trades at $28.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 84.03. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs CLVT-PA Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs PSFE Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 745.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while PSFE trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -628.00. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs HCKT Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 695.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while HCKT trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 29.95. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs XRX Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 664.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while XRX trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs CNDT Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 427.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while CNDT trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs IBEX Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 381.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while IBEX trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs SDHIU Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 325.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while SDHIU trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +16.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs UIS Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 319.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while UIS trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs PHLT Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 313.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while PHLT trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs DMRC Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 284.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while DMRC trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs TTEC Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 231.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while TTEC trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs III Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while III trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas III's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs TLS Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 223.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while TLS trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs SRT Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs CTG Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs BULLZ Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 114.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while BULLZ trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs CSPI Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 111.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while CSPI trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -70.50. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs ALYA Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs CTM Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while CTM trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs LHSW Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while LHSW trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs SAIHW Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 79.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while SAIHW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs NOTE Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 76.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while NOTE trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs SAIH Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while SAIH trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs VEEA Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 70.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while VEEA trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VEEA's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs NOTE-WT Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs JDZG Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while JDZG trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 87.67. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs VEEAW Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while VEEAW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs GMM Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while GMM trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs DVLT Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while DVLT trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs USIO Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while USIO trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs WYY Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while WYY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -15.36. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs GLE Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while GLE trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 73.25. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs CLPS Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while CLPS trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -18.44. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs MASK Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while MASK trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs DTST Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while DTST trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 166.50. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs JFU Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while JFU trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs CYCUW Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while CYCUW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs ARBB Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while ARBB trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs SGLB Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SGLB's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs CYCU Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while CYCU trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs SASI Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SASI's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs WAVD Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs TDTH Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while TDTH trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TDTH's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs DTSTW Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 913.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while DTSTW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is more volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs BTCM Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 325.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while BTCM trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.
AUR vs TRIT Comparison
AUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUR stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TRIT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AUR is priced at $5.33, while TRIT trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.00, whereas TRIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUR's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TRIT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AUR is less volatile compared to TRIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUR.