Acorn Energy, Inc.
Acorn Energy, Inc. (ACFN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ACFN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACFN | $19.04 | -1.35% | 47.7M | 7.65 | $2.49 | N/A |
| APH | $133.92 | +1.86% | 164.6B | 40.10 | $3.34 | +0.56% |
| GLW | $129.12 | -0.50% | 110.8B | 70.57 | $1.83 | +0.86% |
| SNDK | $661.62 | +6.92% | 97.6B | -88.55 | -$7.47 | N/A |
| TEL | $199.41 | +0.75% | 58.5B | 28.73 | $6.94 | +1.43% |
| KEYS | $279.78 | -1.06% | 48.1B | 49.15 | $5.69 | N/A |
| GRMN | $233.52 | -0.56% | 45B | 27.19 | $8.59 | +1.54% |
| COHR | $242.76 | +0.62% | 38.5B | 235.56 | $1.03 | N/A |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | +5.28% |
| CLS | $263.46 | -0.54% | 30.3B | 36.80 | $7.16 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ACFN vs APH Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 164.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while APH trades at $133.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 40.10. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check APH's competition here
ACFN vs GLW Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 110.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while GLW trades at $129.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 70.57. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check GLW's competition here
ACFN vs SNDK Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while SNDK trades at $661.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is -88.55. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check SNDK's competition here
ACFN vs TEL Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while TEL trades at $199.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check TEL's competition here
ACFN vs KEYS Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while KEYS trades at $279.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 49.15. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check KEYS's competition here
ACFN vs GRMN Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while GRMN trades at $233.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check GRMN's competition here
ACFN vs COHR Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while COHR trades at $242.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 235.56. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check COHR's competition here
ACFN vs IIVI Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check IIVI's competition here
ACFN vs CLS Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while CLS trades at $263.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 36.80. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check CLS's competition here
ACFN vs TDY Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while TDY trades at $638.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 33.85. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check TDY's competition here
ACFN vs JBL Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while JBL trades at $250.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 39.29. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check JBL's competition here
ACFN vs FLEX Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while FLEX trades at $63.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 28.45. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check FLEX's competition here
ACFN vs FN Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while FN trades at $502.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 48.18. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check FN's competition here
ACFN vs WDCVV Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check WDCVV's competition here
ACFN vs FTV Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while FTV trades at $54.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check FTV's competition here
ACFN vs TRMB Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while TRMB trades at $66.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 37.76. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check TRMB's competition here
ACFN vs MKSI Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while MKSI trades at $213.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 48.84. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check MKSI's competition here
ACFN vs TTMI Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while TTMI trades at $90.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 53.95. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check TTMI's competition here
ACFN vs LFUS Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while LFUS trades at $326.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is -113.26. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check LFUS's competition here
ACFN vs CGNX Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while CGNX trades at $47.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 70.56. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check CGNX's competition here
ACFN vs VICR Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while VICR trades at $172.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 65.87. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check VICR's competition here
ACFN vs SANM Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while SANM trades at $125.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check SANM's competition here
ACFN vs ESE Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while ESE trades at $263.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 54.77. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check ESE's competition here
ACFN vs VNT Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while VNT trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check VNT's competition here
ACFN vs PLXS Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while PLXS trades at $190.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check PLXS's competition here
ACFN vs ST Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while ST trades at $34.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 163.21. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check ST's competition here
ACFN vs OSIS Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while OSIS trades at $270.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check OSIS's competition here
ACFN vs BMI Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while BMI trades at $146.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 30.65. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check BMI's competition here
ACFN vs NOVT Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while NOVT trades at $116.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 79.43. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check NOVT's competition here
ACFN vs ITRI Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while ITRI trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check ITRI's competition here
ACFN vs BELFB Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while BELFB trades at $197.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 42.60. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check BELFB's competition here
ACFN vs BELFA Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while BELFA trades at $180.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 38.71. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check BELFA's competition here
ACFN vs BHE Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while BHE trades at $53.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 78.26. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check BHE's competition here
ACFN vs NOVTU Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while NOVTU trades at $52.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check NOVTU's competition here
ACFN vs ROG Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while ROG trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -30.11. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check ROG's competition here
ACFN vs OUST Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while OUST trades at $21.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -20.07. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check OUST's competition here
ACFN vs CTS Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while CTS trades at $45.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check CTS's competition here
ACFN vs ALNT Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while ALNT trades at $62.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 52.83. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check ALNT's competition here
ACFN vs DAKT Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 981M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while DAKT trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 36.59. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check DAKT's competition here
ACFN vs PENG Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 945M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while PENG trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 81.73. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check PENG's competition here
ACFN vs BKSY Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 850.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while BKSY trades at $23.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check BKSY's competition here
ACFN vs FARO Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check FARO's competition here
ACFN vs OUST-WTA Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
ACFN vs LYTS Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 601.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while LYTS trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check LYTS's competition here
ACFN vs AMOT Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check AMOT's competition here
ACFN vs VPG Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 545.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while VPG trades at $41.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 102.62. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check VPG's competition here
ACFN vs OUST-WT Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check OUST-WT's competition here
ACFN vs LPTH Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 458.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while LPTH trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -20.21. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check LPTH's competition here
ACFN vs MLAB Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 430.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while MLAB trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 119.94. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check MLAB's competition here
ACFN vs KOPN Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 366.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while KOPN trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -104.00. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check KOPN's competition here
ACFN vs BKSY-WT Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 317M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
ACFN vs VLDR Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check VLDR's competition here
ACFN vs SATL Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 296.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while SATL trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SATL's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check SATL's competition here
ACFN vs OPTX Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 245.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while OPTX trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -83.12. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check OPTX's competition here
ACFN vs MPTI Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 190.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while MPTI trades at $64.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check MPTI's competition here
ACFN vs MEI Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 181.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while MEI trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check MEI's competition here
ACFN vs EMAN Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check EMAN's competition here
ACFN vs MVIS Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 163.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while MVIS trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check MVIS's competition here
ACFN vs RELL Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 160M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while RELL trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 221.80. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check RELL's competition here
ACFN vs SLNHP Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while SLNHP trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of +9.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check SLNHP's competition here
ACFN vs KULR Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while KULR trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check KULR's competition here
ACFN vs ODYS Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while ODYS trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check ODYS's competition here
ACFN vs GNSS Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while GNSS trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check GNSS's competition here
ACFN vs WRAP Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while WRAP trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check WRAP's competition here
ACFN vs SATLW Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while SATLW trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check SATLW's competition here
ACFN vs MIND Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 71.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while MIND trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check MIND's competition here
ACFN vs SOTK Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while SOTK trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 42.10. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check SOTK's competition here
ACFN vs ELTK Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while ELTK trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 53.65. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check ELTK's competition here
ACFN vs CPSH Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while CPSH trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 126.00. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check CPSH's competition here
ACFN vs UEIC Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while UEIC trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check UEIC's competition here
ACFN vs DSWL Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while DSWL trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check DSWL's competition here
ACFN vs LINK Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 49.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while LINK trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -24.27. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check LINK's competition here
ACFN vs LUNA Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while LUNA trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -46.67. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check LUNA's competition here
ACFN vs LGL Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while LGL trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 41.91. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check LGL's competition here
ACFN vs OPTXW Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while OPTXW trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check OPTXW's competition here
ACFN vs ISNS Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check ISNS's competition here
ACFN vs REFR Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while REFR trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -16.83. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check REFR's competition here
ACFN vs HOLO Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while HOLO trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HOLO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check HOLO's competition here
ACFN vs WBX Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while WBX trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check WBX's competition here
ACFN vs NEON Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while NEON trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check NEON's competition here
ACFN vs NSYS Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while NSYS trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check NSYS's competition here
ACFN vs DAIO Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while DAIO trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check DAIO's competition here
ACFN vs TMPOW Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check TMPOW's competition here
ACFN vs SLNH Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while SLNH trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SLNH's ROE of +9.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check SLNH's competition here
ACFN vs WATT Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while WATT trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WATT's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check WATT's competition here
ACFN vs SGMA Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check SGMA's competition here
ACFN vs VIAO Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check VIAO's competition here
ACFN vs SELX Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while SELX trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check SELX's competition here
ACFN vs KNW Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KNW's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check KNW's competition here
ACFN vs ELSE Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while ELSE trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check ELSE's competition here
ACFN vs MTEK Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while MTEK trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check MTEK's competition here
ACFN vs OST Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check OST's competition here
ACFN vs GAUZ Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while GAUZ trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check GAUZ's competition here
ACFN vs SVREW Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while SVREW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check SVREW's competition here
ACFN vs SVRE Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while SVRE trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check SVRE's competition here
ACFN vs BNSO Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check BNSO's competition here
ACFN vs MINDP Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check MINDP's competition here
ACFN vs MMAT Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check MMAT's competition here
ACFN vs AMPGZ Comparison March 2026
ACFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACFN stands at 47.7M. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACFN is priced at $19.04, while AMPGZ trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.65, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACFN's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACFN is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACFN.Check AMPGZ's competition here