YY Group Holding Limited
YY Group Holding Limited (YYGH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (YYGH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YYGH | $1.03 | +0.49% | 16.8K | -0.06 | -$18.15 | N/A |
| ROL | $52.46 | -0.66% | 25.2B | 48.11 | $1.09 | +1.32% |
| SCI | $81.57 | -0.33% | 11.4B | 21.47 | $3.80 | +1.62% |
| BFAM | $77.99 | -3.95% | 4.4B | 23.21 | $3.36 | N/A |
| HRB | $31.21 | -0.22% | 4B | 7.30 | $4.28 | +5.22% |
| CVSA | $114.64 | -1.50% | 4B | 16.91 | $6.78 | N/A |
| FTDR | $53.64 | -3.94% | 3.9B | 15.68 | $3.42 | N/A |
| DSEY | $8.40 | +0.06% | 2.7B | -14.47 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| MCW | $6.97 | -0.14% | 2.3B | 22.48 | $0.31 | N/A |
| ROVR | $11.00 | +0.05% | 2B | 183.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
YYGH vs ROL Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while ROL trades at $52.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 48.11. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check ROL's competition here
YYGH vs SCI Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while SCI trades at $81.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check SCI's competition here
YYGH vs BFAM Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while BFAM trades at $77.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check BFAM's competition here
YYGH vs HRB Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while HRB trades at $31.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to HRB's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check HRB's competition here
YYGH vs CVSA Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, CVSA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while CVSA trades at $114.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CVSA's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to CVSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to CVSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check CVSA's competition here
YYGH vs FTDR Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while FTDR trades at $53.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check FTDR's competition here
YYGH vs DSEY Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while DSEY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check DSEY's competition here
YYGH vs MCW Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while MCW trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check MCW's competition here
YYGH vs ROVR Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while ROVR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check ROVR's competition here
YYGH vs CSV Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 702M. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while CSV trades at $44.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check CSV's competition here
YYGH vs WW Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 142.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while WW trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas WW's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to WW's ROE of -26.25%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is less volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check WW's competition here
YYGH vs EM Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 142M. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while EM trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -112.00. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check EM's competition here
YYGH vs MED Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 107M. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while MED trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas MED's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check MED's competition here
YYGH vs RGS Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while RGS trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to RGS's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check RGS's competition here
YYGH vs XSPA Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while XSPA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to XSPA's ROE of -5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check XSPA's competition here
YYGH vs XWEL Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while XWEL trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to XWEL's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check XWEL's competition here
YYGH vs MRM Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while MRM trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to MRM's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check MRM's competition here
YYGH vs EJH Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while EJH trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to EJH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is less volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check EJH's competition here
YYGH vs BYAH Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, BYAH has a market cap of 691K. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while BYAH trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas BYAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to BYAH's ROE of -5.91%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to BYAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check BYAH's competition here
YYGH vs TRNR Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 191.9K. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while TRNR trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check TRNR's competition here
YYGH vs IVP Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 85.8K. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while IVP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to IVP's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check IVP's competition here
YYGH vs STON Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, STON has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while STON trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to STON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check STON's competition here
YYGH vs NEBCU Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, NEBCU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check NEBCU's competition here
YYGH vs TMX Comparison April 2026
YYGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YYGH stands at 16.8K. In comparison, TMX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, YYGH is priced at $1.03, while TMX trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YYGH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, YYGH's ROE is -1.00%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YYGH is more volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YYGH.Check TMX's competition here