WW International, Inc.
WW International, Inc. (WW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WW | $22.08 | +0.00% | 227.8M | 1.68 | $13.55 | N/A |
| ROL | $60.92 | +0.00% | 29.5B | 56.28 | $1.09 | +1.11% |
| SCI | $80.70 | +0.00% | 11.1B | 20.85 | $3.80 | +1.64% |
| BFAM | $71.06 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 21.55 | $3.36 | N/A |
| FTDR | $55.60 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 16.13 | $3.49 | N/A |
| HRB | $30.83 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 7.10 | $4.28 | +5.23% |
| DSEY | $8.40 | +0.06% | 2.7B | -14.47 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| MCW | $6.97 | +0.00% | 2.3B | 26.04 | $0.27 | N/A |
| ROVR | $11.00 | +0.05% | 2B | 183.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
| CSV | $44.22 | +0.00% | 706.5M | 14.52 | $3.09 | +1.00% |
Stock Comparison
WW vs ROL Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while ROL trades at $60.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 56.28. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check ROL's competition here
WW vs SCI Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while SCI trades at $80.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check SCI's competition here
WW vs BFAM Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while BFAM trades at $71.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check BFAM's competition here
WW vs FTDR Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while FTDR trades at $55.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check FTDR's competition here
WW vs HRB Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while HRB trades at $30.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to HRB's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check HRB's competition here
WW vs DSEY Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while DSEY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check DSEY's competition here
WW vs MCW Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while MCW trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check MCW's competition here
WW vs ROVR Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while ROVR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check ROVR's competition here
WW vs CSV Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 706.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while CSV trades at $44.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check CSV's competition here
WW vs EM Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 145.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while EM trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -115.00. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check EM's competition here
WW vs MED Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 116.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while MED trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas MED's P/E ratio is 531.50. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check MED's competition here
WW vs RGS Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while RGS trades at $22.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to RGS's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check RGS's competition here
WW vs XSPA Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while XSPA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to XSPA's ROE of -5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is less volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check XSPA's competition here
WW vs EJH Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while EJH trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to EJH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check EJH's competition here
WW vs YYGH Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, YYGH has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while YYGH trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas YYGH's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to YYGH's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to YYGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check YYGH's competition here
WW vs MRM Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while MRM trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to MRM's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check MRM's competition here
WW vs XWEL Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while XWEL trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to XWEL's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is less volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check XWEL's competition here
WW vs BYAH Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, BYAH has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while BYAH trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas BYAH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to BYAH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is less volatile compared to BYAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check BYAH's competition here
WW vs TRNR Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 376.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while TRNR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is less volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check TRNR's competition here
WW vs IVP Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while IVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to IVP's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is less volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check IVP's competition here
WW vs NEBCU Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, NEBCU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is less volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check NEBCU's competition here
WW vs STON Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, STON has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while STON trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to STON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check STON's competition here
WW vs TMX Comparison February 2026
WW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WW stands at 227.8M. In comparison, TMX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WW is priced at $22.08, while TMX trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WW currently has a P/E ratio of 1.68, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, WW's ROE is -2.73%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WW is more volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WW.Check TMX's competition here