Waldencast plc

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 344.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while SAP trades at $295.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 52.97. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 258.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while CRM trades at $270.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 42.43. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 215.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while INTU trades at $772.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 63.09. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 209.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while NOW trades at $1,011.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 137.17. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 194.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while UBER trades at $93.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 147.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while SHOP trades at $113.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 91.93. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 117.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while APP trades at $347.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 62.81. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while MSTR trades at $386.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -17.37. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 82.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while CDNS trades at $303.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 76.88. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while SNOW trades at $221.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -52.80. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while ADSK trades at $304.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 65.30. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while WDAY trades at $237.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 131.06. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while TEAM trades at $198.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -120.30. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while DDOG trades at $131.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 278.98. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while FICO trades at $1,815.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 78.05. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while TTD trades at $68.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 82.95. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while ANSS trades at $343.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 51.04. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while HUBS trades at $547.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1274.22. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while STRK trades at $105.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while STRF trades at $104.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while TYL trades at $577.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 86.82. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while ZM trades at $76.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while PTC trades at $169.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 46.58. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while SSNC trades at $81.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while GWRE trades at $234.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 546.21. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while GRAB trades at $4.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 466.50. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while DUOL trades at $398.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 197.36. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while DT trades at $54.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while MNDY trades at $305.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 302.50. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while BSY trades at $52.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 67.47. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while DOCU trades at $75.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while PAYC trades at $225.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 32.03. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while QXO trades at $21.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -62.03. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while MANH trades at $194.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 55.50. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while NICE trades at $165.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while PCOR trades at $67.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -78.98. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while PCTY trades at $177.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while U trades at $23.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U's P/E ratio is -20.91. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while TTAN trades at $106.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -28.65. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while DAY trades at $55.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 344.38. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while DSGX trades at $102.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 61.87. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while ESTC trades at $82.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -79.42. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while SRAD trades at $27.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 135.60. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while APPF trades at $229.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 42.78. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while CVLT trades at $174.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 103.53. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while OTEX trades at $28.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while GTLB trades at $44.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 491.44. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while LYFT trades at $15.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 105.67. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while CWAN trades at $22.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while QTWO trades at $94.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -278.68. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while IDCC trades at $227.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while VERX trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -117.21. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while BULL trades at $11.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while FROG trades at $43.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -61.10. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while LIF trades at $61.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 470.46. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while BILL trades at $45.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2264.50. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while PEGA trades at $52.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 48.33. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while GRND trades at $22.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -37.33. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while FRSH trades at $14.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -61.75. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while RUMBW trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while INTA trades at $51.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -212.83. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while RUM trades at $9.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while SOUN trades at $9.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -16.26. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while ZI trades at $10.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while RIOT trades at $10.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while WK trades at $65.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -56.73. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while ZETA trades at $15.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -61.30. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while BL trades at $56.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 40.97. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while KC trades at $12.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while DAVEW trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while AGYS trades at $118.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 144.22. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while COMP trades at $6.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -48.54. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while CALX trades at $50.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -96.35. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while DAVE trades at $243.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 67.96. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while NCNO trades at $27.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -109.48. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while ASAN trades at $13.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while BLKB trades at $64.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while ALKT trades at $30.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -81.38. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while CLSK trades at $10.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while GBTG trades at $6.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -63.35. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while ALIT trades at $5.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -94.00. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while BRZE trades at $26.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -26.48. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while ALRM trades at $56.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while PAR trades at $67.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -26.60. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.

WALDW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WALDW stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WALDW is priced at $0.07, while PRGS trades at $63.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WALDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 50.20. In terms of profitability, WALDW's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WALDW is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WALDW.