Tattooed Chef, Inc.
Tattooed Chef, Inc. TTCF Peers
See (TTCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTCF | $0.16 | -24.76% | 13.2M | -0.12 | -$1.37 | N/A |
| KHC | $25.78 | -1.15% | 30.5B | 11.77 | $2.19 | +6.21% |
| GIS | $53.55 | -0.02% | 29.3B | 11.77 | $4.55 | +4.49% |
| MKC-V | $73.94 | +1.08% | 20B | 25.50 | $2.90 | +2.35% |
| MKC | $73.87 | -0.19% | 19.8B | 25.47 | $2.90 | +2.35% |
| HRL | $30.29 | -0.96% | 16.7B | 22.27 | $1.36 | +3.78% |
| PPC | $45.96 | -0.39% | 10.9B | 9.05 | $5.08 | +13.70% |
| CAG | $21.61 | +0.16% | 10.3B | 31.77 | $0.68 | +6.48% |
| SJM | $95.40 | -0.33% | 10.2B | -8.25 | -$11.57 | +4.53% |
| CPB | $32.26 | -1.62% | 9.6B | 21.65 | $1.49 | +4.71% |
Stock Comparison
TTCF vs KHC Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while KHC trades at $25.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs GIS Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while GIS trades at $53.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs MKC-V Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while MKC-V trades at $73.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs MKC Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while MKC trades at $73.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs HRL Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while HRL trades at $30.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs PPC Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while PPC trades at $45.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs CAG Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while CAG trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 31.77. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs SJM Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SJM trades at $95.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs CPB Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while CPB trades at $32.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs INGR Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while INGR trades at $137.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs BRBR Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BRBR trades at $62.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs LW Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while LW trades at $55.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs POST Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while POST trades at $113.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs DAR Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while DAR trades at $38.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs BRFS Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BRFS trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs LANC Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while LANC trades at $168.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs TWNK Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs TWNKW Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs FRPT Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while FRPT trades at $72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 241.67. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs FLO Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while FLO trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs SMPL Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SMPL trades at $32.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs NOMD Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while NOMD trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs SOVO Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs JJSF Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while JJSF trades at $113.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs CENT Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while CENT trades at $34.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs CENTA Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while CENTA trades at $30.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs KLG Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while KLG trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs UTZ Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while UTZ trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 39.88. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs THS Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while THS trades at $20.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 205.80. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs HLF Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 824.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while HLF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs JBSS Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 734.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while JBSS trades at $62.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs STKL Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 710M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while STKL trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -67.11. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs SENEB Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 643M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SENEB trades at $92.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs WEST Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 628.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while WEST trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs SENEA Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 620.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SENEA trades at $90.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs USNA Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 574M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while USNA trades at $30.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs THRN Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs LWAY Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 381.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while LWAY trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 37.43. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs BGS Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 352.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BGS trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs MAMA Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 301.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while MAMA trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 72.91. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs NATR Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 273.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while NATR trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs BYND Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 252.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BYND trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs FREE Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs WESTW Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs LFVN Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 160.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while LFVN trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs HAIN Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while HAIN trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs MMMB Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs FTLF Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 124.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while FTLF trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs BRCC Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BRCC trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -16.89. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs PLIN Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs BRLS Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 103.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BRLS trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs ATPC Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while ATPC trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs WYHG Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while WYHG trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs ABVE Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while ABVE trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs BRID Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 71.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BRID trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.49. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs LSF Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while LSF trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -72.06. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs PAVS Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while PAVS trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs MITC Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs ABVEW Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while ABVEW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs DDC Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while DDC trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to DDC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs FARM Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while FARM trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs CLXT Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs HAPP Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs JVA Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while JVA trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs YGF Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs COOT Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while COOT trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs NAII Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while NAII trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs ORIS Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while ORIS trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs BOF Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BOF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs PLAG Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while PLAG trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs NCRA Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while NCRA trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs IMG Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while IMG trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs STKH Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while STKH trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs PETZ Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while PETZ trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs BON Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BON trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs SOWG Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SOWG trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs HCWC Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while HCWC trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs NUZE Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -70.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs BTTR Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs FREEW Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs CYAN Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while CYAN trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs BRLSW Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BRLSW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs FAMI Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while FAMI trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs RGF Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs BTOG Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BTOG trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs SNAX Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SNAX trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs BSFC Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 824K. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BSFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs SMFL Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 96.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SMFL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs SNAXW Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 18.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs RIBT Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs SAFM Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs VGFC Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs DTEA Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.
TTCF vs BRCN Comparison
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.