Tattooed Chef, Inc.
Tattooed Chef, Inc. (TTCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TTCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTCF | $0.16 | -24.76% | 13.2M | -0.12 | -$1.37 | N/A |
| KHC | $28.06 | +2.04% | 33.2B | -6.29 | -$4.46 | +5.74% |
| GIS | $50.18 | +0.74% | 27.2B | 12.24 | $4.10 | +4.82% |
| MKC-V | $72.26 | +1.77% | 19.4B | 25.18 | $2.87 | +2.46% |
| MKC | $72.26 | +1.67% | 19.4B | 25.18 | $2.87 | +2.45% |
| HRL | $29.25 | +1.18% | 16.1B | 21.50 | $1.36 | +3.95% |
| SJM | $113.20 | +0.21% | 12.1B | -9.78 | -$11.57 | +3.83% |
| PPC | $46.16 | -2.33% | 11B | 8.89 | $5.19 | +18.14% |
| CPB | $33.14 | +1.75% | 9.9B | 22.09 | $1.50 | +4.65% |
| CAG | $19.66 | +1.87% | 9.4B | 8.20 | $2.40 | +7.15% |
Stock Comparison
TTCF vs KHC Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while KHC trades at $28.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is -6.29. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check KHC's competition here
TTCF vs GIS Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while GIS trades at $50.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check GIS's competition here
TTCF vs MKC-V Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while MKC-V trades at $72.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check MKC-V's competition here
TTCF vs MKC Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while MKC trades at $72.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check MKC's competition here
TTCF vs HRL Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while HRL trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check HRL's competition here
TTCF vs SJM Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SJM trades at $113.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.78. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check SJM's competition here
TTCF vs PPC Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while PPC trades at $46.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check PPC's competition here
TTCF vs CPB Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while CPB trades at $33.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check CPB's competition here
TTCF vs CAG Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while CAG trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check CAG's competition here
TTCF vs INGR Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while INGR trades at $129.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check INGR's competition here
TTCF vs LW Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while LW trades at $56.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check LW's competition here
TTCF vs POST Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while POST trades at $114.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check POST's competition here
TTCF vs BRFS Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BRFS trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check BRFS's competition here
TTCF vs DAR Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while DAR trades at $34.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 53.60. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check DAR's competition here
TTCF vs BRBR Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BRBR trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check BRBR's competition here
TTCF vs LANC Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check LANC's competition here
TTCF vs TWNK Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check TWNK's competition here
TTCF vs TWNKW Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check TWNKW's competition here
TTCF vs FLO Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while FLO trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check FLO's competition here
TTCF vs FRPT Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while FRPT trades at $62.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 94.88. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check FRPT's competition here
TTCF vs SMPL Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SMPL trades at $30.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check SMPL's competition here
TTCF vs NOMD Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while NOMD trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check NOMD's competition here
TTCF vs SOVO Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check SOVO's competition here
TTCF vs JJSF Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while JJSF trades at $115.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check JJSF's competition here
TTCF vs CENTA Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while CENTA trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check CENTA's competition here
TTCF vs CENT Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while CENT trades at $36.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check CENT's competition here
TTCF vs KLG Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while KLG trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 67.60. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check KLG's competition here
TTCF vs UTZ Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while UTZ trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 63.52. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check UTZ's competition here
TTCF vs HLF Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while HLF trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check HLF's competition here
TTCF vs THS Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 995.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while THS trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 54.78. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check THS's competition here
TTCF vs JBSS Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 785.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while JBSS trades at $67.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check JBSS's competition here
TTCF vs STKL Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 763.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while STKL trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -323.00. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check STKL's competition here
TTCF vs SENEA Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 749.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SENEA trades at $108.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check SENEA's competition here
TTCF vs SENEB Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 747.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SENEB trades at $108.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check SENEB's competition here
TTCF vs WEST Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 616.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while WEST trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check WEST's competition here
TTCF vs USNA Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 588.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while USNA trades at $32.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check USNA's competition here
TTCF vs THRN Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check THRN's competition here
TTCF vs LWAY Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while LWAY trades at $31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 45.33. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check LWAY's competition here
TTCF vs BGS Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 366.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BGS trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check BGS's competition here
TTCF vs MAMA Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while MAMA trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 78.18. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check MAMA's competition here
TTCF vs BRCC Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BRCC trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check BRCC's competition here
TTCF vs NATR Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 289.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while NATR trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check NATR's competition here
TTCF vs FREE Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check FREE's competition here
TTCF vs BYND Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 187.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BYND trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check BYND's competition here
TTCF vs WESTW Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check WESTW's competition here
TTCF vs HAIN Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 167.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while HAIN trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check HAIN's competition here
TTCF vs LFVN Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 164.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while LFVN trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check LFVN's competition here
TTCF vs FTLF Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 159.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while FTLF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check FTLF's competition here
TTCF vs MMMB Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check MMMB's competition here
TTCF vs PLIN Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check PLIN's competition here
TTCF vs DDC Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 105.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while DDC trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to DDC's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check DDC's competition here
TTCF vs ABVE Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 96.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while ABVE trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check ABVE's competition here
TTCF vs ABVEW Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 95.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while ABVEW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check ABVEW's competition here
TTCF vs WYHG Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while WYHG trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check WYHG's competition here
TTCF vs BRID Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BRID trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check BRID's competition here
TTCF vs ATPC Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while ATPC trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check ATPC's competition here
TTCF vs BRLS Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 65.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BRLS trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check BRLS's competition here
TTCF vs LSF Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while LSF trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -60.30. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check LSF's competition here
TTCF vs MITC Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to MITC's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check MITC's competition here
TTCF vs PAVS Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while PAVS trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check PAVS's competition here
TTCF vs FARM Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while FARM trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check FARM's competition here
TTCF vs CLXT Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -5.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check CLXT's competition here
TTCF vs HAPP Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check HAPP's competition here
TTCF vs BTOG Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BTOG trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -20.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check BTOG's competition here
TTCF vs NAII Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while NAII trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check NAII's competition here
TTCF vs JVA Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while JVA trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check JVA's competition here
TTCF vs YGF Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check YGF's competition here
TTCF vs BOF Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BOF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check BOF's competition here
TTCF vs NCRA Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while NCRA trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check NCRA's competition here
TTCF vs COOT Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while COOT trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check COOT's competition here
TTCF vs PLAG Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while PLAG trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -66.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check PLAG's competition here
TTCF vs PETZ Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while PETZ trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check PETZ's competition here
TTCF vs BON Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BON trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check BON's competition here
TTCF vs IMG Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while IMG trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to IMG's ROE of +35.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check IMG's competition here
TTCF vs SOWG Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SOWG trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check SOWG's competition here
TTCF vs NUZE Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check NUZE's competition here
TTCF vs HCWC Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while HCWC trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check HCWC's competition here
TTCF vs BTTR Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check BTTR's competition here
TTCF vs FREEW Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check FREEW's competition here
TTCF vs ORIS Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while ORIS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check ORIS's competition here
TTCF vs FAMI Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while FAMI trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check FAMI's competition here
TTCF vs RGF Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check RGF's competition here
TTCF vs CYAN Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while CYAN trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check CYAN's competition here
TTCF vs BRLSW Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BRLSW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check BRLSW's competition here
TTCF vs SNAX Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 605K. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check SNAX's competition here
TTCF vs STKH Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 493.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while STKH trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check STKH's competition here
TTCF vs BSFC Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 366.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BSFC trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -5.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check BSFC's competition here
TTCF vs SMFL Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 23.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SMFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check SMFL's competition here
TTCF vs SNAXW Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check SNAXW's competition here
TTCF vs RIBT Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to RIBT's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check RIBT's competition here
TTCF vs DTEA Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check DTEA's competition here
TTCF vs SAFM Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check SAFM's competition here
TTCF vs VGFC Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check VGFC's competition here
TTCF vs BRCN Comparison August 2025
TTCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTCF stands at 13.2M. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTCF is priced at $0.16, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTCF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, TTCF's ROE is -0.93%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTCF is more volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTCF.Check BRCN's competition here